Is an Arab-Blue and White alliance good or bad for Netanyahu?

With polls showing neither the Right or Left will be able to secure a coalition, the Joint Arab List could supply a significant boost to the Left in September if it breaks its longstanding tradition of remaining outside the government. Such a deal, however, could also boost Netanyahu’s chances of winning the election.

by  Dov Lipman , TOI

Ayman Odeh, head of the Joint Arab List, signaled a potential major political shift when he announced last week that his party would consider joining a center-left government led by Benny Gantz of the Blue and White party.

Since the creation of the state, no Arab party has ever recommended a Jewish candidate for prime minister or sat in a ruling coalition. Yet, with neither Israel’s right- or left-wing blocs able to secure a coalition following the previous election, Arab party mandates would represent a significant boost to the left should they break their longstanding tradition of remaining outside the government.

Yet such an alliance remains unlikely. Blue and White No. 3 and former IDF Chief of Staff Moshe Ya’alon said that “as long as the Arab parties do not accept Israel as a Jewish and democratic state, Blue and White cannot sit with them in a government.”

Odeh, for his part, poised four conditions for entering a Blue and White-led government.

“The first,” said Odeh, “is the construction of a new Arab city and redoing the rules to allow for more Arab construction and stopping demolitions in Arab areas.”

The second condition, he said, was “governmental focus on fighting crime in Arab areas, including an operation to gather all the illegal weapons in the Arab population. Third is in the welfare realm, including building a public hospital in an Arab city and raising stipends for the elderly.”

The last condition was “direct negotiations with the Palestinian leaders to bring an end to the occupation and to establish a Palestinian state, alongside canceling the nation-state law.”

“I want to lead Arab politics from a politics of protest to a politics of influence,” said Odeh. “We are 20% of Israel’s population and we are needed to bring equality, democracy and social justice to Israel.”

The most problematic of these conditions for Blue and White would likely be the last. The nation-state law, passed by the Knesset in 2018, sets in law that Israel is “the national home of the Jewish people.” Blue and White has talked about “correcting” the law to make sure it emphasizes equality for all of Israel’s citizens, but they do not favor repealing it completely.

Gantz, who is also a former IDF chief of staff, stressed that his party’s sights are not on negotiations with the Arab parties, saying, “We are calling for a unity government” and clarifying that such a coalition would include “anyone who is sane and Zionist.”

Even if Blue and White found a way to accept the Joint List’s conditions, polls currently indicate the left would still need the help of Avigdor Lieberman’s Yisrael Beytenu party to secure a 61-MK majority needed to form a government.

Yet MK Oded Forer of Yisrael Beiteinu told JNS that “there is zero chance we would join a government which includes the Arab parties.”

Forer’s statement makes it extremely unlikely that the Joint Arab List would ever be invited into a Blue and White-led coalition.

Ironically, the greatest impact of Odeh’s dramatic announcement could actually be a boost to the Likud party.

Tourism Minister Yariv Levin told JNS that a potential alliance between Blue and White and the Arab parties may ultimately bring more votes to the Likud party, boosting Netanyahu’s chances of winning the election.

“Now it’s official and the truth has come to light,” said Levin. “Ayman Odeh’s declaration proves what we have been saying all along: Gantz and [Blue and White co-leader Yair Lapid] are planning to form a government with the Arab parties.”

Levin issued a warning to all voters: “A vote for Blue and White or a vote for Avigdor Lieberman’s Yisrael Beytenu party is a vote for Ayman Odeh as education minister and Ahmed Tibi for public security minister.”

Reprinted with permission from JNS.org.

August 27, 2019 | 21 Comments »

Leave a Reply

21 Comments / 21 Comments

  1. A brief biography of Benny Gantz

    Regardless of how the government will be formed in the coming days, Gantz has proven to be a formidable player in Israel’s political landscape.

    Benny Gantz
    Campaign advertisements for Benny Gantz, chairman of the Blue and White party outside a polling station in Jerusalem, April 9, 2019. (photo credit: BEN BRESKY)
    Regardless of how many votes his Blue and White party will gain once all the votes have been counted, political newcomer Benny Gantz will enter Israel’s parliament as part of the 21st Knesset.

    The former IDF chief of staff was born in Kfar Ahim, a moshav in central Israel his parents helped found. His mother was a Holocaust survivor from Hungary, and as chief of staff in 2013, Gantz participated in the March of the Living where he toured the Auschwitz death camp.
    His Romanian-born father was once arrested by the British authorities for trying to enter the Land of Israel during the pre-State British Mandate era.

