by Kelen McBreen, INFOWARS November 5th 2020, 5:10 pm
The Trump card of bringing down the house of cards.
Infowars guest and intelligence expert Steve Pieczenik broke bombshell news during Thursday’s broadcast of War Room with Owen Shroyer.
According to Pieczenik, President Trump assumed Democrat tomfoolery would be needed to prevent him from securing a second term via the 2020 election.
In order to ensure the election remained fair, POTUS devised an advanced trap.
Hidden, trackable watermarks were allegedly put onto ballots so they could be verified if necessary.
“This is really a sting operation, contrary to what everyone else said,” Pieczenik explained. “We watermarked every ballot with QFS blockchain encryption code. In other words, we know pretty well where every ballot is, where it went and who has it, so this is not a stolen election.”
Steve also said President Trump has been out of the spotlight of the media over the past few days in order to let the Deep State dig its own grave, politically.
Upon investigating QFS blockchain technology, Infowars found an application for a patent filed by the United States Postal Service on February 7, 2020 which involved blockchain tracking tech embedded into mail-in ballots.
The patent describes, “A voting system that can use the security of blockchain and the mail to provide a reliable voting system. A registered voter receives a computer readable code in the mail and confirms identity and confirms correct ballot information in an election. The system separates voter identification and votes to ensure vote anonymity, and stores votes on a distributed ledger in a blockchain.”
The patent application includes illustrations showing exactly how blockchain technology would keep votes secure and traceable.
“Voters generally wish to be able to vote for elected officials or on other issues in a manner that is convenient and secure,” the patent states. “Further, those holding elections wish to be able to ensure that election results have not been tampered with and that the results actually correspond to the votes that were cast. In some embodiments, a blockchain allows the tracking of the various types of necessary data in a way that is secure and allows others to easily confirm that data has not been altered”.
Providing further credit to allegations of sophisticated ballot tracking technology is a page on America’s Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency website that displays a graphic showing watermarks are used on election ballots.
Under the “safeguards” section, the site explains, “Most ballots have proprietary style codes, such as timing marks, code channels, or QR codes. If the codes are not recognized by the voting machines, the ballot is rejected, and an election official manually reviews it.”
The agency also confirms, “Some ballots have watermarks indicating that the ballot is authentic. Watermarks are specific to each election and confirm the ballot was printed by an approved printing authority.”
Another indication the watermark theory could be true is an Executive Order President Trump signed in 2018 that allowed DHS to work with election officials in all 50 states and over 1,000 local jurisdictions to secure election systems.
In June, POTUS was already wary of a Democrat election-theft scheme, tweeting out in all caps, “RIGGED 2020 ELECTION: MILLIONS OF MAIL-IN BALLOTS WILL BE PRINTED BY FOREIGN COUNTRIES, AND OTHERS. IT WILL BE THE SCANDAL OF OUR TIMES.”
If this plays out the way Pieczenik has described, the nation could be in store for the most illuminating revelation of corruption in its history.
It is false:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/quantum-blockchain-watermark-vote/
The explanation is very detailed but, basically, a sting operation with watermarks would be an impossible feat for the federal government because each jurisdiction prints its own ballots using private printers and own watermarks, there are 10,000 (ten thousand) jurisdictions, and the federal government doesn’t print ballots.
@ stevenl:
I don’t believe I suggested anything like that of Republicans, but towards the Democrats. The “Steve” I mentioned was that guy who gave the “break” to InfoWars112.
@ Edgar G.:
Very unlikely that repub would get rid of ballots. Most probably in blue cities by corrupt individuals.
Fun but apt movie can now be streamed on Amazon Prime Video: Man of the Year” (2006) Robin Willams. A comedian who hosts a news satire program decides to run for president, and a computerized voting machine malfunction gets him elected.
@ Edgar G.:
This guy Steve has a very dubious background. Been involved in lots of government stuff and also has had much of the qualifications he claims disputed…
I read that the Dept of Homeland Security printed all the legitimate ballots.. How true, I don’t know. But it seems natural that Trump would suspect something and have a hallmark or some identifying code imprinted or concealed. He’s a very astute fella. But why would it all be concealed until this Steve fellow “exposed” it on…of all places…INFOWARS…. We have to wait and see. I’ve also read that every local voting station has the means of identifying a legit ballot.
