by Justus R. Hope, MD, DESERT REVIEW
In a stunning 46-page legal filing to the International Criminal Court on December 6, an intrepid attorney and seven applicants accused Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak, Melinda Gates, William Gates III, and twelve others of numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code. These included various crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined by the Rome Statutes, Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21, and 53.
Besides the four kingpins, twelve others were named, including the CEOs of the leading vaccine corporations and the health leaders held accountable for the United Kingdom.
- Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer
- Stephane Bancel, CEO of AstraZeneca
- Pascal Soriot, CEO of Moderna
- Alex Gorsky, CEO of Johnson and Johnson
- Tedros Adhanhom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the WHO
- Boris Johnson, UK Prime Minister
- Christopher Whitty, UK Chief Medical Adviser
- Matthew Hancock, former UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
- Sajid Javid, current UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
- June Raine, UK Chief Executive of Medicines and Healthcare products
- Dr. Ravid Shah, President of the Rockefeller Foundation
- Klaus Schwab, President of the World Economic Forum
Dr. Ravid Shah, having worked for the Gates Foundation since 2001, was named a World Economic Forum “Young Global Leader” in 2007. He now presides over the Rockefeller Foundation, a group funding ID2020 along with the Gates Foundation.
https://norberthaering.de/en/power-control/id2020-immunization-passes/
Klaus Schwab, a wickedly intelligent, perhaps diabolical German with double doctorate degrees in Economics and Engineering, is the founder of the World Economic Forum, a club for the wealthiest percentile of the world’s corporate and political elite. He is a power broker who has groomed many presidents, prime ministers, and tech CEOs who now view him with reverence and unswerving loyalty.
Schwab, an economist, and technocrat has befriended many nations, most significantly China’s Xi Jinping, who delivered a key speech at Davos. He praised his vision of a New World Order. On January 25, 2021, Klaus Schwab vowed his support for Xi Jinping with these words, “Mr. President (Xi Jinping) I believe this is the best time to reset our policies and to work, jointly, for a peaceful and prosperous world. We all welcome now, his excellency, Xi Jinping, President of the People’s Republic
https://youtu.be/fp0HXMlStBA
Many consider Schwab the mastermind behind the current movement towards cryptocurrency, universal identification, and a one-world (fascist) government to be run jointly, in totalitarian fashion, with China.
https://conservapedia.com/Klaus_Schwab
Attorney Hannah Rose and seven applicants brought the Nuremberg action on behalf of the victims, the entire population of the United Kingdom. She filed the legal proceeding with the International Criminal Court located at The Hague. The Hague is notable for its long history in helping victims seek redress for war crimes and defining appropriate ethical guidelines for conduct during war.
Following the Nazi atrocities committed during World War II, the war crime trials were held in Nuremberg, Germany. Following these, a set of principles was developed, which ultimately led to the development of the Nuremberg Code.
These principles essentially meant that anyone, no matter how wealthy or powerful, even a head of state, was not above the law. The fact that the law of their home nation would permit their action would not relieve the person from justice under international law.
In particular, the medical experiments conducted by the Nazi doctors led to strict rules and ethical principles regarding future human scientific trials, including the doctrine of necessary informed consent and freedom from coercion or threat in submitting to experimental drugs.
As we all know, before receiving a surgical procedure, there is a legal and ethical requirement that the patient be apprised of any significant potential risks, including infection, bleeding, nerve damage, or even death. The patient usually signs the consent form following this explanation. And as we all know, whenever we receive prescription medication, we are notified of the potential risks on a package insert and usually a discussion with the Pharmacist.
The vaccines should be no different, yet they are. A person about to receive the jab is rarely told that there are risks of blood clots, bleeding, cerebral thrombosis, myocarditis, and death, yet those risks exist. See mark 12:58 to 17:40.
https://rumble.com/vg6dcd-peter-mccullough-interview.html
https://ukfreedomproject.org/resources/open-letter-to-dr-june-raine-chief-executive-mhra/
https://www.totalhealth.co.uk/blog/are-people-getting-full-facts-covid-vaccine-risks
Attorney Hannah Rose notes in Point 40 of her brief that the ethical standards of the Nuremberg Code amount to an obligation on physicians and pharmaceutical manufacturers to abide by its principles. Accordingly, any physician or research scientist found to have breached any of the ten principles of the Nuremberg Code would face criminal liability.
She notes in Point 42, “The first principle of the Nuremberg Code is a willingness and informed consent by the person to receive treatment and participate in an experiment. The person is supposed to activate freedom of choice without the intervention, either through force, deceit, fraud, threat, solicitation, or any other type of binding or coercion.”
In Point 43 she argues, “When the heads of the Ministry of Health as well as the Prime Minister presented the vaccine in the United Kingdom and began the vaccination of United Kingdom residents, the vaccinated were not advised, that in practice, they would be taking part in a medical experiment and that their consent is required under the Nuremberg Code. This as a matter of fact is a genetic medical experiment on human beings performed without informed consent under a severe and blatant offense of the Nuremberg Code.”
In addition, Rose argues under Point 44 that there is an obligation for alternative treatments to be discussed, including the risks and benefits of such alternatives. She notes that these were never discussed despite the fact alternative treatments have been proven to be safe and effective “with up to a 100% success rate.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/indias-ivermectin-blackout-secret-revealed
A key principle of the Nuremberg Code requires that a scientist must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
In Point 46, she argues, “It is known that the mRNA ‘vaccination’ treatments have caused the death of many as well as injury and severe damage (including disablement and paralysis) after the ‘vaccine’ was administered. Despite this fact, the government did not instruct the initiation of an investigation into the matter. It is also questionable that given the experimental nature of these vaccinations, that there are not any full reports available of the numbers of dead or injured, as may be expected in such a medical process for the benefit of the public participating in the experiment.”
