By Isi Liebler
Although Benjamin Netanyahu has now become Israel’s longest-serving prime minister, projections suggest that MK and former defense minister Avigdor Lieberman will achieve his objective and bring about Netanyahu’s political demise. If, as appears almost certain, Lieberman’s strident anti-haredi positions will gain him additional seats, he will continue to hold the balance of power. His role is strengthened with polls predicting another deadlock with neither Netanyahu nor Blue and White head Benny Gantz able to cobble together sufficient seats to form a government.
On top of that, should Netanyahu be indicted, it is likely that Likud would be divided as to whether he can retain his position as party leader.
Paradoxically, Netanyahu is currently at the peak of his achievements. He courageously overcame the stormy, confrontational era of former US President Barack Obama with subsequent events totally vindicating him. He has managed to expand the alliance with the United States to an all-time high, while simultaneously developing an unprecedented positive relationship with Russia’s President Vladimir Putin (despite his support of Syria). He has advanced relations with India and deftly penetrated barriers and created relationships in South America, Africa and Asia including China. He has also broken through what seemed an insurmountable barrier and developed covert and even not so covert associations with the Saudis and moderate Sunni states. Israel today, largely due to Netanyahu’s diplomacy, has better relations with the international community than at any time since its inception.
In addition, he can take much of the credit for Israel’s booming economy and for the country being ranked as one of the world’s most successful high-tech innovators. Under his leadership, the IDF has achieved new peaks and is capable of defeating any threat from Israel’s adversaries.
But after Netanyahu’s 13 years in office – extraordinary longevity for any elected leader – many Israelis seek a change. This attitude is exacerbated by a media that has unceasingly demonized him personally as well as politically in a manner unprecedented in any democratic country. His hedonistic lifestyle, which the court is unlikely to deem a crime, has intensified public opposition.
His constant kowtowing to extremist haredi demands, particularly outraging Israelis with his concessions on draft exemptions, has created a backlash and, according to the polls, diverted many voters to Lieberman’s party since he is perceived as the only one standing up to haredi extortion. Unless the merger with the New Right led by Ayelet Shaked can change the environment, a Netanyahu government including haredim will ensure that religious extremism will intensify, even beyond their efforts to enforce total gender separation and imposing obstacles to conversion. Even more critical has been the exclusion of all secular elements from their core educational agenda, making most graduates unfit for anything other than the most menial work. Their ever-expanding population will lead to dire consequences when the state is economically unable to finance the increased demand for social services for those unable or unwilling to engage in productive labor.
To make matters worse, the formerly moderate religious Zionism has now become largely dominated by “national haredim” – hardal – who, while fully supportive of national goals, ally themselves with the extremist haredim on questions of religious observance.
Netanyahu has also been accused of eliminating those with the potential to displace him as head of the party. Getting close to the prime minister is likened to a moth attracted to a flame and leads to destruction. A striking example of his petty-mindedness was his decision to sack Shaked and Naftali Bennet from their cabinet positions and his frenzied efforts to destroy them.
Under current circumstances, even if Likud gains more seats than Blue and White and Netanyahu overcomes his legal problems, if none of the opposition parties or enough individual MKs can be seduced into joining him, we could face an ongoing deadlock. Neither side may be able to obtain a majority. Lieberman’s Yisrael Beytenu party could double its previous electoral strength because of the attractions of its anti-haredi stance and will continue to hold the balance of power.
The only solution is for Likud to propose a national unity government, offering Gantz a rotating premiership with Netanyahu retiring at the end of his term. But this will fail if Blue and White remains true to its pledge not to consider serving under Netanyahu under any circumstances.
If that happens, the president could step in and invite Gantz to form a government. Likud would then have no alternative but to oblige Netanyahu to step down. And once he does, Likud under a new leader would negotiate a unity government with Blue and White – with or without the inclusion of Yair Lapid’s Yesh Atid. This should pose no obstacles because Gantz shares the same basic policies as the current government in relation to security and defense.
Most Israelis would be relieved by such an outcome, which would help unite the nation and bring an end to haredi extortion. Such a merger would also destroy the current distorted perception that Israel is governed by an “extreme” right-wing government but enjoys the overwhelming support of the Israeli people.