    Gantz is a veteran of the 1982 Lebanon War and participated in Operation Solomon the covert airlift that rescued Ethiopian Jews in 1991. A decorated soldier, he served at the Israel Defense Forces top general from 2011 to February 2015 during which he oversaw Operation Pillar of Defense and Operation Protective Edge, both against Hamas forces in Gaza.

    The 59-year-old married father of four lives in Rosh HaAyin. He earned a history degree from Tel Aviv University, a Political Science masters degree from Haifa University and a National Resource Management master’s degree from the United States National Defense University.

    After his discharge, following 38 years in the IDF, Gantz entered the business sector, being appointed chairman of Fifth Dimension, an Israeli security-technology startup in 2015. The company folded in 2018. He also was involved in real estate company Amot Investments and Elron Electronic Industries.

    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been in office for a consecutive 10 years, but his staying power was rivaled by the political newcomer. Regardless of how the government will be formed in the coming days, Gantz has proven to be a formidable player in Israel’s political landscape.

    From April 10 2019 Jerusalem Post. Author Ben Bresky. No information about Ben Bresky’s background. Certainly reads to me like a puff piece for Gantz.

  2. Why can’t Israel kick public corruption? – Analysis

    All of them are, of course, innocent until proven guilty; however, such a lengthy list raises questions over how this can happen and how to prevent it.

    Israeli Supreme Court
    Israeli Supreme Court. (photo credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM/THE JERUSALEM POST)
    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Interior Minister and Shas leader Arye Deri, Deputy Health Minister and United Torah Judaism (UTJ) leader Ya’acov Litzman, Labor and Social Services Minister Haim Katz, Likud MK and former coalition chairman David Bitan, former general and political activist Gal Hirsch and a group of Jerusalem municipal officials are all facing corruption charges at the same time.

    The truth is that this list is not even complete, as others – such as former deputy minister and Yisrael Beytenu powerhouse Feina Kirschenbaum, and a variety of mayors and other government officials – are already facing trials.

    The above list is just the most recent officials who may end up on trial for corruption.

    All of them are, of course, innocent until proven guilty; however, such a lengthy list raises questions over how this can happen and how to prevent it.

    Let us not forget that former prime minister Ehud Olmert and several other former top Jerusalem municipal officials went to jail in the public corruption trial to end all trials.

    Considering the speed and volume of new public corruption scandals, one might think that Olmert was 20 years ago, enough time for a new generation of politicians to come in and forget about him. But, Olmert was only released from prison in July 2017.

    As for the local Jerusalem officials, good governance advocates that there is a chronic lack of checks, balances, boundaries and oversight of local officials.

    Latest articles from Jpost

    Top articles1/5READ MOREThree Palestinians killed in explosions in Gaza

    Even as recent years saw a string of public corruption convictions of Ramat Gan mayor Zvi Bar, Ramat Hasharon mayor Yitzhak Rochberger, Bat Yam mayor Shlomo Lahiani, Nof Hagalil (Upper Nazareth) mayor Shimon Gafsou and several others, activists say that most local corruption is never caught.

    On the national level, corruption is more complex as there is greater attention and oversight.

    Part of the answer likely lies in the fact that most of the above cases do not fit into the classic bribery and fraud box.

    Netanyahu is mainly accused of media bribery, not of receiving cash in envelopes in the blatant way that Olmert did.

    Litzman is accused of trying to help an alleged pedophile avoid extradition, not of being flown around the world by tycoons like Kirschenbaum.

    We do not yet know the full specifics in Deri’s case, but the charges have appeared to allege a complex tax avoidance scheme using a variety of family members. It is a bit closer to classic public corruption, but still some layers removed.

    In short, politicians did actually learn from Olmert. They learned that blatant bribery will be caught and will not be tolerated.

    However, many appear to have engaged in corruption nonetheless, only in more sophisticated ways.

    Many officials have also used their power in allegedly corrupt ways, which could mix in with the narrative of being valid uses of their powers to defeat some kind of unfairness.

    For example, Netanyahu said that his actions with media officials were to try to balance a media war against him that was unfair.

    Litzman is saying that all of his actions were taken to help constituents who were being bullied and treated unfairly.

    This does not apply to all of them, but shows that politicians are planning their power or financial moves to coincide with a sophisticated narrative which they can present to the public if necessary.

    How can we stop this more sophisticated public corruption in the future?

