THE DESERT REVIEW
Calling out the lie
“Merck stock surged 10% Friday after it said its investigational pill cuts the risk of hospitalization and death in COVID-19 patients…The pill reduced the risk of hospitalization or death by about 50%,” Merck and its partner, Ridgeback Biotherapeutics, said in a statement Friday.
“This is a phenomenal result. This is a profound game-changer to have an oral pill that had this kind of effect, this magnitude of effect in patients who are at high risk who are already symptomatic,” former FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said Friday on CNBC about results of the interim analysis.
<
>
<
>
“Meanwhile, shares of COVID vaccine makers Pfizer and Moderna fell 2.5% and 10%, respectively.”
This puts Dr. Scott Gottlieb between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, as a member of Pfizer’s Board of Directors, he is paid handsomely to attend a few board meetings per year, yet on the other hand, he must not be too glowing in his praise of the antiviral, which might lead people away from the Pfizer vaccine. Moreover, it could affect sales just as it has already dropped the stock price.
In 2020, Gottlieb was paid $338,587 by Pfizer. In 2020, he also earned $525,850 as a director of Illumina. Due to his former FDA Chief status, Gottlieb is in high demand as one word of favor from him can send a stock price soaring.
https://www.erieri.com/executive/salary/scott-gottlieb-3bpl
https://www1.salary.com/ILLUMINA-INC-Executive-Salaries.html
He has served on multiple other boards, including Tempus Labs, National Resilience, and the Mount Sinai Health System. It must be a daunting task to walk the line by promoting one corporate interest while not offending any of the others.
But the good news is that soon, Pfizer, too, will be peddling their antiviral drug, which should make up for any drop in their vaccine sales.
“Pfizer is testing whether its pill—PF-07321332—can prevent infection in people exposed to the virus or benefit patients who have not been hospitalized with COVID-19.”
Roche and Atea are not far behind with their antiviral pills, and soon all of Big Pharma can get in on the action. They have timed it perfectly.
While shutting down any competition from repurposed drugs like HCQ or Ivermectin, they deftly rolled out the vaccines first, making sure not to confuse the consumer with antiviral pills that would only be allowed AFTER the majority of the population had been vaccinated.
The one glitch is that Merck’s Molnupiravir only surfaced AFTER a prominent scandal involving Merck lying three times.
Just as Peter would disown Christ three times before the cry of the rooster, Merck would turn their back on their creation with three lies about Ivermectin before they would accept the payoff from the United States government.
On February 4, 2021, Merck, the corporation behind the monumental Mectizan Program, which rescued the world from River Blindness, told three untruths about Ivermectin.
https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/
Lie #1: No scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from preclinical studies;
FALSE: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220302011
Lie #2: No meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease.
Lie #3: A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.
FALSE: https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/36858/pdf/
However, the Monash preclinical study disproved the first statement showing a massive 99.98% reduction in viral load with a single Ivermectin treatment in cell culture.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220302011
The second statement is disproved by the FLCCC’s Public Statement issued January 18, 2021, that reports colossal evidence for Ivermectin’s clinical activity and efficacy against COVID-19 in clinical settings:
a. Large reductions in mortality rates;
b. Shorter durations of hospital stay;
c. Profound reductions in the infectivity rate in both pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis studies;
d. Faster times to clinical recovery;
e. Faster times to viral clearance.
Finally, the third statement concerning “lack of safety data” contradicts the published WHO safety data. In 3.7 billion doses of Ivermectin given over four decades, Ivermectin has proven exceedingly safe.
https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/36858/pdf/
Moreover, more than anyone, Merck is in the position to know Ivermectin’s true safety profile as they provided those billions of doses for the Mectizan Donation program.
However, lying was required, and the payoff came on Wednesday, June 9, 2021, when Merck got a fat reward. They announced the US government had agreed to pay $1.2 billion for 1.7 million doses of their new antiviral, Molnupiravir, BEFORE clinical testing showed either effectiveness or safety. Our hard-earned tax dollars were irresponsibly handed over to Merck by an agency charged with a fiduciary duty to protect our health.