The reader is reminded that Nazi physicians conducted experiments on human beings in concentration camps without informed consent, leading to horrific suffering and death.https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/nazi-medical-experiments
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/holocaust/experiside.html
To dramatically underscore the relevance of Nuremberg to the horrific deaths we now see related to the experimental mRNA ‘vaccination’ program, Rose, in Point 34a, included a statement from a group of Holocaust survivors, those who experienced first-hand both the Nazi experiments and today the vaccine experiment. This is an excerpt from their unique perspective:
We, the survivors of the atrocities committed against humanity during the Second World War, feel bound to follow our conscience…Another holocaust of greater magnitude is taking place before our eyes. We call upon you to stop this ungodly medical experiment on humankind immediately. It is a medical experiment to which the Nuremberg Code must be applied.
Holocaust survivor Vera Sharav issued a statement in Points 34b and 34c:
The stark lesson of the Holocaust is that whenever doctors join forces with government and deviate from their personal, professional, clinical commitment to do no harm to the individual, medicine can then be perverted from a healing, humanitarian profession to a murderous apparatus…What sets the Holocaust apart from all other mass genocides is the pivotal role played by the medical establishment, the entire medical establishment. Every step of the murderous process was endorsed by the academic, professional medical establishment.
As a direct result of the Nuremberg World War II experience, the United Nations asked the International Law Commission to develop the Nuremberg Principles, the key standards to avoid the Nazi doctors’ atrocities. Unfortunately, as Hannah Rose pointed out, many of these ten principles of the Nuremberg Code were systematically violated by the United Kingdom and many other countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-nuremberg-code#permissible-medical-experiments-1
In addition, a permanent international criminal court was established for investigation and enforcement – known as The International Criminal Court. The ICC began full-time operations in 2002 and currently has 123 member nations that have explicitly agreed to be bound by the Rome Statutes.
The United Kingdom is a member while the United States is not. However, under article 12(3) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, even a state that is NOT a member may exercise jurisdiction “by declaration lodged with the Registrar,” meaning that any nation may be subject to the ICC depending upon the circumstances, member nation or not. Keep in mind that Nazi Germany had not consented to jurisdiction.
The ICC bills itself as a “court of last resort” meaning that claims should be decided in the perpetrator’s home nation whenever possible. However, the core principle of impunity drives the ICC, the belief that no one who commits war crimes should enjoy freedom from criminal responsibility. Therefore, the ICC operates as an impartial and omnipotent arbiter of world human rights and will aggressively step in when it sees flagrant Nuremberg-type atrocities without consequence.
That is precisely what Hannah Rose has identified in her legal brief in Point 2,
“We have tried to raise this case through the English police and the English Court system without success, we have been unable even to get the case registered either with the police or with the court after several attempts…This is such a case which is why we are addressing the ICC directly.”
Attorney Rose relied partly upon the expertise of Dr. Michael Yeadon, a research-based PhD in respiratory pharmacology and former Vice President and Chief Scientist at Pfizer.
https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html
In the background section of the brief, she writes in Point 5:
“The Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ do not meet the requirement to be categorized as vaccines and are in fact gene therapy (Appendix 8)…Dr. Mike Yeadon, a joint applicant on this request, asserts that claims calling the Covid-19 injections a ‘vaccine’ is public manipulation and misrepresentation of clinical treatment.
It’s not a vaccination. It’s not prohibiting infection. It’s not a prohibiting transmission device. It’s a means by which your body is conscripted to make the toxin that then allegedly your body somehow gets used to dealing with it, but unlike a vaccine, which is to trigger the immune response, this is to trigger the creation of the toxin.’
MRNA uses the cell’s machinery to synthesize proteins that are supposed to resemble the SPIKE protein of the virus, which is what it uses to enter cells via the ACE2 receptor. These proteins are then identified by the immune system, which builds antibodies against them. The real concern is that these proteins could accumulate in the body, especially in regions of high concentration of ACE2 receptors, such as the gonads. If the immune system then attacks the location where they accumulate, then you could be dealing with an auto-immune condition.”
Dr. Yeadon mentions, in an interview, that our governments have grossly exaggerated the entire threat of COVID-19. He notes that COVID-19 represents a slightly greater risk than influenza if you are older than age 70 but a much lower risk than the seasonal flu if you are younger. See mark 31:00.
https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html
“So it’s just absurd that you should be happy or willing to let your economy and civil society be smashed for something which represents for almost everyone working a lower risk than influenza – but that’s true.
Given this virus represents at worst a slightly bigger risk to the old and ill than does influenza, and a less risk than for almost everyone else who’s younger and fit, it was NEVER NECESSARY for us to have done anything.
We didn’t need to do anything, lockdowns, masks, mass testing, vaccines – there are multiple therapeutic drugs that are at least as effective as vaccines are…an off-patent drug called Ivermectin, one of the most widely used drugs in the world, is also able to reduce symptoms at any stage of the disease including lethality by about 90%.
https://www.amazon.com/Ivermectin-Freedom-Justus-R-Hope-ebook/dp/B09M95F8NF
https://www.amazon.com/Ivermectin-World-Justus-R-Hope/dp/1737415909
https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/SUMMARY-OF-THE-EVIDENCE-BASE.pdf
So you don’t need vaccines and you don’t need any of the measures that have been introduced at all.” See mark 31:15.
https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html
For any reader still under the illusion that these mRNA covid vaccines have helped, please read the following article comparing the countries without vaccination to those with it. The most vaccinated nations have deaths per million up to 100 x greater than the least. Always question what the government tells you.
Yeadon goes on to explain that people need not worry about variants. He explains that our immune system is easily able to deal with ALL mutations of SARS-CoV-2 and explains that 18 years after the first SARS, those people are still protected by their immunity – and this immunity even extends to immunity against SARS-CoV-2, a virus 80% similar but 20% different than the original SARS.
Yeadon’s major point is that if survivors of SARS some 18 years later have immunity against the new virus, which is 20% different, why would we believe that a current viral mutant only 0.3% different would be a threat? See mark 35:40.
https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html
“So when your government scientists say that a variant that’s 0.3% different from SARS could masquerade as a new virus and be a threat to your health, you should know, and I’m telling you, THEY ARE LYING. If they’re lying and they are, why is the pharmaceutical industry making top-up vaccines? They are making them.” See mark 35:55
https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html
“You should be terrified at this point. I am, because there is absolutely no possible justification for their manufacture. But they’re being made, and the world’s medicine regulators have said…we won’t be asking them to do any clinical safety studies. Let me just say again, the variants are not different enough to represent a threat to you so you do not need top-up vaccines…
The regulators have waved them through. I’m very frightened of that – there’s no possible benign interpretation of this. I believe they are going to be used to damage your health and possibly kill you. Seriously. I can see no sensible interpretation other than a serious attempt at mass depopulation.
