T. Belman. From my point of view, it is the US that risks nuclear war. The US policy should have been to embrace Russia rather than alienate her. The US believed in its own supremacy and wanted to dominate Russia. In the end American hubris brought about the demise of American dominance and the NWO.
The pot is calling the kettle, black
The US is reaping what it sowed.
Gordon Chang to Newsmax: China ‘Supplying Lethal Assistance’ to Russia
By
A Russian soldier patrols a street in Mariupol, Ukraine, on April 12, 2022. (Alexander Nemenov/AFP via Getty Images)<
The growing alliance between Russia and communist China carries significant implications for the war in Ukraine and the future of U.S. nuclear deterrence more broadly, according to one former general.
It is likely that the intensity of Russian military actions in Ukraine and potentially elsewhere will increase as Beijing and Moscow grow closer, and there is a real risk that nuclear war could erupt, according to retired U.S. Air Force Brig. Gen. Robert Spalding.
Without economic, diplomatic, and, potentially military aid from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Russian leader Vladimir Putin would not have been able to sustain the significant losses incurred by the Russian military, Spalding told the Epoch Times.
“I think it’s going to embolden Putin the more support he gets from China, clearly,” Spalding said. “He’s been emboldened this entire time by China’s support.”
“Without China’s backing, Russia would be nowhere close to able to mount an offensive this spring.”
Russia Dependent on China’s Support for War in Ukraine
The CCP has consistently blamed the United States and its NATO allies for Russia’s invasion, and has parroted the Kremlin’s propaganda by describing the war as a “special military operation” and censoring condemnations of the conflict on Chinese social media.
Now, U.S. leaders fear that the regime may be preparing to provide lethal aid to Russia’s military, though the regime’s support for Russia has been consistent throughout the war in Ukraine.
For his part, however, Spalding believes that the CCP started delivering such aid long ago.
“I’m of the opinion that they’re helping them with lethal aid, but it’s likely either American or other Western equipment that Chinese companies help them procure by bypassing sanctions,” Spalding said.
“It’s not likely that the Chinese right now would be having their own equipment sent, so that if it was captured on the battlefield you could see that it had come from China. But, if it’s coming from some Western country, then you’re not going to know how, necessarily, the Russians procured it.”
Interestingly enough, the White House has acknowledged that Chinese companies have directly supported Russia’s war in Ukraine, but have stopped short of saying such support amounted to lethal aid.
When the White House issued sanctions on numerous international bodies related to Russia’s war on Feb. 24, for example, it also targeted Chinese entities accused of backfilling Russia’s defense industry, effectively helping the regime skirt sanctions.
Likewise, China previously falsified shipping documents in order to disguise military aviation equipment bound for Russia as civil in nature, and used intermediaries in the UAE to deliver dual-use drones to Russia, according to a report by Der Spiegel.
That same report alleges that the CCP is currently preparing a shipment of suicide drones to Russia for use in Ukraine.
“There is plenty of justification for leveling sanctions on China right now for the support they’ve given to Russia,” Spalding said.
US Nuclear Deterrence Unprepared for Multipolar World
With the relationship between the CCP and Kremlin warming, and tensions with the United States at historic highs, Spalding warned that the United States was entering unknown territory in terms of nuclear strategy.
The United States has never before had to simultaneously deter two major nuclear powers, Spalding noted, and its ability to prevent the war in Ukraine from spiraling into nuclear holocaust was waning with the day.
“We have to be very careful that this doesn’t turn into World War Three,” Spalding said.
“You can’t say that the United States is not constrained in terms of how it looks at the conflict and the potential that it could escalate beyond its current bounds. That’s something that could be very dangerous for the United States and for NATO.”
Spalding warned that a widening of the war in Ukraine could threaten the world with a situation similar to that of the Korean War in the 1950s, when combat between the democratic West and Communist Eurasian powers nearly erupted into nuclear war.
A key part of the problem, Spalding said, was that the United States currently lacks the type of nuclear capabilities required to deter both China and Russia from initiating a nuclear war.
Essentially, Spalding said, Chinese and Russian forces were investing heavily in expanding their nuclear arsenals, including so-called “first-use” weapons. Such weapons are designed to eliminate an adversary’s nuclear arsenal up front, thereby taking away the ability of that adversary to strike back against a nuclear aggressor.
Unless the United States enhanced its own arsenal, he said, it risked becoming the victim in a nuclear war.
“It’s all part of the calculation of how much do we need to ensure that it’s not a good idea for Russia and China to combine on a preemptive strike of U.S. nuclear forces,” Spalding said.
“If China and Russia have sufficient forces that they can basically destroy the American capacity to have a credible second strike capability that would deter the Russian and Chinese from launching a preemptive attack, then we risk them launching a preemptive attack.”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.