Israel Is on a Mission to Supersize Its West Bank Settlements

First, it was revealed last week that Bezalel Smotrich the far-right Finance Minister, who is also de-facto Minister of Settlements requested government ministries to prepare plans and budgets to double the number of settlers living in the West Bank. This would mean seeing their numbers soar from half a million to one million people.

Then it was reported that a Palestinian community of approximately 200 residents from the hamlet of Ein Samia, located east of Ramallah, fled the land they’d been living on for some 40 years, driven out by (ALLEDGED) persistent and devastating violence from settlers.

• Far-right Israeli minister lays groundwork for doubling West Bank settler population
• Why Homesh is not just another illegal Israeli outpost in the West Bank
• Israel’s absent finance minister serves the settlements

On Monday came the news that Israel’s government is now officially permitting its citizens to establish a permanent presence in the Homesh outpost in the northern West Bank, breaking past commitments to the U.S. not to do so.

Once a low-key mostly secular settlement that was evacuated by the Israeli government in the summer of 2005, it has since become rallying cry for the settler movement.<

It arguably goes hand in glove with Smotrich’s massive expansion plan, which itself is not new, but is newly transparent.

Israel’s Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich enters the Old City of Jerusalem at a parade marking “Jerusalem Day” last week.Credit: HAZEM BADER – AFP

Those familiar with the plans stored away in the files of the Ministry of Housing and the Civil Administration, which oversees the West Bank, already know that there are existing plans to establish tens of thousands of housing units in the settlements of Givat Eitam, E1, Atarot, Gva’ot, Nahliel, Emanuel, Givat Zeev and more.

The infrastructure for this settlement expansion, which the government has already started implementing, is currently being laid down thanks to billions of shekels being poured into the construction of a network of highways to accommodate the million settlers Smotrich envisions.

What’s new in Smotrich’s plan is that his intentions are explicitly and openly placed on the table, with no fear of any opposing forces posing a genuine threat to it.

For years since 1967, a cloud of ambiguity surrounded the settlement project. Despite the fact that the settlements have had the most significant impact on Israel’s security, political, economic, and social situation and have determined its destiny, governments refrained from presenting their vision and plans on the matter to the public. It was important for them to maintain the public’s perception that we are the “good guys” and that the prolonged bloody conflict with the Palestinians was not due to our occupation and settlement policy but rather to the Palestinian refusal to compromise.

I remember, when I started working at the Settlement Watch Project for Peace Now 18 years ago, that if we wanted to know what was planned for a particular settlement, we had to go to the local council and request to see the plan. The existence of the planning meetings would be discovered, if at all, only weeks after they took place, hidden in small ads in newspapers.

To find out if the land on which a settlement was built was privately owned by Palestinians, we needed leaks from sources within the Civil Administration.

Today, much of this information is readily available with the click of a button online largely due to our persistent efforts and those of other organizations to expose the information. But it is not only the information that is available, but the intentions of the government that are much clearer and more explicit.

An Israeli soldier and a Jewish settler and her child at the West Bank outpost of Homesh, Monday, after Israel’s government repealed a 2005 act that had dismantled it.Credit: Ohad Zwigenberg /AP

It seems the government now feels no immediate threat to the fate of the settlements, so they have nothing left to hide.

The opposition parties in Israel avoid dealing with the occupation. In the United States, until fairly recently, there was a president openly supportive of settlements. The current administration as well as other countries and international organizations only lip service condemning the settlements but do not exact any price from Israel for its policy.

Smotrich and his colleagues feel invulnerable. So, reveling in this new level of power and possibility they seek to remove the few remaining legal obstacles in their path to implementing their apartheid vision through the judicial revolution the government is conveniently leading.

But perhaps this very success of the settlers is also an opportunity.<

Since their plans and intentions are clearly on the table, today there can be no more debate about the intentions of the Israeli government. If we continue as usual, avoiding the subject or paying a lip service against it, the plans will come to fruition and if our passivity continues, sooner or later the settlers will reach the million.

But it is not only about the million settlers and it’s not about the numbers in the first place. For many good people in Israel and abroad, even 500,000 settlers were enough to despair of the possibility to undo it and of a two states reality.

This despair led them to search for a new vision, of one state, and by doing so, they are effectively taking the wind out of the sails of the struggle against settlements. The settlement project goes beyond the mere numbers of Israeli settlers in the West Bank; it’s a tragic story that entails the dispossession of Palestinians. It is not a new vision that we need but action, strategies of struggle in order to stop this injustice.

The focus on numbers and the resulting despair often overlooks the impact of Palestinians including the Ein Samia community, forced to flee due to settler violence.

It overlooks the Palestinian owners of the lands on which the Homesh settlement was established who cannot return to their land due to the settlers’ presence and their violent attacks against them. It also neglects communities like Masafer Yatta and Khan al-Ahmar which are being displaced from their lands.

Palestinians watch as Israeli machinery demolishes a Palestinian house in Masafer Yatta near Hebron, the West Bank last July.Credit: MUSSA ISSA QAWASMA / REUTERS

Additionally, it fails to address the tens of thousands of Palestinians whose homes are under imminent threat of demolition and the hundreds of thousands of Palestinian landowners who have had their lands seized for the benefit of settlements.

The numbers debate also usually ignores the millions of Palestinians enduring life under a harsh security regime to ensure the secure existence of these settlements. Dispossession is intrinsically linked to the settlement enterprise. It is an ongoing reality that is independent of the future question of whether there will be one or two states.

Now that we, the Israeli public and the international community, know what Smotrich and this government is planning – and already working to make happen – we must take action to stop it.

We should develop strategies for a long and persistent struggle: one that harnesses all potential forces opposing this policy of dispossession. A struggle that includes the silent majority in Israel now rallying to protect Israeli democracy for Jews, although they currently appear largely indifferent about the lack of democracy for Palestinians. A struggle that includes Israeli Palestinian citizens who remain excluded from the mainstream public debate in Israel.

It should be a struggle that includes mobilizing the clear and outraged voice of the world Jewish community. We also need the international community to take genuine action tied to real consequences for Israel if it does not change course.

Hagit Ofran works at the Settlement Watch project of Peace Now