Historians Trampling History (in Gaza)

Peloni:  This is a timely and important article.  Please read and share this outrage with others.

by Rafael Medoff

Since there isn’t any evidence to prove Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, what’s the next best thing? Invent a new kind of “cide” and see how many scholars are gullible enough, or malevolent enough, to go along with it.

That, it seems, is the strategy of former PLO official Karma Nabulsi, who recently invented the term “scholasticide” to describe damage Israel has caused to college campuses in Gaza. From 1977 to 1990, Nabulsi was an official representative of a terrorist organization that murdered or maimed countless Israelis (and many Americans), and sought Israel’s destruction. Now she teaches at the University of Oxford.

Nabulsi’s strategy is working. By a vote of 428 to 88, members of the American Historical Association last week adopted a resolution accusing Israel of committing “scholasticide” through an “intentional effort” to damage universities and other schools and thereby “obliterate Gaza’s educational system.”

There is not a stitch of evidence demonstrating any such intent by the Israelis. Lack of evidence ordinarily would stop an historian dead in his or her tracks. But in this case, the facts, sources, and standards upon which historians ordinarily rely were thrown out the window. By a large majority, those who are supposed to be the gatekeepers of the historical record have embraced a libel.

The damage to college campuses in Gaza is not the result of an Israeli plot. It’s the result of Hamas using those campuses as operational centers for terrorism and storehouses for weapons.

In November 2023, Israeli soldiers found weapons and other terrorist equipment in Gaza’s Al-Quds University. The following month, Israeli forces discovered explosives and rockets in Al-Azhar University, in northern Gaza, as well as a half mile-long tunnel under the university’s yard. The site resembled “a military base,” a sergeant told the New York Times; only “if you look closely, you can see it’s a university.” In January, troops searching the campus of Islamic University, in Khan Younis, discovered hundreds of mortars, explosive devices, grenades, AK-47 assault rifles, ammunition, Hamas flags, and safes stuffed with cash in the classrooms.

In February, Israeli troops found a tunnel underneath Israa University, in Zahra City. In June, they discovered quantities of weapons on the campus of the University College of Applied Sciences, in central Gaza; the army said Hamas used the college “as a command and control center.” Soon after that, terrorists in a building at Islamic University launched anti-tank missiles at Israeli forces.

None of that information is mentioned in the AHA resolution. In fact, Hamas itself is never mentioned. That’s like describing World War II without mentioning Nazi Germany.

The hypocrisy of the accusers is egregious. While these historians denounce Israel, they have said nothing when Israeli universities have been victimized by genocidal terrorists.

Sapir Academic College, the largest public college in Israel, is just a few miles from the Gaza border. The only thing saving it from mass bloodshed during the Hamas invasion of October 7, 2023, was that the campus was closed and nearly empty because of the Simchat Torah holiday. Nonetheless, terrorists cut through its fences and shot at the guard booths and buildings.

Dozens of Sapir faculty members, students and staff who reside near the campus were murdered, wounded, or kidnapped. Some are still being held hostage in Gaza. Yet the AHA has not protested.

More than 1,000 Sapir students and nearly 300 staff members and their families became refugees. The AHA has said nothing about them.

That was not the first Palestinian Arab violence against Israeli universities. In 2002, terrorists bombed the Hebrew University campus, in Jerusalem, killing nine—five of them Americans—and wounding more than 100. A previous bombing at Hebrew University, in 1969, left thirty-six students injured. The AHA said nothing about either of those attacks.

History shows that victims of aggression have sometimes damaged university campuses in the course of defending themselves, as in World War II. The Allies’ bombing of Hamburg in July 1943 caused major damage to the University of Hamburg. Allied bombers destroyed the main building on the campus of Munich’s Ludwig Maximillian University in July 1944. Allied strikes on Bonn in October 1944 completely destroyed the main building at the University of Bonn. More than three-fourths of the buildings of the Technical University of Aachen were leveled in that month’s bombings as well. The University of Greifswald was so badly damaged by the Allies that it had to be rebuilt on a different site. The University of Rostock’s medical clinic, dermatological clinic, and hygiene institute were completely destroyed in Allied bombings, and additional buildings were badly damaged.

