Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Menu There is no diplomatic solutionIsrael should declare three nos;
no to nuclear Iran, no to two-state solution, no to bi-national state
no to nuclear Iran, no to two-state solution, no to bi-national state
@ Sebastien Zorn:
Not for me…. I like being made immortal by cryonic preservation and resuscitation endlessly as science improves. Not by being made a “god”…like Octavian although he passed away in his bed,….or the self-dubbed god “Boots”…I mean Caligula-who didn’t.. Maybe Mohammed ,that mythical illiterate Koran composer, got his “horsey” idea from hearing tales of Incitatus…??
Of course his had to be different so he added….wings…!!
Wandering through youtube today I came across a movie called Hannibal. As I am never tired of reading of him, his tactics and strategies, I looked at it. As soon as I saw it was Victor Mature, I remembered seeing it many years ago, and didn’t like it then.
The sight of poor Mature, elderly, baggy eyed, definitely NOT a 26 year old…… Well…
Also his Carthaginian, Spanish and Libyan troops, who were naturally Mediterranean dark, as well as having been exposed to all sorts of weather conditions, with the whitest, loose thigh muscles, all complete with American accents, was more than I could stand. I HAD to switch if off..
@ Edgar G.:
@ Reader:
@ Sebastien Zorn:
@ Sebastien Zorn:
Oh it’s really nothing understandable, to match your Steve Martin, youtube http QRxtUVwXyZ stuff. Remember you’re talking to “Pops”, kid, and don’t you forget it…You’re still not too old to put you across my knee and give you a couple of beneficial whacks.
Remember the George Bernard Shaw saying about the young, that “a pat on the back works wonders…if administered often enough, hard enough and low enough”…!!
She did it, too. Why is absolutely everybody saying this, now, instead of “the reason is that”. I mean everybody. I even heard an argument before the Supreme Court where whoever was speaking said this. Ben Shapiro, various educated Professors. What is going on with the language?*!#
@ Edgar G.:
What’s
@ Edgar G.:
Ha Ha. Hey, who you callin’ kid, pops? I’m 61, and next year I’ll be old enough to vote [in an alternate universe America where things are done as they should be.]
Sebastien Zorn Said:
???…….?
@ Edgar G.:
?
@ Sebastien Zorn:
Edgar G….That’s O.K. kid, no problem… blogawollygoghttp;// Edgar G.
@ Edgar G.:
Steve Martin: “Well, Excuuuuse, me!”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zANvYB93u2g
@ Sebastien Zorn:
That’s OK, just a generational difference. You, rightly, read children’s stories, I read adult-or more in keeping with your line of reasoning, grownup literature….
Sebastien Zorn Said:
I must say that I thought of her only as pestilent Carbuncle on the back of Trump’s neck.. or similar. Malignant in attitude, not to mention her appearance, which I can’t help but feel, reflected her inner self to a degree.
@ Reader:
Every thing written and said about her has shown that she is brilliant, as per her performance in the Senate hearings……so stop plagiarizing. Surely you are not only realising it now.. Se seems by far the most brilliant member of the whole group of Supreme Court Justices. BY FAR. None showed it to anywhere near the extent, that she accomplished, not had her record of study and passing her tests and exams.
@ Reader:
You are hyperactive with a run away imagination… take a glass of ice cold water. Maybe you’ve already taken a few too many of ice cold whisky.
@ Reader:
Because the judges we’re talking about are all appointed by the individual states. When I said that openly partial Republican judges would be removed by the administration, I was no being facually correct. Even Supreme Court Judges are appointed by the Senate, only chosen by the President.
I’m not an American, YOU are, so why should I know more about the US judicial process than you. I don’t . I can make mistakes about it with no problem. You shouldn’t.
@ Reader:
Yes, if you’d read anything about her, you’d know that she is universally lauded for her brilliance within the legal profession for her brilliance as a judge and as a professor, as she was as a student and when clerking for Jiustice Scalia. Nobody contested her appointment to the 7th circuit three years ago when she was vetted for Congress. But, they decided to Kavanugh her because of partisan politics.
As to your remarks about her appearance, I’ve heard female so-called “feminists” make such sexist remarks about her as they did about Sarah Palin. You would have expected old-fashioned male chauvanists to suggest that she couldn’t possibly be chosen except for her looks.
@ Edgar G.:
Sorry, I meant this:
@ Edgar G.:
You must be psychic. Before reading your post, I posted in Facebook on my newsfeed and in a couple of Jewish pro-Israel groups:
@ Edgar G.:
I didn’t know that the Supreme Court Justices are supposed to be chosen through a beauty contest.
