https://rumble.com/vlod4c-wow-former-pfizer-employee-checkmate.-game-over.-we-win.html
Karen Kingston is a former Pfizer employee, a pharmaceutical marketing expert and biotech analyst.
Kingston joins Stew Peters, and brings the receipts! Kingston reveals how the FDA “approval” is sure to be the “checkmate” move to end the shots that have caused unprecedented injury and death, worldwide.
Kingston shared slides and brought the receipts, which are available at StewPeters.tv, and document everything she states in her BOMBSHELL claims during her exclusive and revealing deliver of damnation to big pharma, and those responsible for pushing these injections onto a global population.
Ding! Ding! Ding! THIS: Albert Bourla says in interview that he will not take the clot shot. Who is Albert Bourla? The CEO of Pfizer. Oh, and he’s a veterinarian. A veterinarian! He says he’s 59, healthy, and doesn’t need it.
@peloni
OK. Thank you for the explanation.
Basically a drop in Helper T-cells was HIV-I, and a drop in Killer T-cells is HIV-II.
Except the cause of HIV-II happens to be much more easily acquired and spread.
What a great achievement of modern medical science! (sarcasm)
@Reader
So it is a bit more complicated than that, but it is both interesting and relavent. I can share a simplified explanation with you that will help you understand the significance of the loss of the Killer Tcells.
To understand this more easily, let me quickly explain the Tcells(80% of lymphocytes) and Bcells(20% of lymphocytes) – it will make this a lot simpler to understand, I think.
Background: There are two major cell types in the part of your immune system that specifically responds to a specific bacteria/virus. These are the Bcells and Tcells. The Bcells, when stimulated, will design and secrete specific antibodies to the specific bacteria/virus. These usually act ~7-10days post infection. The Tcells are comprised of both Helper Tcells(aka CD4 Tcells) and Killer Tcells(CD8 Tcells). The Helper Tcells are the helper cells that actually teach the CD8 and the Bcells to attack a specific bacteria/virus with a specific response. The Killer Tcells kill cells that they sense as being infected by bacteria/virus/fungus or if they are cancerous or pre-cancerous cells. In HIV, there is a functional loss of the Helper Tcells which limits the immune response to any new infections. This was a concern with SARS-Cov2 when Dr. Montieger found 312 pieces of the HIV virus in SARS-Cov2.
The problem with the Killer Tcells is that we don’t know if they are permanently lost or they are just temporarily shutdown. The permanent loss of the Killer Tcells would be massive and catestrophic. The Killer Tcells constantly comb over all the body’s cells looking for tumor cells, so it prevents cancer on a massive scale. It also is the only immune response to destroy any cells infected with bacteria/virus/fungi. It also is the primary attack cell for most viruses. It also caries the record of your body’s cellular immunity to previous vaccinations and previous diseases. It also is the first of the lymphocytes to respond to any current infections. The reports that the Killer Tcells being shut down is very significant in view of the massive increase in cancers being reported by Dr. Cole and Dr. Merritt, as they could be quite related. Hope this wasn’t too complicated, it really is a very simplified explanation of the overall acquired immune system. Let me know if you have any questions.
.
@Sebastian Zorn
The comment quoted by you of someone about the “anti-vaxxers” who whine about being victims and who thus insult the memory of the concentration camp victims assumes that the vaccine is safe.
If it is not, then its comparison to Nuremberg laws is quite appropriate, and if, in fact, it is fully as dangerous as some people claim it is, the vaccination campaign is worse than the concentration camp experimentation because, at least, the concentration camp experiments were very limited in how many people they affected, while the vaccination campaign has already affected billions and is projected to cover the whole population of the world and to do so repeatedly.
If the vaccine is fully as dangerous as some people claim it is then, for the Jews, it will be a great deal worse than the European slaughter, it will be a literal Holocaust given the Jews’ truly insane rush to get vaccinated.
@peloni
Isn’t a drop in T-cells same as HIV?
I don’t agree with the poster I cited about this coercive approach being a “readonable social contract” but I do find agree that this is a false and dangerous moral equivalence that teeters on the wdge of Holicaust denial.
Somebody posted this in a pro-Israel Facebook group:
This is from Yeshiva World News.
