Don’t poke the bear

By Ted Belman Mar 7, 2022

“If you tickle us, do we not laugh? If you poison us, do we not die? And if you wrong us, shall we not revenge? If we are like you in the rest, we will resemble you in that.” Shylock.

If you provoke the bear and it gets angry, who should you blame? Yourself or the bear?

I recently commented;

“I chose to put the spotlight on the US rather than on Russia to counter the spin put on the Ukraine conflict by the west. In doing so we all got educated more fully on the facts and realities. That’s a good thing.

Other stalwarts for the west have chosen to do the same thing. Look at recent posts on Israpundit ;

Ukraine’s Deadly Gamble By Lee Smith

“Biden is as much to blame for this conflict as Putin is” By Robert Spencer,

Can an Exhausted America Confront Russia? by Alex Markovsky.

By the way, Arutz Sheva posted my article, The pot is calling the Kettle black, yesterday. That article mentions nothing about the nefarious activities of the US in Ukraine by installing their own puppet regime there and turning a blind eye to the Nazis and the killing of 14,000 Ukrainians in the break away provinces in eastern Ukraine since 2014. Nor the bioweapon labs they finance and oversee.  The US only got the support of 87 nations so far to their resolution condemning Russia. Among those abstaining or staying neutral are China, India, Brazil, Israel and UAE so far. This may change..

From where I am sitting Russia has been hard done by the US whose policies in Ukraine have pushed Putin to these actions in self defense. Russia is no threat to the US but the US has shown itself to be a threat to Russia.

Before the invasion, Putin demanded that NATO unwind its relentless eastward expansion. NATO refused. So we must ask, was the Russian demand reasonable or understandable? Should NATO have agreed at least in part? NATO was totally against doing so. The inevitable result was the invasion..

Daniel Greenfield just published Ukraine Isn’t WW2 or WW3 – It’s WW1 in which he argues;

Now the Western side of the divide are part of a regional union whose mission is to diminish nationalism and national independence, while on the Eastern side all the nationalism that had been suppressed by Communism reigns unchecked.

The League’s successor, the United Nations, like the European Union and other international bodies, was no longer based around a union of independent nations, but on leveraging the interdependence of global institutions to weaken and eventually eliminate national identities in order to finally bring an end to all wars.

The UN’s effort to bring peace through denationalization has been an even bigger failure than the old community of nations.

In effect we are seeing the return to nationalism rather than internationalism (Globalism).  Dr S. Turley argues that the last century saw conflicts over ideology. No Longer, he says, conflicts are over identity.

The Liberal Globalist Order Has Officially COLLAPSED!!

Ukraine On Verge of COLLAPSE As New World Order IMPLODES!!!

Israel National News reported that Zelensky said “Russia initially demanded preconditions to talks that were tantamount to full surrender, including a halt to all fighting by Ukrainian forces, a demilitarized Ukraine, and the “deNazificiation” of the country. Ukraine refused to negotiate under such conditions, and also objected to Russia’s proposal to hold talks in Belarus,” Zelensky said they were non starters. To me they are reasonable.

Did the eastward expansion of NATO bring peace or war? Had NATO stayed put, would Russia have moved westward?  Maybe, maybe not. If the US had not turned Ukraine against Russia, would there have been an invasion? I think not.”

Most of your criticisms of my position pointed out how bad or untrustworthy Putin/Russia was. At no time did I whitewash Putin.

My goal was to sound off against the Clinton, Obama, Biden cabal.  They take a great deal of the blame for what has transpired. When the bear walks into your house its because you left the door open.

If China follows Putin’s lead and retakes Taiwan, should we blame Biden or Xi or Putin?

If Iran gets the bomb, should we blame Obama/Biden, Putin or the EU or perhaps Israel?  Or nobody?

The WWII was brought about by the failure of the west to prevent Germany’s remilitarization or perhaps because it imposed great punishment on Germany because of  WWI. So who is at fault for WWII?

Germany killed 6 million Jews during the Holocaust. Did you know that but for Britain,  Germany wouldn’t have succeeded in killing so many. Had Britain stuck to the terms of the Balfour Declaration and permitted Jewish emigration from the early 1920’s to 1948, Millions of these Jews would have survived. Had Britain not encouraged Arab emigration during this period, there would be no Palestinian problem today.

And what blame should the US take for its arms embargo of Israel from before 1948 to after the Six Day War?

So should we not focus on the failures of the west rather than the sins of  Russia, Iran and the Arabs for what transpires.?

March 20, 2023 | 48 Comments »

Leave a Reply

48 Comments / 48 Comments

  1. “NETREBKO PACKS OUT LA SCALA
    OPERA
    Norman Lebrecht
    March 20, 2023
    Last night’s recital of songs by Rimsky-Korsakov, Rachmaninov and Tchaikovsky was a total sell-out at La Scala (and you can read both meanings into that phrase).

    Anna Netrebko was partnered at the piano by Elena Bashkirova, Barenboim’s wife.

    She will also open La Scala’s next season on December 7 as Elisabetta in Verdi’s Don Carlo.

    Her ties with the crucible of Italian opera are tightening, despite universal acknowledgement of her past support for Vladimir Putin, who is now an indicted war criminal.

    The management of La Scala needs to check its moral compass.”

    https://slippedisc.com/2023/03/netrebko-packs-out-la-scala/

    So much for sanctions.

  2. @Ted
    @Michael

    Don’t forget that the 5 appointed Russia to the rle and allowed it to do this.

    Also recall that Blinken, just two months ago, carved a loophole in the otherwise crippling sanctions on Russia to encourage them to move Iran’s nuclear program forward. Russia is and has been doing the bidding of the American establishment to provide Iran with the means to advance its nuclear program. But as Alex Grinberg explains, Russia was quite tardy in fulfilling the contract regarding the reactor’s construction, delays which took years longer than needed.

