In late January at the United Nations, the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon referred to Jewish towns and cities in Judea and Samaria as “provocative acts.”
By HANK SHEINKOPF, GEORGE BIRNBAUM, RONN TOROSSIAN, JPOST
It wasn’t too long ago when Israel had a reliable friend at the United Nations. The United States, a permanent member of the Security Council, helped keep enemies at bay and veto hateful resolutions against the Jewish State. But that might not be the case today, and Israel’s battles have become somewhat more solitary than they once were.
Beginning last November the European Commission—the EU’s executive arm—decided that products from the territories obtained as a result of the 1967 Six-Day War can no longer be sold in the 28-country EU as having come from Israel. They must be labeled as being from an occupied area.
In late January at the United Nations, the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon referred to Jewish towns and cities in Judea and Samaria as “provocative acts” and doubted Israel’s commitment to peace. “As oppressed peoples have demonstrated throughout the ages, it is human nature to react to occupation, which often serves as a potent incubator of hate and extremism,” he said, essentially blaming Israel for the months-long spate of stabbings, car-ramming and shooting of pregnant women, children and the elderly citizens of Israel.
Prime Minister Netanyahu retorted angrily that Ban Ki-moon’s comments, “Give a tailwind to terrorism.”
The United Nations opposing Israel is not surprising – nor is the usual rancor in the hall of nations in which Israel is routinely vilified and sanctioned with more resolutions raised and passed than any other issue or nation.
Yet, the one blow that is surprising is that the United States is joining the bandwagon and issued an unusually stern criticism of Israel. President Obama is continuing his legacy, by suggesting that Israel will not have its friend anymore if it does not do exactly what the president wants.
Contributing to this American aggression is the steady work during the past decade of so called leftist humanitarian groups—such as the American charity The New Israel Fund (NIF) and its hoard of grantees like Rabbis for Human Rights, B’Tselem, Breaking the Silence, Adalah, HaMoked and others, to name a few— who have paved the way for this very point in time.
NIF has been clamoring against the State of Israel , and has established itself as a funder of just about any group that has an axe to grind against Israel. Whether it is Adalah promotinglawfare, B’Tselem promoting Israel as an apartheid state, HaMoked providing flawed and erroneous data toward the damaging and now debunked Goldstone report, and a host of other nonconstructive, even wounding ventures, NIF has been at the center.
While claiming to be against boycotts of Israel, NIF has provided plenty of fuel for the Boycott Divest Sanctions (BDS) fire that has been burning hotter lately. For example, Alon Liel, Israel’s former ambassador to South Africa, is a member of two organizations which receive large funding by NIF: Ir Amin, which works against Jewish interests in Jerusalem, and B’Tselem.
Ambassador Liel supports a cultural boycott of Israel and is a co-organizer of the campaign to call on European countries to undermine Israeli sovereignty by “recognizing” the “State of Palestine.” His wife is Rachel Liel, Israel director of the NIF.
NIF’s supporters are a steady stream of American leftists “Jewish leaders” who believe that these methods of shaming Israel and its people is helpful. Philanthropists, including UJA-Federation President Alisa Doctoroff; President of the Jewish Communal Fund and JCRC Board member, Karen R. Adler; David Hochberg, Carole and Saul Zabar, Temple Israel of White Plains and others, have made it so that President Obama receives legitimacy from the Jewish community while openly opposing Israel and see it delegitimized on an international level.
It matters not that some of these very groups were recently exposed for being part of a scheme to kill Palestinians who sold land to Jews. When “humanitarian” Ezra Nawi was caught on record bragging about his role in the demise of Palestinian land owners and later arrested for it, the fact that he was on the payroll of Rabbis for Human Rights and getting money from Breaking the Silence did not jolt NIF’s supporters. Neither did the actions of Nawi’s partner in crime, a B’Tselem worker named Nasser Nawaj’ah, who was also implicated.
The truth falls on deaf ears and the damage they have done for years is having the impact they so desperately want.
There is no one calling out Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas when he proclaims, “If there is an independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital, we won’t agree to the presence of one [Jew] in it” – yet the world claims Israel is promoting apartheid. That is the New Israel Fund doing its job.
The past several months have been difficult on Israeli citizens, as terrorists run amok stabbing and shooting people at random. Abbas calls these people “heroic,” and Ban Ki-Moon suggests it is Israel’s fault, while the leftist NGOs and their supporters continue to harangue Israel endlessly.
At the very least, those of us who stand with Israel must continue to insist that the New Israel Fund and their funders and leaders be considered non kosher.
Authors: George Birnbaum is an international political consultant, who formerly served as chief of staff for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Hank Sheinkopf, CEO of Sheinkopf Communications is a leading political strategist who has worked on campaigns in four continents. His clients have included former President Bill Clinton. Ronn Torossian is CEO of a top 20 US PR Agency, and author of “For Immediate Release.”
The US recognized the Jewish People’s state in 1922 by a Joint Congressional Resolution confirming the Palestine Mandate and by the Anglo American Treaty of 1924. Both of these were signed by US Presidents. The recognition of a state may be express or tacit. The latter results from any act which implies the intention of recognizing the new state. 1933 Montevideo Convention, Article 7. In a report of 1921 used at the Paris Peace talks, the US showed that it intended to recognize Palestine as a Jewish Peoples’ State if and when it attained a Jewish population majority and had the capability to exercise sovereignty. See American Proposal for a Jewish Homeland, January 21, 1921: ” It is recommended that the Jews be invited to return to Palestine and settle there, being assured by the Conference of all proper assistance in so doing that may be consistent with the protection of the personal (especially the religious) and the property rights of the non-Jewish population, and being further assured that it will be the policy of the League of Nations to recognise Palestine as a Jewish state as soon as it is a Jewish state in fact.
It is right that Palestine should become a Jewish state, if the Jews, being given the full opportunity, make it such. It was the cradle and home of their vital race, which has made large spiritual contributions to mankind, and is the only land in which they can hope to find a home of their own; they being in this last respect unique among significant peoples.
At present, however, the Jews form barely a sixth of the total population of 700,000 in Palestine, and whether they are to form a majority, or even a plurality, of the population in the future state remains uncertain. Palestine, in short, is far from being a Jewish country now. England, as mandatory, can be relied on to give the Jews the privileged position they should have without sacrificing the rights of non-Jews.”