By Steven Kovac, EPOCH TIMES Apr 26/22
Dinesh D’Souza attends the premiere of Lionsgate Films’ “America” at Regal Cinemas L.A. Live in Los Angeles on June 30, 2014. (Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images)
Filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza believes that evidence presented in his new documentary, “2000 Mules,” proves that large-scale, illegal vote trafficking occurred in the 2020 election.
D’Souza told The Epoch Times: “2000 Mules will settle the issue beyond a shadow of a doubt by using two powerful, independent modes of investigation. The evidence is so conclusive, so decisive, that it leaves nothing to argue about.”
The film opens in 300 theaters on May 2 and May 4.
D’Souza, who is a contributor to The Epoch Times, said an investigative team used cellphone tracking and video footage to prove that unauthorized intermediaries called “mules” collected thousands of absentee ballots from voters and deposited them in drop boxes for money, which is illegal in all 50 states.
Cellphones emit a unique and identifiable signal or “ping.” Trillions of pings were analyzed by investigators to reconstruct the movements of thousands of mules as they went about their work in the weeks prior to the 2020 presidential election, the documentary claims.
“Who would have ever thought that investigators could look back in time and discover such things?” D’Souza said.
Investigators also sifted through millions of minutes of video surveillance footage and were able to capture on tape numerous mules stuffing absentee ballot drop boxes, D’Souza said. The videos show the mules taking selfies of themselves as proof of services rendered to their employers in order to be paid, he said.
“Not all the drop boxes were under video surveillance, but enough were to provide incontrovertible evidence, much obtained from government entities,” he said. “’2000 Mules’ contains a lot of never-before-seen footage depicting glove-wearing mules moving from county to county delivering absentee ballots to drop boxes, often in the dead of night.”
Much of the film focuses on the state of Georgia, where, according to True the Vote—the organization that conducted the investigations—242 metro Atlanta mules made 5,668 stops at drop boxes during elections in late 2020.
Similar illegal activities were found in Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Michigan, according to the group. True the Vote estimates that at least 4.8 million votes were trafficked nationally. The studies were funded by the human rights organization First Freedoms.
Election fraud has been committed by both parties throughout U.S. history, and therefore “cannot be considered abnormal,” D’Souza said. “The Democrats have a particular history of committing specialized election fraud in urban areas.
“The COVID-19 pandemic created an opportunity to do fraud on a scale not imagined before. The avalanche of absentee ballots sent out and the drop boxes presented much greater opportunity.”
D’Souza said he’s worried about the Democrats’ push to centralize how elections are conducted at both the state and national levels.
“A united Republican opposition is the only thing thwarting Biden, Pelosi, and the Democrats from enacting their plans,” he said. “Across America, the Democrats are trying to get rid of election security measures imposed by the states. They want to legalize fraud.”
The infusion of private money to help pay for elections is something D’Souza finds “very disturbing.”
“The money is largely coming from nonprofits funded by billionaires like Zuckerberg. They pose as politically neutral, which they are not.
“Localities were pressured by the nonprofits to have things like drop boxes as a condition for receiving millions of dollars in grant funding.”
D’Souza said that in November 2020, nonprofits paid for programs and advertising that actively encouraged “certain people to come out and vote.”
According to the Zuckerberg-funded Center for Tech and Civic Life, the money was given to help municipalities cope with public health challenges presented by the pandemic.
“Through the movie ‘2000 Mules,’ we are taking on the ultimate taboo in American politics today—saying that the 2020 election was stolen by systematic, organized fraud committed by the Democrats and the left,” D’Souza told The Epoch Times.
Mindful of the power of cancel culture, D’Souza said great care has been taken to release the film on what he calls “un-cancellable platforms.”
“It’s hard to believe we have reached that point in America, but alas, we have,” he said.
“While I was a writer or a figure in a think-tank, I wasn’t bothered much. It was when I began to reach a wider audience that I became a political target.”
When asked why he’s willing to subject himself to possible cancellation, D’Souza said, “I am defending the system which made it possible for an immigrant from India, a boy at the bottom, to make my way up—a system that makes this kind of upward economic and social mobility possible.”
D’Souza has produced numerous documentaries, three of which are ranked in the top 10 highest-grossing political documentaries of all time.
Steven Kovac is an Epoch Times reporter who covers the state of Michigan. He is a former small businessman, local elected official, and conservative political activist. He is an ordained minister of the Gospel. Steven and his wife of 32 years have two grown daughters. He can be reached at steven.kovac@epochtimes.us
From Gen. Flynn:
Dinesh D’Souza:
Ukrainian election fraud from 2014 is described in the Exhibit H in the Halderman report on page 78.
In the post-Maidan Massacre Election, held 3months post Maidan, many things were coinciding to paint a curious picture as a back drop to the May 25 presidential elections. In March, Russia held a referendum and took possession of Crimea. Counter protests between Maidan and anti-Maidan protesters broke out all over the country. The head of the Russian media station was beaten by the Nazi Svoboda party members – they recorded it and published it on the internet. This was not an isolated event, though it was likely the most publicized of its sort. Many Russo-Ukrainian allies of the overthrown president made their way to Russia for safety. On May 2, the Odessa Massacre was conducted, where somewhere between several dozen to a few hundred anti-Maidan(Russo-Ukrainians) protesters were beaten with clubs, chased into a building, and burned alive by pro-Maidan(Nationalist Ukrainians) protesters. Dmitri Yarosh celebrated this barbarous event. Three days later, on May 5 the Azov Battalion was formed. The call for the largely Russo-Ukrainian Dombas area to become autonomous became louder and louder. Three weeks after the Odessa Massacre and the formation of Azov, the post-Maidan Massacre presidential elections were held. Officially, Yarosh gained about 1%, Poroshenko gained 57%, and there would be no need of a run-off election for president.
But here is a curious point described in an article from the Halderman Declaration: Yarosh was initially seen to actually beat Poroshenko, but due to the discovery of the ‘hack’ it was seen that Poroshenko was ‘actually’ the winner. Given the games played with electronic elections these days, it is claimed that the actual result was certified by the paper ballots. Does any of this sound familiar? And of course, in keeping with the Stop, Drop and Roll technique of coordinated election fraud, counting stopped between 1am and 3am during the election night vote count. Wow oh wow….
From the cited article in the Halderman Declaration:
And of course, how silly, but it is claimed that the brainless Russians seem to be guilty of this as well, choosing to install a rabid Russian hating radical into power over the US preferred puppet Poroshenko . It would never occur to the Russians to choose a candidate that actually supported Russia .
Now the question becomes this: Is it possible that in the war fever period – ie following the Maidan Massacre, Odessa Massacre, Crimea’s occupation, the calls for Dombas autonomy and the terror of many mainstream notable fleeing to Russia for protection – could it be possible that the real election tally was not Poroshenko winning an outright victory, but that he was beaten by Yarosh by 8%? How many suitcases would it take to erase Yarosh’s position in the election down from 37% to 1%?
Regardless of what anyone might believe, it is impossible to unbake that cake and gain any clarity on the subject, especially in the corruption capital of the world, Ukraine, so the question will never truly be answered.
From Patrick Byrne: HALDERMAN’S DECLARATION MADE PUBLIC