    Israel must act to support herself against the international efforts from all corners to make Iran a middle eastern hegemon, and to do this she must counter the efforts of both America and Russia to further expand the Iranian nuclear program. Hence, Israel needs to not be chided into taking the side of Russia nor America while opposing Iran’s rise, as these two nations are each directly and indirectly acting to aid Iran, and by doing so they are each poking the Israeli bear. The only question is when the Israeli bear will finally act to end this blatant provocation being installed against her by both her greatest ally, the US, and her greatest ally’s proxy, Russia.

  3. I think people fell to realize that everything is not black and white, but with many shades of gray as Ted once said.

    Every nation plays both ends against the middle. The games stacks are high, but they change almost with the wind. Like a James Bond movie, The one trying to kill him before breakfast, is the one he’s in bed with shortly after the evening meal.

    Michael, just because Putin, does something and it is used for an evil purpose, months and years later, is like saying we should dig up the great grandfather of Hitler and punishing him for producing such and evil seed. Everyone is responsible for their own choices.

    Which makes one wonder, how much of the wrath of Hashem, is coming to the United States and Great Britian because of our lack of support for the Jews in ww2.

  4. If Iran gets the bomb, should we blame Obama/Biden, Putin or the EU or perhaps Israel? Or nobody?

    IMHO, Seeing that Russia built the Bushehr reactor, enabling Iran to enrich uranium in the first place, then was instrumental in the treaties allowing Iran to progressively enrich it to near-weapons grade, then formed a NATO-like treaty with Iran, one would have to be either an idiot or grossly misinformed to take Russia’s side in this matter.

  5. @Liz
    You are right, very few people know about Britain’s complicity. It has been hidden. I am pleased to hear that Revelation TV reported on it.

    In this article
    https://www.israpundit.org/the-100-year-betrayal-of-israel-by-the-west/

    I expanded on this point.

    During WWII, Hitler attempted to exterminate the Jews, by first transporting them to extermination camps, like Auschwitz, and then killing them with the use of poison gas. Britain still refused to allow more Jews into Palestine.

    In effect, Germany was herding the Jews into barns before setting fire to them and Britain was guarding the burning barns to make sure no Jews escaped, metaphorically speaking.

    The British also bombed and torpedoed many ships of refugees, with the express purpose to kill Jews. Thus continuing the work of Nazi Germany upon those that had escaped the Nazis.

    Tens of thousands of ‘additional’ Jews were murdered intentionally and with malice aforethought by the Government of Britain.

    After the war, Britain still wouldn’t let the survivors in. Instead they were housed in “displaced persons” camps in Europe until Israel’s declaration of Independence on May 19. 1948.

  6. Coming late to this party, but the only way I learned of Britain’s betrayal of the Jews was through a series of documentaries on Revelation TV, a Christian evangelist channel. It went into detail about Britain’s broken promises, and put the blame on the UK government, where it belongs. I have dual citizenship (USA and UK) and live in England, and this is only TV programme I have seen in either country which made this betrayal quite clear. Of course, “Exodus” had a similar theme, but the Revelation documentaries went further back and was entirely factual.

  7. This article includes,

    Germany killed 6 million Jews during the Holocaust. Did you know that but for Britain, Germany wouldn’t have succeeded in killing so many. Had Britain stuck to the terms of the Balfour Declaration and permitted Jewish emigration from the early 1920’s to 1948, Millions of these Jews would have survived. Had Britain not encouraged Arab emigration during this period, there would be no Palestinian problem today.

    This is very damning but it got no response.

  8. The intended/unintended consequences of political malfeasance and stupidity!
    Did Putin feel threatened by the Russia hoax, and did he take advantage on this opportunity to invade Ukraine?

  9. What did Joe ask Vlad during their last conversation?
    Vlad responded: “If you let me take back Ukraine, I will in return give you “the Ukraine Paper Trail”!

  10. @peloni

    I wouldn’t worry about the Ukrainian extremists infiltrating Europe or the West.

    The West is for freedom and democracy when it wants to manipulate other countries.

    If the refugees try another Maidan in the West, they will be simply shot on the spot or given very lengthy jail sentences.

    Besides, freedom and democracy are really laughable terms after two years of COVID takeover.

  11. @Reader
    The Far Right paramilitary groups in Ukraine are actually a mix of various shades of the Right, including fascists and anticommunists and anti socialists among others. These groups will be among the first to be chased out of Ukraine and they will move to Europe. They are accustomed to violent demonstrations of their political fervors and will likely seek out similarly viewed citizens in any country they seek refuge, unfortunately for the Socialists within that country. Ukraine is not a democracy, and it never has been nor would it be easily changed into one. Placing the Ukrainians into a Socialist Democratic state such as Germany will be a rough fit, sort of the round peg into a square hole.

    1
    1
  12. Given the amount of trust that’s built up among us I believe that we can discuss the issue of climate without fear or rancour and in time reach conclusions.

  13. Peloni very perceptive. These left parties of whatever hue have always been politically correct and always seek an accomodation with fascism. The big thing in 1933 is that Hitler was stoppable but they could not ACT. Another thing which is patently true is that it requires a certain method (party necessarily because the individual is always well – an individual!) to SEE clearly what’s happening. I defend Putin because he is FOR nation. I am too. But essentially because it is necessary to defend against Fascism.

  14. The war against Ukraine is only a few days old, but already Russian President Vladimir Putin has amassed a stunning series of historic achievements — all of them precisely the opposite of what he might have hoped to accomplish.

    The conflict is still raging, and Putin may yet turn the tide of an invasion in which his forces have struggled, but much of the damage he has done to his cause — much of what he has done to clarify the principles of democracy, self-determination and global solidarity, and to strengthen the very ideas, organizations and countries Putin tried for decades to undermine — will carry on regardless of his invasion’s ultimate outcome.

    From the United States to NATO to the European Union, Russia’s unprovoked assault on its neighbor sparked unqualified revulsion, defended only by a smattering of autocrats, with even some of them hesitating to give their full support to the attack.

    Putin gave the world a rare moment of moral clarity. The crisis he created presented us with the real-life dangers of unrestrained autocracy, and a very tangible demonstration of the importance of democracy, freedom and self-determination. Rights that are so often seen as lofty, ethereal concepts suddenly became palpable when Putin tried to steal them from the Ukrainian people.

