Jordan-Israel negotiations set to bypass PA

Walid Sadi’s politically-charged and highly-significant article claiming that Jordan never ceded sovereignty ‘West Bank’ could only have been published with the knowledge and approval of Jordan’s King Abdullah.

By David Singer, INN

Jordan-Israel negotiations based on President Trump’s long-awaited peace plan seem increasingly likely to happen – following retired Jordanian Ambassador and former editor of the Jordan Times – Walid Sadi – flagging Jordan’s legal and sovereignty claims in the ‘West Bank’ (Judea and Samaria) and East Jerusalem (“disputed territories”).

Sadi – in an op-ed article in the Jordan Times on 12 August – has forcefully argued that Jordan’s decision to cut off all legal and administrative relations with the disputed territories in July 1988 did not amount to Jordan ceding its claims to sovereignty for the following reasons:

“First of all, the unity of the West Bank with the East Bank was officially and constitutionally adopted on 24 of April 1950. No one disputes this fact. The Constitution of the country at the time was the 1952 Constitution, which stipulated in no uncertain terms that no part of the Kingdom shall be ceded, period. This provision makes the 1988 decision to cut off all legal and administrative relations between the two banks stopping short of ceding the West Bank to any side whatsoever. Any other interpretation of the 1988 political decision is absolutely untenable constitutionally.”

Indeed the 1964 PLO Charter made no claim to sovereignty in the disputed territories – completely negating any claimed ancient and long-standing rights accruing to its Arab populations…
The Jordan Times is published by the Jordan Press Foundation – in which the government-owned Social Security Investment Fund has a majority stake.  Wadi’s politically-charged and highly-significant article could only have been published with the knowledge and approval of Jordan’s King Abdullah.

Jordan’s claims are far superior to those of the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) – Jordan being the last Arab state to occupy and claim sovereignty (albeit illegally) in the disputed territories from 1948 until their loss to Israel in the 1967 Six Day War.

Indeed the 1964 PLO Charter made no claim to sovereignty in the disputed territories – completely negating any claimed ancient and long-standing rights accruing to its Arab populations which would outweigh the claims by Jordan to these areas – where sovereignty still remains undetermined between Arabs and Jews.

Jordan’s pivotal role in bringing Trump’s peace proposals to a successful conclusion are grounded in the following salient facts:

  • ‘West Bank’ and East Jerusalem Arabs voted to unify these areas with Transjordan in 1950 and rename the unified entity – “Jordan”
  • ‘West Bank’ Arabs were citizens of Jordan possessing Jordanian passports between 1950 and 1988.
  • Half the members of the Jordanian Parliament were elected from the ‘West Bank’ Arab population between 1950 and 1967.
  • Jordan’s population is overwhelmingly comprised of Arabs born east or west of the Jordan River.
  • Jordan itself comprises 78% of the territory of former British Mandate Palestine, not an Arab entity.
  • Jordan and Israel are the two successor states to the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine already exercising between them mutually-agreed sovereignty in 95% of that former Palestine
  • Jordanian custodianship of Islamic holy sites in Jerusalem is guaranteed under the 1994 Israel-Jordan Peace Treaty.

Reunifying into one territorial unit the East Bank with agreed-upon areas of the ‘West Bank’ allocated to Jordan only requires Israel and Jordan to redraw their already existing internationally-recognised border to the satisfaction of both.

Israeli and Jordanian negotiators – armed only with pencils, sharpeners and erasers – can achieve this new dividing line within a relatively short time.

The PLO has made it clear it wants no part in negotiating Trump’s proposals. It – and Hamas – will be left to cool their heels and contemplate the many squandered opportunities to create an additional state between Israel and Jordan since the Oslo Accords were signed in 1993.

Jordan’s decision to resurrect its long-dormant claims after 30 years of studied silence and subservience to PLO posturing should be welcomed by all who want to see the Jewish-Arab conflict ended.

Dry Bones 15.8.18

INN:HK

Author’s note: The cartoon – commissioned exclusively for this article—is by Yaakov Kirschen aka “Dry Bones”- one of Israel’s foremost political and social commentators –  whose cartoons have graced the columns of Israeli and international media publications for decades. His cartoons can be viewed at Drybonesblog

August 22, 2018 | 4 Comments »

Leave a Reply

4 Comments / 4 Comments

  1. @ steve_the_yid:

    It’s only made “complicated” by the ridiculous Arab claims of sovereignty by conquest, which was recognised only by the U.K. of which they were a puppet state (with a yearly “stipend”), and newly formed Muslim Pakistan, which nobody cared enough about to know that it even existed.

    For instance, this Arab bean–head says “it was officially an contstitutionally adopted in April 1950.”’ very nice, but then goes on to make a fool of himself by saying that “no one disputed it”.. when in fact the whole world disputed it by not recognising the fait accomplit.. And on top of this bare-faced lie, he goes on to dig the ground away from underneath his own feet by continuing..” The Constitution of the country AT THAT TIME,,, was the 1952 Constitution……..(my emphasis)

    So he obviously fell down, broke in pieces, and the Arab “craftsman” who reassembled him, reversed his left and right feet, as well as turning the toes backwards, to match the direction his head was pointing. The rest of him looked “normal because he was wearing a Brooks brothers suit .

  2. Whatever the King did or did not approve of this article the Jordan – Israel peace agreement says the border is the Jordan River and they did give up any claims to Judea/Samaria. Israel has the legal rights to Judea/Samaria.

    No Arab Leader Will Be Able to Accept Trump’s Peace Plan, ex-Jordanian FM Says

    Marwan Muasher warns that the White House plan will hurt Jordan, noting that Amman can block the plan by ending security coordination with Israel.

    Former Israeli official: Muasher’s statement is ‘sad but not surprising’
    A former Jordanian foreign minister says his country should cut all its ties with Israel in response to the peace plan the Trump administration is expected to unveil in the near future.

    https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/jordan/.premium-jordan-should-cut-israel-ties-over-trump-s-peace-plan-ex-fm-says-1.6406076

  3. I do not welcome the idea that Jordan has anything to do with Judea and Samaria after June 3, 1967. This is Israel . They have no claim . Jordan is 78% of the mandate not more. Stop the Arab occupation of Israel.

  4. So let me get this straight. This high mucky muck Jordanian writing with the approval of the King says:

    “First of all, the unity of the West Bank with the East Bank was officially and constitutionally adopted on 24 of April 1950. No one disputes this fact. The Constitution of the country at the time was the 1952 Constitution, which stipulated in no uncertain terms that no part of the Kingdom shall be ceded, period. This provision makes the 1988 decision to cut off all legal and administrative relations between the two banks stopping short of ceding the West Bank to any side whatsoever. Any other interpretation of the 1988 political decision is absolutely untenable constitutionally.”

    But the possession of J and S by Jordan was through military conquest. Goodness gracious! What about “international law” regarding acquisition of territory by conquest? And what about the Arab States recognizing the PLO as the only representative of the “Palestinian people”? Does this recognition also apply to the “Palestinian people” on the East Bank? This sounds like a very complicated situation!