P. Tierney. What’s the most pressing issue that needs to be done before 2022 gets here? It’s to demonstrate that the election was stolen. The issue isn’t getting the SUPREME COURT TO DECERTIFY THE ELECTION. The issue is to get the Supreme Court to admit the election was stolen. They can admit both things, you know: yeah OK you have compelling evidence here the election was stolen. But we can’t do anything to fix that. That’s up to the Congress and the state legislatures.
Prayer for Relief:
1) They ask the SCOTUS to make a ruling that these 5 states violated the Electors Clause and the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution by the corrupt and illegal manner in which they executed their November 2020 federal elections.
2) Rule that the Executive Branch officers violated both the Guarantee Clause and the Take Care Clause of the Constitution by allowing the 5 defendant states to get away with their blatant and inexcusable election fraud.
3) Vacate the defendant states’ certifications of their fraudulent elections and their certification of their presidential electors for violating the Elector’s Clause and the 14th amendment.
The 5 Counts
Count 1: Affecting the Electoral College count through election fraud. Governors, state AG’s and county officials did end runs around the state legislatures to ‘write’ their own election laws in a most unconstitutional fashion, and this violated the Elector’s Clause of the Constitution and disenfranchised all the states that ran their elections in the legal and proper manner.
Count 2: Due Process. Because the 5 defendant states engaged in illegal, unfair and corrupted election practices to a level of fundamental subversion of the federal election process, they subvert the integrity of the election itself. All the states that followed the constitutional requirements for their elections should not be disenfranchised because enough Democratic states are now running corrupted and illegal elections that change the outcome of a national race for federal office.
Count 3: Violation of the Guarantee Clause of the Constitution. This fundamental clause of our founding document states: “[t]he United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.” [Art. IV, Cl. 1] By instituting obviously and arrogantly corrupt state election systems, the 5 defendant states have harmed the plaintiff states by denying them a Republican government.
That is, if enough US states hold demonstrably fraudulent federal elections that directly affect the outcome of races for federal offices, they are by these acts denying all the other states fair and just federal elections and violating their constitutional right to Republican government. The corrupt don’t get to put their thumb on the scale for everybody else and fix the election outcomes.
Count 4: The plaintiffs charge that the defendant states, by running corrupt and unconstitutional federal elections, directly violated the US Constitution’s Take Care Clause. Short and sweet. Biden, Garland, Harris and all the others in this current administration, since they were the beneficiaries of the fraudulent federal elections held by the 5 defendant states, took no regard of the faithful execution of their duties in office once they were sworn in.
Being fully aware of the constitutional violations that handed them the victory, they have not acted and even thwarted any attempt to remedy the election violations of AZ, GA, PA, WI and MI.
P. Tierney. If all we get from this case is a directive from SCOTUS reminding the states that all their state elections for federal office must follow constitutional guidelines and their own state election laws so these abuses in 2020 are not repeated, I see that as a win.
Last page: Points of relief #9-14.
9) is asking for a re-vote for President & VP in the House and Senate after the tainted Jan. 6-7 electoral college vote is vacated.
10) Alternately, if the Court is not willing to order a new House/Senate vote, the plaintiffs ask the Court to use it’s remedial authority to order the 5 defendant states conduct a special election to appoint new presidential electors.
11) And as a 3rd alternative proposed by the plaintiffs, they ask the Court to order the 5 defendant states to conduct audits of their election results under the supervision of a Court-appointed Special Master.
12) Prevent the defendant states in future elections from engaging in the fraudulent practices adopted by non-legislative actors before the Nov. 2020 election, and ensure they don’t try this tactic again of doing an end run around their state legislatures, using a pandemic or cutting deals with people like Marc Elias.
13) Asks the SCOTUS to award costs to the Plaintiff state/s.
<
<P. Tierney continues
The Machines
CATES: “One of the biggest election reforms that we need now that it’s proven that the Dominion machines in AZ – and likely all the other states – were uncertifiable for any election, and therefore any results obtained off of those machines were likewise uncertifiable: We need our state legislatures to ensure if such machines are going to continue to be used they ALL meet the certification requirements.
1) NO internet connection
2) NO secret operating system
3) NO secret hard drives or hidden Wifi
If the machines were uncertifiable and broke all kinds of election codes laws and regulations, how can any results obtained off the machines be certifiable? It’s a legitimate question, in light of Dr. Shiva’s evidence that Dominion machines don’t meet certification requirements.”
PCAP’s
DR FRANK: “We have made this clear in multiple settings – the PCAPs contain national security information and cannot be released to the public in their raw form. However, the cyber security act of 2015 allows them to be brought into evidence in a secure way without releasing sources and methods. And that is how the PCAPs will be brought into evidence.
Mr Lindell had prepared a “cleaned up” version for public distribution for the Cyber Symposium, and the original PCAPs have been examined and validated by multiple independent and qualified sources.”
The likelihood that the Supreme Court will actually make a decision that alters the results of the election are VERY slim. We all know that.
And while they may not make a ruling that changes the result, they may in their responses conclude that they concur there was fraud, however it is the job of the states to handle the task of recalling electors, not the SCOTUS to first order congress to vote in the POTUS and VP.
Now we wait. How many REPUBLICAN State Attorney Generals will sign on to this lawsuit and file it? We’ll see who our friends really are.
Starting tonight at Midnight CT through Sunday at Midnight CT you can see a state by state review of fraud and details of the SCOTUS complaint at FrankSpeech.com!
Finally an article on the subject that is not in stratosphere.