    And Putin’s assault gave a renewed sense of mission to organizations whose stated mission is to preserve peace, security and democracy.
    In the United States, which has suffered in recent years from the dangerous virus of political polarization — aggravated by Moscow’s interference — Russia’s attack created an uncommon upswelling of near-unanimity. A CNN poll found upward of 80% of Americans backing sanctions to punish and pressure Russia, with equal majorities of Democrats and Republicans aligned to say the US should do even more

  15. Usually media are branded as foreign agents when they are funded by foreign entities and don’t register properly.

    The US has laws like this which it strictly enforces.

  16. “Rain TV” the only independent non state controlled media in Russia has decided to close its doors. They say they can no longer report the lie the Russian was requiring is to say no war was on going.

    So RT which is basically Kremlin TV looks even larger. From the sound of some of the commentary here on Israpundit some of you might be fans of RT.

    Too bad Rain TV is going away. The Kremlin had branded it as a foreign agent last year.

  17. @peloni

    You are right that there will be negative consequences but I don’t get the socialist/communist allusion.

    Russia has nothing to do with either one of those things, and it was the DEVIL under the czars, under communists, under capitalists/oligarchs.

    You might as well connect the consequences to its former absolute monarchy.

    I think that most refugees are simply regular people trying to get out because they are scared.

    Do you mean that Europe is now socialist and the refugees will try to undermine it?

    I really doubt it.

  18. @peloni

    You are right that there will be negative consequences but I don’t get the socialist/communist allusion.

    Russia has nothing to do with either one of those things, and it was considered the DEVIL, by the US especially, under the czars, under communists, and under capitalists/oligarchs.

    You might as well connect the consequences to its former absolute monarchy.

    I think that most refugees are simply regular people trying to get out because they are scared.

    Do you mean that Europe is now socialist and the refugees will try to undermine it?

    I really doubt it.

  19. @Reader

    Ukraine goes visa-free for foreign fighters
    Kiev suspends entry requirements for anyone who wants to enlist in the foreign legion

    There will be two major negative outcomes from this conflict that will directly affect the whole of Europe, regardless of the outcome of which Vlad wins the day in Ukraine. The first of these will come in the form of the refugees being scattered among the European states who are quite intolerant of anything reminiscent of socialism, and who also have a strong history of violent actions to demonstrate this intolerance. The second negative outcome will be the new champions of even more radicalized champions of anti-Socialist/anti-Communist warriors, imported for the expressed purpose of murdering even those who were once socialists/communists, ie Russians.

    When the war in Ukraine is won by Putin, and it will be won by Putin, these imported warriors will carry on the fight which will increase the “Neo-nazi”/anti-communists infiltration into Europe. Europe should be careful which seeds they plant in their own back yard. Ukraine is not Afghanistan, and despite Ukraine’s efforts to act as if there is no consequence to this free infiltration of a “foreign legion” at the steps of Europe to act as NATO’s proxy army, Socialist Europe will likely find a consequence to importing these elements in their not too distant future.

  20. Bear Klein they shot their own people and own police to blame it on Yanokovic

    That was America working with the Fascists.

    Of course Zelensky is steered from the beginning by Victoria Nuland as evidenced in video from Maidan 2014. Jews who do not warn on this open a terrible trap for Israel. The climate people on twitter have lost it. They won’t recover. A new leadership will replace these phonies.

    Bear and Adam just repeat ancient dogma.

  21. At this dark hour, when we see Russia’s unprovoked and unjustified invasion of Ukraine and massive disinformation campaigns and information manipulation, it is essential to separate lies – invented to justify what cannot be justified – from facts.

    The facts are that Russia, a major nuclear power, has attacked and invaded a peaceful and democratic neighboring country, which posed no threat to it, nor provoked it.

    Moreover, President Vladimir Putin is threatening reprisals on any other state that may come to the rescue of the people of Ukraine. Such use of force and coercion has no place in the 21st century.

  22. Reader
    March 1, 2022 at 6:52 pm

    War Propaganda About Ukraine Becoming More Militaristic, Authoritarian, and Reckless
    Every useful or pleasing claim about the war, no matter how unverified or subsequently debunked, rapidly spreads, while dissenters are vilified as traitors or Kremlin agents.
    By Glenn Greenwald
    Global Research, February 28, 2022
    Glenn Greenwald 27 February 2022

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/war-propaganda-about-ukraine-becoming-more-militaristic-authoritarian-reckless/5772350

    And it is only getting worse.

  23. War Propaganda About Ukraine Becoming More Militaristic, Authoritarian, and Reckless
    Every useful or pleasing claim about the war, no matter how unverified or subsequently debunked, rapidly spreads, while dissenters are vilified as traitors or Kremlin agents.
    By Glenn Greenwald
    Global Research, February 28, 2022
    Glenn Greenwald 27 February 2022

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/war-propaganda-about-ukraine-becoming-more-militaristic-authoritarian-reckless/5772350

    And it is only getting worse.

  24. If one supports Putin in his destruction of the Ukraine and killing Ukrainians I can only believe one has no empathy for fellow humans or no informed rational understanding of what is taking place.

  25. I want to go back to Adam and this Becky Sullivan

    To these paragraphs which are very critical to our knowledge.

    “Just days before it is to be signed, Yanukovych announces that he will refuse to sign an association agreement with the European Union to bring Ukraine into a free trade agreement. He cites pressure from Russia as a reason for his decision.

    The announcement sparks huge protests across Ukraine — the largest since the Orange Revolution — calling for Yanukovych to resign. Protesters begin camping out in Kyiv’s Maidan, also known as Independence Square, and occupy government buildings, including Kyiv’s city hall and the justice ministry.

    In late February, violence between police and protesters leaves more than 100 dead in the single bloodiest week in Ukraine’s post-Soviet history.

    Ahead of a scheduled impeachment vote on Feb. 22, Yanukovych flees, eventually arriving in Russia. Ukraine’s parliament votes unanimously to remove Yanukovych and install an interim government, which announces it will sign the EU agreement and votes to free Tymoshenko from prison.