This will provide the tools to do it and plausible deniability – because they will create another story about some sort of biological threat, you’ll line up and get your top-up vaccines, and a few months or a year or so later, you’ll die of some peculiar, inexplicable syndrome, and they won’t be able to associate it with the top-up vaccines.” See mark 36:05 to 37:15.
https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html
Yeadon follows this up with his conclusion, “This system (mandatory vaccine passports) is being put in place using lies, and it’s being put in place for some purpose, and I believe that purpose is complete totalitarian control, and I think the purpose of that is going to be mass depopulation.” See mark 45:40.
https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html
“Do not allow it to be an interoperable global fixed-format database because that will be the end of human freedom, and I see no way of recovering from that once the system’s up and running.” See mark 46:30
https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html
Yeadon explained that few people will hear his words and that this fraud was perpetrated on the world’s population through censorship, fear and propaganda. Dr. Yeadon, an insightful man, notes that the perpetrators have exhaustively planned this all, and they have considered how people might respond. Yeadon notes that if we all respond as expected, we will lose.
“Collectively, we need to do something unexpected.” See mark 48:43.
https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html
However, it is likely they didn’t plan on the International Criminal Court coming after them. They also didn’t plan on Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, an experienced trial lawyer licensed in Germany and California who founded the Berlin Corona Committee, which heads a group of attorneys with global reach dedicated to dragging this deadly conspiracy into the open and suing it into oblivion.
https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Reiner-Fuellmich-Introduction-English_BestCut:e
Fuellmich does an excellent job in this interview of exposing the actions of Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum, WEF, also known as Davos. The WEF has as its goal the establishment of a New World Order, with the globe to be run by self-selected technocrats like Bill Gates, himself, and other members of Davos.
In 1971 Schwab founded what was to become the WEF in 1987. It has 1,000 members. In general, qualification requires a business to have more than 5 billion dollars per year in revenue. The theme of WEF and Klaus Schwab has recently been “The Great Reset,” which essentially means a new world order. In the following video, Klaus Schwab can be heard discussing this with Henry Kissinger. We hear Dr. Kissinger praising China’s Xi Jinping’s speech and the formation of a new international order. See mark 2:50 to 4:00.
Schwab himself sums up the 2017 Davos Meeting with the following statement, “What a wonderful opportunity to conclude our week here with such concrete proposals and ideas of how we can really create a New World Order.” See mark 26:40.
Professor Andreas Oehler aptly describes the agenda of Schwab and the WEF, “The World Economic Forum seems to be the driver behind and organizer of the global population control operations, be it pandemics, biometric IDs, Great Reset, or public-private partnerships in name of the “common good” (fascist corporatism).” See the following article, “The Four Horseman of the Apocalypse identified, along with the Apocalypse itself.”
https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/
Professor Oehler of the University of Bamberg is widely published in credit, banking, finance, and investor protection. He believes that Klaus Schwab and his WEF members, including Bill Gates, planned the COVID-19 pandemic by sponsoring Event 201, a coronavirus pandemic simulation exercise held in New York City on October 18, 2019. WEF has been a proponent of digital biometric identity systems to make societies “more efficient and productive” (and easier to control).
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/
Oehler wrote, “WEF collaborates with the ID2020 alliance, funded by the Gates and Rockefeller foundations to run a program to ‘provide digital ID with vaccines.’ In particular, ID2020 sees the vaccination of children as ‘an entry point for digital identity.’ In reality, this means that anything a person does or is allowed to do (employment, travel, commerce, health care…) will be linked to the person’s digital ID. This will remove any privacy and take total control over each and every activity of any individual on earth.”
https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/
For readers who may doubt this, read Klaus Schwab’s book, The Great Reset. One of his chief goals is to have perfect monitoring ability of every human being and to be able to regulate all behavior, even to the point of complete totalitarian control.
https://www.amazon.com/COVID-19-Great-Reset-Klaus-Schwab/dp/2940631123
The WEF sees times of great turmoil or catastrophes as ideal opportunities to implement this reset, such as during the financial crisis of 2008, and now the COVID-19 pandemic, which Dr. Reiner Fuellmich feels created a perfect opportunity for the WEF to execute its plan. Fuellmich, a world-renowned trial attorney, refers to Schwab and his henchmen collectively as “Mr. Global.”
“Klaus Schwab spells this out in his book, The Great Reset, and demands… a World Government under the UN, which has been brought under control by the WEF. This is to be achieved by creating as much worldwide chaos as possible in the form of pandemics, wars including civil wars and natural disasters so that the world population becomes convinced that the national governments are overwhelmed, and only a world government can help.
At the same time, Schwab calls for the shifting of all wealth to Mr. Global so that in 2030, no one, except Mr. Global, will still own anything, and we will supposedly be happy with that. Cash is to be abolished and replaced by a digital currency. This will be allocated to or taken away from every person in the world who can then also be found anywhere and at any time by various tracking systems. This is to be done by a single central world bank.” See mark 32:45 to 33:56.
