T. Belman. The Judicial Selection Committee (JSC) is made up on nine persons, 5 of which are sitting Supreme Court Judges and representatives of the Bar Assn. Obviously they are aligned in resisting change. Himi said:
“Our judicial method anchors universal values that are the infrastructure for our shared lives. If there is no equality, morality or justice, and there is legislation that harms one minority or another — that’s not democracy,”
“The apparent new government does not have the right to change the method of governance in Israel,”
That’s a crock. Any Israeli government has the right to change the method of governance including the makeup of the JSC. Also a democratically elected government has the right to legislate the values it will uphold and such values need not be “universal values” which is merely a buzz word for liberal left values.
Avi Himi says public should ‘take to the streets’ over proposals to let Knesset overturn High Court rulings, change how judges appointed
5 December 2022, 11:33 pm
The head of the Israel Bar Association warned Monday against legal reforms being pushed by members of the expected new religious-right coalition that would sharply curb the authority of the courts and allow politicians to determine judicial appointments.
Avi Himi called for a broad public effort to oppose the proposals, which include legislation that would allow the Knesset to overturn rulings by the High Court of Justice and change the criteria by which the chief justice is chosen.
“They now want to turn us into Hungary, with all that implies,” Himi told the Haaretz daily, referring to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s authoritarian government.
Himi said the reforms would ultimately “harm the average citizen in Afula, Yeruham, Kiryat Shmona and everywhere,” naming several cities where presumed incoming prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party and allied factions picked up the majority of votes.
“The significance is that there will be a government without restraints or oversight, and which can do whatever it pleases,” he said.
The bar association chief rejected claims that the so-called override clause — which would let a majority of lawmakers reverse court decisions — is needed to ensure the ruling coalition can effectively govern, calling them “an urban legend without any logical basis.
“Our judicial method anchors universal values that are the infrastructure for our shared lives. If there is no equality, morality or justice, and there is legislation that harms one minority or another — that’s not democracy,” he said.
“The apparent new government does not have the right to change the method of governance in Israel, which is what they want and are going to do,” he added.
Asked about the prospect of Netanyahu trying to terminate his ongoing trial on graft charges, Himi argued such a move would be “inconceivable.” Netanyahu, who denies wrongdoing in his corruption cases, has insisted he will not seek to interfere in the trial.
Himi called for hundreds of thousands to protest against the proposed reforms. He also said he did not expect any Supreme Court judges to agree to change the current method in which the Supreme Court president is selected according to seniority. Some of Netanyahu’s allies have called to change this method in order to influence the identity of the next court chief.
“The citizens need to take to the streets,” Himi said.
Separately Monday, Channel 12 news said some of Netanyahu’s political partners have given Likud No. 2 Yariv Levin, who has been named in reports as the likely incoming justice minister, blanket authorization to put forward legal changes as he sees fit.
The unsourced report said two parties had told Likud: “Take a blank page. Yariv Levin can write on it what he wants and we’ll support it.”
The network did not specify which of Likud’s allies — a pair of ultra-Orthodox parties and three far-right factions — relayed this message.
Last week, Supreme Court President Esther Hayut vowed the judiciary will “stand strong” in the face of the prospective government’s overhaul plans and asserted the crucial importance of an independent judiciary, without addressing any specific proposal.
The proposed judicial changes — particularly the override clause — have also been denounced by Netanyahu’s political rivals, a group of law professors, and prominent American lawyer Alan Dershowitz.
@seymour
In point of fact, Glick recently described that we are approaching a constitutional crisis with the override act. Ironically, the constitutional crisis is, in part, the result of the govt not having a completed constitution. As the Knessett will pass the override legislation, the court will name the Knessett’s legislation as unconstitutional, despite it only being base upon their own assertion, and the result is we will have the two branches of govt adopting conflicting positions on this single issue of limit of the court’s authority. While declaring each other’s authority moot, each will be acting outside of any constitutional scenario of resolving the conflicting positions taken by the two branches of govt.
If the “override” legislation is actually enacted (doubtful) don’t be surprised if, the first time said legislation is itself considered by the Court, that it is eviscerated. The least dangerous branch (in American terms as naively thought by the Founders but equally applicable to Israel) has proven to be the most dangerous in all common law jurisdictions.
We do need a functioning Judicial branch that is a check on elected politicians and even unelected bureaucrats who legally remove basic inalienable human rights, bodily autonomy, privacy and liberty as we’ve seen during Covid otherwise we are just an ID number. People need to be free to choose how religious they want to be etc. This is very important but we likewise can’t have a woke elite failures club with powers of the court either.
Let the “judges” take to the streets, as in “beat it”, “get lost” and “take a long walk on a short pier”.