The Canadian government has expressed “zero tolerance” for boycotters of Israel.
Israel is the only country targeted by BDS.
The pro-Israel Canadian government may be planning to include boycotts of Israel as a hate crime, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) reported Monday.
It said that such a move would target organizations such as the United Church of Canada, Canadian Quakers, campus protest groups and labor unions. It also would raise legal questions under Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Canadian Prime Stephen Harper is unarguably the most pro-Israel head of any government in the world. He sounded like an echo of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu during his visit to Israel last year.
Recently-retired Foreign Minister John Baird in January signed an agreement with Israel to fight the Boycott Israel movement, and government ministers have said they will show “zero tolerable” towards groups that are part of Boycott, Divest and Sanction (BDS). He described the Boycott Israel movement as “the new face of anti-Semitism.”
Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney recently said that boycotts of Israel cannot be separated from anti-Semitic hate speech and the recent terrorist attacks against Jews in France.
CBC asked the government to explain the meaning of “zero tolerance,” and Blaney replied that Canada has “one of the most comprehensive sets of [hate] laws anywhere in the world.”
Last year, Canada changed its definition of hate speech to include statements made against “national origin” and not just race and religion.
That has raised fears among civil libertarians that anti-Israel remarks could be classified as statements against Jews.
The concept of associating Israel with Jews goes at the very heart of the liberal Jewish community, as well as Jews who have no interest in Judaism in Israel. Whether they like it or not, hatred of Israel and Jews increasingly makes them identified with Israel by the fact that they are Jews.
They can like it or not, but inevitably, “Jew” cannot be separated from “Israel.” They can like it not, but the “People of Israel” means Jews – everywhere.
The question is whether that definition has a legal standing.
CBC reported that the Canadian Quakers wrote a letter to Foreign Affairs Minister Rob Nicholson in March “expressing concern” about describing boycotts as acts of anti-Semitism.
Blaney’s office did not specifically say that would be the case but noted that it is illegal to promote hatred against an “identifiable group.”
However, BDS protests in other parts of the world have been anything but violent, with frequent clashes with police such as in France.
In Israel, it is against the law to boycott the country
In France, hate speech as a crime includes statements aimed at people’s “national origin,” and BDS activists sometimes have been charged with violating the law.
Belgium is considering a similar law.
On paper, it would seem that prohibiting a group from promoting a boycott of a country – and Israel is the only nation that is targeted – because of its political polices is a violation of freedom of speech.
In reality, such protests are often like the Palestinian Authority term “resistance,” a code word to encourage terrorists to kill Jews.
About the Author: Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu is a graduate in journalism and economics from The George Washington University. He has worked as a cub reporter in rural Virginia and as senior copy editor for major Canadian metropolitan dailies. Tzvi wrote for Arutz Sheva for several years before joining the Jewish Press.
I would go further in order to circumvent possible Charter of Rights situations. I would allow the BDS folks to boycott Israel as long as they commit to boycotting at least two other countries. And as long as they provide rational/parallel reasons for committing BDS on all three.
This should separate the cowards – ie those who would be too afraid of boycotting non-Jews of all descriptions – from those who truly feel they have a “moral obligation” to boycott “for the good of mankind”.