Dennis Ross: ‘Netanyahu never agreed to ’67 borders or division of Jerusalem’

T. Belman.  I believe Dennis Ross. He has no reason to lie. Why did Bennett say it was correct? The left is really piling on Netanyahu. Everywhere except INN I read articles trashing Netanyahu and all kinds of former IDF and intelligence people are doing their utmost to discredit him. Bibi is blamed for everything. Its a bloody avalanche.  Bennett also weighed in.

By Dudi Caspi, Shlomo Cesana and Gadi Golan, ISRAEL HAYOM

Dennis Ross, who mediated peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians, responds to Yedioth Ahronoth report suggesting PM Benjamin Netanyahu agreed to dramatic concessions • Netanyahu: Report is a pile of nonsense orchestrated by Noni Mozes.

Dennis Ross, the man allegedly behind the “concessions document” published by Yedioth Ahronoth over the weekend, told Israel Hayom that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “never agreed to Israeli withdrawal to 1967 borders, dividing Jerusalem or the right of return.”

March 8, 2015 | 5 Comments »

Leave a Reply

5 Comments / 5 Comments

  1. @ bernard ross:

    Good point not lost with me. Why did Netanyahu bring his seeming arch foe into such an important role, when he would have been able clearly to establish a reasonably stable coalition without her. Was it a concession to Obama? There must be a reason he did that obtuse maneuver. Did she blackmail him, I wonder. Someone here knows.
    Will he do it again.

  2. “In stark contrast with this outrageous publication, and contrary to the position held by Tzipi Livni (who condemned construction in Jewish neighborhoods of Jerusalem), during the course of the negotiations and over the last six years the governments led by Netanyahu have approved the construction of thousands of housing units in Jerusalem, in the Valley and in Judea and Samaria.”

    the problem is that BB appointed Livni to negotiate and to preside over the judicial system. He never explained why his appointments should not be considered to be a desire to implement his intended policies. I dont think he can claim that he did not know who livni was.

  3. Excellent reporting on this issue Mar Belman. Bennet deserves an opportunity to explain his position and whether he was mis-quoted or whatever, with no delay whatsoever. There is indeed an avalanche of anti Netanyahu editorials which are being published from the likes of Amos Oz to usual suspects who deserve no recognition. It is obviously well organized and probably just the opening salvo. I sure hope this concerted effort to bring him down will influence PM to stick with his natural allies in forming a new gov”t.

  4. Ted, I am certain you are correct in writing that Dennis Ross has no reason to lie in his confirmation that Mr Netanyahu never signed on to the 2013 memorandum drafted by Washington.

    As for Naftali Bennett, his latest backstabbing of Netanyahu at a time when he nonetheless seeks tied to Likud as the major nationalist coalition partner, clearly shows that Mr Bennett is not ready for prime time service as prime minister of the State of Israel, and that it may never prove advisable to elevate him to that status.

    What Israel clearly needs, right now and for a long time in the future, is a majority government based solidly on the same general platform of purposes. Mr Bennett increasingly sounds like a rear-bench electioneering loudmouth looking avidly for political power, and little more than that. I write this even though I understand that he solidly supports an Israeli future that I too advocate. David Ben-Gurion, despite his inability to accommodate opposition to his programs and policies, nevertheless had strength of character of a level that I think Mr Bennett has yet to show that he might be able to achieve.

    Arnold Harris
    Mount Horeb WI