    The new government charges Yanukovych with mass murder of the Maidan protesters and issues a warrant for his arrest.

    Russia declares that the change in Ukraine’s government is an illegal coup.” End Quote

    Sullivan is clearly performing a whitewash here of Ukrainian Fascism.

    Adam did you not believe Almueda in that critical article presented by Reader.
    This TRUE HORROR STORY meant the total turning of the tide BY THE FASCISTS

    AND LED INEXORABLY TO THE PRESENT WAR.

    Adam what good will it do you as a Jew covering for Nazis?

  26. Actually, in the FSU there was a referendum on whether the republics wanted to keep the USSR.

    All of them said “Yes”, including the Baltic republics (~75% of the votes).

    However, there were three government officials who got together afterwards and created an agreement dissolving the USSR, signed it, and reported this act to the American president (I am not making this up).

    When Gorbachov found out about this, he did nothing, and let the agreement stand.

    The populace, of course, didn’t understand anything that was going on and thought that things will be the same but better – more freedom, prosperity, etc.

    To make it easier to understand – what would you think if the governors, let’s say, of California, New York, and Texas got together, signed a paper that the United States of America is thereby dissolved, and every state is now a free and independent country, reported this event over the phone to Putin, and the current US president found out about this and thought that it was perfectly OK?

    BTW, “Putin” has no interest in killing “Ukrainians”, the Russian military is destroying the Ukrainian military infrastructure there while avoiding the cities, etc. while the Ukrainians are blowing up every bridge they can lay their hands on.

    There is a very large Ukrainian military contingent now at the borders of the self-proclaimed republics killing “Ukrainians”, “Russians”, et al. – why do you think they shipped women and children to safety in Russia?

  27. @Ted Belman

    I note that you are generally in agreement with me.

    I am glad you noticed.

    It is amazing to find out that Francisco Gil-White is your friend.

    I found his website many years ago,

    In this country, the American soldiers are adored.

    They are “our heroes who fight in (fill in the blank) for our freedoms” and it is considered an honor to buy them a meal or to pay their bill at a store.

    Russia, of course, is the DEVIL and has no right to have its own interests or anything else (the only country in the world which does is the US, of course).

    I suspected that the destruction of the economy by COVID would be used to prime the population for a big war but I really didn’t want to be proven right.

    I think the calculation is that the fight will be between Russia and the former Eastern Bloc countries which will destroy each other, and everything will be Russia’s fault.

    I think they do want a big war in Europe:

    28 Feb, 2022 23:18

    Ukraine goes visa-free for foreign fighters
    Kiev suspends entry requirements for anyone who wants to enlist in the foreign legion

    https://www.rt.com/russia/550905-ukraine-foreign-legion-visas-zelensky/

  28. @Ted, what you are missing clearly in conflating the imperfections of the US (people like Obama) with Putin’s killing of Ukranians.

    Is the Ukrainian people DO NOT WANT to be ruled by the Russians.
    They DO NOT WANT to be killed by Him,
    They DO NOT WANT their homes destroyed.
    They DO WANT to be Refugess
    .

    They voted in the 1990s to be separate from the Russians and they want to be FREE! They are fighting bravely even though overmatched to try and stay free.

    Most of the world gets this loud and clear. It is black and white. Conflating your grievances into this about the USA are frankly incomprehensible and callous.

    Israelis get it clearly. Think about it please!!! You are dreaming up arguments where Russia under Putin are some great friend and in fact they are pure evil at this point in action and deed!

    Israel tiptoes with Putin because of his threat to Israel from Syria. Morally Israel would love to send Ukraine weapons but for fear of incurring his wrath they do not. So they stop with messages from Lapid (ONLY not Bennett) plus allowing volunteers to help Ukraine plus sending lots of humanitarian aid in material and human aid.

    You are ignoring again my comments that Russia arms all of Israel’s worst enemies plus sold them the nuclear technology to allow them to make nuclear fuel. Ted you should stop your conflating and rationalizing of Putin and Russia. Do not try and protect evil!!

  29. @Peloni, the reactors to start with are Russian in Iran.

    DUBAI (Reuters) – Iran began building a second nuclear plant with Russian help on Saturday, in a $10 billion project which follows Tehran’s landmark nuclear deal with world powers last year, state media reported.

    State television showed Iranian and Russian officials at launching ceremonies for the 10-year project which will include two power plants with a total capacity of more than 1,000 megawatts after their completion.

    Iran already runs one Russian-built nuclear reactor at Bushehr, its first. Russia signed a deal with Iran in 2014 to build up to eight more reactors in the country.

    A report by the U.N. nuclear agency has found that Iran has kept to the nuclear

    There are many other citations. This is very common knowledge.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-russia-nuclearpower/iran-russia-start-construction-of-new-iranian-nuclear-plant-idUSKCN11G0EB

  30. @Bear

    Selling Nuclear technology to Iran

    I have never heard that Iran received its nuclear technology from Russia. Do you have a citation for this or a source I could pursue? I really don’t believe that Russia would be so foolish as to empower Iran with nuclear tech. It is completely contrary to Russia’s self interest to do so, which doesn’t mean it isn’t true, but I have never heard of this claim beyond your assertions.

  31. Israel’s Relations with Russia – Andrew N. Koss

    Moscow has generally taken Iran’s side in the nuclear deal negotiations, while showing itself especially eager to sell arms to Iran – arms that the latter will use against America and Israel. Russia doesn’t see Israel’s destruction as a primary policy goal, or even an especially good outcome. It doesn’t mind the occasional Israeli airstrike against Iranian forces, which remind Iran that it’s the junior partner in the Moscow-Tehran alliance. And the Kremlin would rather avoid friction with the IDF, the region’s most effective military.

    But this shouldn’t be mistaken for actual good relations. Putin supports Israel’s enemies with diplomatic cover, weapons, and boots on the ground. His soldiers fight side-by-side with Hizbullah and Iran’s Quds Force. Moscow’s relationship with Hamas is a cozy one. And Putin’s overarching goal is to upend the American-led international order and hurt the U.S. wherever he can.