So in the end, Scott Gottlieb did not endanger Pfizer’s bottom line. Just as Moderna was choreographed to go first in the vaccine rollout, Merck was first with the antiviral, and Pfizer first with the booster. They would take turns as there was more than enough profit to go around. Soon it would be Pfizer’s turn at the antiviral trough, but they had to be patient for now. There was an order and method to this.
But the craftiest strategy of all was Merck’s: Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty.
This quote has been variously attributed to Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, and Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda minister. Regardless of its source, it has proven remarkably effective as a propaganda tactic throughout modern history, and Merck was betting on this to sell the public on Molnupirivar. However, the move backfired. In the case of Ivermectin, they falsely argued that it was ineffective and unsafe while their own drug suffered from both.
For example, one could argue, “There is a concerning lack of safety data” regarding Molnupirivar. Indeed, it does not have decades of safety data like Ivermectin; it does not even have years. The little safety data pertains to a dearth of Phase II and Phase III clinical trials, which total less than a few thousand patients.
While Ivermectin’s safety data with over 40 years of treatment in over 3.7 billion doses is truly robust, Molnupiravir’s safety numbers are barely rudimentary. In short, Molnupiravir’s safety data is concerning because of its lack.
Of more concern is a recent study showing the alarming potential of Molnupiravir’s metabolite, NHC, to induce mutations. In a peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of Biological Chemistry, the author writes, “The mutagenic effect of NHC has been shown in animal cell cultures, raising concerns on the potential risk of molnupiravir-induced tumorigenesis and the emergence of detrimental mutations in sperm precursor cell generation and embryo development.”
https://www.jbc.org/article/S0021-9258(21)00667-0/fulltext
I don’t know about you, but that would be enough for most of my patients to decide against this drug. With all due respect to Dr. Gottlieb, if the choice were between a drug with a 40-year safety profile of excellence versus a new experimental one that could introduce mutations into germ cells, it would be a no brainer.
As if this were not enough, another group of researchers at the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center associated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill are also concerned.
They write, “The concern would be that mutations in host DNA could contribute to the development of cancer or cause birth defects either in a developing fetus of through incorporation into sperm precursor cells.”
https://academic.oup.com/jid/article-abstract/224/3/415/6272009
This may be the best time to mention that cheap, repurposed drugs, all FDA approved as safe for other conditions, are one of the best ways to address terminal cancers. They have well-defined and often long-term safety profiles, and cocktails of such old drugs hold great promise as adjuncts in cancer prevention and treatment. Moreover, unlike experimental new medicines with little safety testing, repurposed drugs will not give you cancer.
https://www.amazon.com/Surviving-Cancer-COVID-19-Disease-Repurposed/dp/0998055425
As for meaningful clinical activity or efficacy in patients with COVID-19, there are also concerns with Molnupiravir. The hospital trials were stopped early. Where is the data for inpatients? Where is the data for patients on ventilators? Where is the evidence for pre-exposure prophylaxis?
The limited trials that have been performed only suggest a correlation between Molnupiravir use and a lower rate of hospitalization and fewer deaths based on low numbers of patients. But the evidence is lacking on safety, prevention of disease, and treatment of late disease. This is where the evidence on Ivermectin is overwhelming.
However, the evidence of effectiveness for Molnupiravir is sketchy at best.
Moreover, on the use of Molnupiravir in mild and moderate disease, we have one study – only partially completed – showing 7.3% death OR hospitalization in the drug group versus 14.1% of those receiving placebo. The fact that deaths were combined with hospitalizations does not mean that 48% fewer in the treatment group died. It means the sum of deaths and hospitalizations was 48% lower in the treatment group.
