“There he goes again!” were the famous words of President Ronald Reagan when referring to the naivety, dereliction and incompetency of President Jimmy Carter during a presidential debate in 1980.
Ironically, these words also ring true with regard to our current president, Barack Hussein Obama, who, like Carter, has bent over to the radical Islamic regime in Iran. This regime – which already has enough enriched uranium to produce at least five atomic bombs and which has repeatedly threatened not just Israel’s destruction, but our own with these nuclear weapons – is one of the biggest political thorns in our traitorous “mullah in chief’s” side to affect his re-election. Just as the Iranian hostage crisis sunk Carter’s re-election prospects in 1980, so, too, Iran could be Obama’s undoing, as least so he thinks.
And why do Obama and his leftist, socialist, anti-Semitic and anti-Christian minions believe this? Because they know full well that people of genuine Judeo-Christian faith and other rational voters, which include a significant portion of independents who will decide the 2012 presidential and congressional elections, are outraged at Obama’s refusal and failure to take forceful action to remove the Islamic regime in Iran and eliminate the threat of their planned nuclear war against the United States, Israel and the West. Obama’s failure to act on this real threat and his support of other radical Muslim interests, such as the ascension of the granddaddy of terrorist groups the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and throughout the Middle East, is perceived by many to be the result of Obama’s own conflicted Muslim roots – his Kenyan father having been a Muslim who had to be deported from the United States. Obama’s actions and words over the last three and a half years have supported this view, and now even many leftist Hollywood Jews, who previously voted for him, believe he is a not too latent anti-Semite bent not just on harming the interests of Israel but also American Jews and evangelical Christians in general. This certainly is borne out as well by Obama’s mentors and friends, which include the Jew-hating anti-Semitic likes of so-called Reverends Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan, not to mention late Harvard Law professor Derrick Bell, to name just a few.
So it came as no surprise when I opened my copy of the New York Times last Friday to find yet a new front-page article leaking previously classified information about our intelligence communities’ efforts to slow down Iran’s march to nuclear weaponry. The column, written by leftist and pro-Obama reporter David Sanger, and titled “Obama Order Sped Up Wave of Cyberattacks Against Iran,” is an even more egregious dump of classified information about the National Security Agency’s (NSA) and Central Intelligence Agency’s (CIA) methods, sources and techniques than in previously discussed intelligence breaches involving Iran’s nuclear program and our war plans if Israel should have to wage a unilateral attack on the Muslim nation.
This leak is perhaps the worst in American history because it discloses, admittedly from anonymous sources inside the Obama administration, the specifics of our cyberwarfare against Iran’s nuclear facilities. By disclosing this classified information in excruciating detail, Obama and his traitorous comrades not only compromise our cyberwarfare capabilities, but also broadcast to Iran and the rest of the hostile world that the United States was the first use these weapons – potentially triggering retaliation against American and Israeli interests. Israel is revealed to have participated in the claimed cyber-attacks, and indeed the Obama administration conveniently blames the Jewish state for having inadvertently released the cyber-virus Stuxnet into the public domain for other nations and terrorist groups to use against us – constituting yet another sleazy “attack” by Obama on our only ally in the Middle East.
So there he “goes again” to further his and his Democratic Party’s political prospects in the upcoming 2012 elections and to create the false impression that he is strong on national security issues and Iran. This traitorous “leader” compromises our national security and the security of Israel and the Western world in the process. Nothing could be as low and criminal as this, and for this Obama must surely be held to account. Benedict Arnold is no longer first on the top-10 list of traitors in American history!
Yesterday, I filed – as is the case with the two prior major disclosures of classified information concerning Iran – Freedom of Information Act requests to get to the bottom of this traitorous activity by Obama and his administration. My first two FOIAs are already the subject of ongoing court litigation, the Obama administration not surprisingly having failed to respond to them – all in its belief that the “mullah in chief” and his accomplices at the NSA and CIA are above the law. But the matter will not end there, as I fully intend to use the citizens’ grand jury process I have written about before in this column to obtain justice.
As importantly, save for former United Nation Ambassador John Bolton, where do Republicans stand in calling out Obama for this treasonous act? Not a peep from Sen. John McCain, Sen. Lindsey Graham and other establishment national security figures of the Grand Old Party – not to mention their 2012 presidential candidate, Mitt Romney.
This latest national security breach underscores the dilemma we Americans now see clearer than ever. Our government is not a government by and for “We the People,” but a government only for our so-called representatives in the nation’s capital. And, notwithstanding television appearances and other “fun and games” that merely mouth their concern for us, the Washington, D.C., establishment protects itself. They are all part of the same exclusive club. As Groucho Marx once said, “I would not want to be part of a club that would have me as a member.” I agree, and that is why when I ran in Florida for a U.S. Senate seat in 2004, I promised to take the concept of my former public-interest group inside of the government; that is, I would have set up what in effect was a law firm to sue from within.
While I was not successful in that election, for my own part I still would like to take a club to this establishment club. But, I no longer see government as a vehicle to accomplish this, as matters have gotten far worse and beyond repair since 2004.
