Surely these secret negotiations have provided for the contingency that Israel will probably attack. What has Obama agreed to do about it. Ted Belman
News Agencies and Israel Hayom Staff
-
“So, a bad deal actually can lead you to exactly the place you don’t want to be. I think if you want a peaceful solution as I do, then the right thing to do is ratchet up the sanctions.” Netanyahu
Israel was vexed to learn recently that the U.S. and Iran have been holding secret talks on the future of the Islamic republic’s nuclear program for over a year, Channel 10 reported Sunday
According to the report, learning of the secret “Geneva-bypass” channel has further strained the already tense relationship between Jerusalem and Washington, as Israel is concerned that most details of a future agreement with Tehran will be finalized behind the scenes, and not in Geneva.
Secret meetings have been held between Ali Akbar Salehi, the head of the Iranian nuclear program, and Valerie Jarrett, a senior adviser to U.S. President Barack Obama, the report said. It said most of the meetings were held in the Persian Gulf.
Israel has made no secret of its dissatisfaction over the U.S.’s apparent favoring of a “softer” approach towards Iran, saying that the sanctions imposed on Iran by the West have been eroded before reaching their final goal.
Jerusalem sources told Channel 10 that they believe an agreement with Iran is “closer than ever” despite the apparent disagreements noted in Geneva last week.
Meanwhile, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told CNN on Sunday that the international community should “ratchet up the sanctions” on Iran rather than pursue what he stressed was an “extremely bad deal” with Iran.
In an interview with CNN’s chief political correspondent, Candy Crowley, Netanyahu warned that it would be wrong to prematurely ease the sanctions that could cause Iran to “cease and desist” its controversial nuclear program.
“Iran is really on the ropes, their economy is … close to paralysis, and all of a sudden, you take off the pressure; everybody will understand that you’re heading south,” he said.
“I think they [the West] should not only keep up the pressure, I think you should increase the pressure, because it’s finally working. And if you give it up now, when you have that pressure, and Iran doesn’t even take apart, dismantle one centrifuge, what leverage will you have when you ease the pressure?”
The prime minister is set to meet with several world leaders this week, to further urge them to draft a deal that would better ensure Iran’s relinquishment of its nuclear ambitions.
“If you do a bad deal, you may get to the point where your only option is a military option,” he told Crowley. “So, a bad deal actually can lead you to exactly the place you don’t want to be. I think if you want a peaceful solution as I do, then the right thing to do is ratchet up the sanctions.”
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry is set to visit Israel again this week and is expected to arrive on Friday. Speaking at the weekly cabinet meeting, Netanyahu attempted to dispel reports of a rift between him and Kerry.
“The secretary of state is an old friend of mine and a dear friend to Israel. He is doing everything he can to promote the issue of peace and we will discuss if, of course, but we will also discuss the Iranian issue,” he said.
“I would like to make it clear that there can be disagreements even among the best of friends, certainly on issues related to our future and our fate. I hope that we will succeed in convincing our friends this week and in the days afterwards to achieve a much better agreement.”
Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon also addressed the Iranian issue at an event honoring former Defense Minister Moshe Dayan, held Sunday at the Tel Aviv University: “We say that those who seek peace should be ready for war. If we have to confront [Iran] then so be it, as long as they don’t have military nuclear capabilities.”
Also on Sunday, Netanyahu, who will leave for a state visit on Moscow on Wednesday, named Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman as his deputy for the duration of his trip.
Senator Mark Kirk: Iran’s Deal of the Century
http://www.madisdead.blogspot.co.il/2013/11/irans-deal-of-century.html
I am not a military expert, by any means,but it seems to me that if Israel strikes Iran, they can expect some serious retaliation. In addition, there is no way of predicting what Hamas and Hizbolla might do. It is possible Israel could end up having to attack Gaza and Lebanon to prevent rocket fire from those countries. Even though Israel has sophisticated anti-missile technology, nothing is 100% effective. I am personally all in favor of attacking Iran, but it seems that at the same time Israel has to pre-emptively attack Lebanon and Gaza.
Obama has repeatedly shown his deep dislike for Israel and is willing to compromise Israeli security. I fear that he already has plans to sabotage any military strike by Israel to make it very costly and ineffective. This is a very deadly game for Israel and I wish that Israel would pre-empt Obama by publicly warning that any interference by Obama, during an Israeli strike, will only escalate the war. This is also a public relations conflict with Obama trying to put Israel on the defensive to weaken their resolve.