I have a very close relationship to the author I expect to meet with him next week. Ted Belman
Israel has enjoyed calm borders with Jordan for over four decades. While Israel’s military superiority and alert borders guards are the main reasons for that, still, the Hashemite regime in Amman has managed to keep anti-Israel forces at bay, an advantage for which Israel has given much in return to Jordan’s king and his late father.
But will this arrangement remain the same with the tsunami of the Arab Spring? The facts on the ground suggest Jordan is anything but stable. Upon the king’s return from his recent visit to the US, tribal fights broke out in Ma’an, Jordan’s largest governorate in the area. Four people were killed in cold blood on the campus of Ma’an’s university and all hell broke loose. Now Ma’an residents are claiming “independence from the Hashemite regime”; videos leaked on YouTube and even appearing in Jordanian media show raging gun battles between Jordan’s army and tribal Jordanians in the south. The last police post was declared “liberated” by Ma’an’s locals on June 24.
Despite public calls “daring” the king to visit Ma’an to solve the matter, Abdullah visited Kerak, another troubled southern city in Jordan, 160 km. from Ma’an, two weeks ago.
Abdullah spoke in Kerak’s university, Mutah, where regular gun battles between students recently claimed the life of a sophomore.
In his speech, Abdullah said there were “those who try to claim that Jordan is going through unrest because of the tribes. That is not true! The tribes have always been a foundation of security.” Four days after his speech, gun battles broke out again on the very same campus.
At the same time protests right at the gates of his private palace became regular events, with people calling for him to step down.
The king’s troubles did not stop there. On June 22, Gazan Palestinian Muhammad Assaf won the Arab Idol reality television competition.
Jordan’s Palestinian majority took to the streets for days in massive numbers, waving Palestinian flags and kaffiyehs right under the noses of Jordanian police.
In the past, merely wearing a Palestinian kaffiyeh in Jordan could get you harassed by the police, and hanging a Palestinian flag on your car would get you imprisoned by the fearsome intelligence department.
Young Palestinian men were moreover seen all over Amman shooting their M-16 rifles in celebration. While it is common knowledge that Palestinians in Jordan have weapons just like their brothers on the other side of the river, they never showed them off before, nor were they ever able to show off their oppressed character right in the Hashemite regime’s face.
In short: the king’s formerly loyal “East Bankers” now want him out, and the Hashemite-despising Palestinians are not afraid to move against the king openly.
This means the king’s days might, indeed, be numbered.
Speaking to a crowd in London almost a year ago, Arabist and political thinker Murdachi Kedar said: “Those buying an insurance policy on the Jordanian regime’s survival should reconsider their options.” Even more, he predicted Jordan’s south would break away from the state.
Apparently, Kedar’s prophecy for Jordan seems to be fulfilling itself. But what would that mean for Israel’s longest borders? If Jordan falls into Islamists’ hands it will turn into either another Hamas or at best another Egypt.
Nonetheless, the Islamists in Jordan have had a long partnership with the Hashemite regime, and the Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood has been openly refusing public calls to topple the king.
Additionally, The Independent, the Associated Press and Al Jazeera all reported Jordan’s secular citizens were the ones leading the protests against the king; nonetheless, they are not financed as are the Islamists, and they are almost totally ignored by the Western media.
If the king falls, the Islamists opposing the revolution now will hijack it and put a president in Amman.
Unless something changes and secular population gets the support it needs.
The response among those concerned about peace in the Middle East does not seem to match the level of the threat an Islamist takeover of Jordan poses.
Some choose to maintain verbal support for the king, saying that “Jordan is just clam and the king is stable.”
They are basically ignoring the facts.
In an interview with The Atlantic’s Jeffery Goldberg, Abdullah admitted he thought of stepping down back in 2010, before there was an Arab Spring. What would the king do if Jordanians do actually take to the street like the Egyptians and Tunisians did? There is another camp, nonetheless, one that agrees that there is not much to be done to save the king, and that instead he should be replaced by a pro-peace secular Palestinian leader.
Wondering if that were even possible, I spoke to Palestinian-Jordanian writer and former Washington Institute fellow Samer Libdeh, who lives in Amman.
