Navarro Argues Fauci is ‘Biggest Mass Murderer in History’

IF YOU CAN’T SEE THE VIDEOS GO HERE.

May 29, 2021 | 15 Comments »

Leave a Reply

15 Comments / 15 Comments

  3. WOW!!! There is an email that was released on FOIA to judicial watch on March 11, 2020 from Adam Gaertner to Fauci on his NID/NIAH official email. The subject is CORONAVIRUS BIOWEAPON PRODUCTION METHOD!!!

    The body of the text is a lab recipe describing the method used!!!

  4. Pence was a gift that just never stopped giving to his anti-Trump masters.

    This was on Emerald Robinson’s twitter today:

    The person most responsible for unleashing the Fauci fraud on America is @OliviaTroye
    who was VP Pence’s “COVID advisor.”

    In a recent article, Troye explains how her job was to misinform the Trump Admin at every turn.
    It’s interesting that Olivia Troye now describes herself as “a former career intelligence professional.” Which agency did she formerly work for before joining Pence’s staff? Why was she so hostile to the Wuhan lab leak theory? And so hostile to Pompeo’s lab leak investigation?

    Troye writes that the lab leak theory was so dangerous a threat to the IC that “ultimately CIA Director Gina Haspel intervened to defend the integrity of the intelligence community & insulate it from political pressure.” How would she know that?

    In Sept. 2020 @OliviaTroye
    was fired by Trump Admin after someone finally figured out she was another NeverTrumper on Pence’s team. Almost the next day, Troye started an anti-GOP org. Then she publicly voted for Biden. While claiming to be a Republican.
    1:51 PM · Jun 2, 2021·Twitter for iPhone

  5. The Fauci emails are being used to expose the propaganda falsities espoused by Fauci/CDC/FDA. But the knowledge of the uses and uselessness of masks in the study of the spread of disease has long been established. Everything about the useless use of masking to prevent the spread of disease was known well before 2020.

    There have been thousands of studies, including the random control trials that have become the latest obsession of the FDA and CDC to pretend ignorance and intentionally cause delay, conducted over decades that show little to no support of the use of masks to prevent disease. With the numbers of people who die every year from influenza, if mask usage was useful, why would it not have been instituted years ago to save all those victims.

    It was for this among other considerations that stimulated these thousands of studies to be conducted. In addition to the lack of benefit, masks that are repeatedly used carry disease causing consequences. The continuous use of a material barrier around the mouth and nose will cause a dehydration of the tissues of the upper(and possibly lower) airways as a result.

    The masks collect moisture from a person’s moist breath and this supports growth of bacteria and fungi. The masks if used repeatedly will, consequently, collect large quantities of bacteria and fungi that will grow on the masks if not kept clean. And if they are kept clean, the cleaning products may leave residues on the cleaned masks which are harsh chemical that can cause problems when inhaled.

    All of this is beyond the harmful effects of the mask material itself. Not all materials included in mask production will stimulate the same response by the body. For instance, nylon, if inhaled is known to have very harmful effects. The N-95 masks, among others are made using fibers that overlay eachother and act to catch larger particles(much larger than Covid).

    These overlaying layers are stiff and not intended to be bent or over-used. When they are, the fibers fracture and the resulting fragments are vacuumed into the body’s airways – think of microscopic buckshot covered in desease causing filth being shot into the airways. With the dehydration of the airways, due to the mask, these fragments from the mask, often carrying bacteria, viruses and fungi that grew on the mask, are sucked into the lungs on a free ride and in large numbers to areas of the lung that can have serious consequences.

    And all of this while people who become ill are instantly terrified of seeking medical assistance from the hospitals due to Covid. None of this was intended by the institution of mask usage. Some will say it is the result of the Law of Unintended Consequence, but that would suggest that none of these facts were known by those responsible for suggesting and mandating these policies.

    All of this, and a great deal more, was fully known by those who mandated it. And nothing found in Fauci’s emails was necessary to prove this fact.

  6. Emails Show Fauci Knew Masks Weren’t Very Effective Before Pushing Universal Masking
    June 2, 2021 By Jordan Davidson

    Dr. Anthony Fauci pushed Americans to mask up even when he knew masks weren’t very effective. In a batch of emails recovered and published by Buzzfeed News and the Washington Post through the Freedom of Information Act this week, Fauci confidently responded to inquiries that wearing a mask wasn’t necessarily effective at stopping the spread of the new virus.

