This site is very impressive. Each one of the links takes you to a world in itself. I refer you to Historical killings for Christianity. Ted Belman
The Holocaust did not come out of nowhere. It was not a random choice that the Jews were selected as the targets. The Holocaust was the climax of a thousand years of killing and persecution by the Christians.
- Historical killings for Christianity
- Anti-Semitism in Christian history
- Pius IX (19th century)
- Unholy War: The Vatican’s Role in the Rise of Modern Anti-Semitism by David Kertzer, also pub as The Popes Against the Jews.
- The Modern Use of Ancient Lies, David Kertzer, May 9, 2002 – on the Catholic church’s libels against the Jews, even into the 20th century.
The belief of the German people in national socialism is surely a warning against belief systems in general, and a reminder of the value of scepticism. I fear, unfortunately, that this is not a very widely drawn lesson.
- Religion And The Holocaust by Richard E. Smith (what they don’t tell you in school).
- Christianity and the Holocaust by Michael Hakeem.
- Hitler was a Catholic
- Hitler was a Catholic
- Hitler quotes about his Catholic faith
- Hitler quotes about his Catholic faith
- Debate with “Dan” about various topics, including Christianity and the Holocaust.
Nobody can tell me that Fascism is not a key issue for Jews yet nobody above offers any light. Antisemitism is NOT Fascism. So what destroyed 6 millions of your people is not discussed. Where do YOU stand on this Yamit82?
Define Fascism
This is very difficult! But I am certain that this article by Mark Humphries is very wrong on this issue. For Humphries a Fascist is somebody evil, and that leads to who he or public opinion or the BBC thinks or says is evil.
That becomes totally subjective.
The key to an understanding of Fascism is to read the analyses of Trotsky. Not Marx. Why not because fascism was not a term in the time of Marx
This affirms the approach of Trotsky that Fascism was located inside the decline of capitalism.
yamit is closer to Humphries than he is to me. This is because both stay clear of an understanding of capitalism as an historical human phenomenon, it had a beginning,a high point and a decline
@ Samuel Fistel:
“Christianity was invented by greek pagans, and was originally written in Greek for other greek pagans.
Although it is obvious that christianity is a pagan Hellenistic savior mystery religion derived from Greco-Roman mythology, the christians keep on telling their big lie and insisting that christianity directly evolved from Judaism. For example:
that the man-god is himself divided into part man and part god, that his human mother was conceived without original sin, was an “eternal virgin” despite giving birth to the man-god, and was resurrected when she died to become a type of pagan goddess.”
Felix Quigley Said:
Define Fascism???
This should be good. 😛
Christianity as the “real” Judaism: deceitfully using the trees to distract from the Jewish forest
Christianity claims to be the “real” Judaism; that christianity has replaced Judaism, that the Torah is invalid and has been replaced by the “new testament”, and that the Jews are devils who will burn in hell for eternity for rejecting and killing the christian man-god.
Christianity was invented by greek pagans, and was originally written in Greek for other greek pagans.
Although it is obvious that christianity is a pagan Hellenistic savior mystery religion derived from Greco-Roman mythology, the christians keep on telling their big lie and insisting that christianity directly evolved from Judaism. For example:
Judaism says that HaShem is One, indivisible, and beyond time, space, and matter. Christianity says that god is three separate gods, or a “three-in-one god” (called father, son and something referred to as the “holy ghost”); that the man-god is himself divided into part man and part god, that his human mother was conceived without original sin, was an “eternal virgin” despite giving birth to the man-god, and was resurrected when she died to become a type of pagan goddess. That’s all pagan, as well as their turning their human “saints” into minor gods represented by idols which you pray to.
Judaism says that Hashem created men, and that He Himself is something far beyond humanity. The Torah directly tells us “G-d is not a man, and is not a “son of man (adam)”. Taking a man and deifying him after death, as the christians do, is pagan.
The “virgin birth” is pagan. It is based on a mistranslation of the original Hebrew into Greek. The gods coming down to earth and having sex with human women who then give birth to man-gods, is a common pagan theme. In Judaism, if you do not know who the biological father is, then the child is illegitimate with no tribal standing. Adopting someone else’s son as your legal heir, is pagan and unknown to Judaism.
Human sacrifice (“he died for your sins”) is pagan. It is forbidden in Judaism (Do not give your children to Molech). Another person being killed for your own sins is pagan. In Judaism “Each man will be put to death for his own sins”.
Drinking blood is absolutely forbidden in Judaism. It is a pagan practice (“This is my blood. Drink it”.)
So how did this idol-worshipping, polytheistic, pagan religion, featuring man-gods, human sacrifice, and ritual human cannibalism, get to claim to be “the real Judaism”. Simple enough: for two thousand years, they killed any Jew who said so, after raping his wife and daughters, and stealing all his possessions. And now, Jews are so used to being beaten, that they are still afraid to state simple, obvious Jewish truths out loud.
The Holocaust of the Jews can only be understood from the standpoint of understanding Fascism, and this is what the writer cannot actually do. So the method of Humphries is heaps of information but all leading to the defence of capitalism, WHICH IS THE CAUSE OF FASCISM IN THE FIRST PLACE
Harold Reisman Said:
http://archive.org/stream/GoedekeGrundrissZurGeschichteDerDeutschenDichtung-2-16-1-2/GoedekeGrundrissZurGeschichteDerDeutschenDichtung-2-1612#page/n545/mode/2up
Your reference above is to the appendix????
The article by Mark Humphrys is fine but he may have missed the worst statement of the Church (in my opinion). It is from the Handbuch der religiosen Gegenwartsfragen (The German Catholic “Handbook of Contemporary Religious Questions”) page 536, published in 1937. It had to have the imprimatur of the Vatican. I do not have a URL but my email is given if there is any interest in the quotation.
Anyone wanna do a book review?