Although the latest one is a young cutie (relatively speaking).
She must be really brilliant to have reached such heights so early in her career.
@ Edgar G.:
Well, then, if this administration would remove the biased Republican judges, why can’t they remove the biased Democrat judges?
There is only one President of the United States whose authority doesn’t stop with those Americans who are registered Republicans or those appointed by a Republican administration.
“Administration, which would not want to be accused of partiality in it’s appointed judges.” You are joking, right?
This administration has just forced the confirmation of a new Supreme Court Justice before the elections (something which they forcefully denied to the previous “corrupt” Obama administration) PRECISELY because they knew they were going to go all the way to the Supreme Court and that having “their” Justice might help their cause.
If Trump does lose and keeps fighting anyway, the whole thing may end in a blood bath (150 million gun owners with at least 400 million guns).
Unless this is what the powers-that-be are planning in order to finally implement martial law and all the “fun” things that go with it, so everyone will remember the “quarantine” as the good old days and the “new normal”.
@ Sebastien Zorn:
Yes, I agree. In fact , every time I saw her I was reminded of the old witch who lived in the cave, in the book “King Solomon’s Mines”..
@ Edgar G.:
@ Reader:
In Illinois, Mitchigan and Pennsylvania, the judges are selected by partisan voting, which means Democrat Judges elected by Democrats. So being corrupt, as th Democrat Party is, they could be expected to act as bnefts the party sometimes putting a thin gloss of “impartiality” over their partisan decisions.
@ Reader:
Sebastien has answered your post. I was not saying that about Republican Judges. Trump is dedicated to installing judges who go by precedents based on legal acts. Also on the Constitution, if that comes into the case. So, as Sebastien says they would try to be impartial. If they were too “Republican” I’m sure they know they would be removed by the Administration, which would not want to be accused of partiality in it’s appointed judges.
@ Sebastien Zorn:
Why don’t we then declare the Democratic party illegal and install the Republican dictatorship, if all the Republicans are so virtuous and all the Democrats – so evil.
Just declare the Dems the enemies of the people and be done with it?
And if they dare to protest, just jail the miscreants (or send them to labor camps)!
@ Edgar G.:
The late and unlamented Ruth Bader Ginsburg was among the worst. She praised Israel’s post Aharon Barak legal system, advising Israel never to adopt the American system because judges have more power there. She voted to railroad Jonathan Pollard. I just read now, that she made a donation to the anti-Israel New Israel Fund in her will. https://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/israel-group-humbled-by-ginsburg-cash-gift-before-death/
@ Reader:
Edgar is right about Democrat judges. Republican judges sometimes go one way and sometimes the other because they try to be impartial.
@ Edgar G.:
Are you saying that the US judges are so corrupt and incompetent that they make their decisions exclusively according to the party lines?
And that Trump will win his case as long as the judge is a Republican?
Don’t you think it’s a bit too much?
@ Reader:
Trump didn’t “declare” victory as such. He said that they were ready to go outside (presumably to celebrate) and then everything stopped (referring to the mysterious stopping of ballot counting and prevention of Republican observers close to the counters “I feel we won, frankly we did win”. This was his personal opinion to his co-workers in their headquarters. (Paraphrased)
@ Reader:
They have been dismissed by Democrat judges. The suits now go to a higher court. It was a formality that they had to go through.
There are more lawsuits. And some have been dismissed on dubious grounds, like on standing. That’s a way judges can duck suits they don’t like.@ Reader:
Trump’s campaign lawsuits in Michigan and Georgia have already been dismissed.
Trump seems to have made a mistake by declaring victory and alleging widespread election fraud.
How much is Trump paying her?
For some reason that I can’t figure out, the Republicans and the Trump campaign have failed to to appeal the election on the grounds that most of the states made no effort to insure that only U.S. citizens voted. People were allowed to use their driver’s licences and other documents that did not require proof of citizenship to register and vote. One would think that Trump, with his campaign against illegal immigration, would have instructed his lawyers to bring this “problem” before the Supreme Court. Raising this issue would be particularly sensible in view of the fact that it is a Federal, not a state, law, that requires citizenship. This means that Federal authorities have a mandate to investigate possible illegal voting by non-citizens.
Rudy Giuliani intends to file lawsuits alleging massive voter fraud, or at least the possibility of such fraud, in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
This beautiful lady is just brilliant! 🙂