Israeli intelligence leak details extent of warnings over Hamas attack

Peloni: More details surrounding what was included in the warnings about an attack by Hamas which were so strongly rebuked that threats of court martial were made if these concerns were raised again.

See also: Military Intelligence Directorate head to resign due to Oct. 7 massacre, takes responsibility

Officer who reviewed intelligence considered risk of big attack ‘an imaginary scenario’, leak suggests

     Tue 28 Nov 2023 09.11 EST

Israel’s military and intelligence officials were given a highly detailed warning that Hamas was actively training to take over kibbutzim on the Gaza border and overrun military posts with the aim of inflicting substantial fatalities, according to reports in the Israeli media.

The claim made by Israel’s Channel 12 on Monday evening was based on leaked emails from the Israeli military’s 8200 cyber-intelligence unit discussing the warnings.

Those emails revealed that a senior officer who reviewed the intelligence considered the danger of a massive surprise attack by Hamas across the Gaza border to be “an imaginary scenario”.

The hugely embarrassing leak describes in shocking detail what would turn out to be key elements of Hamas’s planning for its massacre of 1,200 Israelis on 7 October, including that Israel spotters were aware of senior Hamas officials present as observers during training preparations.

According to the leaked emails, Hamas went as far as giving the mocked-up kibbutz used in training a name and even practised raising a flag over its synagogue.

Plans were also intercepted that discussed overrunning a border military base and killing all of its occupants.

While much of the focus of recent scrutiny for the intelligence failure before the 7 October attack has looked at what information was available to senior political and military figures, including Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, the new leaks and briefings suggest serious failings within the Israel Defense Forces’ intelligence reporting and distribution system as well.

The source of the warning is a highly respected career military intelligence NCO identified in Israeli media reports as V who warned her chain of command during the summer that Hamas was planning a large-scale incursion.

Further emails leaked to Channel 12 suggest the initial warning was corroborated a few days later with evidence that other Hamas units were involved in similar training aimed at apparently different targets.

Some officials appear to have been impressed by the intelligence but a senior intelligence officer who reviewed the material in July was more sceptical and suggested it was necessary to distinguish between what Hamas was doing for “show” and what was “realistically” the purpose of the training.

In another subsequent email, a colleague of the soldier who gave the initial warning said they emphatically disagreed with this assessment, while V herself suggested they were seeing a concrete “operational plan without a timetable for implementation” and that Hamas was planning for a “big event”.

Other very senior officers, including the head of the 8200 unit, have suggested in briefings to Israeli journalists that they were not shown V’s warning, despite the email chain discussing it.

One report suggested that when the head of the IDF’s military intelligence directorate, Maj Gen Aharon Haliva, visited V’s unit, the warning was not passed on to him, and Haliva left with an assessment suggesting that “[the Hamas leader] Yahya Sinwar has no intention of causing the situation to deteriorate [and that] Hamas has instructed its operatives on the ground to show restraint”.

Israeli media have carried their own versions of stories relating to the warnings of an imminent Hamas attack over the summer.

Haaretz described the same training exercise on the mocked-up border kibbutz with reference to the 8200 unit email chain, which it said concluded with a Hamas message from those involved in the exercise saying: “We have completed the murder of all of those on the kibbutz.”

Haaretz described V’s warning six months before 7 October that Hamas had completed training exercises simulating a raid on kibbutzim and IDF outposts on the Israeli side of the border.

“V concluded that Hamas had completed its preparations, because senior Hamas commanders had turned out to view the exercises – something that was also reported by IDF spotters based on the border. Just like the spotters, her warnings were brushed off dismissively,” it said.

“While they were distributed to senior officers, to her own unit and to field intelligence, a senior intelligence officer wrote to her in response, praising her work but adding: ‘It sounds imaginary to me,’ almost exactly echoing the language of the leaked 8200 emails.”

According to this telling of events, V’s direct commander backed up her assessment, insisting it was a real exercise and not a display. The warnings were reiterated by the soldiers involved a few weeks before 7 October when an unnamed senior intelligence officer visited their base and the intelligence was presented to him.

Despite the warnings, however, even of the eve of 7 October, when senior officers discussed the prospect of an imminent Hamas attack, senior officers in the IDF were describing the evidence as “weak”.

The Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper reported that on 6 October, hours before Hamas launched its assault, the IDF’s most senior officers were alerted to “weak signs” that something was happening on the Gaza border and that Hamas was preparing for an offensive.

Commenting on the claims, the IDF said: “These days the IDF is entirely focused on fighting the terrorist organisation Hamas. After the war, the IDF will conduct a thorough, incisive and uncompromising investigation and publish its findings to the public.”

November 29, 2023 | 3 Comments »

Leave a Reply

3 Comments / 3 Comments

  1. Figures that a higher up was the problem as the arrogance that is characteristic of ambitious people can be lethal. But warnings about enemy activity should have multiple channels, not one guy who can gum up the works.

  2. @dreuveni, I agree it does sound like the anti-government behavior going on before 10/7. It sounds like the same people with the same attitudes, the people who felt that Bibi was a bigger danger to the country than the Palestinians. Then immediately after 10/7 these same people rushed to blame it all on Bibi.

    I don’t doubt many in leadership positions had some degree of responsibility, and this will be investigated in detail after the war. The people have a right to know how this happened.

    But we also need to keep in mind that the primary responsibility for this goes to Hamas and Hamas’s enabler: Joe Biden and his Iranian friends.

    Israelis in positions of responsibility for national security must never again be able to dismiss intelligence concerns as “imaginary” without a thorough review at all levels. But let’s keep in mind the difference between errors of judgment and evil. Hamas is evil. Joe Biden and his Hamas enablers are evil. Israelis who made errors in judgment have to be held responsible, and their blind spots need to be exposed so in the future those blind spots will be guarded against.

    Those were possibly political blind spots. I am just guessing at the nature of the blind spots here, but I am hoping that this will be part of the inquiry and the exact nature of the blind spots will be revealed by the data. It seems to me this is as important as finding out who was responsible. What led to their error in judgment needs to be identified too.

  3. So it seems that some people were willingly asleep at the wheel and now it’s time to blame Bibi. In theory, it was on his watch, but does that include micromanaging his own intelligence sources? This smells like the same systematic dismantling of the government that was going on before October 7.