Mike Pompeo: This can not happen

POMPEO IS LEADING THE FIGHT AGAINST IRAN.
HE IS TOTALLY ON ISRAEL’S SIDE.
HANNITY DEMANDED THAT THE MSM CORRECT THE STORY IT PUT OUT ON ISRAEL BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HOSPITAL ATTACK.
HE CALLED IT A BLOOD LIBLE THAT MUST BE CORRECTED BY A FULL SCALE APOLOGY.

October 21, 2023 | 4 Comments »

Leave a Reply

4 Comments / 4 Comments

  1. STEVEN-

    Israelis are congenitally lazy, always have ben, occasionally aroused from overconfident somnambulism like in 1967.

    They find “West Bank” short and easy to say against the cumbersome Yeduda and Samaria.” In truth, so do I so I use YESHA, which is what Israeli’s should/could use. They’re too lazy to think of it.

    How the hell would a nonentity like Vivek know what plans Israel may have, .The simp is “advising” from far back in the rear. He knows less than nothing about anything relevant to the issue.
    Mind you, it doesn’t prevent him from bloviating, because free speech is a mandated right under the Constitution. So let him gas away but ignore him. Lack of attention will shut him off.

  2. Sorry, but Vivek has a point.
    Israel knows its targets.
    How to achieve its goals is the most important considering the fact that liberal and Muslim propaganda machine are already working against Israel.
    Separately, Israelis using “West bank” instead of Judea & Samaria are damaging their own rights on this portion of the Jewish land! I do not get it!

  3. Excellent job by Sean Hannity.

    In view of what Mike Pompeo said, what do we think of Vivek Ramaswamy, one of our presidential wannabes?

    October 20, 2023 04:40
    Vivek Ramaswamy: Israeli ground invasion of Gaza could be a disaster

    GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy argues an invasion of Gaza by Israel without a ‘clear plan’ would result in failure on ‘FOX News @ Night.’

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6339568443112

    The words that come to mind are, “ujnprincipled” and “opportunist”.

  4. JORDAN’S ILLEGAL CREATION IS A WEAPON AGAINST ISRAEL.

    The given reasons for changing the land’s historical names are avoided in all sectors, including by Governments, politicians, media and theologians. However, the name distortions that are directed at Israel are a placebo of its underlying premise of a theologically based dominion that is not related to land occupation. Instead, Israel is rejected because it contradicts a theological premise.

    An extensive search why the name Palestinian, once fully disdained by the Arabs, was usurped from the Jews, offers one reason by supporters of this bewildering chaos of history. Namely, that because both Jews and Arabs are living in the land called as Palestine it allows both peoples to use the name ‘Palestinians’; both may have passports as citizens of Palestine. Thereby, both Arabs and Israelis are Palestinians of one land. However, this can harbor an adverse underlying application when further examined, appearing as a denial and rejection rather than an enjoined assembly of two peoples as citizens of one country. One side rejects the other’s history and existence, using the issue differently than so defined.

    Today, both Israelis and Arabs are not equally referred to as Palestinians; they are rival displacement premises of the Arabs against the original people who were referred to as Palestinians prior to 1960. The usurping of the name held by the Jews for 2,000 years displays a deception and intent of displacement of the Jews; it is accompanied by denial of the Jews’ attachment to this land and a claim of a separate state, aligned with formidable incitement. In the West Bank example, the Arabs were not called by the name Palestinian in the 1940’s or prior; this emerged after an illegal annexation and the changing of this land’s name by Jordan in 1948. The land’s previous name was Judah and Samaria and its changing marked a negation of Israel’s history.
    Both the names West Bank and Arab Palestinians are a successive outcome of Jordan’s illegal annexation of Israel’s historical and legally allocated territory, whereby Arabs as Palestinians occurred soon after the West Bank name emerged. If this was not intended to dislodge the Jews from their land, then Israel’s ancient Hebrew names would not be changed to West Bank, and the Arabs would call themselves as Israeli Arabs instead of Palestinians. Instead, the Jews are barred from their most sacred portion of lands west of the river, as well from the new state of Jordan.
    Unlike Israel, Jordan is a new state that never existed before that was created by Christians illegally. West Bank is a fictional name with no heritage or historical veracity and applied illegally by Christians. 5-Stars: https://amzn.to/2XCR3DH