    No one has come up with a way to eliminate the scourge of corruption from the planet, but in September 2018, Yuval Feldman of the Israel Democracy Institute and Bar-Ilan University told The Jerusalem Post that “the law doesn’t understand how people make decisions. Typically, with a bribe, someone gets money and gets something in return from a public servant. Very few people would engage in such corrupt behavior.”

    However, “many more people would do things for someone – write something nice about them in a newspaper, invite them to a conference or give a gift” – especially if they “know them and feel like the person is a friend.

    “When everything is a criminal law approach,” he said, “it is a very problematic approach to most violations. Regulatory laws prevent gifts to public servants, but that is not enough.”

    Regarding a different strategy for penalties, he talked far more about administrative fines and frequency of enforcement than of using jail time and criminal law.

    He is convinced that the much broader and corrosive group that law enforcement should go after are those who give money to others in these questionable borderline situations. This is as opposed to targeting the smaller group of people looking for ways to directly get money in their own pockets illegally.

    Another answer is the public itself. Even if all of the above politicians are eventually found to be innocent, it has been stunning that none of them have faced any electoral consequences to date.

    If the public reelects politicians accused of corruption – or in Deri’s case, those who have already been sent to jail previously – why should politicians avoid it?

    New State Comptroller Matanyahu Englman is about to eliminate his office’s anti-corruption division with the support of the ruling political class.

    Most voters do not seem to care or may not even have noticed. Until voters make politicians pay for corruption charges, the political class is unlikely to be deterred.

    From August 6 Jerusalem Post. The author, Yonah Jeremy Bob, definitely wants Netanyahu out. He has been “covering” the Public Prosecutors case against Netanyahu for the Post for the past two years, consistently from the prosecutors point of view. He has another “revelation” from the prosecutor’s office today, August 28.

  3. @ Adam Dalgliesh:As I have had several writers and editors of the Post as friends during the years. I find your commentary not only wrong but offensive. It is a Zionist Publication first and last. It will print things from writers with various perspectives. It is a very good news organization. In fact from a broad based even handed news reporting the most objective of the Israeli English written papers.

    You’d think you were writing about some of the kookier leftist writers at HaAretz.

  4. The JP is not so much pro-Gantz as it is pro-Arab. It has repeatedly accused Israel of “racism” towards Arabs, and criticized it for failing to be sufficiently conciliatory towards the PLO and Hamas. It wants anti-Zionist Arabs in the government. It is hostile to “settlements” and “settlers.” Although they may not be especially enthusiastic about Gantz personally, they realize that only a Gantz-led leftist coalition at least might move toward these pro-Arab, anti-Zionist policies, And so they want Netanyahu, whom they think (perhaps incorrectly) to be anti-Arab out at all costs, and a leftist coalition that includes the Arabs to take his place. Since Gantz would have to be at least the nominal leader of this coalition, they much prefer him as Prime Minister to Netanyahu.

  5. Bear–I now think you were right and I was wrong that the Jerusalem Post has never explicitly endorsed Benny Gantz’s candidacy. And it has not been especially enthusiastic about him. But the Post did explicitly endorse including the Arab Joint List in the next government in an editorial published August 23. It also spefically endorsed, in that editorial, a similar endorsement by one of its columnists the day before (August 22). A day or two later, their columnist Jeff Barak, who is a former editor-in-Chief of the Jerusalem Post, also endorsed the inclusion of the Arab List (openly anti-Zionist) in the next government. The JP editorial also explicitly praised the “Democratic Union” for endorsing the inclusion of of the United List in the next government. And it noted that Netanyahu made it clear that he would never include the Arab list in any government that he and the Likud led. It pointed out that Yair Lapid said he was open to the inclusion of the Ayman Odeh faction of the United List . This all adds up to a backhanded endorsement of a Gantz Prime Ministership, since everyone knows that the Arab parties will never serve in a Likud government, but might serve in a Blue and White led government.

    Just today, the Jerusalem Post published an opinion piece titled “An Open Letter to Benny Gantz,” appealing to him to accept Ayman Odeh’s offer to join a Blue and White government in order to “banish” Likud and the haredi parties from the government “forever.” In view of the preceding editorials and opinion pieces of the past week, any reasonable reader to conclude that the JP editors wanted Netanyahu to lose the election, and a leftist coalition headed by Gantz to win.