https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Reiner-Fuellmich-Introduction-English_BestCut:e
Fuellmich and Oehler both describe a series of puppets that the WEF has trained to help carry out these missions under the WEF “Young Global Leader” program, which started in 1993. Such people have gone on to become Presidents, Prime Ministers, and CEOs. These include some of the key players in this pandemic and vaccination effort:
- Microsoft founder Bill Gates (1993)
- California Governor Gavin Newsom (selected in 2005)
- Pete Buttigieg (selected in 2019, candidate for US President in 2020, US secretary of transportation since 2021)
- Stéphane Bancel (Moderna CEO; selected in 2009)
- Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg (2009)
- Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg (2007)
- Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page (2002/2005)
- Covid Twitter personality Eric Feigl-Ding (a ‘WEF Global Shaper‘ since 2013)
- New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern (since 2017, selected in 2014)
- Australian Health Minister Greg Hunt (selected in 2003; former WEF strategy director)
- Canadian Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland (selected in 2001; former managing director of Reuters)
- Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is a WEF participant but is not a confirmed Young Global Leader
- German Chancellor Angela Merkel (selected in 1993, 12 years before becoming Chancellor)
- Current German Health Minister Jens Spahn and former Health Ministers Philipp Roesler and Daniel Bahr
- EU Commission Presidents Jose Manuel Barroso (2004-2014, selected in 1993) and Jean-Claude Juncker (2014-2019, selected in 1995)
- French President Emanuel Macron (since 2017, selected in 2016),
- Former French President Nicolas Sarkozy (2007-2012, selected in 1993),
- Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz
- Former Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi (2014-2016, selected in 2012),
- Former Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar (1996-2004, selected in 1993)
- Dr. Ravid Shah, President of the Rockefeller Foundation
https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/
When we notice the harsh authoritarian and mandatory lockdowns of Australia, Austria, and Canada, perhaps it begins to make better sense when we factor in the names of those in the WEF Young Global Leadership program. See mark 34:25 to 34:58.
https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Reiner-Fuellmich-Introduction-English_BestCut:e
Now, against our seemingly hopeless situation, Reiner Fuellmich gives us all every reason to be optimistic:
“Against this background, which increasingly more people are recognizing, very large legal disputes have been set in motion in India, South Africa, the US, Canada, and France. Their goal is to hold those responsible accountable under both civil and criminal law. This also includes that the assets that have been taken away by Mr. Global from the world’s population…are returned…In particular, Anglo-American Law with its powerful tools of class action, pre-trial discovery, punitive damages…provides the tools for very effective justice.” See mark 35:00.
https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Reiner-Fuellmich-Introduction-English_BestCut:e
Reiner mentions that he has developed very good evidence that the PCR test was fraudulently used to grossly exaggerate the number of true COVID cases and the courts in Portugal, Austria and Germany, have set excellent precedents in their rulings to that effect.
Fuellmich concludes, “The Berlin Corona Committee already now has extremely incriminating evidence proving that this Corona ‘plandemic’ NEVER had anything to do with health; rather Mr. Global’s actions are aimed solely at these goals:
#1. Destruction of regional economies to make the population dependent on Mr. Global’s global supply chains.
#2. Shifting the wealth of the world’s populations from the bottom to the top – to the super-rich – to Mr. Global.
#3. Population reduction – you can call it genocide.
#4. The installation of a World Government under the UN which is now under the control of the WEF.” See mark 36:13 to 36:56.
https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Reiner-Fuellmich-Introduction-English_BestCut:e
He reminds us that we are dealing with megalomaniacs and sociopaths, those who lack a conscience. Fuellmich reminds us that while the mainstream media may censor, hundreds of thousands of people hear the message anyway; they are taking to the streets in protest in England, Germany, Australia, Brazil, etc. Civil servants, medical doctors, lawyers, politicians, nurses, and police officers are refusing the jab.
Key elements include those of compassion and spirituality, as this has indeed become an epic struggle between right versus wrong. Reiner tells the story of a doctor who walked into a bank and was accosted by a person afraid because he was not wearing a mask. He hugged the individual who began to weep because they had not been held in more than a year. Fuellmich reminds us that we can all laugh, cry, and feel while they (the sociopaths) cannot.
Attorney Rose, now a heroic icon, asked the ICC to take immediate action by way of legal injunction in Points 128 and 153:
It is of the utmost urgency, that ICC take immediate action, taking all of this into account, to stop the rollout of covid vaccinations, introduction of unlawful vaccination passports and all other types of illegal warfare mentioned herein currently being waged against the people of the United Kingdom by way of a court injunction.
In closing, Reiner Fuellmich asked us to remember spirituality. We must celebrate our humanity. Like those in the Nazi concentration camps, who remembered to sing and praise God in the face of the most extreme adversity, we too must cling to our roots in religion and love for one another.
Fuellmich is confident that we will prevail. See mark 38:40.
https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Reiner-Fuellmich-Introduction-English_BestCut:e
That’s what this is all about, humanity versus inhumanity. We are human. We can laugh, cry, sing, dance and hug. The other side, Mr. Global and his puppets can’t do that. They can only fake feelings and have no empathy at all. This is because the other side has no access to the spiritual side. The US Constitution starts with the words, ‘We the People.’ And when the wall came down between East and West Berlin, 33 years ago, it was the East German people chanting – We the people – that brought it down. Mr. Global’s house of cards will come crashing down the very same way. Without a doubt in my mind, Mr. Global and his puppets will lose this war of good against evil – they will lose their insane war against life and creation itself. There is no other way.
After hearing him speak, I am confident as well. Dr. Pierre Kory once told me, “This situation seems backward. The doctors were the corrupt people who caused this mess, but the lawyers are those with ethics who will save us.”
Pierre Kory, as usual, is correct. Someday, today’s youth will become senior citizens. They will remind their society of today’s Nuremberg II trials, and how they helped stop the largest con job ever perpetrated on the world. It is time to end the lockdowns, the vaccination mandates, the censorship, and the propaganda.
The media will resume reporting real news and cease fear-mongering. Then, journalists will return to what they do best – proper investigative reporting. And the International Criminal Court will most assuredly continue what it does best – bringing cold-blooded mass murderers to justice.
https://famous-trials.com/nuremberg/1903-doctortrial
Dr. Justus R. Hope, writer’s pseudonym, graduated summa cum laude from Wabash College where he was named a Lilly Scholar. He attended Baylor College of Medicine where he was awarded the M.D. degree. He completed a residency in Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation at The University of California Irvine Medical Center. He is board-certified and has taught at The University of California Davis Medical Center in the departments of Family Practice and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. He has practiced medicine for over 35 years and maintains a private practice in Northern California.
@Felix
I am quite aware of the research your article references. Here is the citation for the actual research:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/virus-hunters-identify-closest-relative-yet-sars-cov-2-laos/
Please refer to this as I explain what you have failed to grasp by using this layman’s article as a filter to what is stated in the actual report.
