‘Eritrea won’t accept forced citizen repatriation’

I DON’T BELIEVE THAT A COUNTRY HAS THE RIGHT TO PREVENT ITS CITIZENS RETURNING. WHEN A PERSON SEEKS ASYLUM, I BELIEVE HE MUST PROVE MORE THAN “{THE POSSIBILITY OF PERSECUTION.” TED BELMAN

By BEN HARTMAN, JPOST

Eritrea will not accept the forced repatriation of its nationals living in Israel, Ambassador Tesfamariam Tekeste said on Monday, at a lively and at times heated meeting of the Knesset Committee on Foreign Workers.

Tekeste said his government’s position remains that it will welcome those who choose to return and will help the Israeli government determine which migrants are Eritreans. He also said his government would ensure the safety of those returning and would not prosecute them for leaving the country, except those who skipped out on mandatory military service.

Eritreans make up the majority of the more than 60,000 African migrants in Israel, with some estimates claiming there are over 40,000 in the country. Their homeland is ruled by a dictatorship and Israel cannot legally return Eritreans there due to the possibility of persecution upon their return. Commonly referred to as the “North Korea of Africa,” the country is ranked by Reporters Without Borders at the very bottom (179 out of 179 countries) in terms of press freedom, and has been accused of widespread human rights abuses against its citizens.

Tekeste began his remarks from a defensive stance, and expressed concern about the presence of NGO representatives and Eritrean asylumseekers, saying he was only coming to brief the government and not get involved in a debate.

Committee chairman Nitzan Horowitz (Meretz) told him it was a meeting open to the public and he would have the opportunity to respond to any allegations against himself or his country.

Throughout the meeting, which was held in English, Tekeste was dismissive of all claims presented against his country, which he said is beset by allegations and demonization from “external forces” trying to smear it. He defended the lack of democracy in Eritrea, where no elections have been held since independence from Ethiopia was gained in 1993.

“We consider democracy a process; it should not be imposed. We witnessed in our neighboring countries [that] because of elections, people are now buying guns and sharpening their swords. This is the history of Africa, where there is elections there is bloodshed. [Elections] divide the society and the country and other African countries have this, and we have our own recipe for our country,” Tekeste said.

“People blackmail Eritrea, say we are not a democracy and a lot of allegations because we don’t comply with their policies which have their own agenda,” he added.

The ambassador admitted that his country has never had elections, at which point MK Miri Regev (Likud) cracked that the Eritrean regime resembles that of Avigdor Liberman’s Yisrael Beytenu party, which does not hold elections for party leader.

Tekeste was later interrupted by a back-and-forth between Regev and Horowitz in Hebrew, after which Horowitz apologized and said that “Miri Regev is considering immigrating to Eritrea.”

While there have been allegations that the Eritrean regime has encouraged its citizens to immigrate to Israel in order to send money back to their cash-starved homeland, Tekeste blamed Israel for giving work permits to Eritreans who arrived in 2006 and 2007, saying that it has created an incentive for economic migrants to continue to move to Israel.

Tekeste said he has followed the issue for the entire seven years he has been stationed in Israel, at which point MK Ya’acov Katz (National Union) asked, “Will you stay in Israel when your time is up?” He was answered by Horowitz with, “Yes, he will move to a neighborhood in Beit El.” Katz lives in the West Bank settlement.

Tekeste also claimed that Israel has granted group protection to thousands of African migrants from Ethiopia and Sudan, who claim to be Eritrean in order to remain in the country.

Horowitz then asked Tekeste about the UN position that Eritrean asylum-seekers cannot be returned to the country because they might face persecution.

He replied, “Well, as an Israeli member of the Knesset, do you accept all the UN resolutions against Israel? Do you take it at face value? I think we’re in the same position on this.”

Avi Granot, deputy directorgeneral of the Foreign Ministry’s Africa department, described how Israel has had relations with Eritrea since it became independent, but would prefer it chose a different path in its internal politics.

“We value the strategic relevance and importance of Eritrea, but this does not mean we agree on all variety of issues and politics. We do realize that Eritrea has taken a certain policy of isolationism in regards to its multilateral relations,” Granot said, earning a miffed look from Tekeste with his reference to isolationism.

“That is Eritrea’s choice,” Granot said. “But that is not what we’d welcome in our relation with Eritrea, we’d rather welcome greater sharing of responsibilities.”

Granot also spoke about the desire to find a third country willing to take in Israel’s Eritrean population, but said that since there are 20 million refugees and illegal migrants from Africa just within Africa – including 200,000 Eritreans in Ethiopia – this has not yet borne fruit.

Tekeste was beset by criticism of his country’s human rights record by Amnesty International director in Israel Yonatan Gher and Tel Aviv University Prof. Irit Beck as well as MK Dov Henin (Hadash). They said accepting the ambassador’s assurances of refugees’ safety upon return would be akin to a Syrian ambassador promising that Syrian refugees who return from Turkey would not be harmed.