    Other evidence for the Post’s desire to defeat Netanyahu at all costs is an “analysis” of the prosecution case against Netanyahu by Yonah Jeremy Bob, claiming that what a former aid to Netanyahu has prosecutors has “sealed his fate.” Bob’s summary of what this potential witness has allegedly told prosecutors didn’t sound very incriminating to me. Please check out the Bob “analysis” and give me your opinion of it, Bear.

    Then there was an edirial earlier this month in the JP, ( I think it was August 9) entitled “The Problem of Corruption in Israel) (I can’t recall the exact title, but the word “Corruption” was definitely part of the headline), accusing Bibi and at least three other ministers in his government of corruption, and arguing that it was urgent that Israel’s government be cleansed of corruption. One would have to be dense not to see this as an appeal to vote Bibi, Likud, and the haredi parties (whom the editorial also accused of corruption) out of office.

    All this amounts to a back-handed endorsement of Gantz as Prime Minister, if only because he won’t include Netanyahu and Likud in his government, is unlikely to include the haredi parties,and is open to including Meretz and possibly the Arab anti_Zionist parties. The JPs election preference is ABN (Anybody but Netanyahu).

  6. Reporting on the Blue/White by the Chief Political Correspondent of the Post. Sounds like reporting and not endorsement. Certainly not positive news. Perhaps someone who is a Blue/White voter will blow the article out of proportion and say the Post has a conspiracy against Blue/White

    Political Affairs: Are Benny Gantz’s gaffes getting to Blue and White?
    How the final two weeks go will determine the fate of the election and the party that, despite all its missteps, could still win it.

    By Gil Hoffman
    August 23, 2019 00:4

    The questioning of Gantz’s judgment by MKs in his party followed a series of gaffes that also made them ponder his ability to serve as a viable candidate for prime minister.

    There was his interview on Tisha Be’av, in which he spoke openly about a rotation in the Prime Minister’s Office with Netanyahu. That interview put in question his denial that he had heard a question a few days earlier about joining a Netanyahu-led government.

    The first time, he blamed it on his “M-16 ear” that was damaged by noise from gunfire during his long career in the IDF. The second time, there was no gun to protect him.

    Gantz forgot the name of murdered soldier Dvir Sorek, which will likely make its way into the Likud’s election ads, just like
    Gantz’s almost too-unbelievable-to-be true statement during a Blue and White faction meeting that “the public is stupid.”

    Whether or not the public is stupid, Blue and White voters are very forgiving.

    After all those gaffes and after this week of such press, the polls found that Blue and White stayed consistent with 30 mandates, just one less than Likud.

    https://www.jpost.com/Israel-Elections/Are-Gantzs-gaffes-getting-to-Blue-and-White-599418

  7. @ Adam Dalgliesh:
    One of the longtime writers at the Post Herb Kenion wrote this article below sticking up for Bibi. If the Post had a conspiracy against Bibi it would not be allowed in the publication. Then that claim is is simply not true.

    Netanyahu – damned for bad ties with Obama, damned for good ties with Trump
    A good healthy relationship with the president was necessary for a good, strong Israel-US relationship. When that was lacking, all was – the doomsayers said – on the verge of collapse.
    By Herb Keinon

    Putting it mildly, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and then US president Barack Obama had a difficult relationship.

    Obama was on the Left, Netanyahu on the Right. They saw the world through very different lenses and disagreed fundamentally both about Iran and the Palestinians. As a result, there were constant fights, name-calling, leaks, and an altogether dysfunctional relationship, as one pundit after the next explained it.

    Each new disagreement – over the settlements, over the stymied peace process, over the Iran nuclear deal, over Netanyahu’s speech to the US Congress – gave birth to overheated headlines that the entire US-Israel relationship was on the verge of collapse. It was as if Netanyahu’s difficult relationship with Obama meant that the entire Israel-US relationship was about to go down the drain.

    A good, healthy relationship with the president, this argument ran, was necessary for a good, strong Israel-US relationship. When that was lacking, everything – all the doomsayers said – was on the verge of collapse.

    Fast forward a few years, and now Netanyahu has the best relationship an Israeli prime minister has ever had with a US president. Ever. So what do the headlines morph into? The US-Israel relationship is on the verge of collapse because of the strength of that relationship – that relationship is too good.

    Netanyahu, and by extension Israel, were damned when they had a difficult relationship with the US president, and now Netanyahu, and by extension Israel, is damned for enjoying a good relationship with the US president.