    “Masks are really for infected people to prevent them from spreading infection to people who are not infected rather than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection,” he replied to Sylvia Burwell, possibly the same woman who served as former President Barack Obama’s Health and Human Services secretary, on Feb. 5, 2020. “The typical mask you buy in the drug store is not really effective in keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through material. It might, however, provide some slight benefit in keep out gross droplets if someone coughs or sneezes on you.”

    Fauci’s final recommendation for Burwell was not to wear a mask “particularly since you are going to a very low-risk location.”

    The White House Coronavirus Task Force member continued to warn the public against wearing a mask and even said “there’s no reason to be walking around with a mask,” on March 8, 2020, but by the end of the month, he changed his tune. Despite acknowledging that the masks available to most Americans only offered a “slight benefit” to users, it wasn’t long before Fauci began to push for widespread masking.

    “The idea of getting a much more broad, community-wide use of masks outside of the health care setting is under very active discussion at the task force. The CDC group is looking at that very carefully,” Fauci told CNN on March 31, 2020.

    Unlike the way he portrayed the non-efficacy of masking in the email to Burwell, Fauci later pushed for widespread masking under the guise of accidental asymptomatic transmission — a phenomenon that studies and even the World Health Organization’s technical lead have said is “very rare.”

    “Because if, in fact, a person who may or may not be infected wants to prevent infecting someone else, one of the best ways to do that is with a mask. So perhaps that’s the way to go,” Fauci continued to CNN.

    Fauci carried this masking narrative for more than a year, even encouraging people to begin wearing layers of masks because it is just “common sense.”

    Fauci knows and has even admitted that science doesn’t drive the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s decisions, but that hasn’t stopped him from repeatedly engaging in political theater by masking beyond what the health agency recommends and even after he received both doses of his COVID-19 vaccine.

  7. Evidence Emerges China Created An Unnatural Virus, Then Tried To Conceal It…In Order To Destroy The USA?
    by CD Media StaffMay 29, 20211979
    Share1
    Virologist: NIAID Grantee Funded Wuhan Coronavirus Studies Used In Gain-Of-Function Research
    Image by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

    Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, Gab TV

    British Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen are soon publishing evidence the Chinese Communist Party created an ‘unnatural virus’ in a lab and attempted to backdate the research and conceal their activities from the world.

    The CCP then allowed the virus, even enabled, it’s escape to the West. Wuhan Province was locked down but millions allowed to travel to the U.S, Italy, India, et cetera.

    The shocking allegations in the study include accusations of ‘deliberate destruction, concealment or contamination of data’ at Chinese labs, and it notes the silencing and disappearance of scientists in the communist country who spoke out, wrote the Daily Mail.

    Now, Dalgleish and Sørensen have authored a new study, which concludes that ‘SARS-Coronavirus-2 has no credible natural ancestor’ and that it is ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ that the virus was created through ‘laboratory manipulation’.

    In the 22-page paper which is set to be published in the scientific journal Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery, the scientists describe their months-long ‘forensic analysis’, looking back at experiments done at the Wuhan lab between 2002 and 2019.

    The ‘whistleblower’ deposed by attorneys in a legal case in GA, who claimed blackmail and corruption at the highest levels of government writes the following:
    Jon-US Senate candidate MD 2022
    @Johnheretohelp
    ·
    May 29
    It’s a weapon.
    This was/is an attack.
    Deliberately treasonous persons in our government aided and abetted a hostile foreign government to infiltrate our country and manipulate the elections.
    The DS has already moved into delay/ignore mode regarding the audits.
    Jon-US Senate candidate MD 2022
    @Johnheretohelp
    ·
    May 29
    The audits are inevitable.
    They already have a backup plan in place. They know the election will be reversed they intend to stall, call for investigations, and want to run everything through the court taking as long as possible. Knowing that it will be reversed
    Jon-US Senate candidate MD 2022
    @Johnheretohelp
    ·
    May 29
    They are giving hostile foreign governments complete access to our intelligence, government, military, banking, every system. Their intention if/when they lose power is to leave the country so damaged and infiltrated that their plans will continue.

    The whistleblower in question is Jon McGreevey(aka Ryan D. White; aka Johnheretohelp) from the Lin Wood Whistleblower videos released in Jan.

  9. @ keelie:
    Fauci is indeed a Jesuit, Keelie. Many have found this fact to be edifying, but, for myself, nothing can be more supportived of Fauci’s crimes than his the facts of his own actions. For anyone interested in Fauci and the many crimes he has commited I would refer you to the following dossier:
    https://foreignaffairsintelligencecouncil.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/the-fauci-covid-19-dossier.pdf

    The Dossier was completed by Dr. David E. Martin a couple of months ago and is filled with citations where can be found followup documentation for the many ills this man has perpetrated against us the world.

