By Ted Belman
From now on comments on every post must relate to the content of the post.
Comments that don’t relate to the post must go here.
Any person who contravenes this demand will be put on moderation. Also their offending comment will be trashed.
The reason for this demand is so that people who want to read comments which pertain to the post, don’t have to wade through the chatter.
Everyone will be happier.
yamit82 Said:
if you are speaking of the algemeiner link, the answer is no I have no problem with it.
@ yamit82:He says “You don’t know my programming power for hacking!!”. He managed to convince Google that he was the owner of tedbelman90@gmail.com by answering the many questions they ask in order verify. Once he was allowed to change the password, he did so and also changed the recovery email thereby preventing me from changing the password. I think I can’t retrieve the address. But at the same time he could have set up a gmail account for the address tedbelman91@gmail.com. Thus he didn’t have to appropriate my address to set up a Paypal account.
Please note that I have created a “Chit Chat” box just above “Recent Comments”. You can click on “comments” just under it and that will lead you to the comments , like this one, under it.
@ yamit82:
So was the above italicized comment, Bozo.
And how would PresentCompany know a thing like that?
— You’re too DENSE to tell the difference between obtuse & acute.
I have never committed murder.
It’s against my religion.
(Rumor has it that the civil authorities don’t take it very kindly either.)
dweller Said:
It was rhetorical asshole. Shit you’re obtuse!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 🙂
Who did you murder and how dweller???? 🙂
@ yamit82:
Oh, yes. And not only in the nose. Blackened a few eyes & dislocated a couple of arms too (not those guys, but some others), as well as possibly a few other body parts I was never aware of injuring; the catalog is actually rather extensive, tho I’ve never advertised it.
Am not suggesting I was a habitual scrapper or even a particularly ‘violent’ person — I wasn’t — but I was quite good at taking care of myself & my friends when I had to. (Of course I collected a few lumps, bumps & bruised knuckles of my own in the process.)
Yeah, you make the same mistake they all made. (It always gives me a chuckle recalling it.) GWB used to say he liked (or appreciated, anyway) being underestimated. I can definitely relate.
The brawlers & bullies invariably assumed that since I was unfailingly courteous and always well-spoken, that I must be a pushover. Whenever they’d start showing signs of harboring such assumptions, I’d warn them they were making a major mistake, but they never had the discipline to resist going after what they assumed to be the smell of blood in the water (to which they were so well accustomed).
But they learned. They did learn. I was a most efficient . . . teacher.
Nah. That was never my style. (Still probing for chinks in the armor, aintcha…)
Flip a coin. They’re both the same. Told you that before, some YEARS ago.
Pitying somebody — feeling sorry for them — is just an attempt to get ‘above’ the guilt you experience for your HATRED of them in the first place. You’re trying to do an end-run around your conscience.
— But there will ALWAYS be a flag on that play. The Ref is never fooled, yahnkele.
The only real way to get past the guilt of hatred is to give up the hatred. Anything else is bogus, phoney.
Since you asked.
@ yamit82:
No lie. Degrees immaterial.
Irrelevant. She has a thing about profanity. And I don’t.
So I told you to take it up with her. This gets stupider the longer you pursue it. (Haven’t you got anything else today?)
Don’t have obsessions. If you learn to stop reacting to life emotionally, YOU won’t have obsessions either.
And why would you CARE what ‘everyone’ remembers (or even thinks)???
And as I told you last time [post #31, prev pg], you seem to have no point to make with the quote — since this time (just like last time) you accompany the quote with no comment of your own
— yet it’s quite clear that you YOURSELF could learn something from the remark — which seems to have gone right past you.
We BOTH know that’s horseshit.
BUT the difference between us is NOT that I’ve bested you (that’s easy when one is not emotional). The difference between us is that it’s terribly IMPORTANT to you, while YoursTruly can take it or leave it.
You haven’t ‘proven’ anything except that you’re lost between your own ears. You’re just rationalizing the fact that you’re out of aces, pancho. (This is one of YOUR tells.) It’s not a scintilla more complicated than that.
I had no need to respond to you (as I would have ‘had’ to do if I were actually & truly O-C). My response was purely a matter of courtesy, a concept that seems to elude you.
@ bernard ross:
As soon as I linked the Url you supplied my anti virus blocked an attack. Did you have a similar event?