    Three days after Israel decided to bar US representatives Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib from entering the country because of their BDS advocacy, three days after hyperventilated headlines and over-dramatic tweets, it is time for everybody to sit back and relax. This too will pass.

    https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Netanyahu-Damned-for-bad-ties-with-Obama-damned-for-good-ties-with-Trump-599014

  8. @ Adam Dalgliesh:So I do not see you meeting the challenge of where the Post endorsed the Blue/White or endorsing a coalition with the Blue/White and Arab parties.

    I read the Post on a regular basis for decades and they report both positive and negative things about the Likud and Bibi. I think you are groping to validate your positions. Then everyone is entitled to their position, and you certainly have that right. In this case I do not even remotely share it.

    I enjoy many of their writers and the editors.

  9. @ Bear Klein: Even if we assume that Mideast Monitor’s quotations are accurate, you should notice that they are non-denial denials. Ashkenazi is not the party’s leader and cannot speak for the Blue and White coalition as a whole. He speaks only for himself and maybe one colleague.. Lapid said he he would rule out serving with the Balad party, but not with the other parties on the United List, who except the leadership of Ayman Odeh, who proposed a coalition with Blue and White. A desire to form a coalition with only the mor “Moderate” wing of the Arab coalition (which is still anti-Zionist and anti-Israel) is hardly a denial that Lapid and his colleagures want to include the ‘Moderate” anti-Zionist Arabs, who include the Communists and relatively moderate Islamists, in their future government.

  10. @ Bear Klein: Middle East monitor is a pro-Arab and anti-Israel newspaper like Haaretz. Like Haaretz, written mainly by pro-PLO, pro-Hamas Israeli Jews. There are a lot of these intellectual-moral traitors (I call them “vipers”) among the Israeli intellectual-journalistic set. They put England’s pre-World War II Clivden Set to shame by the extent of their willingness to collaborate with their country’s enemies.

    In any case, I wouldn’t take for granted that anything you read in Mideast Monistor is true.
    @ Bear Klein:

  11. @ Bear Klein:

    SHAKED DENIES TIES TO NETANYAHU IMMUNITY SCANDAL

    From today’s Jerusalem Post. A typical example of the Post’s biased coverage of Netanyahu, Shaked and other right-of-center politicians. The supposed “scandal” is a report in Haaretz that Shaked “pimped” herself to Netanyahu by promising that she could “control” Attorney General Mandelblit, and arrange for him not to prosecute Netanyahu if he reappointed her Justice Minister. Of course Netanyahu and Shaked immediately denied it. The JP offered no evidence that such a “scandal” ever occurred, except for a claim that the leftist parties “are taking the allegation very seriously” and are protesting outside Mandelblit’s house demanding he take action against Netanyahu(they’ve been holding these demonstrations for months in any case).

    In other words, there is no “scandal,” only an unspupported claim that there is a scandal by a newspaper noted for its anti-Israel, pro-PLO and pro-Hamas reporting. Yet the JP, which clearly knows better, calls this unfounded accusation a “scandal.” Plain evidence of extreme bias.@ Bear Klein:

  12. @ Adam Dalgliesh:
    I challenge you to back up your claim that the Jerusalem Post has endorsed the Blue & White. Please show me a quote from the editor or paper with a link. They have NOT endorsed anyone.

    I also challenge your claim that Jerusalem Post is advocating for a coalition with the Arab List? Kindly find a quote from the editor or something with the paper endorsing this and a link.

    They have writers who span the whole gambit of political views. Perhaps you are confusing the view of a writer with that of the publication?

  13. I am not a fan of Blue/White or Gantz but saying they will sit with the Arab Joint List is not accurate.

    Lapid also said that Blue and White could not sit with Odeh’s Hadash party while it formed part of an alliance which includes Balad, a Palestinian nationalist faction of the Joint List alliance. “[Balad] is a group of Israel haters who do not recognize the Jewish State,” Lapid said of the party.

    Though Gantz did not rebuke Odeh’s overtures directly, just a day later he vowed only to sit in government with “Jewish and Zionist” allies, effectively ruling out the prospect of any cooperation with the Joint List.

    https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20190822-israel-election-joint-list-head-says-willing-to-join-gantz-government-is-quickly-rebuked/

  14. @ Adam Dalgliesh:
    I think you are wrong. Immediately after Oded floated his trial balloon the Blue & White said this was not going to happen.