Moreover, the study only involved 775 patients. This is far too few on which to base an approval. Right? Isn’t that what we have been told regarding Ivermectin? After all, we now have over 32 randomized controlled trials of Ivermectin in COVID, reflecting a 58% improvement in the Ivermectin groups compared to placebo. Thus, we have 65 clinical trials in total involving 655 scientists and 47,717 patients. We have been told this is insufficient evidence, so the Merck data on 775 patients cannot possibly be enough if we use the same standard.
With Ivermectin, we see an average of 86% improvement in 14 prophylaxis studies, a 66% improvement in 29 early treatment trials, a 40% improvement in 22 late treatment trials, a 57% improvement in the 26 mortality trials. This data has been updated to October 1, 2021.
So, even assuming Molnupiravir effectively reduces death PLUS hospitalization by 48%, we still do not know how reliable this figure will be when looking only at death. Ivermectin’s reduction in death in mild to moderate COVID-19 surpasses this number.
Assuming more studies confirm Molnupiravir’s lesser effect at reducing mortality in mild to moderate disease, we are still left with uncomfortable questions about its safety. However, Ivermectin’s excellent long term safety profile is solid, and this alone will lead many to choose Ivermectin OVER Molnupirivar, especially when factoring in the possibilities of mutagenesis and gene toxicity.
The price of around $700 per course of treatment which involves ten pills, makes it vastly more expensive than Ivermectin, which might be fine if it were considerably more effective. But it isn’t, it is less effective, and it is potentially MUCH more dangerous. The fact the choice is being “forced” does not make it more appealing.
Perhaps the most distasteful dimension is that the drug was developed through deceit and propaganda under Merck’s scandal with Ivermectin.
https://www.amazon.com/Ivermectin-World-Justus-R-Hope/dp/1737415909
It is part of an overall mandated program that robs people of their God-given liberty to choose their own medical treatment.
The mandates have been fraught with division among leading scientists, including Dr. Robert Malone. Dr. Robert Malone discovered in-vitro and in-vivo RNA transfection and invented mRNA vaccines while he was at the Salk Institute in 1988. He helped draft “The Physicians Declaration,” which was announced at the Global COVID Summit held in Rome, Italy.
The Physician’s Declaration is not unlike the US Declaration of Independence, as both documents enumerate a series of injustices that create the need for a Declaration.
In the case of the US Declaration of Independence, those injustices included taxation without representation, not providing fair hearings or trials – the lack of due process – and “exciting domestic insurrections amongst us.”
In the case of the Rome Physician’s Declaration, these injustices include public policymakers who have forced a “one size fits all treatment strategy” to the Pandemic resulting in “needless illness and death.” In addition, physicians have been subject to censorship of ideas, barriers from pharmacies, threats of censure, and loss of license for upholding their Hippocratic Oath to do no harm.
Censorship of Senate testimony of Harvard and Yale-educated physicians by YouTube at the behest of government agencies should not be tolerated in a democratic society.
When the WHO and CDC degenerate into captured agencies that no longer serve the medical interests of the people, something needs to change.
The United States declared itself free from oppression from England in 1776 with the signing of the Declaration of Independence.
As of today’s date, some 10,000 physicians and health scientists have also signed the modern Physician Declaration and accused the public health agencies of “crimes against humanity.”
Physicians have declared through this document that they “must be free to practice the art and science of medicine without fear of retribution, censorship, slander, or disciplinary action” and that physicians shall not be restricted from prescribing safe and effective treatments. A fully informed patient should have the right to choose or decline medical treatment. This absolute right MUST be restored.
Taking a stand for truth is what is essential now. Over the last 18 months, Americans, indeed citizens of the developed world spanning from the United Kingdom to Australia, have been fed a steady diet of propaganda by Big Pharma and Big Regulators being aided and abetted by complicit governments, media, and Big Tech.
