SkyNews reported that Geert Wilders will stand trial on criminal charges of violating the Dutch hate speech laws,“Geert Wilders hate speech charges upheld in court.” His counsel had filed a motion with the Hague court to dismiss the charges, The case against Wilders arose from petitions filed with the Hague prosecutors by Dutch Muslims and leftist allies that his 2014 local campaign remarks of ‘fewer Moroccans” constituted prosecutable violations of hate speech laws in the Netherlands. Wilders’ counsel has also questioned possible bias in the three judge tribunal.
Wilders had been acquitted of similar charges in a trial in the Amsterdam Distirct Court in 2011. The trial comes at a time where Wilders’ Freedom Party (PVV) has risen near the top of Dutch political polls close behind the ruling coalition of PM Mark Rutte’s VVD party in the Hague Parliament. Wilders’ counsel has also questioned the validity of the submitted petioners that the Hague prosecutors have based their charges.
Sky News reported:
A court has upheld hate speech charges against Dutch far-right MP Geert Wilders over comments he made about Moroccans.
The leader of the Party for Freedom (PVV) sparked outrage when he asked supporters at a rally in 2014 whether they wanted “fewer or more Moroccans in your city and in the Netherlands?”
After the crowd shouted back “fewer” Mr Wilders said: “We’re going to organise that”.The MP appealed to have the charges thrown out, but his objections were dismissed by The Hague District Court.The comments triggered more than 6,400 complaints and criticism from within Mr Wilders’ party.Five organisations and 56 people have registered as victims of the remarks, judges said.Mr Wilders’ lawyers slammed the trial as a “political case” ahead of parliamentary elections in March.They argued that the MP had merely “put forward his party’s political programme” and claimed the case could have “far reaching political consequences for democracy”.At an earlier hearing, Geert-Jan Knoops, defending Mr Wilders, told judges that freedom of expression is “the last freedom Mr Wilders has left”.But the court said that although politicians are entitled to freedom of expression they should “avoid public statements that feed intolerance.Judge Hendrik Steenhuis said: “Where the border lies between the two will be debated in this trial.”He added that prosecuting Mr Wilders will “not affect his political freedoms or that of this Freedom Party”.After the hearing, Mr Wilders claimed he was being prosecuted “for voicing the opinion of millions”.He added: “The Netherlands is like Turkey. Displeasing political opinions are being silenced in court.”The MP was previously cleared of five counts of inciting hatred in 2011, after he compared Islam to Nazism.The comments caused Mr Wilders to be denied entry to the UK in February 2009 on public security grounds.He attempted to visit anyway and was deported back to the Netherlands.Mr Wilders later travelled to London after an immigration tribunal overturned the ban imposed by former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith.The MP’s trial at The Hague District Court will start on 31 October.
@ Hans Holtrop:
Thank you for the information.
Boker tov Pinchas Baram,
As you might know :
Geert Wilder’s grandmother was Jewish.
Nobody in The Netherlands is talking about
his Jewish roots.
Geert Wilders has many Jewish friends in Israel :
in a moshav near Jordan border in Samaria.
He travelled many times to that moshav.
His lawyer in his first trial in 2011 was :
Abraham Moszkowicz (Jew), who has three children :
Nathan, Micah, Chaya.
His lawyer in this trial October 31, 2016
is : Prof. Geert-Jan Knoops (Jew), married with
Carry J. Hamburger (Jew).
Geert Jan Knoops worked together with
Abraham Moszkowicz’s father : Max Moszkowicz.
Trial is clash of ideologies : Judaism >< Islam
Who is Allah ?
Yours,
Berachot,
Hans Holtrop MSc, Jewish NVJ-reporter
Born in The Hague, The Netherlands, Nov. 28, 1941
Living near Government Center.
holtrophans@gmail.com
@ pinchas baram:
Good post !!!
it’s amazing how politically correct the anti-free speech laws are in Holland and the UK. simply saying anything that can be construed as racism is seen as a criminal offense, even if it’s not in the category of incitement to violence.
in theory, this clampdown on free speech should shelter Jews from being subjected anti-Jewish speech in the public domain– but is that so?
firstly, Jews (like others) in Europe have to pay the price for being sheltered by stringent anti-racist laws, i.e., they have to be p.c. and keep quiet lest they say anything negative about arabs and islam. second, given all the hate speech, demonstrations, etc., against Israel and Zionism, the answer is no, Jews are not really sheltered by the anti-racist laws. unless one argues, as many anti-semites do, that demonstrating against Israel, or the settlements, is not racist or anti-semitic, and is thus fair play. after all, they say, many leftists and NGOs in Israel do likewise.
this common mindset will change only and until it is understood, by Jews and the world at large, as it once was, that Zionism and Judaism go together, like the left hand and the right hand, that Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria and Torah and the Jewish People are all intertwined, and that to vilify one is to vilify the other.
in short, only when the old slogan that Zionism is racism is turned on its head and the new slogan becomes anti-Zionism is racism will things go well for Am Yisrael.