Thanks for the info, Adam and Peloni
@Adam
So, this study took a complicated look at the infection-breakthrough rates, but they initially looked at two comparisons with the following results:
1. There was a 13X-increase in vaccine breakthroughs in people testing PCR+ with/without illness[likely included many false PCR+]
2. There was a 27X-increase in vaccine breakthroughs in people who were who were actually ill, ie confirmed disease(some disease) only, with PCR+.
Both of these data sets considered only those people vaccinated or infected in Jan/Feb 2021.
Both of these findings had large confidence intervals and should be of course be followed up with similar studies.
They also found that if you look back from 2020 and compare all Covid-breakthrough cases against the vaccine-breakthrough cases, there was a ~6X increase for the vaccinated breakthroughs, but this wider comparison was only statistically significant in the >60+ years of age category who had a smaller confidence interval, curiously.
These were all very profound results which each contradict CDC claims.
My thoughts, for what its worth:
It should shock no one at this time that the vaccines are failing. Yet, to only analyze this against natural immunity 10months later after 2.5billion people are already vaccinated is scandalous. It is true that Covid is a deadly disease, but this is only because the govts force doctors to not treat Covid till it is in a lethal stage. If early-treatment or prophylactic-medical-treatment were employed, over 80% of illness could be easily treated on an out-patient basis, ie no hospitalizations(Oxford-study). This was always know to be true.
An important side-issue that is rarely discussed is that the spike is really small in size relative to the antibodies that attacks it, which makes them less effective, than if the antibodies attacked the capsule, for instance, which is amuch larger target.
It is good that we have a study showing the failing rates specifically, but a vaccine that is designed to only identify a single element of the virus will never have better efficacy than natural-immunity, which identifies every part of the virus. Anyone with even a limited knowledge of the immune-system should recognize this fact. The vaccines do create avery large level of antibodies, but two things limit their effectiveness:
1. The large level of antibodies are, again, only against the spike which is hard for the antibodies to attack (with Delta and Delta+, they are increasingly immune).
2. The antibodies from vax are very short lasting in the mouth and respiratory tract. Covid disease begins in the mouth/nasal-passages, so natural-immunity has a prolonged-presence of a full(against every part of the virus) immunity in both the blood and the mouth/nasal-passages and can stop the infection at the place of exposure(mouth/respiratoy-tract). But after 30-40days post-vax, the vax immunity declines sharply in the mouth/nasal-passages while it declines in the blood more slowly. After this initial 4-6wks of strong protection, the infecting virus can only be stopped in the blood after it has gone through the lungs, ie post-infection/illness. This is the critical failing of the vax(my opinion).
Studies like this one should have been done hundreds/thousands of times across the many countries for each vaccine. There has been plenty of time/cases/need to warrant these simple observational-studies, and the only one that has been done is 10months later, 5 days after CDC approved Pfeizer and only analyses Pfiezer! – there should be heads rolling for this lack of interest in the viability of this project. Remember, one study is just one study. We need more data not less.
Let me know if any of this is unclear.
This is from Zero Hedge. I cannot reproduce the prepublished medical study on which Tyler Durden’s article is based, since the site will not permit this.. But he does provide the URL for the prepublication site. (Med-something). Peloni, could you read this study, co-authored by about 20 Israeli scientists and physicians, which finds that natural immunity resulting from past infection with COVID is 13 times more likely to prevent reinfection than the vaccines are to prevent infection? Perhaps you could summarize it and explain it to us. It seems to be a very important study that raises doubts about the profylactic value of the vaccines.
Former member of White House Corona Task Force on Stew Peters show – Very revealing interview. Dr. Alexander speaks to the opposition within the Trump White House that opposed Trump. He relates that Trump was dupped by his advisers. He again calls on Trump to oppose Child Vaccination(good luck with that). Many other relevant issues are discussed.
Here is the link
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/08/senior-trump-hhs-covid-advisor-drops-bombs-task-force-mislead-potus-no-pandemic/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rPYI2nXNIKbn/ Dr. Peter Breggin, a Jewish psychiatrist, explains documents in his book,“We are the Prey”, of the global meglomanical predators, Schwann, Gates, Fauxi, and WHO, and the genocidal plan to control everyone in a feudal system with endless deadly injections!