<
>
<
>
These corrupt organizers seem to be driven by a desire for money, power, and control. Most citizens are either willing participants or are those who feel powerless to object. Most physicians who are part of organized medicine dare not speak out for fear of consequences. The NIH influences most of the world’s medical research through the strategic use of its nearly $50 billion annual budget. As a result, it can affect most medical societies, medical journals, most research, and thus it can and does control the way data is analyzed.
The top medical journals have even published fraudulent studies to discredit unprofitable repurposed drugs.
https://www.the-scientist.com/features/the-surgisphere-scandal-what-went-wrong–67955
These same medical journals have appointed questionable figures to investigate the origins of COVID-19, those with ties to coverups, and those who are likely to maintain the coverup.
From the AMA to the FDA to the New England Journal to the Lancet, the NIH controls organized medicine around the globe. But it cannot do so alone, especially abroad, which is why the WHO also figures prominently.
The WHO budget is about 10% of the NIH at $5.8 billion.
https://www.who.int/about/accountability/budget
The Gates Foundation contributes roughly 10% of the WHO budget. Thus both Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIAID – an arm of the NIH, and Bill Gates, vaccine proponent of the world, play significant roles.
All those physicians who signed Dr. Malone’s Physician Declaration are genuinely courageous, just as were Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin, and John Hancock, those men of courage who signed the US Declaration of Independence.
And, whether or not most recognize it, we, the citizens of the United States, those of Australia, and the United Kingdom, are living in an increasingly totalitarian world, run by Big Pharma, Big Regulators, and Big Tech where the politicians and governments are secondary.
This concept is very similar to the “soft totalitarianism” described in the book Live Not by Lies by Rod Dreher. In a thoughtful review, Abe Greenwald notes, “Lies are the lifeblood of totalitarianism; to resist, therefore, is to hold fast to the truth.”
https://www.commentary.org/articles/abe-greenwald/soft-totalitarianism-hard-truth/
Our world’s current soft totalitarianism goes unrecognized by most because it is so different in appearance from that of the Soviet Union, yet it is every bit as deadly. In quoting Dreher, totalitarian society is defined by, “An ideology (that) seeks to displace all prior traditions and institutions with the goal of bringing all aspects of society under control of that ideology…A totalitarian state is one that aspires to nothing less than defining and controlling reality.”
https://www.commentary.org/articles/abe-greenwald/soft-totalitarianism-hard-truth/
In this Pandemic, those who do not conform to lockdowns, mask wear, or vaccination protocols are vilified, regardless of the science. As Greenwald observes, our totalitarianism is couched in the guise of “helping and healing others.” We live in a totalitarian “therapeutic culture.” Those who do not conform are branded as “the enemy (of the state).”
Dreher writes, “It masks its hatred of dissenters from its utopian ideology of helping and healing…In therapeutic culture, which has everywhere triumphed, the great sin is to stand in the way of the freedom of others to find happiness as they wish.”
As Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn often said, the antidote to totalitarianism has always been exposing the truth and then living in truth. It is what is essential now. Just as evil hates the light, lies hate the truth.
Dreher correctly observes that living in truth requires courage to stand up for what is right. For example, he offers this quote from a Slovakian dissident:
“The question is, which is going to win: fear or courage?” he says. “In the beginning, it was mostly a matter of fear. But once you started experiencing freedom—and you felt it, you felt freedom through the things you did— your courage grew. We experienced all this together. We helped one another to gradually build up the courage to do bigger things, like join the Candle Demonstration.”
Fear is now falling while courage is rising. The word is slowly getting out through alternative media. Doctors are organizing resistance groups. Whereas six months ago, few patients had heard about Ivermectin, today most know about it, and many take it.