There remains one problem with such a solution: Does Gantz possess the qualities to lead the country? Could he, like Netanyahu, successfully walk the diplomatic tightrope between Trump and Putin? Gantz displays neither charisma nor a strong leadership image. A big question mark hangs over his ability to effectively lead the country over the next 12 months, when critical decisions will need to be made.
And if not Gantz, who in either party does have the qualifications to lead? The brutal truth is nobody!
This is why, despite the fact Netanyahu does not endear himself to most Israelis, at the same time polls show that even today many consider him the only competent candidate for prime minister. Indeed, there are many who detest him but would still opt for him to retain the reins of leadership over the coming crucial year.
So, while many are predicting that this is Netanyahu’s last hurrah, they could be wrong. Today the odds are against him but on previous occasions he used his extraordinary political skills and overcame what seemed to be hopeless situations. Don’t write him off yet!
This is the Jerusalem Post’s summary of the latest Channel 12 poll:
@ Adam Dalgliesh:
This has long been my nightmare since the destruction of the Gush Katif communities. Israel cannot afford to relocate close to 750,000 citizens (not 300,00 as quoted). The only recourse will be to ?????? – to abandon them to their fate. No compensation. No real protection. Just take it or leave it. Whether the fabric of Israeli society could ever recuperate from such a monumental treason or not is not an issue for those who prefer Israel to be a state of all its Citizens and to ignore or drop any “Jewish” identity it might have preserved till this day as a compromise for unity.
In general, this is an intelligent analysis by Isi Leibler, one of the JP’s few remaining pro-Zionist columnists. He is wrong about one thing, however. Bibi has promised he will not dismantle any settlements. Gants has repeatedly refused to make any such pledge, although repeatedly invited to do so by reporters. He has promised only to preserve the settlements in the main “settlement blocs,” and has pointedly refused to promise that he will allow the 90,000 Jews who live in Judea-Samaria outside the settlement blocs to remain. Instead he has said that this is an issue for negotiations between Israel and the PLO. Not much of an assurance to these 90,000 Jews.
This is a major policy difference between Likud and Blue and White. It is not clear that most Likud MKs would be willing to join a coalition with parties who are unwilling to commit to preserving the existing settlements.
While it is likely that Bibi will come under pressure from within the Likud to retire if he is indicted, he is unlikely to face such pressure before he is indicted. For one thing,AG Mandleblit has promised to refrain from holding a pre-indictment hearing before October. If the Likud coalition does manage to win the election, Mandelblit will come under intense pressure from the Right bloc and from much of the public to allow Bibi time to conduct the negotiations necessary to appoint ministers and win a vote of confidence. Then to avoid any appearance of unfairness, he will need to allow Bibi some additional time to prepare his case for a pre-indictment hearing. And there is definitely no guarantee that he will decide to indict Bibi after the pre-indictment hearing. A number of legal experts have opined that the prosecutors have a weak case in all three of their charges against Netanyahu.
Then Mandelblit have need several months to consider whatever new evidence, affidavits, etc. that Bibi brings to the table, plus the prosecutions rebuttal of this evidence. In that case, it could take months more before the AG makes a final decision as to whether to indict Bibi or not. Bibi would stand to remain Prime Minister for several more months even if he is indicted, and perhaps for another four years if he isn’t.
This scenario will only if play out if Bibi plus coalition partners win the election. If the left coalition, including Yisrael Beiteinu, plus the Arabs, get a majority, a very confused and uncertain future will await Israel. As I have pointed out in earlier posts, a coalition that would include the Arab bloc could not be excluded.
Lieberman rides a wave long in place. As it has always been with the Lieberman saga, he assumes others action plans.
The Netanyahu era has ended. Presently he is handy as a stop gap to block the Oslo generals, that is all.
GauchoSam
Churchill won a war but was voted out. Times up for nutunyahoo as p m he did a good job, raise him to the house of lords, make him a minister of what he did best was it overseas relations, was it promo of hi-tech? send him back as u n ambassador. Let his name be put up as sec. gen. or give him a nice farm.