Tekeste said he would invite a delegation to visit Eritrea, saying that people should not speak ill of his country without having visited it. He then added: “Everyone told me before I was going to Israel that it is hell. If you look at it from the outside you see hell, but seeing is believing. Someone who has never been to Eritrea cannot give me a lecture.”

As for accusations that the Eritrean Embassy is taking money from migrants in Israel, who have to pay a “recovery tax” on their earnings abroad, Tekeste said that this is done with Eritrean diaspora communities around the world. He compared it to Israeli practice, saying, “You Israelis collect money from Jewish communities all over the world, any hospital I go to [in Israel] I see this donation from somebody from here or there, so we can’t be accused of these issues.”

While Tekeste was criticizing protests held by Eritreans outside the country’s embassy in Ramat Gan, an Eritrean man named Isaias shouted, “It’s not like that, it’s not like that!” “Do I have to confront him? Is this the aim of the meeting?” Tekeste asked. “Democracy is not elastic, this is a problem of democracy.”

Isaias accused the ambassador of lying and said, “Eritrea is being led by a group of people who have a dictatorial way of thinking, and because of this we have been dispersed just like a seed all over the world.”

He added that he never dreamed of coming to Israel, but fled after seven years in Eritrean prison because “I love democracy, I love human rights.”

The ambassador responded, “Thank you for betraying your country. You are talking so much nonsense.”

He then said that if Isaias “had any courage to fight for the liberation of the country you should just come and fight for the liberation of the country. Why did you cross so many countries’ borders? Why didn’t you stay in Sudan and fight us from there? This is nonsense. If you had a gut and courage you would fight for the liberation of the country like I did, when I spent years in the bush. I am proud of that.”

The meeting concluded with Katz proposing a committee visit to Eritrea to assess whether Israel can return Eritrean migrants to their homeland. The proposal was greeted warmly by the ambassador.

On Monday night, a plane carrying 144 South Sudanese, including 53 minors, took off from Israel on a one-way flight to Juba. The Population, Immigration and Borders Authority said that would bring to 271 the number of South Sudanese repatriated since the first flight left last Sunday night.

Each adult received 1,000 euros and each child 500 euros.

PIBA spokeswoman Sabine Haddad said Israel had chartered an Ethiopian Airlines plane for the flight, and there were plans for two more flights next week. In total, 600 South Sudanese had agreed to leave voluntarily, 300 had refused and were arrested and another 500 face deportation proceedings.

PIBA also said that 800 African migrants had entered Israel from Sinai this month, and they were all in prison.

June 26, 2012 | 5 Comments »

Leave a Reply

5 Comments / 5 Comments

  1. yamit82 Said:

    One would think by your comment that there was any historical difference in the past as opposed to the present. Regimes change but not the despotism. In the end it’s up to the people to fight for their human rights not bring their problems to our door. We have enough of our own.

    I don’t deny the fact that there are/has been despots in different parts of the world. It is not easy to understand the plight of those who live under those who believe in communist ideology in a tribal society with different religion and deep rooted animosity among different functions like in Eritrea. In such society people are afraid to express themselves due to numerous government spies among them. I wish everyone of the Eritrean refugees were able to live in their country. If you return the refugees to Eritrea no doubt that they will be killed sooner or later. Whatever the ambassador or the current Eritrean government promise don’t matter. They are not individuals that can be trusted at all. I hope the whole world know about the sufferings of the Eritreans by now. I know Israel has a lot of problems to deal with: Enemies that want to destroy it; anti-antisemitism on the rise in different parts of the world etc. I donot want Israel to be overburdened by any additional issue as it is fighting for its own very existence. I hope the Eritrean refugee issues could be solved by possibly sending them to another country/countries.

  2. @ TTW:

    Much of the world today suffers under despotic regimes. One would think by your comment that there was any historical difference in the past as opposed to the present. Regimes change but not the despotism. In the end it’s up to the people to fight for their human rights not bring their problems to our door. We have enough of our own.

    The other problem we face is how to differentiate between political refugees and economic refugees seeking better life opportunities. Europe is full of them and America will become a Spanish speaking nation in not too many years by Mexican illegal immigration

    press 1 for English press 2 for Spanish!

  3. There are many Eritreans who are suffering in jails after being tortured by the dictatorial Eritrean regime. Among them are prominent government officials and Christians. The Christians have been imprisoned for just practicing their faith.There are reports that they are kept in a cage like prison cells and no body is allowed to visit them.
    The Eritrean ambassador did not tell the truth about Eritrea to members of the Knesset and others. I trust the UN statement about the Eritrean refugees as they have a better info from the refugees and others.