There is a reason that so many health care professionals are speaking out against the mandates, and it may have something to do with the fact healthcare is their field. For example, if airline pilots, experts in their field, refused to fly on a specific model of 747 aircraft, would an average person wish to know why, or would they blindly jump on that plane – because the FAA declared it safe? Help get the truth out.
https://www.commentary.org/articles/abe-greenwald/soft-totalitarianism-hard-truth/
To patients everywhere, to all those whose voices have been silenced during this Pandemic, I advise the courage to live in the truth, share this message with others, and never yield to fear by remaining silent. Please share this article with your physician(s), share the link below, and ask them to sign the Physician’s Declaration. We are at 10,000 signatures now. When I started a petition on www.change.org this spring, it was taken down by the censors. However, this declaration cannot be taken down.
Let us reach at least a million signatures. Then, when the signature box is opened for signing by the general public, please sign as well.
I now invite all physicians and medical scientists to join in truth with Dr. Malone, Dr. Fareed, Dr. McCullough, Dr. Tyson, and Dr. Kory and sign the Rome Physician’s Declaration in the link below. Let us stand for truth, freedom, and Human Rights, which shall always prevail over totalitarianism. Let us honor our sacred Hippocratic Oath.
https://doctorsandscientistsdeclaration.org/
Dr. Justus R. Hope, writer’s pseudonym, graduated summa cum laude from Wabash College where he was named a Lilly Scholar. He attended Baylor College of Medicine where he was awarded the M.D. degree. He completed a residency in Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation at The University of California Irvine Medical Center. He is board-certified and has taught at The University of California Davis Medical Center in the departments of Family Practice and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. He has practiced medicine for over 35 years and maintains a private practice in Northern California.
This is a must watch video. It covers the tragedy that has unfolded over past 19months. It is the first part of a 5part series.
This part covers the lockdowns, testing and the initial outbreak of the “pandemic”.
https://banned.video/watch?id=615f96b3aa816336dbd21792
@Adam
It does, indeed, cause the brain to become like a kitchen sponge at a microscopic level.
Pathologists, who are always the smartest people in any room they enter, take slices of tissues and stain them to look for obvious irregularities in the tissues associated with known disease presentations. The normal brain tissue stains very pink, but with TSE we see a lot of open clear areas on the slide and it resembles more of a pink sponge, ie lots of open spaces. Here is an example of normal(on the right) and Spongiform(on the left) brain tissue samples. The disease is due to the patient consuming a piece of food contaminated with an infectious form of protein. The infectious protein is not really infectious, as it is only a protein. But this infectious protein is only folded in an abnormal fashion. The thing that makes it infectious is that when this protein comes into contact with other similar proteins they cause them to spontaneously change their folded pattern. This doesn’t sound like an important change, but these proteins are found on nerve cells such as those found in the brain. The changed folding pattern causes the neurons in the brain to become clumped and die. This causes the sponge-like characteristic pattern associated with the disease. The loss of density or compact packing of the neurons will cause a significant measurabel change in the weight of the brain as the disease progresses. Once the disease begins, nothing can stop it. The patient will die within months to years with increasing signs of mental derangement.
Mad cow disease, also known as Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy(BSE) is a form of TSE that can be passed from infected cows to humans as well as other animals. No doubt you have heard of this disease, as there have been some near disasters. A very interesting but terrible disease. It has killed ~100 people in UK since the mid ’90s so not too serious. It used to be a great concern of mine that this would be the public health crisis of our lifetime, as I expected an out break in which many thousands might be easily be infected. Now, I think back with a certain sense of dread at how naive that fear might turn out to have been.
@peloni.
is the name I am familiar with from Dr. Graetzner’s article and other articles on this subject, even though I could not remember it until you prompted my memory.. But now I know from what you have told us that there are many other “spongiform” brain diseases involving prions as well.
Do these diseases make the brain tissue become like a sponge?
Thanks again for enlarging our knowledge of medical matters connected with cv19-2 and the vaccines, and keeping us informed about the medical scandals connected with them.