http://www.Breggin.com Outlines his information! Or
http://www.Wearetheprey.com
Looks like Fauci is planning on stepping up boosters from every 8months to every 5months. That should help the balance sheet. There was a finding that those who had previously been infected with Covid and then received the 2shots of Pfiezer resulted in a drop in functional T-Cells that react to SARS-Cov2, ie the shots decreased immunity. If this occurs with each successsive shot, it could have a serious consequence. Of course we don’t yet know why the T-Cells functionally halted after the 2nd shot because there is no govt/Pharma funding that would harm their vaccine programs, and the private research is being pursued as funds permit. It is regretful that CDC policy is being based on hope and not data. As the CDC Director Walensky noted in response to a question earlier this week regarding the 3rd shot, “There’s actually hope, we don’t have data yet…” Not exactly evidence-based-medicine. Anyone who thinks any of this is science based missed the part where science is usually based on data not hope. This is a belief system that could have more significant results than just wealth transfer and govt over-reach. Just saying….
A Canadian trucker has successfully stood down a COVID Court:
https://www.brighteon.com/f29a6dca-b650-4ecd-bf54-448984be9891
“Patriot Patrick King represented himself in court after being fined $1200 dollars for protesting against the Covid-Hoax, slew the beast and emerged VICTORIOUS. He issued a subpoena to the Provincial Health Minister for proof that the so-called Covid-19 Virus exists, and they were forced to admit that they had no evidence whatsoever. The virus has never been isolated, and thus the government had no legal grounds to impose any of the punishing restrictions they have inflicted on society…”
@peloni
I think we should just agree to disagree.
For this sort of thing you need a strong organization with a leader which is impossible to put together in this age of electronic survelliance.
It was almost impossible in the olden times, also, since no government likes competition from popular unelected leaders or a possibility of “the mob” getting out of control.
Besides, who are you going to petition for grievances?
It’s like a chicken coop petitioning the fox who owns the coop.
The violence is going to be directed at the protesters by the police and/or the military because they’ll be labeled “potential terrorists”.
Anyway, there is obviously no point in discussing this further.
@leanmarc@ii.net
Absolutely.
Most people don’t even have the time (not to say anything about the desire) to investigate those new initiatives, plus they’ve been trained from very early childhood to trust the government unconditionally, plus this is a consumer society which is inundated by ads and marketing almost 24/7 (the elections are also run by marketers and financed by large corporations).
Everyone takes their rest either in front of their TV or playing with their smartphones.
What can you expect?
@Reader
Take the local political infrastructure over. The Rep and Dems are owned by the establishment at a local level. If you take it back you can throw out the machines and then you control the local political environment. Public protests, letter writing, organization. Seize the political assets that control the local politics. It requires time and commitment and organizing with like minds. Again, no violence is needed or useful.
how is it that people totally ignore the evidence and data? I don’t want to attack this one person as there are millions the same.
We have data showing vaccinated carry same viral load as unvaccinated – one study I saw showed vaccinated carry 251 times viral load of unvaccinated in aged care workers.
And yet they call the people ‘vaccine deniers’?
It’s like a cult.
What will ever deprogram these people? No one is really against safe inoculations – these are not safe.
The reported harm events including death from these ‘vaccines’ are greater than for all vaccines combined since early warning system began.
The hospitals in Israel and UK report much higher intake of ‘vaccinated’ patients – up to 90% in Israel.
Is it that these people sit in front of the propaganda box all day and trust those people in the media etc or what?
@peloni
I didn’t advocate not resisting.
I think that the type of resistance you suggest is fruitless and hopeless.
Maybe I failed to understand what you meant – could you be more specific?
If you mean things like writing to you representatives, participating in your local government meetings, walking around on a sidewalk with some handwritten slogans (with the police permission) – this is pathetic, especially because it would be impossible to organize on a countrywide scale – there won’t be any organizers to start with.
Comparing the 18th century Americans with the modern ones is comparing apples and oranges – they are two completely different nations.
Their respective concepts of government, freedom, etc. don’t match in any way, to say nothing of their respective levels of political corruption, of their politicians, etc.
Resistance only works when the resisters have better leverage than the side they oppose and claim to resist.
What kind of leverage have a couple of hundred people (or even a couple of thousand) shouting slogans for an hour, exposing themselves to violence and arrests, and looking like a bunch of “anti-vaxxer” weirdos, especially if this event is not covered or is barely covered by the MSM?
Millions and millions of people refusing the vaccine and rejecting all the enticements designed to entrap them into complying will be noticed, for sure.
