Defense Ministry to okay 1,000 Palestinians homes and some 2,000 settler houses; Jerusalem court freezes Palestinian home demolitions in Silwan
By TOI STAFF, AFP and JACOB MAGID, TOI 11 August 2021, 8:54 pm
New housing construction in the Nokdim settlement in the West Bank, south of the Palestinian city of Bethlehem, on October 13, 2020. (MENAHEM KAHANA / AFP)
The government is slated to approve new building in Palestinian areas of the West Bank as well as in Jewish settlements.
Defense Minister Benny Gantz has approved the construction of 1,000 Palestinian homes in the Israeli-controlled Area C, mostly in the Jenin and Bethlehem areas, a defense official confirmed to The Times of Israel Wednesday
Meanwhile, the ministry’s Civil Administration will also okay some 2,000 new homes in West Bank settlements, for the first time since both Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and US President Joe Biden took office.
Area C makes up some 60 percent of the West Bank and is fully under Israeli security and administrative control. Israel rarely approves Palestinian construction in Area C, with the overwhelming majority of requests being denied. This has resulted in rampant illegal building, which is in turn often demolished by Israel.
Between 2016 and 2018, just 21 of the 1,485 Palestinian applications for construction permits in Area C were approved by the Defense Ministry, or 0.81 percent.
In 2019, the security cabinet approved — in principle — a record 700 building permits for Palestinians in what was widely seen as an attempt both to prevent the High Court of Justice from blocking further demolitions of Palestinian property on the grounds that it is impossible for Palestinians to build legally and to stave off international criticism against Israel for failing to allow Palestinian construction.
A view of the Bethlehem skyline (CC BY SA Daniel Case/Wikimedia Commons)
However, an investigation by The Times of Israel last year found that very few of those buildings permits had actually been issued.
Most of the international community considers settlement construction a violation of international law.
Meanwhile, a lawyer said Wednesday that a Jerusalem court had ruled that dozens of home demolitions in a flashpoint Palestinian neighborhood should be frozen for six months.
Israel had ordered the demolition of around 100 homes in Silwan, a Palestinian neighborhood on the edge of the Old City in East Jerusalem, claiming they were built illegally on public land.
Monday’s court order froze most of those demolition orders until February 2022, while also allowing 16 homes to be razed immediately.
“I have reached the conclusion that it is appropriate to grant a specific extension,” wrote Judge Sigal Albo of the Jerusalem Court for Local Affairs in the decision.
Lawyer Ziad Kawar, representing residents in the Al-Bustan area of Silwan, told AFP the ruling was “progress” but “not a victory.” He said he would appeal to foreign diplomats to put pressure on Israel over home demolitions.
View of the East Jerusalem neighborhood of Silwan, April 8, 2021. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)
Kawar said his clients were applying for retroactive permission for their homes, which he said they built on their own private property without permission.
“It is not possible to get permits there,” Kawar said.
Israel captured East Jerusalem from Jordan during the Six Day War in 1967, and later annexed it in a move not recognized internationally.
In the 1980s, settlers began moving into Silwan, which sits on land where — according to Jewish tradition — King David established his capital some 3,000 years ago, making the area hallowed ground in Jewish history.
Israelis have said they hope to build a park devoted to the biblical King David in Al-Bustan.
Several hundred settlers currently live in Silwan under heavy security, among about 50,000 Palestinians.
whereamI
AUGUST 12, 2021 AT 6:06 PM
So would I.
@Bear
Perfectly stated. The Jews should not parcel one fist of dirt to those who seek out her destruction. It is a matter for the Jewish people to determine their own fate in their own lands. Linking Jewish construction as limited to some algorithm relating to Arab construction is a complete surrender of sovereignty. There is no victory here, but a rather massive defeat. Bibi’s govt did pursue this path, as you note. It was, however, days b4 the current administration took over and it was an attempt to placate the coming animosity between the two govts. It was wrong then and it is wrong today for the same reasons. The Israeli govt owes their people the right of being good stewards of the lands they hold. They are Jewish lands, ours by right of heritage. What the Jews do within their own lands should be left to their own discretion. I can not believe Bennett and Shaked and Saar would support this. I honestly thought that this day would come, but not this quickly. The members of the Right must end this linkage or end the govt. They have leverage with the current admin in Washington, if they care to force the point they will likely win. And if they bring the govt down over this point, it will be victory enough to stop this process.
This is from today’s Arutz Sheva. Bennett and Co. are bastards.
.
@Peloni, what Gantz has done to justify to the Biden Administration with building additional 2000 units of housing for Jews in Judea and Samaria is approve building for Arabs. I believe this is an additional 300 units for Arabs for a plan done under Bibi’s watch of 700 units (Gantz was also DM I believe).
Simply put Israel needs to build what it needs and wants! Screw Biden and Company.
My apologies for an error in my last post and clipping from Wikipedia concerning Silwan. I had confused Silwan with the nearby Jerusalem neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah. Both neighborhoods are within the borders of Jerusalem, as defined by Israel.
However, the history of Silwan is not all that different from that of Sheikh Jarrah. In ancient times, the village was Jewish and was known as Siloam. Much later, some Arabs did settle there. But prior to the renewed Jewish settlement in 1882 they numbered less than 1,000 people in only 90 homes. These Arabs inhabited only a small part of the modern town.
“Modern” Jewish resettlement of the village began in 1882, long before the the Israeli “occupation” beginning in 1967.
The following clipping from Wikipedia gives a narrative of the village’s history going back to about 1850. It isfor the most part, although not entirely, fair to the Jews.
The following clipping is from Wikipedia, of all places.
I agree that this is 100 per cent not acceptable.
A vicious distortion of the facts by a pro-Palestinian journalist. Jewish first began to move into the area of what is now called Silwan around 1870 , when there were no Arabs at all living in the area. The settlers named their town “Shimon HaTzaddik.” When the Jordanians seized the area in 1948 , they ousted the Jewish ‘setters,” many of whose families had been living there for generations, and then repopulated the area with Arabs. The Arabs also renamed the town “Silwan.”
Jews still hold legal title deeds to almost all of the land. The landowners have demanded that the Arab squatters pay them rent, including back rent, or leave if they are unwilling to pay. The Arab squatters have defied court orders to leave by staging violent riots. Israeli courts, even the pro-Arab Israeli Supreme Court, which had several times authorized the eviction of the squatters and/or the demolition of their illegal built homes. However, since the organized riots in “Silwan,” which were coordinated with Hamas’ campaign of rocket and mortar attacks on Israel, the Israeli courts have now ordered postponements in executed the eviction orders they had earlier approved.
As for the “international community” regarding Jewish settlements in the Judea-Samaria disputed territories as “illegal,” there is actually nothing in international law that prevents Jews from living in this area or acquiring land there, or much the less moving back to properties they have owned for decades. The ‘international community” (UN, EU, etc. (has just made this claim up.
@Bear
Very well stated Bear. I hope Bennett agrees. How is this not covered in Bennett’s Redlines? This smells very much of America exercising her control of the America First faction in the Israeli govt, to which Gantz has always been a member.
@savtah8
I have had the same question in mind for some time now.
is the Times of Israel connected to the NYT?
So would I.
Why West bank and not Judea & Samaria?
Follow up to my previous post.
What I am talking about is authorizing building for Palestinians in Area C. This should NOT stand.
Bennett needs to stop Gantz from doing this. This is 100% NOT ACCEPTABLE. I would bring down the government over this if I could.