Attorney Lin Wood’s Whistleblower Tapes Expose….
T. BELMAN. I DON’T WHETHER THIS IS TRUE.
https://newtube.app/user/MyAmericana/cL7ZngR
- 1 min Talks about Epstein facilitating providing children to Justice Roberts
- 2:40 min says FBI has copies of videos proving his claims explicitly names FBI agents with access to the videos
- Also names Pence being homosexual and with “younger ones”.
- 4:40 min talks about Roberts talking about murdering other supreme court justices. Obama and Hilary didn’t want any terrorism unless it was “white” terrorism.
- 5:50 min states Justice Roberts was part of the planning in assassinating other supreme court justices right down to providing the planners with scheduling of the justices.
- 7:00 min says he blew the whistle on the above plan which was planned to take place during the first term of Hillary Clintons presidency!!!!
- 9 min the above was intended to allow them to take out the 2nd amendment.
- 10:50 talks about them actually taking out Justice Scalia as out of the all the justices he was the biggest threat to their plans
- 11:35 states actual poison used to kill Scalia
- 19 min talks about Pence being a raging homosexual
- 20 min Epstein got kids for Justice Roberts
- 31 min Talking about Seth Rich connections/murder
LIN WOOD posted all kinds of stuff on his telegram in the last couple days.
https://t.me/s/linwoodspeakstruth
In another interview that’s been scrubbed over a year ago he also, says that Schiff was wearing FULL DRAG while raping the kid, who was given meth to make the victim pliable and lively.
Says Pelosi has a copy of the video and uses it to control Schiff.
Anthony Bourdain killed in France 6.8.2018 because of this. Seems he was there and didn’t like what happened.
Mentions that they specifically target kids that have been abused, as … nobody will believe them.
Brings up Elijah Cummings, deceased 10.17.2019, former Head of House Ethics. He was a ****phile.
Epstein didn’t kill himself….
****
I have previously provided the entire interview of the whistleblower to agents of the U.S. Secret Service. His evidence reveals a level of evil, perversion, & criminality at the highest levels of government that is so shocking that it is hard to believe.
Believe it.
The whistleblower is a truth-giver. When he speaks, listen carefully.
views
The whistleblower has been brutally tortured and he and his wife have lived in fear of death. The guilty parties thought their threats silenced him. Further damning evidence was sealed for alleged National Security purposes in a federal court in Maryland. False charges were brought against the whistleblower. He decided to risk his life to speak truth. He did so as a believer in God. He is a hero. In time, I pray that he will be pardoned and honored for his courage in revealing the truth. If FBI or other nefarious actors harm him now they will only further indict themselves and prove their guilt. Pray for Psalm 91 protection for this brave man and whistleblower. – Lin ?????
“ All lies will be revealed”
@ Ted Belman:
Being fearless for his safety is one thing, but it doesn’t keep him safe. Are there any records of sittng Supreme Court Chief Justices suing in a personal capacity. or a Vice President doing the same. Pence was still VP when Woods accused him. And Epstein is dead and can’t sue. If he’s alive then then a whole section of the Prison Service is complicit in a huge cover up…for what…???
How is it that he has encough “evidence” that could only have been accumulated by several whistleblowers, and how os it that, with such potentially dangerous accused, in such high places, with many very capable subordinates available, who surely know rafts of “hit men”, the whistle blowers are still alive. The Clintons bore charmed lives in that those dangerous to them all committed suuicide or had fatal accidents.
These are what I’d like discussed, not Woods’ high standing etc. He has a history of going off half-cocked on conspiracies of the most decadent kinds. And he has now withdrawn them…. Can anyone suggest why???
Ted , as a lawyer what do you think about his “dropping” of evidence. Is this a withdrawal of accusations.?? Is that the same as an apologetic retraction.?? Would it be sufficient. Or is it that he has possible evidence and has built a massive story around it..?
@ Ted Belman:
Hi Ted,
I agree. Lin Wood has had a very highly esteemed defamation law career. He has had many(10) “Firside Chat” interviews in which he is very clearly spoken and defends himself quite cabably. He would not leave himself open to a lawsuit he could not support. So far not one individual has even suggested they would suit him in court for defamation. Not even Dominion who has now threatened several and actually opened a suit against Sidney Powell(who is represented by Lin Wood).
A lawyer friend who is familiar with Lin Wood told me the other day they thought he was playing crazy like a fox so he could gain access to their records should they be so bold and foolish as to suit him. So far not one of the many individuals he has accused has done so. I really wonder why that would be.
The whistleblower has been in touch with Sidney Powell and Patrick Byrne as well. From what I have read, everything he has stated has checked out with the public record. To go further, some Federal or State agency will have to take it up to confirm his claims entirely(bank records, phone records, missing evidence from ATF, etc). But from his claims, the CIA and FBI are both badly compromised(or captured as Patrick Byrne would say), which is probably why Lin Wood gave the evidence to the Secret Service(perhaps the only one of our institutions left not certainly compromised) for investigation. There is a sealed court case(Ryan White v. US, I think) in VA from a few years back in which Ryan White is claimed to be the whistleblower in question. Lin Wood has made reference to this case as being important with substantiated evidence being hidden behind the seal regarding the Cheif Justice Roberts claims.
@ vivarto:
Far too wild and conspiratorial. If the “whistleblower” could be whisked away and
brutally tortured” -with no recourse- (sounds anecdotal at best, to me- how was it that he was allowed to go free and reveal, to Lin Woods-of all people-a Georgia loudmouth, all the gory details, which even the whistleblower couldn’t have known. The way Woods’ reaveals things there must have been a half-dozen whistleblowers working 24 hrs daily non-stop only for Woods..
I’d think his body would have been buried deeply in some nearly inaccessable spot, long before he “blew his whistle” to Lin Woods….
HE has a massive”kink” which we both know can affect other apparently “almost sane” people with irrational hatreds. Woods; seems to hover around paedophelia.
Well, with such horrible accusations; especially supreme court justice involved in child abuse, how can this just stand there and nobody does anything about it?
The accusations are beyond imagination.
If someone accused an innocent person of such horrors, would not that person have a recourse to defend himself?
Is the fact that the accused does not defend himself, does not sue this accuse for defamation, an acknowledgment of guilt? Or is there another explanation?