He said “Jordan is like a soft mould, it’s not like Egypt where Islamists had influence before Mubarak fell. Jordan is easy to direct anywhere its next leader will take it – if he is secular, Jordan will turn secular, if he is an Islamist, Jordan will turn into another Afghanistan, so it’s basically what the outside world wants to make out of it, and its future will depend on which country will invest more money or send its media reporters to cover the events to come.”
Amid uncertainty on Israel’s eastern front, one thing will be certain if and when the king falls: Jordan’s next ruler will be a Palestinian.
Those who care for peace and Israel’s eastern borders should try to prepare for the coming storm and ride the freedom train to help put the right engineer in the front carriage.
The clock is ticking.
The writer is a Palestinian- Jordanian residing in the UK.
The “arab spring” is actually the arab implosion:
The dominating liberal media are delusional. In order to conform to their “narrative”, they interpreted the arab spring as the arabs demonstrating increased western “enlightenment”, overthrowing military dictatorships and islamic supremacists, in favor of true democracy.
On the scale of delusion, this is up there with Chamberlain claiming that appeasing Hitler will bring peace in our time.
So what did the arab spring really represent? It is the self-destruction of arab countries, and their descent from second-world to third-world status due to massive overpopulation.
In the last 50 years, the population of arab countries has more than tripled. But these same arab countries have limited resources. They are all semi-arid, and have maxed out the amount of food they can grow and drinking water they can produce, and it is no longer enough. At the same time, because of globalization, they have lost all their manufacturing base, and cannot compete with China, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Southeast Asia, etc.
In other words, arab countries have become less like Europe, and more like sub-saharan Africa. This is good news for Jewish Israel, since Egypt and Syria have ceased to be existential threats. And similarly, it is good news for us Europe-haters, since the pressure for arab muslims to emigrate to Europe will become even more irresistible, hastening the destruction of liberal, Jew-hating Europe.
@ yamit82:
@ LtCol Howard:
How wonderfull for the Pundit, my two very favorites debating. We shall learn so much.
LtCol Howard Said:
Let me add: “The Bible promises the nation of Israel a huge country from the Nile to the Euphrates. Such a country was unsustainable and utterly unnecessary for Jews in antiquity. “From the Nile” includes Sinai, but even Egypt didn’t govern the Sinai in times of old except for a narrow strip. The Promised Land was a technical impossibility and a burden to maintain. The land wasn’t prized, but consisted of deserts and steppes. If you were bent on seducing Hebrews with a promise, a takeover of Egypt would be much more attractive.
Only in the late twentieth century did we understand the rationale behind the Promised Land. Israel critically needs the Sinai for depth of defense against Islamist Egypt. If not for Sinai and the Negev, the initial thrust of the Yom Kippur war would have drowned the Jews in the sea. Now that Egypt has acquired missiles and cutting-edge aircraft, the depth of defense the Sinai affords to the Jewish state becomes all the more important.
The Promised Land includes the Frankenstein state of Lebanon. Jews so far have failed to realize the commandment and conquer that land, driving the ever-fighting Lebanese tribes away to Syria—and the Lebanese tribes have proved to be a perpetual source of trouble for Jewish Galilee.
Likewise with the Euphrates. The Jordanian monarchy won’t last long. The Palestinian majority will take over that desert state, and unable to create a viable economy there, they will turn to nationalism and militancy. Jordan will become a huge Gaza, rife with terrorist training camps. Jordanians will extend their influence to those Arabs whom Israel failed to expel in violation of the commandment, and they will become “a trap for you,” “a sore in your eye,” and “masters over you.” In order to establish security, Israel would have no choice but to extend toward the Euphrates, relocating the hostile Arabs to Iraq.
As if prompting Israel to fulfill the commandment, the strong and militant state of Iraq was invaded for no reason and destroyed; now the way for relocating Palestinians and Jordanians is cleared.” Read More:”Promised Land is the ultimate minimum”
@ yamit82: @ Yamit82 Unfortunately, your description of the situation is very accurate.
However, I worry about your action conclusions:
1.Eventually Israel will be forced to retake Jordan and annex it. Under what circumstances? I fully expect the Palis to continue their aggression against Israel forcing us to not only defend ourselves but to create real defensible borders up to and including parts of Iraq.