I was off line for an hour and just rebooted a half hr ago I have nothing up except israpundit.
dweller Said:
Liar with a degree!!!!!!!!!!!!
dweller Said:
I never injected HB you have. Is your obsession over her or me?
I repeat to refresh everyone’s memory:
You have never bested me in anything except possibly endurance. At some point you become so repetitive and boring I sit it out till I decide to throw you a new and sometimes an old bone. I know all your tells …all that animate you to go off and off and off ad nausea.
What you call a shallow skull game was made to prove my point that you are obsessive and compulsive but best of all you are naively childlike. As to you punching out some boys in the nose??????????? Fegele com’on your a mamas boy, a snitch to boot.
To know you is to hate you or pity you. I hate you, but I almost pity you; if i did I couldn’t hate you. Which do you prefer???? 🙂
@ bernard ross:
Ooh, that’s a good one. Even the emotionally manure-laden shrink community hasn’t heard that one yet.
A new category of psychobabble, how ‘bout that!
Rover has brought US a bone
— call the Guinness people, there’s probably a reward in it.
@ yamit82:
Not HB, however.
No. I use them when I find them suitable; I don’t use them when they aren’t. It’s that simple. No ‘extreme lengths’ have anything to do with it.
You’re just trying to have it both ways, because you’ve been bested at every turn, and have clearly got nothing else. So, you’re stuck with playing shallow skull games. Pitiful.
@ bernard ross:
‘Reduced’? — hardly.
You just don’t like having your shallow shtiklach flung back in your teeth.
Nope. Never projecting — as usual.
It’s YOU who are projecting. What I said about you resorting to shallow psychobabble was right on target.
You toss around terms like “OCD” in ways which make it ABUNDANTLY clear that you haven’t the remotest clue as to what they’re about — that’s TRULY psychobabble.
Then when I SHOW you the basis of the syndrome you so freely and ignorantly bandy about, you ignore ENTIRELY the substance of it — and instead, flatly & mindlessly label THAT ‘psychobabble.’ Not a word of dispute or challenge, just the dull-witted charge of ‘psychobabble’ (and this from a babbling psycho of the first water).
— You are a buffoon’s buffoon — a know-nothing ignoramus; a goofy, walking caricature of yourself.
Reduced to repeating MY words, I see.
Oh yes, Ladies & Gents, they are indeed my words — which this clown repeated (even w/ my original ALL-CAPS emphasis on the word “NEVER”)
— while carefully doctoring it by altering two words in such a way as to forensically INVERT the Presumption-of-Veracity and the Burden-of-Proof. This is the ORIGINAL, as I wrote it to him, and as it should read:
“You’ve NEVER been able to show a single instance of my being wrong about someone’s emotional and psychological makeup (including your own [BR]). “
There, fixed it for him. And it remains as true today as it was when I first wrote it long ago.
@ bernard ross:
More BROSS psychobabble.
No ‘fantasies.’
Memories — and uncluttered ones at that.
In fact, it’s obvious that the party who’s actually obsessed with my memories is not I, but YOU.
‘Miffed’? — Nah. They tried sharing them with me — one time.
After I broke their noses for them, however, they thought better of the idea, and subsequently sought (apparently) more ‘congenial’ company for their favorite pastime.
Israeli Dismissed From U. Minn Post by BDSers Vows to Overturn Ruling (VIDEO)
http://www.algemeiner.com/2014/11/27/israeli-dismissed-from-u-minn-post-by-bdsers-vows-to-overturn-ruling-video/
write to the jew stalker here:
carri196@umn.edu
yamit82 Said:
LOLROF
yamit82 Said:
Mr. Anal Compulsive can’t control himself, he must bring back every bone
dweller Said:
Could have fooled me in any case you go to extreme lengths not to use them and the quote said “People who use a lot” That excludes you.
This is between us and I just threw you a bone that you jumped at. Of course the quote is a fabrication as a joke but you bought it. You are so full of your self it’s almost no fun mocking you. I said almost.
Sit Fido!!! Now go catch some more bones…. Fool!!!
@ yamit82:
If you believe that, you should be telling it to HB, not YoursTruly.
I’ve never had a problem with the occasional (or even frequent) cuss word.