You don’t even have to wade into the body of the research data to find that it states directly in the abstract that
Why is this important? The Furin Cleaveage Site is the reason that SARS-Cov2 is as contagious and lethal as it is. It results in a irreversible 3D change in the ACE2 receptor preventing the virus from detaching from the ACE2 receptor as it would normally do without this advantage. In spite of this fact, about a year before the virus just happened to break loose in Wuhan, Daszak requested funds for his latest project in which he just happened to plan to place a Furin Cleaveage Site into a coronavirus collected from a cave bat. He was very specific about its purpose in increasing the virulence of the virus in his grant proposal. So, you would have us believe that nature and Daszak were both working on a parallel path towards creating the greatest leap in coronavirus history, to specifically place, not just any Furin Cleaveage Site into a coronavirus, but a human Furin Cleaveage Site. Oh, and the naturally evolving virus would emerge just outside Daszak’s lab? 😀
This would require 4 simultaneous and adjacent changes of the amino acids which make up the viral Spike protein at just the very specific position in the 3D structure of the virus, and this would require 12 simultaneous mutations as each amino acid is coded by 3 genes each.
What else does the report you reference actually state in the abstract?
So they found this viral mutant in Laos, some 1000miles distance from Wuhan.
So you presume that a bat flew some 1000 miles while demonstrating a feat in nature that would require 12 simultaneous and adjacent mutations to take place at the specific location on the Spike, rather than beleive that Daszak actually did what he planned to do and described he wanted to do in Wuhan….Think about the leap of absurdity that you are requiring to keep Daszak from being implicated in a crime he fully proposed as reasonable to pursue. Do think about this.
I understand that people like to read these popular press articles about what is reported in the actual reports where all the juicy details lay. The problem with this tendency is that these popular press journalists are not careful, not honest or not knowledgeable to accurately report what is contained in the reports they are reporting on. I don’t fault you or anyone for using such second hand reports, as we all do so. Yet, when you actually read what they are reporting, as in this case, you don’t even have to move further than the abstract to find that they skipped all the relavent information. This is too often the reality in state served propaganda which you are probably aware of given your knowledge of the Soviet Union’s history.
Oh, here is something to read in your spare time, where they explain some of the issues and how China was actually studying these Laosian bats in the same lab in which Daszak worked:
Wuhan Scientists Were Studying Laos Bat Viral Samples Before Pandemic: Report
Re the lab conspiracy
Scientists have been stung by the claim that the virus was manufactured in a lab. So groups of scientists have been trying to trace the virus in nature.
Scientists hone in on “missing link” in the natural origins of COVID-19
Andre Damon@Andre__Damon
Earlier this month, scientists revealed the closest discovery yet to a “smoking gun” in the search for the origins of the deadly COVID-19 pandemic.
In a new pre-print paper by the French Institute Pasteur and the University of Laos, an international team of scientists say they have found a group of viruses that are the closest relatives of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.
(Picture follows here)
A researcher swabs a bat’s mouth to take samples at Sai Yok National Park in Kanchanaburi province, west of Bangkok, Thailand, Friday, July 31, 2020. Researchers in Thailand have been trekking though the countryside to catch bats in their caves in an effort to trace the murky origins of the coronavirus. (AP Photo/Sakchai Lalit)
In the part of the virus critical to infecting humans, called the receptor-binding domain (RBD), the newly discovered viruses are more similar to the original variant of SARS-CoV-2 than are the variants of that virus that have emerged in the past year, including the currently dominant Delta variant.
“Sequences very close to those of the early strains of SARS-CoV-2 responsible for the pandemic exist in nature, and are found in several Rhinolophus bat species,” concludes the paper.
Professor Stuart Neil, head of the department of infectious diseases at King’s College London told the Telegraph: “Two or three of these viruses have RBDs which is only two or three changes from that seen in SARS-CoV-2—essentially, closer to the original than some of the variants of concern we see out there in some respects.”
The authors continue, “These viruses may have contributed to SARS-CoV-2’s origin and may intrinsically pose a future risk of direct transmission to humans.”
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2021/09/23/wuha-s23.html
(I personally reported in the past on this pre-print paper linking to an article in France 24 news. The Louis Pasteur organisation was also involved)
“Scientists have discovered another clue to the origins of the virus that causes Covid-19, with bats living in caves in Laos found to be carrying a similar pathogen that experts suggest could potentially infect humans directly.”
https://amp-france24-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.france24.com/en/live-news/20210922-bats-with-covid-like-viruses-found-in-laos-study?amp_js_v=a6&_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16404268559254&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&_tf=From%20%251%24s&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.france24.com%2Fen%2Flive-news%2F20210922-bats-with-covid-like-viruses-found-in-laos-study
We can thus expect more and more knowledge from science as to the nature of covid SARS 2. Science is always vulnerable to conspiracy theories which are really lies and there are old sayings about this, but since science is a striving which builds on past knowledge it wins out in the end. Since approximately September 2021 this has been happening.
There’s no doubt at all that the lab theory is a dud. But what it raises is the extreme cruelty inside of this Bannon – Trump political group and how far they will go to destroy people who have expertise, like Daszak.
Reader Also the Muslims of Bosnia involved in the Holocaust. And from 1945 to 1985 is just 40 years but Europe inside those forty years had turned.
@adamdalgliesh
Croats murdered over a million Serb civilians in WWII.
Felix, Peloni has a medical background and has contributed much valuable information to this site. You weaken your argument by attacking him.
Strange coincidences:
https://www.fredericknewspost.com/news/health/fort-detrick-lab-shut-down-after-failed-safety-inspection-all-research-halted-indefinitely/article_767f3459-59c2-510f-9067-bb215db4396d.html
https://ordonews.com/fort-detrick-lab-us-shut-down-a-secret-laboratory-after-cases-of-pneumonia-of-unknown-origin/
https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/e-cigarettes/severe-lung-disease.html
In fact, there is a proposed indictment by Dr. David E. Martin, who points out many violations of US code. See:
https://www.davidmartin.world/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/The-Criminal-Conspiracy-of-Coronavirus.pdf
Dr. Martin is a US patent attorney. An Attorney General of a State or several Attorney Generals would need to bring this law suit in the United States.
@Felix
Do not misdirect, please. Answer the question I posed to you or is your call for revolution your only answer to every question?