The proceedings of the AHA’s annual meetings during World War II do not mention any resolutions condemning President Franklin D. Roosevelt or Prime Minister Winston Churchill for damaging German universities. One wonders if the current generation of AHA members would have viewed those events differently. Would they have pointed an accusing finger at the Allies, just as they now unjustly heap blame on Israel? Would they have branded FDR and Churchill guilty of “scholasticide” ?

Unless the AHA leadership intervenes, the “scholasticide” resolution will soon go to the association’s full membership for ratification. If adopted, the new official position of the AHA would contravene its own mission statement. Instead of “promoting historical work and historical thinking in public life,” the AHA would be on record as discarding historical thinking in favor of extremist political posturing.

According to the AHA’s by-laws, however, its leaders could step in and veto the resolution. To preserve the association’s credibility and to remain true to its mission, they should do so.


As published in the Jewish Journal of Los Angeles – January 9, 2025

Dr. Medoff, a member of the American Historical Association for more than four decades, is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and author of more than 20 books about Jewish history and the Holocaust. His book The Road to October 7: Hamas, the Holocaust, and the Eternal War Against the Jews will be published on October 1, 2025, by The Jewish Publication Society / University of Nebraska Press.

 

January 12, 2025 | 3 Comments »

Leave a Reply

3 Comments / 3 Comments

  1. Extremely informative and timely article by Raphael Medoff. The complicity of academic institutions and their faculties in the false and libelousl blaming of Israel for the aggressive wars and terrorist campaigns waged against it ever since 1947-48, is one of the most disgraceful aspects of the persecution of Israel by the “international community” ever since then.

    As for the “historians,” both academic and non-academic, who blame Israel for the agressive wars waged against it, inmy opinion they are war criminals. In unrelated cases, the International Criminal Court has ruled that inciting terrosim and genocide is a war crime.

  2. “Would they have pointed an accusing finger at the Allies, just as they now unjustly heap blame on Israel?”
    Candace Owens did, said the Allies were worse than the Nazis. She would have justly spent the rest of the war in prison like pacifist agent provacateurs did in both World Wars, including A.J.Muste who would go on to found the War Resister’s League which played a role in the U.S. losing future wars after the Supreme Court declawed the Alien Registration Act of 1940 in the late 50s and civil disobedience over Jim Crow became legitimized over anything and everything.

    The end result of this will be to effectively remove genocide from the dictionary as they already have, Nazi, Holocaust, antisemitism which is what the enemy fifth column wants.

  3. Would they have pointed an accusing finger at the Allies, just as they now unjustly heap blame on Israel?

    Candace Owens did, said the Allies were worse than the Nazis. She would have justly spent the rest of the war in prison like pacifist agent provacateurs did in both World Wars, including A.J.Muste who would go on to found the War Resister’s League which played a role in the U.S. losing future wars after the Supreme Court declawed the Alien Registration Act of 1940 in the late 50s and civil disobedience over Jim Crow became legitimized over anything and everything.

    The end result of this will to effectively remove genocide from the dictionary by making it meaningless as they already have Nazi, Holocaust, antisemitism, democracy, which is what the enemy wants.

    “The words democracy, socialism, freedom, patriotic, realistic, justice have each of them several different meanings which cannot be reconciled with one another. In the case of a word like democracy, not only is there no agreed definition, but the attempt to make one is resisted from all sides. It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it: consequently the defenders of every kind of regime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using that word if it were tied down to any one meaning. Words of this kind are often used in a consciously dishonest way. That is, the person who uses them has his own private definition, but allows his hearer to think he means something quite different. Statements like Marshal Petain was a true patriot, The Soviet press is the freest in the world, The Catholic Church is opposed to persecution, are almost always made with intent to deceive. Other words used in variable meanings, in most cases more or less dishonestly, are: class, totalitarian, science, progressive, reactionary, bourgeois, equality.”
    – Politics and the English Language
    – George Orwell

    https://www.orwell.ru/library/essays/politics/english/e_polit