@Adam
The umbrella scientific name is transmissible spongiform encephalopathy(TSE). This is a disease that affects both humans and animals and there are many specific forms including bovie spongiform encephalopathy(BSE), Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease(CJD), Scrapie and others[I will note that abreviations are universally employed in medicine to help with communications with people less familiar with the intimidating terms such as encephalopathy, for example, which only means a disorder with the brain – just FYI]. The ‘transmissible’ term is often dropped and it is commonly referred more often, recently, as simply spongiform encephalopathy. The name references the sponge-like formations(hence, spongiform) brain disorder(hence, encephalopathy) that result from the changes caused by the disease. In human physiology and anatomy, a common observational mantra is repeated endlessly – form follows function[famous architectural principle that is well used in science], ie the three dimensional shape patterns of proteins, carbohydrates and DNA/RNA dictate their physiologic actions. This is seen to be very relevant with TSE , as the natural form of the folded proteins within the brain slowly become realigned based on a three dimensional pattern that does not provide the normal function of the brain.
As I noted, the danger of TSE is real, but the certainty is not due to the lack of investigational studies that are not in the interest of the govts or Pharma in revealing the this to a more certain extent. Also these facts could be better delineated if we had several thousand autopsies by now to show incidental changes in the brain of people who have died for whatever cause six months or more post-vax. I am, however, encouraged by the findings of Dr. Cole, for instance, not mentioning any degenerative evidence in his examinations. I should however note that the brain examination is often not performed during private autopsies due to costs or consent of the family. When the Germans complete their autopsy reports on their 40 cadavers we should know something more on this topic.
@ Reader. Reader, my most recent comments about this disease were posted very recently, and should appear in both the “recent comments” column to the left of the screen and under the most recent article about ivermectin (“Ivermectin-Truth and Totalitarianism” from the Desert Review.).
I remember that you had commented on the danger of prion disease and had posted a link to Dr. Graetzner’s article long before I did. In fact it was my memory of your comment that led me to search for and finally find his article about the prion danger from the mRNA vaccines. However, I could not find your comment when I searched through the back posts of Israpundit.
Could you please repost your previous comments about this vaccine risk, and add any additional thoughts on the subject that you may have? Thanks, Reader.
Many thanks for your detailed reply to my concerns about prion disease (I can’t remember the correct scientific name for this illness. Could you find this out and inform us? I don’t like to use incorrect terminology if I can help it).
I would point out that in some important respects the dangerousness of prion-generated disease is much greater than any of the other possibly lethal side effects of of the mRNA vaccines. That is because the death rate from prion-generated disease is almost 100% . That is a much higher death rate than for nearly all, if not all, other diseases. I believe even the death rate from ebola, for example, is less than this. If the prion menace is real, then practically everyone who was vaccinated and perhaps even some who were not vaccinated will die of this disease. n addition the symptoms are more painful than in most other illnesses, even terminal ones. Awful!
Molnupiravir fails to be beneficial to moderate cases of Covid! OOPS… This may surprise many following the recent fanfare associated with the announcement last week about Merck’s new wonder drug, but the phrasing of “reduced hospitalization or death” was a very strong warning bell which suggested this might be the case to anyone who read the Press release critically. These press releases are never done haphazardly, so odd phrases are often significantly revealing. A good rule of thumb is to always suspect the worst about Pharma companies, and you will very rarely be proven wrong. They are simply very reliable in that way. 😉
To pull the drug during trials due to its inability to show “significant efficacy” is an important tell. They will commonly do this to prevent patient harm from having insufficient treatment to prevent mounting health complications – the trials usually have “triggers” defined at the trials outset to make this determination unequivocal or improperly influenced by interested parties. We will have to await the clear definition of ‘mild’ vs ‘moderate’ used, but if mild is something akin to those who do not need treatment, which might be the case, the $70/pill cost should be re-examined as a few neutriceuticals which cost very little, can be used to manage these cases without the complications of employing a mutagenic compound. This is very bad news for Merck.