But, of course with so many crooked guys working a them in the important states, it seems logical hat they would identify Trump ballots and destroy them, replacing them with fake Biden ones and passing them into the whole pile, so that they would be difficult to isolate.
I’m just letting my speculative mind meander around the situation. Anything is possible in this messed up stew.
Edgar G. Said:
When I say “Mr. Reeder” I don’t mean the silly, poorly cast TV show…I mean the character in the Edgar Wallace books, a quite different personage. They are classics of their kind.
e@ Adam Dalgliesh:
If your report from InfoW ars is correct(I highly doubt anything from InfoWars) it does not only provide a “pathway”…(what a luke-warm term to use) but a complete upheaval of the voting system, and most likely a complete recounting of ALL te ballots. But…what happens to the LEGAL ballots, many of which were undoubtedly dumped in the garbage or destroyed by rabid Democrats. Likely if a complete recount is ordered (by whom-the supreme court??) enough genuine ballots would be found to give the proper outcome .
But…….InfoWars…….a sole reporter of a rabid Conspiracy Outlet……??
@ Adam Dalgliesh:
Adam,
This election is like a compost bin, and I haven’t been troubling myself to destinguish the smell of the rotten onions, the old fish and the week-old linguini. It all just stinks. Here’s one I think Cashill missed:
“A federal lawsuit filed on Oct. 19 noted that Facebook billionaire Mark Zuckerberg provided the funds to double the number of polling places in Philadelphia and that he is also paying for judges to oversee ballot counting.
Votebook: Turns out that Mark Zuckerberg has a heavy hand it what is transpiring in Philadelphia. / C-SPAN
The suit, filed in U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania, highlights how a grant for $10 million from the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) explicitly requires the City of Philadelphia open no fewer than 800 new polling places – and failing to do so may require the City to forfeit the grant money. The funding from Zuckerberg also pays for judges to oversee ballot counts and the outcome of disputes that arise regarding the eligibility of ballots in the election.”
— https://www.worldtribune.com/facebooks-zuckerberg-funding-election-judges-in-pennsylvania-what-could-go-wrong/
Just for the record, I humbly accept the election of Zuckerberg’s pet bull’s pet crocodile as the 46th President of the United States (he wishes). Maybe if that gets tweeted and re-tweeted enough, we will get a croc of bull in the oval office.
…or maybe the SCOTUS will decide that we should follow the US Constitution, and only count ballots legitimately counted.
It’s the sort of thing that Trump should have, might have , thought about, and maybe had it done. ( I HOPE HE DID) But…with the massive corruption riddling the whole country how could he have fixed it so that nobody knew about it, …except this ONE special reporter associated wit INFOWARS..They are a mashuggena Conspiracy outlet, that guy Alex Jones is half nuts.
How could Trump have obtained control of all the legal ballot printing in the country. I would assume-without actually knowing- that each state has it’s pwn…of is it a solely Federal monopoly… Someone out here please answer this question.
If I’d been in Trump’s position I’d have done just that…I have a criminal TYPE (only) mind set. and think of all possibilities, when faced with complex situations. This would have been a “given” for me.
I don’t want anyone (I’m looking at you Sebastien) o ask me “when did I get out this time, and wasn’t it about time I turned honest”….No Joking allowed on this matter….. except by ME….!! Mr. Reeder Redidivus…!
If this report from InfoWars is accurate, it might just provide a pathway to challenging the election results.IBut only if some DA or court subpoenas thes (possible or supposed) records, and the post office the agrees to hand them over. “Possible, but not probable. But possible.” as Ronald Reagan’s Secretary of the Treasury once memorably said, when asked by congressmen whether it was possible that the Federal government’s budget could be balanced that year.
@ Adam Dalgliesh:
Milwaukee is COMPLETELY Democrat. I don’t think any official there is impressed by something in American Thinker.
