Jonathan Pollard: Trump’s Victory, Israel & Stopping Iran

Peloni:  An important discussion with Pollard.  Pay particular attention to his explanation for the removal of Gallant being based upon his opposition to Israeli victory in the last twenty minutes of the video.

November 10, 2024 | 4 Comments »

Leave a Reply

4 Comments / 4 Comments

  1. ADAM D-

    I eagerly await “more later” but not about the “rebbe” Pollard. To look at him, drowning in whiskers, is to look at the successor to THE REBBE.
    G-D Forbid.

  2. Pollard is not in a position to know anything that many others don’t already know.

    This self important spy who sold US secrets to several countries for pay
    became “sanctified” by the length of his sentence, came to Israel grew a beard like a Rebbe, and started selling himself again by pretending to be a political Guru.

    Israel allowed him in, a sickening psychoneurotic, guilty as hell as a traitor to his country, and refused entry to Myer Lansky who helped much to arm the Jews against the Arabs when the state was being born…and was found NOT GUILTY by an antagonistic court of all charges.

    I find this unpleasant.

  3. Earlier in this interview, Pollard exploded a whole series of devastating “truth bombs” about a conspiracy against Bibi by Israel’s leftist establishment, If this conspiracy was ever was ever widely and accurately reported in Israel and in the international MSM, it could could destroy Israel’s leftist establishment politically if it was ever fully and accurately reported in the Israeli and international MSM. But it has been reported in extremely distorted and misleading ways if at alll, Pollard says. Pollard characterizes the versions of this conspiracy reported by the media as amixture of distortions and outright lies.

    Here are the main truth-bombs set off by Pollard: Before Sinwar was kia’ed by Israeli soldiers in a Hams tunnel, Sinwar issued detailed instructions to his Hamas subordinates concerning the hostage negotiations. These instructions remain in force today in the Hams organization, since the surviving Hamas leaders have reaffirmed them. The contents of Sinwar;s instructions were that Hamas would never under any circumstances release any hostages. But it would enter ino feigned negotiations with Israel concerning possible release of the hostages in order to create false hopes among the hostage families and sow internal divisions among Israelis. This Hamas strategy has been implemented by Hamas and has worked to sow internal dissention and distrust of their own government among Israelis, exactly as Sinwar predicted.

    Although the Sinwar document contained nothing that could damage Israel’s national security if it was published, the leftist military chiefs decided to to “bury” it under an extremely high security classification, making it extremely unlikely that it would ever be released.

    Although by law military intelligence as well as the Shabak (which was given copies of it) are legally obligated to show such highly classified documents to the Prime minister, they withheld it from him, so that it was weeks, possibly moths before Bibi learned about the existence of the documents.

    Whan someone in the defense establishment finally worked up the courage to share the document with Bibi, Bibi bungled his response. Instread of declassifiying the documents, which he was legally entitled to do, and reading the document on television to the Israeli people after declassifying it, which he was also entitled to do by law, Bibi “leaked” the documents to a few political associates in the Likud party who did not have security clearances. Pollard says that this was extremly self-destructive and inept behavior by Bibi. But he thinks that this kind of inept and self-destructive behavior is typical of Bibi. Be that as it may, Bibi’s political associates then asked the Israeli censor, who is part of Israel’s military, for permission to give copies of the controversial documen to foreign journalists-even though the censor had banned the Israeli press from publishing the document. These Likud politicians (low ranking) then gave copies of the controversial document to two foreign newspapers, one British and one American, who published them.

    One two foreign newspaers published Sinwar’s explosive document, a few right-wing newspapers in Israel also published it, because it is an established practice in the Israeli press that once a story or documents are published in the foreign press, which Israelis can read on the internet or or hear on foreign TX and radio, it is OK for the Israel press to publish it as well. However, the Shabak and Israel’s military police nevertheless decided that the publication of the Sinwar document was a crime. And that even thoughits publication, whether at home or abroad, could not possibly damage Israel’s security. One of the Likudniks who released the documents to the press has been put in jail, and the other three are being harshly interrogated. There are rumors in aight wing circles that all four are being tortured. The Israel and foreign MSM have depicted the publication of Sinwar’s instructions to his men, damaging to Hamas but not to Israel, as a major security breach by Bibi. The Israeli internal security agencies have openly demanded Bibi’s resignation, as have leftist journalists and politicians in Eng;and and American. I believe that the Israeli leftist prosecutors will soon file new criminal charges against Bibi. Earlier criminal charges against Bibi, over many years, have yet to result in convictions. But the leftist prosecutors will use this “incident” to try again.

    More later.