    At the same time, Russia, an ex-superpower with a vast military machine, has a sizable military presence on Israel’s northern border, where it controls the airspace. It could give Israel’s adversaries even more dangerous weapons. So Israel’s leaders are being careful. They must mind what they do, as well as what they say. (Mosaic)

  32. @Ted, just very recently Russia themselves jammed Israeli communications and kept many planes from flying for a couple of days or so. So referencing previous years is and downplaying it is inadequate in mind.

    Has the USA sold Iran equipment to make nukes? NO Russia has.

    Russia Selling Weapons to all of Israeli enemies is that okay with you?

    Interesting is that you need to go back to bad mouthing US to try and downplay Russia’s anti Israeli positions.

    Russia has always said the Golan is Syrian!! Yes they recently they brought it up again. So it was okay with you that Russia was punishing Israel?

    Is okay with you that Russia consistently takes anti Israeli and pro Pal positions at UN?

    Forget the US for a moment. Can you honestly say Russia is Pro Israel and an ally?

  33. @Bear.
    I will deal with your comment issue by issue.
    By the way, I am not a hater. I don’t have such a strong emotion.

    1. Except for Iran, so does the US. But the US give Iran the money to buy the weapons.
    2. I do not know to what extent they sell nuclear technology to Iran. Here’s the definitive report. but the US didn’t object to the deal and currently has no issue with it.
    3. Backing the Palestinians on the two state solution but Russia doesn’t apply any pressure on Israel on that front but the US and the EU and the UN do. When Obama didn’t veto Res 2334, Putin was asked to veto it and he declined. What you don’t know is that Obama wanted to follow up with an even worse resolution but didn’t because Putin said he would veto it. Look it up.
    4. Yes Putin did say he supported Syria’s claim to the Golan but only did so to punish Israel from voting against Russia on Ukraine.
    5. Don’t blame Russia for the war in Syria. Obama started it. Although Putin sold Syria the S-400 system it hasn’t prevented Israel from attacking. And Russia has been upholding the deconflicting agreement with Israel. Even now. Nevertheless one Israeli plan was shot down though there have been hundreds of Israeli attacks.
    6. Yes in 2019, Israel accused Russia or selling jamming equipment to Syria. Russia said it was necessary. to protect her soldiers. It turned out not to be such a problem as Israel created an antidote.
    7. Diplomatically Russia stands by the Palestinians. Agreed.

    But the damage to Israel in her fight against the Palestinians is caused by the US demands on Israel. So the US is harming us more than Russia is.

  34. @Ted, you can NOT answer my question because it would show in your hate of the USA you give Putin and Russia a pass for all their anti Israel actions:

    1. Selling weapons to all of Israel enemies
    2. Selling Nuclear technology to Iran
    3. Backing the Palestinians on the two state solution
    4. Claiming the Golan is Syrian
    5. Backing Up Assad and helping him slaughter millions (plus selling them weapons to hurt Israel and shoot down their planes.
    6. Jamming Israeli communications which kept planes down at Ben Gurion
    7. Supporting anti Israeli agenda at UN

    So basically you support Putin and Russia more than you care about Israel?

  35. @Peloni
    Thanks for your support.
    The Times of Israel also turned me down saying essentially it was not true.. It obviously is taking the position of the MSM.

    I sent the article to Newsmax where I also have a blog. They have not gotten back to me as of yet.

  36. @Bear
    I failed to respond to your question because it would take a detailed account.. Nobody supports Israel in full. Russia and the US have their own interests so there are pros and cons. for Israel.with each..

    Both Russia and the US are corrupt. I no longer worship the US nor recognize Biden as a democratically elected president.

    There is no question in my mind that the US stole Ukraine from Russian influence. and is using Ukraine to the detriment of Russia. Does it amount to a causes belli? Russia thinks so. The US refused to negotiate so Putin took action.

    Must Putin continue to accept the abuse. At what point is he entitled to fight back. Or do you believe he must take the abuse. The moral issue is was he entitled to invade Ukraine’s sovereignty? “never” is not the answer and good people will have differing opinions.

    Next question is, who is responsible for this turn of events. Do we simply blame it on Russia or do we recognize that the US shares some of the blame. Robert Spencer and many others blame the US at least in part.

    I am highly critical of what the US has become and so used this as an opportunity to show it in the pot calling the kettle black.

    Now we must ask how sacrosanct is one’s sovereignty. For instance both the US and the EU and the UN do not recognized Israel’s sovereignty. So it is only sacrosanct when they say it is. I would prefer that no one’s sovereignty be violated including Ukraine’s. and Taiwan’s. But as Greenfield pointed out historically sovereignty gets violated either by the internationalists or by the nationalists. The new World Order also violates sovereignty.

    Did the US care when she invaded the sovereignty of Cuba, Serbia, Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq? I think not.

    China says it considers Taiwan is Chinese territory and wants to unify Chinese territory. The only thing stopping them is the notion of sovereignty. China never consented to it seceding.. So to me everything is complicated. To you and Laura, its straight forward. You see it as us and them. Black and White. I see a lot of grey.

    Apparently, Israel is going to vote against Russia. I wonder if the US forced Israel to do so. Or do you think it was just a moral decision?

  37. @Ted
    I am glad the Arutz Sheva published your article. AmericanThinker was quite incorrect that the tone was anti-American. There is no more American quality than empowering the people with transparency of govt overreach, crimes and blatant corruption. Furthermore, there is no more vital role for a journalist, or a journal for that matter, than to expose the history of such governmental misdeeds, and thereby enlighten current events with a vigorous discussion and analysis, which I think you clearly have achieved. Well done!

  38. A brief but useful summary of Ukrainian history since 1990. Obviously it doesn’t tell us everything in such a brief article. But it does give us some idea of how the conflict developed. As Deng Tsiao-ping, China’s wisest and most humane dictator, once said, “learn truth from facts.”