    If this document is too extensive, the following is a video where Dr. Martin discusses some of his findings:
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/J43pw4NxxMhN/

  11. @ mirib:
    If true, and the Jesuits have substantial international power, despite being relatively quiet about it, this would appear to put a rudder on what seemed to be the “rudderless ship” of Globalism, and its determined effort to control the world (a term I dislike, but there it is…).

  12. Fauxi is a Jesuit. Definitive and astonishing expose’ of the Jesuits behind everything- http://www.Vaticanassassins.org . It’s not the Jooooz. Jon Eric Phelps is a preacher( just get past that) & diehard supporter & defender of Israel and the Jewish people.

  14. The following article from the World Tribune presents Peter Navarro’s and Dr. Robert Redfield’s views on Dr. Fauci’s culpability for the Wuhan virus in written form. It is a very useful and informative supplement to Navarro’s interview with Steve Bannon on America’s Voice.

    Navarro: Clear signs show Fauci is ‘father of the pandemic’; Mnuchin blocked Trump commission
    World TribuneApril 15, 2021
    [Note: Google’s algorithms are objecting to some WorldTribune articles, including this one, for unexplained reasons. Specific comments from credible human sources about the following content should be directed to the editors’ attention. WorldTribune upholds the First Amendment Freedom of the Press for diverse and responsibly edited presentations of news, analysis and commentary.]
    by WorldTribune Staff, April 15, 2021

    Mounting evidence pointing to laboratory origins of the Covid-19 virus in Wuhan, China implicates Dr. Anthony Fauci, said economist Peter Navarro, an assistant to President Donald Trump and early proponent for cutting off travel from China early in the pandemic.

    Navarro followed up the explosive statements in a column with a podcast in which he said President Trump had wanted to launch a presidential commission on the origins of the virus which would have placed China on the defensive. However Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin blocked the initiative.

    In an April 13 op-ed for the Washington Times, Navarro wrote: “The former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Robert Redfield, believes the SARS-CoV-2 virus originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

    “If Dr. Redfield is correct — and he almost certainly is — then Dr. Anthony Fauci of the National Institutes of Health must assume significant responsibility for a global pandemic that has killed over half-a-million Americans, kicked tens of millions of Americans to the unemployment curb and drained trillions of dollars of wealth from the American economy.”

    It was Fauci who “provided the Wuhan lab with both the funding and the green light for gain-of-function experiments,” Navarro noted, adding those are facts that “are not in dispute.”

    “Gain of function” refers to artificial manipulation of existing viruses in order to enhance or enable their transmission to humans and to cause disease. The acknowledged purpose is to gain knowledge to better fight such viruses. Bioweapon development is another potential application.

    After a number of leaks of dangerous pathogens from high security labs, the Obama administration had already stopped funding for gain of function research as being too dangerous. However, in 2017, Fauci as head of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and Francis Collins, the head of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), reauthorized funding for the Wuhan research without informing the Trump administration, Navarro pointed out.

    Between 2014 and 2019, Fauci was responsible for $7.4 million provided by the NIH that went to funding gain of function in two batches, as reported by Newsweek in April of last year.

    The first $3.7 million went to collection and study of bat coronaviruses under the direction of Wuhan’s Shi Zheng-Li, with a portion of another $3.7 million for gain of function research directed there by Peter Daszak of the World Health Organization.

    In December of 2019, just before news broke of a new virus outbreak, Daszak spoke openly about the accomplishments from more than 15 years of genetically engineering viruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and the ease of doing this with coronaviruses.

    The Wuhan Institute of Virology is a P4 weapons lab. “With a biosafety rating of P4, the Wuhan lab houses the most dangerous pathogens on Earth, including the deadly Ebola,” Navarro writes. Further, the lab “engaged in research on behalf of the People’s Liberation Army since 2017 — the same year Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins approved gain-of-function research in Wuhan.”

    Such labs are not 100 percent secure. As recently as 2018, the U.S. State Department warned of improper precautions at the Wuhan lab, and voiced concern of the possibility of a “new SARS-like pandemic.”

    SARS-CoV-2 most closely resembles viruses that have been found in horseshoe bats. The Wuhan lab has an extensive collection of these rare and novel viruses. Adding fuel to this bat cave fire, many of these viruses were brought to Wuhan by China’s so-called Bat Lady Shi Zhengli. Before she was effectively muzzled by the Chinese government, Shi expressed concerns that the virus may have leaked from her lab.