    Odeh willing to enter coalition with Gantz, Ashkenazi rules it out
    “We will not invite a party that does not recognize Israel as a Jewish state,” Ashkenazi told Army Radio.
    By Gil Hoffman
    August 23, 2019 04:35

    MK Aida Touma-Sliman, who is second behind Odeh in the Hadash party, also countered Odeh’s comments, tweeting: “I invite all those who got excited over what was published in Yediot Aharonot to calm down, there is no change in our stance. We will not sit in a government of occupation, wars and racism. Our terms do not exist in the current political map. Blue and White declare they aspire for a right-wing government with Likud, and have signed a surplus vote agreement with [Avigdor] Liberman.”

    Blue and White’s No. 4 candidate, former chief of staff Gabi Ashkenazi, said on Thursday that his party would not invite the Joint Arab List into a coalition.

    “We will not invite a party that does not recognize Israel as a Jewish state,” Ashkenazi told Army Radio.

    https://www.jpost.com/Breaking-News/Gabi-Ashkenazi-rules-out-coalition-with-Ayman-Odeh-599365

  15. @ Bear Klein: Bear,The Jerusalem Post hates Netanyahu and is constantly dumping filth on him. Their reporter Yonah Jeremy Bob is constantly reporting leaks from the state prosecutors office , with all sorts of allegations against Netanyahu and numerous other Likud and other right-wing politicians serving in the government. Their is never any criticism of these leaks and rarely any replies from the accused or their supporters. The anti-Netanyahu, anti-Likud, and anti-right bias is or should be obvious.

    They have also enthusiastically praised Benny Gantz and have endorsed his candidacy for Prime Minister.

    THey even published an article by their long-time security reporter Yossi Melman calling on the Shin Bet or the Mossad to “remove” Netanyahu. How they could do that wasn’t specified. But given these organizations training and work experience, I don’t see how they could accomplish this except by assassination.

    The quotation in Mr. Lipman’s article from Gantz seems to me to be a “non-denial denial.” He says that Blue-White is “calling for” a unity government with “anyone who is sane and a Zionist.” He did not say he wasn’t open to other options if such a unity government could not be formed. And since he has said that his party would not join a coalition headed by Netanyahu, as has Leiberman, the chances of forming such a unity government are slim. As is usual with Gantz, one can only tell what his plans are from what he does notsay.

    I think Lipman is probably correct that the push for including the United Arab list in the government, obviously a trial balloon by Blue and White using their informal spokesmen at JP, will help Netanyahu and the rightist parties generally in the election.

  16. Odeh also attacked Gantz for rejecting his offer to have the Joint List join him in a coalition, saying Gantz has not yet fully formed his ideology and was helping keep the Arab population from political power.

    Members of Blue and White have mostly dismissed Odeh’s offer, noting the inclusion of the anti-Zionist Balad faction within the Joint List, and attempted to distance themselves from being seen as allied with the Arab party.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/joint-list-head-unity-government-would-make-me-first-arab-opposition-leader/

  17. @ Adam Dalgliesh:Could you be confusing the Times of Israel (TOI) and the Jerusalem Post (Jpost)?

    Horowitz the editor/publisher of the TOI is leftist and criticized the Blue & White for ruling out the possibility of including the Joint List in a coalition.

    The Blue White keeps saying they will be in a coalition with the Likud.

  18. @ Adam Dalgliesh:I do not view JPOST as leftist. In my view they report on all political spectrum’s and may be lean to right of center. They try and report as news reporters not partisans for the most part.

    Do more research Gantz and Lapid have commented on having the Joint List in their coalition and are against it. So have many others in their party. Dig back about one week in your research if you decide to do it. You must have missed it. I believe Lapid was the first to jump on this as opposed.

  19. The Jerusalem Post has launched a campaign to include the anti-Israel, anti-Zionist United Arab List in the next government, to be led by Gantz and Lapid. Since the JP is only a mouthpiece for the leftist parties, they are obviously behind this push, and want to include the Arab anti-Zionists in their government, in order to gain a majority. This is a very sinister and menacing development that should be reported and discussed on Israpundit. Bear and Edgar, it is exactly what I predicted.

    A few Knesset candidates running on the Gantz branch of the Blue and White alliance have claimed that the party won’t enter into an alliance with the anti-Zionist Arabs. But Gantz and Lapid havebeen absolutely silent on the matter. And the thing about Gantz is that one can only infer what his actually agenda is by what he does not say, not by what he does say. This is in itself a very sinister characteristic in a politician, who should share with the public his program and intentions.

  20. If the Arab parties do not accept Israel as a Jewish and democratic state as Yaalon says how are they not banned by the Supreme Court in violation of Law 7b, like Ben Ari, Merzel, Gopshtein, and the Kach party?