    Russia’s at war with Ukraine. Here’s how we got here
    Becky SullivanUpdated February 24, 20229:27 AM ET

    Demonstrators wave Ukrainian flags as they gather in central Kyiv, Ukraine’s capital, on Oct. 6, 2019, to protest against broader autonomy for separatist territories. Protesters chanted, “No to surrender!” and some held placards critical of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Police said the crowd swelled to around 10,000 people.
    Genya Savilov/AFP via Getty Images
    As Russian forces begin an all-out assault on Ukraine after months of troop buildup and failed diplomatic efforts by the U.S. and its European allies to head off conflict, the situation for Kyiv is the most high-stakes in the country’s 30-year history.

    Since breaking from the Soviet Union, Ukraine has wavered between the influences of Moscow and the West, surviving scandal and conflict with its democracy intact.

    Now it faces its biggest test as Russia threatens its very existence as an independent country.

    Since the illegal annexation of the Crimean Peninsula in 2014, many Ukrainians have turned away from Moscow and toward the West, with popular support on the rise for joining Western alliances such as NATO and the European Union.

    But along the country’s eastern border with Russia, separatists backed by Moscow took control of two regions in 2014. Violence in eastern Ukraine has killed more than 14,000 people in the years since, according to International Crisis Group research. Russia’s recognition of the two regions’ independence set the stage for moving its troops into Ukraine.

    Read on to understand how Ukraine came to where it is today.

    The 1990s: Independence from the Soviet Union

    1989 and 1990

    Anti-communist protests sweep central and Eastern Europe, starting in Poland and spreading throughout the Soviet bloc. In Ukraine, January 1990 sees more than 400,000 people joining hands in a human chain stretching some 400 miles from the western city of Ivano-Frankivsk to Kyiv, the capital, in the north-central part of Ukraine. Many wave the blue and yellow Ukrainian flag that had been banned under Soviet rule.

    Representatives of the Ukrainian Catholic Church protest the visit of Russian Orthodox Church Patriarch Alexi II to Kyiv on Oct. 29, 1990.
    Efrem Lucatsky/AP
    July 16, 1990

    The Rada, the new Ukrainian parliament formed out of the previous Soviet legislature, votes to declare independence from the Soviet Union. Authorities recall Ukrainian soldiers from other parts of the USSR and vote to shut down the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in northern Ukraine.

    1991

    Following a failed coup in Moscow, the Ukrainian parliament declares independence a second time on Aug. 24, a date that is still celebrated as Ukraine’s official Independence Day. In December, Ukrainians vote to make their independence official when they approve the declaration by a landslide 92% of votes in favor. The Soviet Union officially dissolves on Dec. 26.

    Ukrainians demonstrate in front of the Communist Party’s Central Committee headquarters in Kyiv on Aug. 25, 1991, the day after Ukraine declared its independence from the Soviet Union.
    Anatoly Sapronenko/AFP via Getty Images
    1992

    As NATO allies contemplate adding central and Eastern European members for the first time, Ukraine formally establishes relations with the alliance, though it does not join. NATO’s secretary-general visits Kyiv, and Ukrainian President Leonid Kravchuk visits NATO headquarters in Brussels.

    December 1994

    After the Soviet Union’s collapse, Ukraine is left with the world’s third-largest nuclear stockpile. In a treaty called the Budapest Memorandum, Ukraine agrees to trade away its intercontinental ballistic missiles, warheads and other nuclear infrastructure in exchange for guarantees that the three other treaty signatories — the U.S., the U.K. and Russia — will “respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine.”

    President Bill Clinton (from left), Russian President Boris Yeltsin and Ukrainian President Leonid Kravchuk join hands in 1994 after signing a nuclear disarmament agreement. Under the agreement, Ukraine, the world’s third-largest nuclear power at the time, said it would turn all its strategic nuclear arms over to Russia for destruction.
    Sergei Supinsky/AFP via Getty Images
    1994 to 2004

    In 10 years as president, Leonid Kuchma helps transition Ukraine from a Soviet republic to a capitalist society, privatizing businesses and working to improve international economic opportunities. But in 2000, his presidency is rocked by scandal over audio recordings that reveal he ordered the death of a journalist. He remains in power about four more years.

    The 2000s: Wavering between the West and Russia

    2004

    The presidential election pits Kuchma’s incumbent party — led by his hand-picked successor, Viktor Yanukovych, and supported by Russian President Vladimir Putin — against a popular pro-democracy opposition leader, Viktor Yushchenko.

    In the final months of the campaign, Yushchenko falls mysteriously ill, is disfigured and is confirmed by doctors to have been poisoned.

    Yanukovych wins the election amid accusations of rigging. Massive protests follow, and the public outcry becomes known as the Orange Revolution. After a third vote, Yushchenko prevails.

    Viktor Yushchenko, the pro-Western hero of the Orange Revolution, became the third president of an independent Ukraine. Yulia Tymoshenko (left) became prime minister.
    Maxim Marmur/AFP via Getty Images
    January 2005

    Yushchenko takes office as president, with Yulia Tymoshenko as prime minister.

    2008

    Following efforts by Yushchenko and Tymoshenko to bring Ukraine into NATO, the two formally request in January that Ukraine be granted a “membership action plan,” the first step in the process of joining the alliance.

    U.S. President George W. Bush supports Ukraine’s membership, but France and Germany oppose it after Russia voices displeasure.

    In April, NATO responds with a compromise: It promises that Ukraine will one day be a member of the alliance but does not put it on a specific path for how to do so.

    An employee of the state-owned Russian natural gas company Gazprom works at the central control room of the company’s headquarters in Moscow on Jan. 14, 2009.
    Yuri Kadobnov/AFP via Getty Images
    January 2009

    On Jan. 1, Gazprom, the state-owned Russian gas company, suddenly stops pumping natural gas to Ukraine, following months of politically fraught negotiations over gas prices. Because Eastern and central European countries rely on pipelines through Ukraine to receive gas imports from Russia, the gas crisis quickly spreads beyond Ukraine’s borders.

    Under international pressure to resolve the crisis, Tymoshenko negotiates a new deal with Putin, and gas flows resume on Jan. 20. Much of Europe still relies on Russian gas today.

    2010

    Yanukovych is elected president in February. He says Ukraine should be a “neutral state,” cooperating with both Russia and Western alliances like NATO.