    “The only remaining question about whether Anthony Fauci is the father of the CCP virus is whether that virus escaped from this lab,” Navarro said.

    In an interview on Steve Bannon’s “War Room”, Navarro said, “one of my deep regrets at the Trump White House was not being able to push forward with a presidential commission.” President Donald Trump wanted to do one, Navarro said, but Steve Mnuchin “fought this tooth and nail” over concerns of its reception by the Chinese.

    “That commission not only would have gotten to the bottom of the origins of the virus,” Navarro said, “It would have put in motion a calculation of trillions of dollars that China has cost us with this virus, and allowed us to collect both compensatory damages and punitive damages.”

    “They took away, at a minimum, a full year’s worth of GDP when you cost it all out — over 20 trillion dollars.“

    Framing China’s legal obligations for the economic damage stemming from such a virus leak, Navarro added: “That’s the language of tort law. A tort is when you sue somebody who has harmed you and you collect compensatory damage for the harm they inflicted on you as well possible punitive damages to discourage them from doing that again. That’s exactly what we need to do with communist China.”

    INFORMATION WORLD WAR: How We Win . . . . Executive Intelligence Brief

    Anthony Fauci, China virus, covid, Donald Trump, gain of function, Navarro: Clear signs show Fauci is ‘father of the pandemic’; Mnuchin blocked Trump commission, Steven Mnuchin, WorldTribune.com, Wuhan Institute of Virology

  15. The following report is from the World Tribune. It documents that the WHO organization has banned invermectine, another medicine that like hydroxichloriquine, provides prophylaxis against COVID19 and a much improved survival rate when used in the early treatment of the disease. Also, the approval of remdesivir for treatment of CV19 despite very little evidence of its effectiveness. The reasons are that Big Pharma cannot profit from invermectine, a generic drug that is cheap to produce, while it makes huge profits from the patented vaccines. Also, remdesivir is a patented drug. The WHO and the CDC serve Big Pharma, not people’s health.

    ‘Literally criminal’: Suppressing data on ivermectin cost ‘half a million lives’, doctor charges
    WorldTribumeMay 26, 2021
    Special to WorldTribune, May 26, 2021

    Commentary by R. Clinton Ohlers

    In a recent Zoom call, Dr. Pierre Kory of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance outlined numerous details showing the World Health Organization (WHO) knowingly suppressed data on the effectiveness of ivermectin against the virus in order to benefit the vaccine interests of Big Pharma.

    Dr. Pierre Kory. / CSPAN / Video Image
    “It’s criminal,” Kory said. “It’s literally criminal.” The drug “could have saved half a million lives this year if it had been approved.”

    The WHO, Kory contends, is simply taking part in the tactics of a time-worn “Disinformation Playbook.” The term was coined by the Union of Concerned Scientists 50 years ago to describe the strategies corporations have developed over decades to “attack science when it goes against their financial interests.”

    It consists of five parts:

    The Fake – Conduct counterfeit science and try to pass it off as legitimate research.
    The Blitz – Harass scientists who speak out with results reviews inconvenient for industry.
    The Diversion – Manufacture uncertainty about science where little or none exists.
    The Screen – Buy credibility through alliances with academia or professional societies.
    The Fix – Manipulate government officials or processes to influence policy inappropriately.
    In the full Zoom call, since removed by YouTube but available on Bitchute, Kory describes how the five tactics have been deployed against the scientific findings on ivermectin. One example is the corruption of leading medical journals, whose editors refuse to allow ivermectin studies to advance to peer review. The most egregious institutional participant, however, is the WHO.

    Kory is the lead author of a scientific review of the studies on ivermectin worldwide, which was published in the May-June edition of The American Journal of Therapeutics.

    As reported on the FlCCC website, there have been a total of 56 trials involving 469 scientists and 18,447 patients. Of these, 28 were randomized control trials (RCT), the type of trial considered highly authoritative in the medical community.

    Together these have shown an 85 percent improvement as a preventative against the disease when taken before exposure. There has been a 78 percent patient improvement when administered early and a 46 percent improvement when delivered late. A 74 percent improvement in mortality was found and a 66 percent improvement across multiple areas in the 28 randomized control trials.

    Within only 10 days of publication the paper on ivermectin was rated number 13 most-read among the more than 200,000 other scientific publications that appeared during that time, Kory reports.

    Out of the 17.7 million papers that have been tracked by the rating source since it began, the ivermectin study is already ranked 246.

    Kory believes the response to the paper is a good sign, and says he sees “a sea change happening.”

