Just last night…Tina Peters in Colorado, they stole that election from her. How do I know that? Because we were watching in real time, we had cyber guys watching. There’s a way we are watching in real time without even going inside the machines, because these things are fed up thru the internet, then you all hear about it and see it on TV. The same algorithm that went thru Tina Peters [election] went thru the other two candidates [from GA] and they look identical.
The method that they can watch without going thru the machines was developed by Jeff O’Donnell and he gave a couple of interviews now with Joe Oltman where they discuss the findings. It appears that the races that have been reviewed in Colorado demonstrate the presence of ratio-ing. It should be recalled that in the 2020 election, after the vote dumps brought the Biden vote numbers up, it was seen that every update provided Trump with about 30% and Biden with about 70%, for example. This is called vote ratio-ing (I really am not certain how to spell that word) where each candidate receives a predetermined proportion of the votes, be it a 50-50 split or 70-30 or some ratio based on an established algorithm. This is what was seen in the Colorado races that have been looked at so far. What it results in is an established gap size between the two candidates, where each still gains votes, but the gap between them is somewhat normalized. The non-MAGA candidates were all found to have fallen behind in the first three vote updates, following which the ratio-algorithm appears to kick in and maintain a very regular distance between the candidate’s vote numbers.
Also, it appears that on election night, there was also a 3-way vote swap between Peters and her two opponents early in the night, where, after a couple of updates, each candidate was fond to have the number of votes previously held by one of the other two candidates. The odd thing is that the day after the election when this was pointed out by O’Donnell the previous evening, the official data changed, eliminating the 3-way swap.
The method that they can watch without going thru the machines was developed by Jeff O’Donnell and he gave a couple of interviews now with Joe Oltman where they discuss the findings. It appears that the races that have been reviewed in Colorado demonstrate the presence of ratio-ing. It should be recalled that in the 2020 election, after the vote dumps brought the Biden vote numbers up, it was seen that every update provided Trump with about 30% and Biden with about 70%, for example. This is called vote ratio-ing (I really am not certain how to spell that word) where each candidate receives a predetermined proportion of the votes, be it a 50-50 split or 70-30 or some ratio based on an established algorithm. This is what was seen in the Colorado races that have been looked at so far. What it results in is an established gap size between the two candidates, where each still gains votes, but the gap between them is somewhat normalized. The non-MAGA candidates were all found to have fallen behind in the first three vote updates, following which the ratio-algorithm appears to kick in and maintain a very regular distance between the candidate’s vote numbers.
Also, it appears that on election night, there was also a 3-way vote swap between Peters and her two opponents early in the night, where, after a couple of updates, each candidate was fond to have the number of votes previously held by one of the other two candidates. The odd thing is that the day after the election when this was pointed out by O’Donnell the previous evening, the official data changed, eliminating the 3-way swap.
Here are the interviews
https://rumble.com/v1aprfz-election-panel-not-radical-msm-liars.html?mref=nmtun&mrefc=3
and
https://rumble.com/v1aprfz-election-panel-not-radical-msm-liars.html