    2011

    Ukrainian prosecutors open criminal investigations into Tymoshenko, alleging corruption and misuse of government resources. In October, a court finds her guilty of “abuse of power” during the 2009 negotiations with Russia over the gas crisis and sentences her to seven years in prison, prompting concerns in the West that Ukrainian leaders are persecuting political opponents.

    Anti-government protesters guard the perimeter of Independence Square, known as Maidan, in Kyiv on Feb. 19, 2014. Protesters were calling for the ouster of President Viktor Yanukovych over corruption and an abandoned trade agreement with the European Union.
    Brendan Hoffman/Getty Images
    2014: The Maidan revolution and Crimea’s annexation

    November 2013 through February 2014

    Just days before it is to be signed, Yanukovych announces that he will refuse to sign an association agreement with the European Union to bring Ukraine into a free trade agreement. He cites pressure from Russia as a reason for his decision.

    The announcement sparks huge protests across Ukraine — the largest since the Orange Revolution — calling for Yanukovych to resign. Protesters begin camping out in Kyiv’s Maidan, also known as Independence Square, and occupy government buildings, including Kyiv’s city hall and the justice ministry.

    In late February, violence between police and protesters leaves more than 100 dead in the single bloodiest week in Ukraine’s post-Soviet history.

    Ahead of a scheduled impeachment vote on Feb. 22, Yanukovych flees, eventually arriving in Russia. Ukraine’s parliament votes unanimously to remove Yanukovych and install an interim government, which announces it will sign the EU agreement and votes to free Tymoshenko from prison.

    The new government charges Yanukovych with mass murder of the Maidan protesters and issues a warrant for his arrest.

    Russia declares that the change in Ukraine’s government is an illegal coup. Almost immediately, armed men appear at checkpoints and facilities in the Crimean Peninsula. Putin at first denies they are Russian soldiers but later admits it.

    Anti-government protesters clash with police in Kyiv’s Maidan despite a truce agreed between the Ukrainian president and opposition leaders on Feb. 20, 2014.
    Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images
    March 2014

    With Russian troops in control of the peninsula, the Crimean parliament votes to secede from Ukraine and join Russia. A public referendum follows, with 97% of voters favoring secession, although the results are disputed.

    Putin finalizes the Russian annexation of Crimea in a March 18 announcement to Russia’s parliament. In response, the U.S. and allies in Europe impose sanctions on Russia. They have never recognized Russia’s annexation. It remains the only time that a European nation has used military force to seize the territory of another since World War II.

    April 2014

    With some 40,000 Russian troops gathered on Ukraine’s eastern border, violence breaks out in the eastern Ukrainian region of Donbas — violence that continues to this day. Russian-supported separatist forces storm government buildings in two eastern regions, Donetsk and Luhansk. They declare independence from Ukraine as the Donetsk People’s Republic and Luhansk People’s Republic, though they remain internationally recognized as part of Ukraine. Russia denies that its troops are on Ukrainian soil, but Ukrainian officials insist otherwise.

    A man holds a Crimean flag in front of the Crimean parliament building in Simferopol, Ukraine, on March 17, 2014. People in Crimea overwhelmingly voted to secede from Ukraine during a referendum vote on March 16, 2014, and the Crimean parliament declared independence and formally asked Russia to annex Crimea.
    Dan Kitwood/Getty Images
    May 2014

    The pro-West politician Petro Poroshenko, a former government minister and head of the Council of the National Bank of Ukraine, is elected Ukraine’s president. He promotes reform, including measures to address corruption and lessen Ukraine’s dependence on Russia for energy and financial support.

    Sept. 5, 2014

    Representatives from Russia, Ukraine, France and Germany meet in Belarus to attempt to negotiate an end to the violence in the Donbas. They sign the first Minsk agreement, a deal between Ukraine and Russia to quiet the violence under a fragile cease-fire. The cease-fire soon breaks, and fighting continues into the new year.

    Ukrainian troops train with small arms on March 13, 2015, outside Mariupol, Ukraine. The Minsk II cease-fire agreement, which continued to hold despite being violated more than 1,000 times, was nearing the one-month mark.
    Andrew Burton/Getty Images
    2015 through 2020: Russia looms

    February 2015

    The Minsk group meets again in Belarus to find a more successful agreement to end the fighting in eastern Ukraine, resulting in the Minsk II agreement. It too has been unsuccessful at ending the violence. From 2014 through today, more than 14,000 people have been killed, tens of thousands wounded and more than a million displaced.

    Together, the annexation of Crimea and the Russian-backed violence in the east have pushed Ukrainian public sentiment toward the West, strengthening interest in joining NATO and the EU.

    2016 and 2017

    As fighting in the Donbas continues, Russia repeatedly strikes at Ukraine in a series of cyberattacks, including a 2016 attack on Kyiv’s power grid that causes a major blackout. In 2017, a large-scale assault affects key Ukrainian infrastructure, including the National Bank of Ukraine and the country’s electrical grid. (Cyberattacks from Russia have continued through the present; the latest major attack targeted government websites in January 2022.)

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy greets lawmakers during the solemn opening and first sitting of the new parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, in Kyiv on Aug. 29, 2019.
    Sergei Supinsky/AFP via Getty Images
    2019

    In April, comedian and actor Volodymyr Zelenskyy is elected president in a landslide rebuke of Poroshenko and the status quo, which includes a stagnating economy and the conflict with Russia.

    During his campaign, Zelenskyy vowed to make peace with Russia and end the war in the Donbas.

    His early efforts to reach a solution to the violence are slowed by U.S. President Donald Trump, who briefly blocks U.S. military aid to Ukraine and suggests to Zelenskyy that he should instead work with Putin to resolve the crisis.

    In a phone call with Trump in July 2019, Zelenskyy requests a visit to the White House to meet with Trump about U.S. backing of Ukraine’s efforts to push off Russia. Trump asks Zelenskyy for “a favor”: an investigation into energy company Burisma and the Bidens. A White House whistleblower complains, leading to Trump’s first impeachment in December 2019.