    Kory notes his team is hardly alone. “Dr. [Tess] Lawrie is one of the world’s experts in making guidelines and doing systematic reviews. Just her group alone and their independent effort, the BIRD (British Ivermectin Recommendation Development) consortium, they arrived at the conclusion that it should be the standard of care. Our article also arrived at that same conclusion. We are not alone. Prof. [Satoshi] Omura, the Nobel prize winner, his group from Japan, published their paper concluding the same. Another independent group from Spain and Italy” did so.

    Most importantly, he said, “the key about all of these groups… is that we are independent expert panels. None of us are conflicted. None of us have any other interests than the oath that we took as physicians which is to the care of our patients.”

    Part of the problem is that the WHO’s corporate donors not only provide funds, they determine all aspects of research and even provide the research teams.

    “Look at where the money is coming from. Now the money has strings attached,” Kory said. “People give the WHO money, but they say ‘we want you to do this or study that. We want you to use our consultants and our experts, and our scientists.’ Many of them come from pharma. Pharma has pretty much completely infilatrated this organization.”

    When “you look critically at the medicine, especially in a pandemic, you can’t help but arrive at an objective conclusion that it is the standard of care,” Kory said. “And it really is doing phenomenal impacts around the world.”

    In Mexico and India for example, “the death rates and hospitalizations just absolutely plummeted” where ivermectin was used.

    The real problem with the drug, Kory believes, is that in addition to being effective, safe, and easily available, it is very cheap. Ivermectin costs only a few dollars per dose. This pits the drug against financial interests of over 100 billions of dollars to be made from vaccines.

    “I can’t imagine in the history of pharmaceuticals, a competing interest as deep and as vast as is arrayed against little ivermectin,” Kory said. “It is truly almost incalculable the interest against it.”

    Once trusted healthcare agencies such as the WHO, have become the chief advocates of the interests of their Big Pharma, vaccine-driven donors. As a result, Kory said, the WHO and others, are actively suppressing the vast evidence for ivermectin in order to keep it out of public view.

    The evidence for this claim is startling. Looking at the WHO’s panel report on ivermectin, he said, “The stuff that they are doing is not subtle. It is so clear that whoever was in charge of that panel had a nonscientific objective.”

    “Number one, there was no protocol for excluding data. So they were basically free throw out any trial that they found inconvenient to their purpose,” Kory noted. “And guess what? They did that. They threw out a lot of the trials that their own Unitaid team had uncovered and amassed over the last few months.”

    The most egregious thing, Kory found, is a sentence in the WHO report their researchers did not even bother to defend, “it just simply says, ‘We did not look at randomized controlled trials and the prevention of COVID-19.’ No reason why, no reason not why. We just didn’t do it.”

    One of the most important indicators of effectiveness in a drug is dose response data, Kory explains. “They deliberately avoided mention” of dose response data. “They completely omitted really important data, because if that’s there, that’s a huge scientific pillar showing efficacy.”

    They also did not include epidemiological studies, such as that by Juan Chamie’s research that has been going on for a year “showing every place that does widespread distribution and adoption you see case counts and death plummet,” and which was presented to the WHO.

    “So when I read that, I know this data. My head was in my hands and I was just like these people or criminals. They’re literally are criminals,” Kory said.

    When the report examines whether ivermectin is safe or not, Kory remarked, “it’s just absolutely comical.”

    Speaking of a drug used for over 40 years with billions of doses delivered and a better safety track record than aspirin or Tylenol, he says, the WHO found three studies that contain a suggestion that there might be adverse effects. The panel then determined, Kory said, “‘it doesn’t work, because we threw out all the data showing that it works. But you know what, we are seeing that it could be harmful. I mean, [it is] absolutely ludicrous what they’re doing.”

    By contrast, the WHO allowed remdesivir for COVID-19, which costs between $2340 and $3120, on the basis of a single study performed with 800 patients. That study found remdesivir does not reduce mortality, and reduces length of hospitalization among survivors by an average of two days.

    In 2018, the WHO recommended ivermectin for the treatment of scabies on the basis of 10 randomized control trials with only 852 patients. It did the same for ivermectin as a treatment for strongyloides, a parasitic infection, on the basis of five randomized control trials and 591 patients.

    However, 28 randomized control trials consisting of almost 3,000 patients have not been enough for the WHO to approve this life-saving therapy for COVID-19.

    “The WHO essentially committed a criminal action,” Kory said. “This is clearly not science going on here.”

    INFORMATION WORLD WAR: How We Win . . . . Executive Intelligence Brief

    ‘Literally criminal’: Suppressing data on ivermectin cost ‘half a million lives’, covid, doctor charges, WorldTribune.com