You are not at a workers rally here. Just answer the question, if, indeed, you have an answer beyond your penchant for radicalism. If the melted snow you toss about without end is to be the only foundation of your non-argument, well, I will accept your non-answer as convincing enough that you have only a desire and no explanation beyond ‘workers unite’. I had thought you might have a reason to argue, so I give you the floor to make your argument reasonable. Truthfully, I am interested in hearing if you have more than a bag of wind to propher to your nails on chalkboard vision. So please do respond to the question I asked. Or let us end with your silly cries of socialist banter. You will not goad me into changing the topic to your goal. Answer the question.
Peloni yes indeed the coming social revolution in America will definitely deal with Trump and his sorry band of liars in a most determined manner. Because what these liars with Trump at the head have aimed is to destroy good scientists at the lab. Yes the latter courageously donning protective gear went into caves and got samples of virus. And being visionary scientists they had to work in the labs on order to anticipate how natural selection might go. To prepare the world for a Pandemic. If only Chinese Stalinism and American imperialism had only prepared with just a fraction of that dedication so many lives would have been saved. We socialists will honour these brave and selfless scientists in the same moment we will place Trump and Biden on trial. You will be joining them Peloni although you may try stupidity as excuse but I’m not buying stupidity.
Peloni yes indeed the coming social revolution in America will definitely deal with Trump and his sorry band of liars in a most determined manner. Because what these liars with Trump at the head have aimed is to destroy good scientists at the lab. Yes the latter courageously donning protective gear went into caves and got samples of virus. And being visionary scientists they had to work in the labs on order to anticipate how natural selection might go. To prepare the world for a Pandemic. If only Chinese Stalinism and American imperialism had only prepared with just a fraction of that dedication so many lives would have been saved. We socialists will honour these brave and selfless scientists in the same moment we will place Trump and Biden on trial. You will be joining them Peloni although you may try stupidity as excuse but I’m not buying stupidity.
@Felix
There is no rationale that this is true. How was the virus not created in Wuhan? Beyond your hatred for capitalists, what do you base this claim that Daszak is not involved in building this virus at the location of the viral outbreak which is just coincidentally at a lab in China, a very routine source of lab escaped viruses, including SARS(different lab in China to be clear) on multiple occaisions. We have a document stating Daszak intended to design a virus which eerily describes the formulation approximating the very virus causing Covid today, and he proposed they create it at the lab in Wuhan, coincidentally. Daszek does not even make the claim this document is false. Nor does Collins. Nor does Fauci. So what do you base your claim to the contrary. Or is it blind faith that ties your certainty to your conclusion. Faith may be a great motivator, but it is not proof of anything but the reality that you have no evidence or reason to state what you state. Serious question here.
Furthermore, you suggest that Trump shot himself in the head and brought his own legacy and presidency to an end?? Do try to make sense of the reason you are weaving here because you are fast loosing any semblance of honest support for what seems based solely on your political desires.
Peloni it is not Peter Daszak but Donald Trump, and Biden and others as on Breitbart, who need to answer their horrific lie that the virus was created in the Wuhan lab.
@Felix
The proof is very clear so far, but limited. You are quite correct to be sceptical of what is being claimed over this variant. There are limitations upon how to distinguish between the Delta and Omic versions of Covid in different nations and alternate testing methods. The proof available, however, shows us that the virus is not just milder but also enormously more contagious.
The actual proof that it is milder lies in the fact that the cases being identified as Omic are demonstrating an enormous increase in viral spread, eg tens of thousands of new cases daily in S. Africa, while the death rate is flatly disassociated from the increase in cases. The hospitalizations are massively reduced over what was seen previously, but deaths are nonexistent. In the US, the cases are rising and the deaths are flat as well. In the world, this is being seen as well. You can monitor these trends on John-Hopkins dashboard or Worldometer.com or OurWorldInData.com, as I have been doing for some time now. This break in association between infections and serious disease and death is quite important. If the disease is significant enough to create an immune response without causing deaths, while still able to achieve immune memory, it will effectively become a self-spreading version of a modified live vaccine against Covid and may be able to end the pandemic. There are provisos however.
Omic has to defeat and vanquish Delta. It is claimed that in the US Omic is causing 76% of the cases in the US already, so this appears likely to occur. Next, its spread has to be diffuse enough in the population to produce herd immunity, as this is required to end the pandemic. If, however, Omic becomes too easily defeated by the population’s group immunity before it completely outcompetes Delta, it will burn out and leave Delta to make a comeback. If Omic does out-compete Delta, but does not provide the strength of immunity in the vaccinated population, you could have a recurring cycle after cycle of disease in the vaccinated, but this seems unlikely given the rate of disease spread. The disease is mild so for now it is not an issue, but if the cycles are too closely timed, such that the virus never recedes, it could cause complications that would provide support of further immune escape and bad outcomes would result from this. The speed of spread seems quite significant so this is very promising so far
The basis for this disassociation between infection and severe disease and death is related to Omic not invading the deep lung but rather substantially infecting the bronchial airway. This distinction renders symptoms of a severe cough, soar throat, but no pneumonia and no systemic(body-wide) spread.
This is eerily similar to what has been used in veterinary products to produce an immune response in animals with a modified live intranasal vaccine against Coronaviruses with variable success. Dr. Malone actually reached out in the Spring 2020 to pursue such a remedy with the HHS, but they refused to even return his call on the matter.
For now the outlook is not good but very good. There does seem to be a great deal of ready spread among the vaccinated and even 3rd jabbers per current reports in Denmark and elsewhere. To properly asses this, it is difficult to tease out the confounders as I have talked of repeatedly in epidemiological(general population-wide) studies, so we will see how things proceed.
Felix Quigley
@FelixQuigley
·
40s
The origin of this virus was natural and the Trump crowd are fascist liars. Natural as in capitalist misuse of animals in agriculture. Trump re the lab in Wuhan China is a bare faced liar and Biden the same.
Leave aside the headline to this article
What is the evidence that the Omicron virus is milder and is evidence foolproof? Is this going to create, sans vaccine, herd immunity.
If so good but decisive questions will remain as to origin.
And if this is a solution focus will change to existentialist global warming.