@ dweller:
So there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
dweller Said:
Captain Queeg and doc psychobabble rolled into one, reminiscing over the causes of his OCD and paranoia. Your fantasies are quite detailed which indicates your obsession with these past “traumas”. I suppose you were miffed that the naughty boys never “shared stories” with you, and that they called you a twinkie.
dweller Said:
Reduced to repeating me like a parrot.
dweller Said:
LOL, projecting, as usual. it appears that all you can do is repeat me like a parrot. You are famous here for your psychobabble:
gosh, we never have to look far for examples of your pathologies
dweller Said:
LOL, another lecture from Doc Psychobabble
here is another reliable maxim, well worth repeating, regarding your psychobabble assertions:
When checking your ludicrous psychobabble posts for errors you should also consider this timeless principle. 😛 😛 😛
@ yamit82:
I wouldn’t assume that.
If it’s the same party that did it last summer, they may well have been responsible for the fact that a lot of posts pertaining to Islam seem to have disappeared shortly after the summer hack.
Also, it’s become much harder to access the archives with any kind of efficiency. Used to be possible to plug in a key phrase or two and pull up a given post in reply to any given article going way back. It’s much more difficult now.
I wouldn’t be too quick to rule out political motives. The fact that they’ve diverted money in the process may just be a bonus for them, a turning of the knife in the wound.
@ yamit82:
Apples & Oranges. I don’t add emphasis (of any kind) to a repeated remark that can’t stand on its own. If I place emphasis on something I’ve said before, it’s typically to draw attention to it from a different angle from the one by which it was previously offered.
You added the extra exclamation point as if to shout in a louder voice a comment that had just been disputed. As if the added emphasis would — all by itself, without further development — somehow make its bald assertion go down more easily than it had the previous time.
Care to try for the trifecta? Nutty.
So you say, but based on your posting history here (where multiple exclamation points have never been your style), it’s hard to believe you.
— Seems more likely a sop to HB (who’d be lost without ’em) !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@ bernard ross:
What’s TRULY ‘reliable’ is your resorting to shallow psychobabble over matters on which you’re so obviously and utterly clueless. Attaboy, Rover; we can count on you like clockwork.
No compulsiveness on my end, however — no need for it; I don’t wallow in emotionalism, and that’s the basis of OCD.
Compulsiveness is a defense; like being on auto-pilot, because you don’t dare trust you own good sense in the moment — why? because you reacted emotionally in the past, and it turned out badly. So, now you’re gun-shy; can’t handle moment-to-moment reality, and avoiding it has become an obsession.
— Eh, voilà: Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (or so-called), characterized by what appears to be orderly fussiness under the pressure of stress.
Shrinks observe the symptoms — but they’re light-years from understanding the cause OR the solution.
Learn to give up the emotionalism, and the compulsiveness falls away all by itself — like crutches that are no longer needed when your legs become strong. Amazingly simple.
@ bernard ross:
There you are, right on schedule. Good, Rover — here’s your bisquit.
Told you: you don’t think.
— You SCHEME.
You SMEAR.
You SLIME.
But think? — No, that you don’t do.
For you, as for el señor Grande Inquisitor, there can be little doubt that you NEED relief about now, though it’s clear enough that you’re NOT getting any relief — of comic or any other sort — at this juncture.
A “good” laugh? No; a naughty laugh, a dirty laugh.
— And two posters out of how many readers, a few hundred?
Truthfully, I don’t think either one of you knows HOW to laugh. Your humor is sneering & sniggering, and utterly without mirth. Two naughty boys sneaking cigarettes in back of the schoolyard, while sharing nasty stories about the girls they’ve heard will give them anything they want.
Yeah, I remember twits of your caliber. The only place where these lame attempts of yours don’t consistently fall flat is in the world of your over-amped and hateful imaginations.
But YOU don’t rely on each other’s support in this — no, not you. Tweedle-dum and Tweedle-dumber. Two drunks holding each other up as they stagger home at closing time.
dweller Said:
Neither does your use of Bold and other grammatical and syntax aids and tweaks you use.
You use yours and I will use mine.
I like mine better!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 😛
@ bernard ross:
There are a couple of programs dedicated to trojans. I access them on line from time to time….In addition to my embedded security software.
It isn’t only Ted everybody seems to be getting hacked these days. This one looks strictly mercenary. If they are dealing out of Cyprus it sounds like Russian mafia MO.
I personally keep no financial data on the computer I blog with. If I ever get hacked i would clean my hard drive and reformat. Pain in the ass but it works.
@ yamit82:
Yes, but if they tinkered with his page it is possible they have links which function to insert a trojan or info collecting virus to get more suckers info.
yamit82 Said:
I thought that was his raison d’etre?
yamit82 Said:
and we sure did 😛
yamit82 Said:
and you can be sure that fido will fetch it willy nilly.