Meanwhile, as Dr. Hope has demonstrated in his many articles, IVM is cheap, safe and has efficacy ealry in Covid disease, late in Covid disease, before Covid disease and even in treatment of Long-Haul Covid disease. Quite simply, as I have noted before, IVM is a hard treatment choice to top.
@adamdalgliesh
Adam,
where is your comment about the “mad cow disease”?
I guess I missed it and I would like to read it.
I mentioned the fact that Dr. Gaertner thinks that everyone has been infected with prion proteins at this point.
@Adam
Yes the danger is real – but the danger is not new.
I did read Gaernter’s comments. There are concerns and there is a physiologic basis of disease that could cause prion disease, Alzheimers, and other neurological diseases. Also, VAERS and Yellowcard(UK) both demonstrate hundreds of thousands of neurological conditions in tight association with the shots. The brain has a very tightly controlled regulation of drugs and substances that can actually gain access to the brain and eye. We call them privileged sites as a compound needs to have regulatory privilege to gain access to them. The spike however goes everywhere including these privileged sites, and so too does the lipid nanoparticles. Dr. Patterson has shown that the spike infected immune cells have been demonstrated to be present 15months post-infection in his long-Covid research, and we know that the mRNA of the vax are resistent to being degraded and vax-Spike is present upto months post-shot.
In Jan-Feb, there were studies on monkeys and mice where the viral spike went to the brain in both and caused severe brain degeneration(Prion disease) in the mice(95% died in weeks)(https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.13.425144v3) and Alzheimers development in the monkeys(https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.23.432474v2.full). The experiment used an associated dosage that would result in lower body-wide spike than represented in the vaccine dosages. These neurologic concerns were never experimentally addressed prior to the rollout last Dec or since. And these are just a few issues that I have referenced that are routinely mandatory but were skipped with the Covid vax, including teratogenic(birth defects) and mutagenic(inducing mutations) studies that should have been absolutely mandatory before the rollout – they haven’t addressed any of these since the rollout either.
In anycase, these are very concerning signs that were never considered. The evidence will be in future diagnoses of Prion disease and other neurologic conditions. We should be able to find some random pathological evidence in routine autopsies, but again, we are not conducting autopsies – this never gets old being the most concerning part of the vaccine rollout. We don’t know because we don’t want to know…And why would we not want to know?
The danger is real, however. Brain degenerative diseases are very slowly progressive conditions, but as Gaertner notes the overload of a non-natural injection of 11.3billion spike generating factories, just in the lower dose Pfizer product, is a massive wave – and both the mRNA and the spike are suspected of having potential prion activity. What is the real consequence of this? We don’t know yet due to the limited autopsies, but there is other things that are equally concerning to support the conclusion of things to come. There are millions of adverse effects listed world-wide and of these Neurological conditions is among the top 3 categories. The early signs of these brain disorders are non-specific, which is why we should’ve known before the rollout. But there is significant clinical evidence to support a suspicion of these concerns.
In truth, I have followed Prion disease for 20yrs and it was among the most alarming concerns I had with Covid, as it is with the genetic-vaccines. But we don’t know more than this at this time. We should be seeing an uptick of things within the next 6+months. The recent autopsies out of Germany was a preliminary report of concerns and I don’t believe the brains were discussed. So we will have to wait for their final results, as it appears the govts will not finance autopsies that might upset their vaccine agenda.
Peloni, did you see my earlier comment about the alleged danger that the vaccines may cause a mass outbreak of “mad cow’s disease?” Adam Graetzner and numerous other authors have published articles recently in which they claim that the Moderna and Pfitzer vaccines inject “billions” of prions into the bodies of the recipients, creating a great risk of mad cow disease, which is nearly 100% fatal.https://covidcandy.net/coronavirus/this-is-how-they-tell-me-the-world-doesnt-end/
PLease read Dr. Graetzner’s article, or one of the other s that discuss this possible bad consequence of the vaccines, and give us your feedback. Is this danger real or not? Many thanks.