We the People must ourselves rise up and do all we legally can to end and obtain justice for the traitorous acts of President Barack Hussein Obama and his enablers – acts that have so severely and irreparably harmed our nation!
Larry Klayman is a former Justice Department prosecutor and the founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch. His latest book is “Whores: Why and How I Came to Fight the Establishment.”
@ yamit82:
Yes, the works. Knock their military aggression and retaliation capacity back to the stone age, to match their ideology.
@ Alexis:
Correct but then would add all of their retaliatory missiles/ and ICBM capability as well.
H@ the phoenix:
That’s a great comment!!
@ the phoenix:
He got that right.
They both can have credit for it.
rongrand Said:
indeed!
here is my two cents:
The folks who are getting free stuff, don’t like the folks who are paying for the free stuff, because the folks who are paying for the free stuff can no longer afford to pay for both the free stuff and their own stuff.
The folks who are paying for the free stuff want the free stuff to stop, and the folks who are getting the free stuff want even more free stuff on top of the free stuff they are already getting!
Now… The people who are forcing the people to pay for the free stuff have told the people who are RECEIVING the free stuff, that the people who are PAYING for the free stuff, are being mean, prejudiced, and racist.
So… The people who are GETTING the free stuff have been convinced they need to hate the people who are paying for the free stuff by the people who are forcing some people to pay for their free stuff, and giving them the free stuff in the first place.
We have let the free stuff giving go on for so long that there are now more people getting free stuff than paying for the free stuff.
All great democracies have committed financial suicide somewhere between 200 and 250 years after being founded. The reason? The voters figured out they could vote themselves money from the treasury by electing people who promised to give them money from the treasury in exchange for electing them.
Thomas Jefferson said it best: “The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”
@ Y.Osher:
It’s not necessary.
Can you give us any reason or reasons this clown should be re-elcted?
His bio: “An acorn community organizing pamphlet anti-Semite, pretending to be a Christian for political reasons who embraces Islam and was orchestrated by George Soros & company and the liberal left media, an incompetent president”
Something tells me you bought the Ice Cream
Alexis Said:
Alexis is does. If most Americans support a war against Iran, and Obama’s administration is against it, then the Republicans would be fielding candidates on that platform.
Rongrand, why aren’t the Republicans using the Iran war card to beat Obama? I have yet to hear a response to this, from those who claim Amerians support a war to wipe out Iran’s nukes.
@ Alexis:
The US and Israel as a partnership should take out the sites and support the over throw of the government.
The Iranians as a whole are not the enemy, it the creature and creatures like little Hitler and the gangsters mullahs who rule with an iron hand.
By doing them in we free the people.
Remember Hamas and Hezbollah along with the Syrian government are proxies of Iran yet the liberal left media gives them a pass.
So far in 2012 over 250 rockets were sent into Israel from Gaza thanks to these gangsters and silence of the world is deafening.
Stop all aid to the Arab world, they don’t like us anyway.
Israel is our only true friend and trusted ally in the ME. We need treat Israel as such and not as a step child.
This election is the time to clean house. The change we got we deserved for not paying attention.
All those who drank the Obama kool-aid should wake up with one bad hangover and they deserve it.
Y.Osher Said:
Y. Osher: Maybe because the Republicans don’t view this as a lure for votes.
Your comment has nothing to do with what I said: that the US doesn’t need to “win a war with Iran”. We merely need to eliminate the threat emanating from there.
Alexis, why isn’t this the Republican trump card then? Even the Republicans are not using an attack on Iran as a lure for votes. They would be toast. Your comment belies an ignorance of the threat.
Blandoatmeal, same question, US will never defend Israel, never has, cept for it’s own interests.
Israel can go it alone. That’s much better.
Y.Osher Said:
I’m afraid the US would not win a war with Iran, even dumbed down Americans see that.
The US does not have to win a war with Iran. There’s nothing we want there; we have no interest in invading Iran, or conquering it. We just need to wipe out their nuclear weapons production and their means of delivering such weapons.
@ BlandOatmeal:
JUst for the record, I was literally asking what the polls were- not accusing anybody of spreading misinformation
Most Americans would back U.S. strike over Iran nuclear weapon: poll
Now, David Chase and Y Osher, apologize to Laura.
Laura Said:
Laura, if that were so, then the Republicans could have used that against Obama. But they havn’t. I’m afraid the US would not win a war with Iran, even dumbed down Americans see that.
It matters not to Israel. Israel can go it alone. Most Israelis support it.
@ Laura:
What do the polls actually say? I also think Romney should be talking about this and how are the American public reacting to the realities in this article- that is, especially how do Obama supporters rationalize their continued support. It’s one thing to think he might be good when originally running but NOW, Jewish or not, how can any Americans support him is the fear of cognitive dissonance worse than maybe admitting a mistake
t
Actually the majority of Americans support an attack on Iran to prevent it from gaining nuclear weapons.
So does that mean the Obama’s enablers include Mitt Romney and those who don’t regard this as a fallacy?
What % of Americans support an attack on Iran by Obama? They don’t. That’s the reality. Go it alone Israel.