@peloni. Superb legal research, Peloni . I hadn’t realized that the Nuremberg ‘Code” has been cited as a legal precedent. That does give it some legal force.
I still maintain that it was never a “code” (which refers to a body of laws, but only part of a legal opinion of one court to explain its verdict in one particular criminal case. Such a judges’ opinion might create a legal precident, but it does not create a code of laws.
I believe there were several ways that the four occuptying powers, or at any rate the three Western powers, could have established a firm legal basis for the trials. Unfortunately, they failed to do so. And that formed a basis for unjust future war crimes and crimes against humanities trials. I believe that the war crimes trials of the Serb leaders in the 1990s, the trials of the Hutu journalists after the Tutsi-Hutu war in Rwanda and Burundi, and the trial of a Liberian political leader named Taylor (who is still in imprisoned, as are several Serb leaders and military officers after more than twenty years) were not only without a legal basis, but were unjust, because they were so selective. The Tutsi leaders were never brought to justice for the hundreds of thousand of Hutus they murdered. The Croats and the Bosniak Muslim leaders were not never brought to justice either for the thousands of Serbs they murdered, or the thousands of each others’ people they murdered in this “three cornered hat” civil war.
In each of these cases,the international courts arbitrarily decided that one side was completely to blame in all three of these wars, when the truth was that there was plenty of guilt spread around among all of the combatants. The courts, largely following biased media coverage, treated these civil wars as if they were identical to the Nazis’ aggression against all of Europe, when this was not the case.
These miscarriages of justice could have been avoided if the Nuremberg trials had been grounded in a legitimate code of criminal law. and subsequent war crimes trials had been conducted in accordance with this law code
Justice requires the rule of law, not rule by judges not bound by any laws. That is arbitrary justice, which isn’t justice at all.
Ok Peloni I read the linked article. The aged have the right to roam free at the end period (never the end) and it is not up to anyone to suggest shielding. That shielding has proved in the real tragedy of Pandemic to be isolation. The separation of the old out from society. No way.
@peloni. You make excellent points, Peloni. I did not know that the ICC had agreed to give them a hearing. Of course that changes matters. I don’t think they will order the arrest of these international criminals against humanity. But the publicity will be excellent.
I also think it is important that they file these charges in all of the democracies, however. And especially in Germany. Germans feel humiliated that they had to suffer six years of foreign rule, and even more in the East; also, that their former leaders were put in the dock and charged for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Most Germans today recognize that their grandparents only got what they deserved, and that their former leaders certainly got what they deserved. Most German don’t question that their sentences were just. But it was a humiliating experience, a humiliating national memory nonetheless. So has been the need to pay reparations to millions of victims, somewhere upwards of 12 billion dollars over a 50 year period.
As a result, I have a feeling that there might be some German judges who would be only too happy to put senior officials of the countries that defeated them in the dock for crimes against humanity. They might feel schadenfreude at doing this. In addition, modern Germany has extradition treaties with nearly all the other democracies. So that a German judge could make extradition requests, although Britain, the United States, Canada, Australia, etc. would certainly refuse to hand over their officials and former officials. Still these modern-day human rights criminals would be embarrassed.
However, it would also be important to bring charges against them in the United States. Possibly a court or a grand jury in one of the more rural “red” states where people feel deeply harassed by these vaccine “mandates” might be willing to convene a grand jury and issue subpoenas. That would create an interesting situation.
Specifically within the US, the code’s importance and relevance has been cited in various US court rulings. Among these are included a ruling over the use of LSD in mind control experiments by the CIA in 2013, US v. Stanley, 483 YS 669 (1987), where it was cited in the dissenting opinion that
More pivotal than this, though, it went on to state that
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/483/669/
In 2001, there was a major victory out of an Appeals Court decision in Grimes / Higgins v Kennedy Krieger Institute where they ruled that the Nuremberg Code should be used as the legal standard of juris prudence regarding medical research:
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/md-court-of-appeals/1236870.html
This was reinforced in a ruling against Pfizer in 2009 before the Appeals Court, Rabi Abdullahi, et al. v. Pfizer, Inc., 562 F.3d (2d Cir. 2009), where it cited that NC
and further noted that
This is in no way an exhaustive list of cases in which NC is cited in briefs or rulings, but these are among the more significant rulings related to medical research.
NC also forms the basis for bioethics and medical research.
As such, it is referenced in the British Medical Journal in 1996
and, not specifically cited, its tenets are largely included in the World Medical Association’s (WMA) Declaration of Helsinki of 1964
updated in 2013.
So, for what it is worth, I am not sure where it will lead or what will come from these matters, but it is very good that the ICC has not dismissed the case and it will be an enormous victory to gain discovery. Should they refuse to do this, the publicity that it is gaining currently by simply being allowed to move this far will at least have some value in this fact as well as the details revealed in the publication of the complaint, though this would be a very limited victory, indeed.
/2
@Adam
Yes and no.
The ICC is a criminal tool used to exploit the whim of these masters as you suggest. I would also agree that it is dangerous even offering this vile institution the recognition as a useful or legitimate tool of juris prudence at all. That being stated, we are at a crossroads of legal standards of personal sovereignty, and a great deal of support could be gained even by a limited victory before this organization. This is, in fact, not the first case brought before the ICC, but the first case that is actually not been dismissed without a hearing. The hearing before the ICC may also bring some relevance, currently, in other nation state courts around the world who will recognize that the ICC is about to offer a hearing to this case.
I do believe we have to couch our expectations of victory before such a ‘court’ within a reasonable context. The ruling of the ICC is not the greatest victory possible. The greatest victory possible is simply the grant of discovery. Should they dismiss this case ultimately after granting discovery or before doing so, the ICC would actually expose itself as the useless device that we, at least, recognize it to be. The wider recognition of this fact would undermine its credibility among the public of the world, as it may come to be seen as the self-serving international weapon it is, rather than the court of justice some perceive it to be.
Meanwhile, the exposures resulting from discovery of what was known by whom and when it was known and with whom it was shared and from whom it was hidden would be an enormous victory. The revelation of these facts to the wider public would be an uncompromisingly vital tool against the mass psychosis now in place in the world – not against the most devout, who are deluded beyond reason, but of the central group who actually recognize something is wrong in the world and are simply looking for a reason not to go along with the collective narrative. It is this central group who will act to end this nightmare if we could but gain their support. Without their support, it will be very difficult to stop what is coming.
