Democracy used to be about the will of the majority. This was softened by constraining the will of the majority making it subservient to the rights of minority. What should be included in these rights are the subject of debate. Chazan goes much further making democracy synonymous with the status of these rights. For her, the more these rights are realized, the greater, the democracy. Put another way, she negates the will of the majority. For instance, it doesn’t matter if a dictator is in power. So long as he protects the minority rights his government is a democracy. The majority no longer has a say. Perhaps she only negates the right of the majority to rule only in matters of minority rights. For her, they are sacrosanct. But this is not so simple. The most important of these rights is the right to be treated equally i.e., not to be discriminated against. But if the Majority want the state to be a Jewish state, however this is defined, and a minority say that such a state violates its rights, should not the state have the right to make itself so. There are many similar examples. For instance should not the state have the right to defend itself by infringing on the rights of the minorities when warranted. Lets hear from my readers. Ted Belman
Naomi Chazan ends her term as New Israel Fund president, is replaced by Brian Lurie.
Naomi Chazan has ended a tumultuous term as president of New Israel Fund (NIF), which leads the ultra-leftist camp in Israel through the use of neo-Marxist tactics and public advocacy “rights groups,” and the promotion of “politically correct” Newspeak. The Fund has disbursed well over $200 million in its 23 years of existence.
In her farewell speech at the New Israel Fund’s 2012 Guardian of Democracy Dinner in San Francisco last week, Chazan used Newspeak to describe the current state of events in Israel as a “tug-of-war” between the “neo-nationalist” camp in Israel and the “democratic revival” of “civil society.”
Chazan made it clear that in her view, “democracy” does not refer to majority rule and that she sees Israel’s democratically elected government as ruling only “on the formal level.”
“When you ask Israelis today what is the best form of government in the world – it is democracy,” she said. “But when you ask Israelis what is democracy, over 50% say ‘majority rule.’ That should get you worried. Very much so. The democratic recession has led to a neo-nationalist upsurge in Israel, which is hegemonic. It rules on the formal level.”
“Neo-nationalist Israel is doing very well at the formal level,” she added, noting that the coalition has 94 MKs at present.
Chazan said: “There is a neo-nationalist crackdown now. It deals with settlements and women: women’s faces, women’s voices, women’s status, women’s prayers… It deals with incitement against foreigners and against minorities within Israel. And this neo-nationalist crackdown is trying to silence the media. It is very difficult. Just this past weekend, protesters were harassed on social change issues, and they were carrying banners – ‘we want democracy.'”
She then explained what true democracy means, in her eyes. “The struggle against racism is a struggle for democracy. The struggle against xenophobia is a struggle for democracy. The struggle against gender discrimination is a struggle for democracy. The struggle against homophobia is a struggle for democracy.”
Chazan was the focus of an aggressive nationalist campaign in 2010 by grassroots Zionist group Im Tirtzu, which blamed the NIF for assisting the Goldstone Commission in libeling Israel over the Cast Lead counter-terror operation.
Chazan is replaced as NIF president by Brian Lurie, who was CEO of the San Francisco Jewish Federation for 17 years and has been involved in advancing Arab-Jewish relations.
Democracy is majority rule, so I don’t agree with Chazan.
Yidvocat, what kind of pacifist, pious nonsense are you advocating, that God should forgive (!!) her for all the harm she has done to Israel? Try reading the Amida prayer which a Jew says 3 times daily and which expressly asks HaShem “to destroy enemies and bring down desecrators.” Judaism is fair and ethical, but is NOT a turn your cheek religion.
Democracy is not just about majority (that is how Nazi Germany took off!), it is not about equality since we are all different, it is not about minority. Democracy implies fairness towards everybody, every individual (demos = people = not as an entity but a sum of EACH individual). It is not about rights but rights AND obligations. Equality is meaningless since we are all different. Although the laws are the same for all of us, we are not equal towards the laws. As we all know, some among us feel more equal than others. The unfairness of the delivery of Justice even in the US is a good example. Democracy has an obligatory relation to humans (it does not exist in the animal kingdom (- human).
It has some connection to humanity and “universalism” applied to the humans. Some among us believe that it should apply to the whole universe (homo megalomania).
One fundamental obligation of each individual (member of a democracy) should be his/her obligation to defend democracy.
For the uninformed, “political correctness” finds its origin in Marxist ideology and is nothing else but the denial of freedom of thought and speech by intimidation. Favorite weapon of communists and dictators.
Does N.C. has any idea of what is the best system? I doubt very much!
Ideally speaking, it is good to treat everybody equally. However, we are not living in an ideal world yet. In the name of equal rights for minorities,there are instances in which a minority has become a tyrant in different parts of the world. The word “discrimination” is very much misused and misunderstood. Individuals and states usually discriminate between harmful and beneficial stuff on a daily basis. If a right is not mutually beneficial to a minority as well as a majority, it is alright to discriminate against it. Keeping a balance between a majority and minority rights are challenges that a state faces.
I disagree with Yidvocat! May the Almighty ‘reward’ her for her iniquities in equal measure to her treasonous stance.
I believe that in the case of Israel where the minority muslim population may be a direct threat to the nation, then the answer is yes.
Chazan is a great enemy of the Jewish people. May the All Mighty forgive her for all the harm she has inflicted upon her people.