Leave a Reply

20 Comments / 20 Comments

  1. One votes for every office on the same ballot. If there are fake Biden ballots, then they would also have fake votes for the Democrats running for House and Senate. Does it make sense that the Democrats retained the House and made gains in the Senate? Does anybody believe that?

  3. Other than commentators like Carlson and Hannity, who are great, Fox has been unreliable. OAN (One America News) is the only tv network that is honestly covering this that I know of.

  4. @ Ted Belman:
    Thank you…I should have realised that but was not sure, …that will be tomorrow. I wonder how the Repubs know that the votes counted already are all kosher…? I should imagine that of the millions of votes already counted in all states under challenge, there must be very many duds which have been slipped through as genuine votes.

    I have to suspect that in EVERY state there was/is a Democrat fake ballot system working. No reason to think it is only in the challenged states. Even in Republican states, the Repub administrations as so weak and limp that Dems could “make hay” there with no drawback.

  6. We will found out what happens when they final finish all the counts. I wish it was in the bag but that is far from certain!

  8. @ Wooly Mammoth:
    ABC has retracted it’s calling Arizona for Biden, and now seems predisposed to a Trump win. Pennsylvania and Michigan are even more egregious as are Georgia and Wisconsin. Trump had insurmountable leads until all counting stopped for hours and mysterious new ballots ALL for Biden, appeared.

    I believe that Trump had over 100,000 lead in Georgia with only 60,000 ballots left to be counted.

  9. @ Edgar G.:

    Correct me if I am wrong, Edgar, but it appears to depend upon the news source how many electoral votes are listed for a given candidate.
    For example PBS uses the Associated Press. Therefore, when the Associated Press calls a state, based upon whatever criteria for a candidate, the numbers are reflected down at Feminazi Woodruff’s Slimy News,[ aka The Newshour with Judy Woodruff. 99% Pro Democratic editorializing the norm at PBS. They do not even bother trying to conceal it.]
    That is why different news sources have varying electoral votes for the two candidates.
    Israel and it’s gulf allies have to decide whether it needs to prepare to take out Iran’s Nuclear Program before everything goes to shit January 22.
    Trump will have to hit a home run to get to first base in contesting this election.
    Dershowitz was interviewed and stated only if the votes needed to win by Biden came from Pennsylvania does Trump have a chance to prevail in court. We will see…

  10. I HAVE A QUESTION……. All over the internet, and youtube especially, I see evdence that the contested states are being either recounted, counted properly or legal actions are being taken,

    On each screen projection I ALWAYS see
    Biden 264…Trump 213. Does this mean that the states which supplied the 264 to Biden are NOT contested………or does it include some of the contested states.. That he actually got 264 votes, alone is suspicious.

    Anyone with an answer…??

  12. I wish I could say otherwise but this is delusional. It’s over. We have sleepy, dementia, thoroughly crooked joe to be in the White House. The swamp is back in charge and will cover up all of their crimes and dirty deeds. China and Iran are thrilled. AS for the snakes at FOX, Trump will start his own media empire and take FOX’s entire prime time line up and their audiences with him. FOX single handedly gave this election to sleepy joe by very prematurely calling Arizona for him. How many people standing in line waiting to vote, left after that call by a station they trusted?

  15. @ Ted Belman:

    You obviously have inside information, not published anywhere. Even Giuliani didn’t go as far. Although news outlet, Blaze said that he was leading by 100,000 votes in, I think, Georgia, and there were only 60,000 left to be counted..

  20. Which would add up to 310. Steve Bannon had predicted 312, if I remember correctly. Amazing. I had a political science professor who could do that kind of thing, George McKenna. Almost restores my faith in statistics. Let’s see.