His OCD is very reliable.
@ yamit82:
Indeed. Your own.
(FYI, saying the same thing you already said, only w/ more exclamation points than you used the first time, won’t make your statement any more applicable or true than it was the first time.)
If he were, he wouldn’t need YOU to say so.
WRT these matters, he is strictly your poodle, and sooooooo eager to please.
LOLROF. And that coming from one who relies on the sages for everything.
I rest secure in the bosom of Reality, pancho — and when it comes to being able to stand the truth, y’just can’t beat that with a baseball bat.
The heat of your kitchen couldn’t soften butter at midsummer.
I’ve little doubt that you NEED relief about now, though it’s clear enough that you’re NOT getting any relief — of comic or any other sort — at this juncture.
You betcha.
dweller Said:
I don’t believe you!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anyway they weren’t really for your ears, they were for any reader who wishes to hear them and have a good laugh.
@ dweller:
I don’t believe you!!!Anyway they weren’t really for your ears, they were for any reader who wishes to hear them and have a good laugh.
I don’t have to type hundreds of wordy dissed BS like you do a simple video song is much better and to the point something any child can understand without need of a dictionary.
it’s fun searching for the right clip and I have many in reserve. it’s an unrecognized art finding the right clips for you. 😛
@ dweller:
dweller Said:
Delusional projection!!!! You and reality are purely serendipitous!!!! You may believe every word you post, and if you do it proves my point.
You make your stupid points and I will make mine….I don’t play by your stupid ass-hole rules, I play by mine and if you don’t like? I can tell you where to go, but you must know by now!
BR is is own man and I am mine, you can’t stand the truth and the heat in our kitchen… again you know where you can go.
BTW this is another bone and I wonder how many comments and bandwidth you will use up in reply and you will because you can’t help your sick compulsive self…. Hey I like your songs each one is really you!!!!
For me you are really comic relief. Sorry Bernard I don’t mean to support you but truth will out! 🙂
@ bernard ross:
Their object here seems to be mercenary not political. It doesn’t take much sophistication to do what they did if they have found a vulnerability.
@ bernard ross:
By which you confirm just how important it is for YOUto have that support
— which, incidentally, is largely lacking these days. (Or hadn’t you noticed?)
I do say so. But that isn’t what makes it so.
What makes it so is the fact that it IS so, quite IRRESPECTIVE of what I say (or anybody else says, or fails to say) about it.
@ bernard ross:
You ‘think’?
THAT kind of ‘thinking’ is what’s known as wishful thinking . . . . slime bucket.
@ yamit82:
@ yamit82:
No titles onscreen.
And no sound here.
Your efforts will just have to wait.
dweller Said:
LOL, if you say so , twinkie.
dweller Said:
not just me but everyone else who finds you unintentionally comedic.
@ yamit82:
I think this guy has gone nuts
@ Ted Belman:
They have probably used this to try and get into all our computers. They appear to be quite adept.
@ yamit82:
No projection , putzele. And no delusion either. (Not on MY part. . . .)
And I, the same, in yours. Irrelevant and off-point.
So what? The subject wasn’t your opinions of me. (Re-read the post, Bozo.) The subject was BR’s receiving support masquerading as acknowledgment of his malicious & sophomoric attempts at humor as if they were substantive.
You offer it, you accept it, and you encourage it.
Once again [sigh], you’re off-point. Anybody — got that? ANYBODY — who readily piles-on (anywhere other than on the football field) IS needy for support. There is absolutely no other reason to OFFER it, coward.
dweller Said:
Elephant paddies: Total delusional projection on your part!!! I have been shitting in your garden and leaving my bones there long before BR and any of the current posters ever came on to Israpndit and I don’t need no support to shit on your Bizzaro head!!!!
Another dweller song!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCyYuLQ7_Ws
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCyYuLQ7_Ws
bernard ross:
‘Coping’ not needed. I’m satisfied with my remarks; I stand by them.
Liar. You hoped to embarrass me. You didn’t. I wrote what I intended to write. You’re thoroughly transparent.
No, Monsieur Nostradoofus, the reason why you can’t embarrass me is that my conscience is clear. It’s just that simple.
And WHY would you want them to have a ‘good laugh’ if you weren’t hoping to embarrass me? I repeat, you’ve lied again.