2. looks like we will need to bring the equalizers up from the basement storage.
I will ask Ted Belman to comment on his viewpoint and prescriptions.
Jordan to hike power prices, risking public outcry
@ the phoenix:
I expect by that time BB will no longer be with or among us.
@ yamit82:
That may just be so, yamit,
BUT
who do you think will give the ‘go ahead’ order???
There is a discussion here in Israel re: Egypt and what the MB will do when the Army turns it’s full force against them. Historically they were mostly compliant and did not oppose directly or violently the Nassarist and Mubarak regimes. They managed to assassinate Sadat but I have the notion the Army meaning certain factions in the Army were really behind the assassination.
The Army has an interest an economic interest like Turkey they own and control 80% of the Industry and major business enterprises. Their incomes life style and pensions depend on those enterprises. Morsi was destroying an already collapsing economy and the Army in-order to protect their incomes and pensions needed to rid themselves of gross incompetents.
What they are doing is trying to restore under their leadership essentially the Mubarak regime. Problem is the MB has had a taste of power and now feel their long sought after gains were stolen from them. I am not ssure this time they will go quietly into the night. The economy is still collapsing despite 12 billion injection by the Saudis and Gulf States. Next month they will need additional injections of outside cash and the month after etc. Egypt’s 85million population is in danger of massive austerity and food shortages, Fuel shortages and tourism is down 90%.
The people supporting the Army will soon turn on the Army because of the economy and austerity which can only strengthen the MB and the more radical Salafists. Peoples of the ME have learned that massive popular demonstrations if persistent can topple regimes even hard core military regimes.
Egypt descending into a Syrian or Lebanese situation is a possibility. I see no possibility of a stable political outcome no matter who gains control in the short term.
Jordan’s economy is heading in the direction of Egypt with a budget deficit of some 50 billion dollars. Jordan has raised taxes across the board and they are significant. There is a fuel shortage as the Gas imports from Egypt are now determined by the Bedouin in Sinai. The Palis in Jordan are protesting all economic activity with Israel including gas imports which the king is now negotiating. The last time I was in Jordan the atmosphere towards us was anything but friendly and we needed armed guards to get around.
from Israels POV the only positive result is keeping the little King in power and even helping him to drive most of the Palis into Iraq. I don’t think that will happen. So the Kings days are numbered.
I would not want to see the Palis gain control of Jordan’s Armed forces. They are small by Israels standards but modern. The Palis will enlarge their numbers and weapons, eventually posing a serious threat on our eastern border where today there is none. I also believe that the most radical and militant forces in the Muslim world will eventually rule because they have an ideology, patience, focus and are zealous.
The Hashamites will need to depopulate their country of most Palis because they will never be loyal to the King and are a constant threat. Israel will need to do the same. Iraq is a good place to send them, they will either assimilate or be wiped out. I don’t expect that to happen they will overthrow the King before that happens.
Assad is gassing the Palis in Syria and nobody gives a damn because it’s not Israel doing the gassing.
Eventually Israel will be forced to retake Jordan and annex it. Under what circumstances? I fully expect the Palis to continue their aggression against Israel forcing us to not only defend ourselves but to create real defensible borders up to and including parts of Iraq.
In the age of Missiles A bombs and even predicted earthquakes it’s a necessity for Israel to extend our borders eastward. Palis Attacks against us will be our casus belli to that end.
With all respect to the author Mudar Zahran, I am skeptical about secular moderate Arabs. In the end their language is Arabic, the culture is Arabic/Muslim and they would be eliminated by the most radical Arab Muslims negating any moderating influence they hope to have if they were by some quirk of fate to actually gain power in Jordan. I know of no Arab in the West Bank or Jordan that would welcome a couple million ignorant bandit criminal Palis from Syria to settle in areas they now control. they would destroy anything positive in their culture and economy. It would be like inviting millions of Mafia and their families to move in as next door neighbors. There will be a civil war as a result.
I see the ME chess board aligning the pieces against us. Israel will need to be able to counter these moves and go on the attack, looks like we will need to bring the equalizers up from the basement storage.