    Several U.S. officials later testify that Zelenskyy was close to announcing such an investigation, though he ultimately demurs, saying Ukrainians are “tired” of Burisma.

    Russian troops take part in drills at the Kadamovskiy firing range in the Rostov region of southern Russia on Dec. 14, 2021.
    AP
    2021: The crisis escalates

    April

    Russia sends about 100,000 troops to Ukraine’s borders, ostensibly for military exercises. Although few analysts believe an invasion is imminent, Zelenskyy urges NATO leadership to put Ukraine on a timeline for membership. Later that month, Russia says it will withdraw the troops, but tens of thousands remain.

    August

    Two years after his entanglement with Trump, Zelenskyy visits the White House to meet with President Biden. Biden emphasizes that the U.S. is committed to “Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity in the face of Russian aggression” but repeats that Ukraine has not yet met the conditions necessary to join NATO.

    November

    Russia renews its troop presence near the Ukraine-Russia border, alarming U.S. intelligence officials, who travel to Brussels to brief NATO allies on the situation. “We’re not sure exactly what Mr. Putin is up to, but these movements certainly have our attention,” says U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin.

    Russian troops take part in drills at the Kadamovskiy firing range in the Rostov region of southern Russia on Dec. 14, 2021.
    AP
    December

    Biden, speaking with Putin on a phone call, urges Russia not to invade Ukraine, warning of “real costs” if Russia does so.

    Putin issues a contentious set of security demands. Among them, he asks NATO to permanently bar Ukraine from membership and withdraw forces stationed in countries that joined the alliance after 1997, including Romania and Balkan countries. Putin also demands a written response from the U.S. and NATO.

    2022: Russia moves in

    January

    Leaders and diplomats from the U.S., Russia and European countries meet repeatedly to avert a crisis. In early January, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov tells U.S. officials that Russia has no plans to invade Ukraine.

    The State Department orders the families of embassy staff to leave Ukraine on Jan. 23. NATO places forces on standby the next day, including the U.S. ordering 8,500 troops in the United States to be ready to deploy.

    Representatives from the U.S. and NATO deliver their written responses to Putin’s demands on Jan. 26. In the responses, officials say they cannot bar Ukraine from joining NATO, but they signal a willingness to negotiate over smaller issues like arms control.

    French President Emmanuel Macron (right) meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Feb. 7, 2022, for talks in an effort to find common ground on Ukraine and NATO.
    Sputnik/AFP via Getty Images
    February

    Diplomatic efforts pick up pace across Europe. French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz travel between Moscow and Kyiv. Biden orders the movement of 1,000 U.S. troops from Germany to Romania and the deployment of 2,000 additional U.S. troops to Poland and Germany.

    Russia and Belarus begin joint military exercises on Feb. 10, with some 30,000 Russian troops stationed in the country along Ukraine’s northern border.

    The U.S. and the U.K. urge their citizens to leave Ukraine on Feb. 11. Biden announces the deployment of another 2,000 troops from the U.S. to Poland.

    In mid-February, the fighting escalates between Russian-backed separatists and Ukrainian forces in the two eastern regions of Donetsk and Luhansk. Separatist leaders call for evacuations. “In our view, what is happening in Donbas today is, in fact, genocide,” says Putin on Feb. 15 — a false claim that Western officials say Putin is using to create a pretext for an invasion.

    Russia continues to build its troop presence on its border with Ukraine. Estimates range from 150,000 to 190,000 troops. U.S. officials, including Biden, increase the urgency of their warnings, saying that Russia has decided to invade.

    On Feb. 21, Putin formally recognizes the independence of the Donetsk People’s Republic and the Luhansk People’s Republic — including territory claimed by separatists but controlled by the Ukrainian armed forces. He orders Russia’s military to deploy troops there under the guise of a “peacekeeping” mission.

    In response, Biden declares the move “the beginning of a Russian invasion.” Together, the U.S., the U.K. and the European Union enact a broad set of sanctions targeting Russian banks and oligarchs.

    On Feb. 24, Russian forces launch a devastating assault on Ukrainian territory — the largest such military operation in Europe since the end of World War II. Missiles rain down on Ukraine’s cities and columns of Russian troops from neighboring Belarus and from Russian-held Crimea reportedly begin streaming into the countryside. Ukrainian forces reportedly try to hold back the Russian advance on several fronts.

  39. @ Ted, Putin only need for self defense is when he attacks a country and they counter attack. A consistent pattern. This article is a Putin propaganda spin!

    Ted, you did not answer one of points about how Russia and Putin are NOT on Israel’s side but on its enemies side generally. Yet Putin is who you applaud and sympathize with!!

  40. Ted you fail to observe and digest that in regards to Israel: Russia supplies Iran nuclear equipment, takes their side on the nuclear issue, sells them weapons, and sells weapons to everyone of Israel’s enemies. Takes the side of the Palestinians on almost all issues.

    Putin is on the side of Assad in Syria and has kept in him in power and propped him up. He says the Golan belongs to Syria.

    Putin wants to conquer or control other countries. He is trying this now in Ukraine. The West opposes this. Ted is on the side of Putin.

    Ted, tell us what is pro Israel or good about Putin? Did you like it when recently they jammed Israeli flight equipment and planes could not take off safely from Ben Gurion? Do you approve of them selling Iran and Syria equipment to shoot down Israeli planes?

    The USA and other western countries sell weapons to Israel and buy weapons from Israel. Yes the west or much of it has tried to have Israel agree to a two state solution but so does Putin and Russia.

    What is good about Putin again from the standpoint of Israel. So this supposed objectivity in my eyes is not objective but is nothing but a shallow anti American rant that one could hear from a Jihadi and/ or Putin.

    Your analysis that Ukraine was threaten is Russia is almost funny if was no so sadly wrong. The fly threatening the Elephant is the proper analogy. Wow how wrong you are 100%!!!!

    2
    2
  41. Lunatic analysis.

    From where I am sitting Russia has been hard done by the US whose policies in Ukraine have pushed Putin to these actions in self defense. Russia is no threat to the US but the US has shown itself to be a threat to Russia.