“Perfect” is a loose term, especially as a twit like PresentCompany uses the word. When I use it in this context, it means that the post accurately reflects what I intended to say.
You make it sound as if making proper use of emphasis were some kind of ‘failing.’
Now, THAT’s sour grapes.
@ bernard ross:
Original material unnecessary. I’m not here to entertain you.
ALL projection is adolescent in inspiration. If you were past that age emotionally, you’d know this. The evidence that you aren’t is that you constantly employ it — as you did here.
Yes, I’ve seen the comments. I also note that they are posters who owe you for your online support of them. No surprises there.
Oh, it does happen from time to time actually, but I don’t encourage it. Nor is it important to me. A MAN doesn’t require external supports; that’s how you know he IS a man.
The fact that you haven’t noticed it (IF, in fact, you haven’t) indicates only that you allow what SUITS you to register with you; the rest goes in one ear and out the other. “All & everything lies in jest; still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest…”
In any case, the little universe composed of the poster clique here is just a tiny part of the totality of readers of this blogsite, and you truly are kidding yourself if you really think the remarks of the posters is in any way representative of general sentiment among the broad readership. My email inbox suggests to me quite, QUITE the
contrary.
Anybody who depends on mutual support of other persons — is INESCAPABLY witless; has no choice but to be witless.
I’ll know more tomorrow.
@ Ted Belman:
Do you have any idea how they are getting in?
Can’t you change the password on your gmail acct?
Sounds like Russian criminals MO
I have been hacked again. This time they stole an old gmail of mine that I never used and changed my Paypal button on the site so that the donations went to the old email which they now control. they opened up a paypal account with it in Cypress. And donations made on the site go there. But donations made on Digest go to me. that’s why I removed the buttons on this site. they also seemed to hav e messed with the Right column and other things.
The dweller song in Living color!!!!!!!!!
Yes deller, you have more than one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luKmSLXukaw#t=48
@ dweller:
Since you have used the word ding-a-ling
I have found your song it fits you like a glove!!!
my ding a ling chuck berry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADTJ1W_XKYI
dweller Said:
denial is the longest river in Egypt. YES, sour grapes, produced by your inability to cope with your own quotes making you appear the ludicrous, humorless buffoon
dweller Said:
dweller Said:
not at all, its impossible for you to be embarrassed as you are completely unaware of your pathology. However that does not prevent the other posters from having a good laugh at your vanity and obsessive compulsive behaviors; here is just one of the thousands you post here:
dweller Said:
Michelangelo reviewing his work of art or an obsessive compulsive engaged in his vain pathological behaviors? Pay special attention to the nuances of italics and capitals in your original post for the full laugh. You remind me of Captain Queeg. I can just see you now, reviewing your creations and then posting them as perfect. I know you enjoyed seeing yourself in print again and I believe posters enjoy seeing some theater of the absurd. Hence the re posting of your absurd quotations.
I leave it to the other posters to see if they find your behavior funny. 🙂
dweller Said:
Thank you for bringing back the bones I threw you fido, but I am disappointed that you have no original material except to accuse me of what I accuse you. Its an adolescent form of projection.
dweller Said:
dweller Said:
I have been told that my “cheap, sneering attempts at ridicule” are funny here but I have never read anyone say the same of you. Apparently posters here are not as witless as you believe.
@ bernard ross:
LMFAO.
The voice of experience, evidently.
We BOTH know perfectly well that if there were, in fact, any sour grapes in my back yard, you’d have wasted no time identifying them by NAME.
Hell, you’d have thrown up a neon sign around them in record time, and with arrows pointing at them from all directions. Your intentions are embarrassingly transparent.
No sour grapes.
And no sale.
@ bernard ross:
And why would you do THAT, even if you believed that
— especially if you believed that? (which you don’t)
No, Sir, you’re lying again.
You didn’t repost my comment because you thought I’d like to look at it.
You reposted it because you THOUGHT to ’embarrass’ me with it. But your maliciousness caused you to miscalculate the effect of it.
So lost are you in your own imagination that you assumed that seeing what I had written would ’embarrass’ me.
It didn’t, however, because it was RIGHT ON. I’d looked at it carefully, as I do every comment of mine before hitting “post,” and it was quite sound; made eminently good sense. I’d post it again MYSELF, if circumstances called for it — and not out of ‘vanity’ either. Rather, from simple, sound discernment.