The Rome Statutes were invoked because they represent the legal charter upon which the ICC was founded. It does require that the case be ignored by the national courts before being brought before the ICC and this has been done, which gave the case the ability to trigger the request before the ICC.
Regarding the Nuremberg Code(NC), it was the basis of a legal judgement employed on the world stage at the end of WWII. It is fair to say that it was not, in and of itself, binding in the US and elsewhere at the time, but its principles have come to be inculcated into the binding set of rules known as Common Law and the the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki of 1964, as well as various legal codes around the world as the basis of bioethics and medical experimentation.
The NC is not perfect, has several known issues including various loopholes. It’s basis goes back to both the Prussian Berlin Code of 1900 and the German Guidelines for Human Experimentation of 1931. There are significant changes from these codes, but the principles of the NC has been accepted in the US and many nations around the world to one degree or another.
/1
@Felix
What do you think the this cruel policy of shielding of the elderly meant? Serious question.
It is important to remember that the “Nuremberg code” was only a statement of opinion by the judges at the “doctor’s trial” of Nazi doctors by an American military tribunal in 1947. It was part of the judges’ opinion justifying their conviction of those of the doctors who were convicted of crimes against humanity and war crimes. It is very doubtful whether it has any legal force or is a valid legal precedent for future cases. The legality of the Nuremberg trials themselves was dubious. It may be true, however, that the judges opinion (it wasn’t a “code’) did influence post-war laws concerning the crimes of doctors in the United States and other democratic countries
People seeking to punish present-day government officials and doctors for “crimes against humanity,” of which the individuals listed here, or at least some of them, are certainly guilty, like to use the phrase “Nuremberg Code” because it creates a feeling of legitimacy for their accusations against these modern day medical experimenters of the people of the whole world. Public opinion in the democratic countries associate the Nuremberg trials with the just punishment of Nazis who committed crimes of a truly heinous nature that were authorized by the Nazi regime.
In the lawyers’ actual court filings with the international court, the authors cite genuine international statutes, the Rome Statutes, as the legal basis for their charges, rather than the supposed “Nuremberg Code.”
Even then, there is a problem with bringing these charges before the International Criminal Court. The United States, Israel and Russia have all rejected the legitimacy of this court. It has been used as a vehicle to investigate and bring false allegations of “war crimes” and “crimes against humanity” against Israel. The International Criminal Court is therefore not the best place to bring these charges.
In addition to problem that the ICJ is biased against Israel, there is the problem that its judges are appointed by the foreign ministries of governments chosen by the infamous United Nations Human Rights Council ( or whatever name it is now calling itself). Most of the judges appointed by the court are from police states that are themselves major human rights violators.
There s no possibilty that this court, a creature of the “international community,” will rule in fovor of this petition. It will probably refuse even to hear it.
A link for you to consider
https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/583115-climate-tipping-points-the-arctic-is-a-bellwether-for-irreversible
I will read the link later. Fauci became a respected figure on that stage with Blix and Trump the opposite. I was sympathetic to Trump because the Russian Hoax was appalling. But I immediately said on watching that Trump would lose the election. People switched in large numbers but as Laura said the cult remained and is going to cause upheaval.
It didn’t take me long to oppose Barrington. I oppose the shielding of elderly and believe that’s cruel.
I back vaccines PLUS all measures to save all life. Vaccines only a la Boden and Johnson is dangerous.
LOLOLOL, What a stretch of logic. I am truly beguiled.
Here is your prince of purity squashing free speech of scientists in the middle of a medical emergency:
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/emails-expose-fauci-collins-collusion-smear-anti-lockdown-scientists
I could go further to target your manipulative, maniacal and murderous heroes, but what’s the point.
This is the whole thing about this crisis. What crisis? Pandemic and Global Warming. Both existentialist issues.Trump and cabal lead an anti science world movement. Based on lies.
Lies on this scale always are made personal. So they choose in this the scientists in Wuhan Lab, Peter Daszuk and Fauci. With racist themes also re Chinese.
This article therefore is aiming to destroy personal – those three above (the scientists in Lab, Daszuk and Fauci)
Similarities to the Nazis and Jews.
Trump may be a friend of the Jews but if I’m correct above a context of scapegoating is created.
And veering away from science, and lies re the Lab, is always going to be ultra dangerous to Jews.
So I alone among all of you am defending the Jews. Simple as!
Yes, keelie, I am sure you are correct. I also recognize that they would only place their strongest target on this initial complaint to successfully gain the enormous victory of discovery.
I have to admit a strong opinion, quite supported by documentation and Bright’s own words, that Bright single-handedly prevented Trump from defeating this virus with his manufactured use of an EUA for a drug that has already been approved some decades past. This manipulation of the legal and binding purpose of the EUA by Bright defies and unermines the use of off-label prescription drugs use. Still, hopefully we will see someone held responsible for the deaths of millions of people. But Bright needs to be on this list, and not far from the top, IMHO.
Peloni, I believe that as things start to unwind, most or all of the key players will find themselves in trouble. As you say in your last sentence.
Felix,
It’s not “Fascist muck,” it’s Factual muck.
The facts that are and will be brought out are truly muck in its most vivid sense.
The ad hominem attacks and defamation are something to which, unfortunately, becoming accustomed to these days of “cancel culture” and worse. And yet you laconically berate a man – one among many – who for his own self-protection uses a nom-de-plume. Shame on you…
So, we can finally read the final product of those hundreds of hours of interviews conducted by Reinhardt and his Corona Committee. Here is the complaint:
https://docdro.id/WUjv6iw
I find it disturbing that the role of some key players, such as Rick Bright among others, are not named among the defendants.
Should discovery be granted, it will be quite revealing.
You’re the odd man out here.
Stop with the ad hominem attacks and the defamation or I will ban you.
So he throws the Fascist muck about but hides his name. What has become of Israpundit and how much does it represent Zionism today. People on Israpundit cannot hide when Fascists are advancing this Alex Jones Trump stuff.