This is from Jack Cashill, a first-class investigative reporter, in American Thinker:
“Milwaukee Officials Have Some Explaining to Do
A rumor circulated widely that more people voted in Wisconsin than were registered. Although not true, it strikes me as an honest mistake. The originator of the rumor was looking at the registration numbers for 2018. More people did vote in Wisconsin in 2020 than were registered in 2018.
The real numbers are almost as incredible. In 2020, an astounding 88 percent of those registered to vote seem to have voted. In Ohio, another battleground state, the turnout was a much more typical 68 percent. The highest voter turnout in recent years nationwide was 61.6 percent in 2008. In 2012, the last year for which data are readily available for Wisconsin, the turnout was 65 percent.
If the Wisconsin average was 88 percent statewide, some parts of the state obviously had to have higher numbers. In this regard, the City of Milwaukee is suspect, and not all of Milwaukee, either. Contrary to expectation, in many of the wards with the heaviest concentration of black American voters, the turnout was relatively light. Joe Biden was no Barack Obama, but more on this in a minute.
As a caution, let me call this a work in progress. I am looking at a ward-by-ward spreadsheet that strikes me as a legitimate. Those who know Milwaukee better than I should feel free to contact me through American Thinker.
The most striking feature of the data is a fact that cries out for clarification: in seven wards, voter turnout appears to have exceeded 100 percent. In two of those wards, turnout exceeded 200 percent. In another 15 wards, voter turnout exceeded 95 percent. Joe Biden carried 21 of the 22 wards of the 95-plus-percent wards. But then again, he carried all but one of the 67 additional wards in which the turnout was above 90 percent and won 80 percent of the vote citywide.
In 25 wards, Biden received 97 percent or more of the vote, none higher than 98 percent. Based on exit polls, it is highly likely that these were overwhelmingly black districts. No other demographic could produce those numbers.
One suspects that Democratic operatives could not afford a repeat of Philadelphia 2012, when Barack Obama received 100 percent of the votes in 59 voting districts. They know that Trump is no Mitt Romney (thank God!). Here is how PolitiFact tried to cover for this apparent fraud:
For Pennsylvania, the meme reads, “In 59 voting districts in the Philadelphia region, Obama received 100% of the votes, with not even a single vote recorded for Romney. (A mathematical and statistical impossibility.)” This kind of happened, and it’s not actually mathematically impossible.
These fact-checkers do not know how foolish they sound. Barack Obama outscored Romney by a combined 19,605 to 0 votes cast in these 59 districts. Fidel Castro never did this well. That said, not a single major media outlet followed up on the Philadelphia story.
They should have. According to Roper, Romney received 6 percent of the black vote nationwide. If those numbers held in Philadelphia, and there is no reason to believe they would not have, nearly 1,200 of these Philadelphia voters would have voted for Romney.
If only 14 people voted in those districts, the odds would have favored Romney’s receiving at least one vote. If 80 people had voted, Romney would have had a better than 99 percent chance of receiving at least one of those votes. With nearly 20,000 voters, the odds of Romney being completely shut out are beyond any reasonable calculation.
According to exit polls, Trump doubled Romney’s vote totals among black Americans to 12 percent. To subtract all of his votes would have been too obvious. Interestingly, in every one of these 97- to 98-percent wards, voter turnout was below the statewide average. This suggests that if there were any mischief, it was of the traditional, small-scale kind.
Wisconsin has known voter fraud before but never on this scale. According to the MacIver Institute, a Wisconsin free-market think-tank, nearly 4,000 cases of likely voter fraud were recorded by state officials after the 2016 election, close to a thousand of which were referred to district attorneys.
The likely large-scale fraud of 2020 calls way too much attention to itself. If the data I am looking at are correct, there are people on the hard left who may want to get caught. For them, a Biden win overturned by the Supreme Court would offer a whole lot more opportunity for mayhem than they could hope to find with a faltering old liberal as president.
Jack Cashill’s new book, Unmasking Obama: The Fight to Tell the True Story of a Failed Presidency, is widely available. See also http://www.cashill.com.
Image: Gage Skidmore via Flickr, CC BY-SA 2.0.”