32 min read
I am going to refrain from saying too much about mine and Sidney’s relationship. For one thing, over time it became something like I was working for her, helping her get answers to questions. Then, if I recall correctly, she became my lawyer. Whichever it was, in time the relationship became something for which privilege surely applies. One cannot selectively waive privilege, and just share things one wants to share while claiming “privilege” on the others. I know that. But what I can say is that our relationship started with me walking in off the street as a volunteer with information, and so I can talk about that phase of the relationship, but in time it became formal enough I will not be able to say more.Mayor Giuliani, however, never became my lawyer, and I will not be so constrained in my accounts, as my ultimate purpose (my only real purpose), is to deliver to the public as honest a rendering as I may construct of the events between November 3 and January 6. It seems like a historically worthy thing to do.
Gen. Flynn just confirmed Byrne’s story on his Clouthub acct. Yesterday he wrote, “When this MUST READ story is told in full, it will be an international bestseller (I believe not the author’s intent) but instead the story will be a means to an end to reveal a vital piece of American history, the outcome of which is still unfolding (or unraveling), you decide.”
Also Garret Ziegler(a mid-level staffer from the Trump White House and ardent supporter of Trump) seems to confirm the gist of Byrne’s story on his Telegram acct two days ago as he wrote “In response to a very astute question on this thread: I wouldn’t say Trvmp ignored the few of us who were telling him to “Cross the Rubicon.” He heard us out. It was that he continued — and continues, given his meeting with McCarthy — to listen to those who told him not to. It’s a travesty…”
@ Michael S:
Hi Michael,
A very appropriate analogy, I think. How unfortunate for us all.
@ Edgar G.:
Hi Edgar,
I have,over the past several months(since mid-October), been following Byrne and have watched or listened to every interview he has conducted(and there were a lot of them). He has told this story in those many interviews, pieces at time so as to not overwhelm the public with too much(“devouring an elephant in many small bites”). Also he was, to some extent, held back due to legal considerations with respect to the cases being brought in defence of Trump. In these interviews, much of what he exposes here is discussed in much less detail. He did not, for instance, discuss the alcohol issues with Giuliani or the spies and listening devices that were found in their command center or the conflicting sense of disorder and lack of structure (which is quite concerning). But he did tell much of the content of the story displayed here in broad strokes, so to speak. He is, from what I have seen, fairly unassuming and very patriotic (though from a more non-partisan perspective), but he was, for all his efforts, cut out of the support of the President as was Powell and Flynn. He spent a large amount of his own finances(paying for lodging and transportation for much of the team he assembled) in pursuit of a just election outcome which was, unfortunately(for all of us), denied And he is convinced, from his interviews, that the President did himself and the country a great disservice by not pursuing the forensic review of the ballots under the authority of the Executive Order 13858. Byrne saw this as a deeply personal blow, seeing that he describes himself as a constitutionalist, meaning the constitution is his religion(his explanation).
On a side note, Byrne has had a much larger role over the years in fighting the Deep State. He forsaw the 2008 financial crash and was involved in the early stages of what became the Russia Hoax. He describes these elswhere on his website, Deepcapture.com. It is an interesting tale.
Regarding the “Perils of Pauline” analogy, Byrne uses the sense of dramatic unvailing to try to become a point of discussion among people. He referenced this in an inverview with Tracy Beanz. He saw it as a way to increase the exposure of his story to the general public who did not actually hear the inverviews he was giving – and thereby evade the descending curtain of censorship that is now almost everywhere.
@ peloni1986:
The Trump legal team seems to resemble “The Three Stooges Meet Abbot and Costello”. It’s highly believable. Or as the nursery rhyme goes, “All the king’s horses and all the king’s men couldn’t put [America] together again”.
Meanwhile, we have locusts:
https://youtu.be/rbHR7wzyhIo
peloni1986 Said:
Me too…but I CAN believe it. The results have all the earmarks of the description in the article. I DO think that since he was very scathing of Giuliani’s competence, he could have also denounced (because that’s what he did re Giuliani) The “Mediocrity who should, if the account is correct, never be allowed into any position of trust or confidence. This has a feeling of a serial like “Superman”…. since he stopped at a vital and intriguing point where he and the General ar going to see Trump by whatever means neccessary. I look forward to the next installment, as if following “The Perils of Pauline” which often left her hangingover acliff, or bound across a railroad track with the engine almost over her.
Which is why I’m not sure I believe althogther, the story, it seems to lead to a staged effect, not a good match for the patriot he represents himself to be. I mean Patrick Byrne. He seems not above self-interest in forwarding his reputation and later situation..
WOW!!! I am lost for word to express the horror and dismay described in this article. I can’t believe it. I just can’t.