@Reader
If you do not resist their authority over you, you will have earned the defeat you accept. If the masses fail to resist, they may eventually catch up, but in any event I will not join them in their acquiescence to arbitrary authority. We are either free men or we are something less. I will not accept this second possibility as truth.
A great experiment was begun in 1776. The experiment was an audacious attempt to hold off what they saw as an intolerable over-reach of their govt. They placed everything upon the board to oppose this over-reach, and had little reason to believe they could overcome the vast British Empire. Still, they held nothing back. They spent most of the war retreating from one defeat after another. They even lost their capital. They nearly lost everything. But they resisted using sense, strategy and hope. They grew bold, they gained successes, they achieved allies and then they won.
It was a hard, nearly hopeless situation. They did this all while many of their neighbors sought the comforts you speak of by complying with the British, some even fought alongside the British. Many of those who resisted died, many lost everything, and they all suffered great hardships. If they looked only to the impossibility and cost of their actions, they would never have found their victory, nor would they have inspired the rise of the age of democracies in which we live in today. Below, I noted that
It is true. But it is also true that if we do not resisst, we have already lost. I do not accept this is true and you should not either. There are many who are reluctant to resist such authoritarian over-reaches, but we should not look to them as our role-models. Organize on a local level and pursue such protests to these authoritarians as you can. This is our only hope to oppose the growing list of tyrannical measures being pursued against us. In any event, this is how I see things.
I think this is no longer true and may even be self-defeating.
Why?
Because the few people who do protest will be severely punished to frighten the rest and things will go on as planned.
As you said – “Protests are effective in any free/semi-free society”
Based on this video (Karen Kingston) and on what has been happening in the last several decades – what makes you think that we live in a free or even semi-free society?
The best thing is civil disobedience, namely: refuse to vaccinate yourself or your children even if you will have to:
1) stop going to restaurants, bars, gyms, malls, etc.;
2) stop going to the movies;
3) stop flying;
4) have to order groceries or other necessities online;
6) stop sending your children to school;
7) even have to quit your job – look for the employers who don’t require vaccinations.
In order for this to have any effect, however, enough of the people must act in as if in unison, and that depends on whether enough people have enough self respect and dignity not to act on their worst instincts which seek various pleasures at the expense of their freedom.
If they are willing to pay with their life or the lives of their children for the permission to go to the movies, restaurants, on vacations, etc., then it is their choice!
@Reader
Fair point.
There are a host of people who have been taken in or convinced by the CDC propaganda, such as poor Felix, that this is the only way. It was never the only way and certainly not during the year long wait while 450k US citizens died and 2million world-wide, all without treatment prior to the too often fatal pneumonia.
In any case, I think people, as opposed to lab rats, have the ability to say no. Regardless of the cost, financial, or otherwise, you can resist this arbitrary authority that is being weighed against your will, no rat can claim this. But more than civil disobedience, you can protest. Local organization aimed at local protests and political activism, no violence please.
Protests are effective in any free/semi-free society – especially at a local level. Such things are difficult with lock downs, but then there are letter writing campaigns(not email). Politicians, or those not pre-chosen/managed by Chinese/Globalists/DNC will respond, but it requires local organization and local participation.
This is how the AZ audit started. It’s not sexy, but it can be effective. It is more useful at the local level, but if you gain control of the local political apparatus, you use this to further organize with other localities and produce a larger and larger protest movement.
If you push back, you can win. This is how we can prove we are different from lab rats That is, of course, if we really are different from lab rats.
@peloni
Actually, we should feel LESS like lab rats now because no researcher will prohibit reporting adverse reactions in lab rats to the substance he is testing on them.
So our status now is BELOW the status of lab rats.
A lab rat is now a higher creature than a human (it’s official, according to OSHA).
Should we now envy the lab rats??
@Felix, why do you address me? You know I think you are nothing but a nuisance at best. I was very happy when said you would never comment on the site again. Please keep that promise!
OSHA requirement to report vaccine injury suspended til after vax study is completed in May ’22. Should we feel more like lab rats now??
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/osha-tells-employers-do-not-report-vaccine-injuries/
So Bear shows who he really is in aiding the vaccine deniers and the reality is that the only way to beat down on a virus is by means of vaccine. No other way. The crime of these people is massive. It is those who refuse to be vaccinated who give this virus FREEDOM TO MUTATE.
@Felix
Please, do your homework if you are going to challenge IVM/HCQ drug cocktails. This piece by the Guardian is a very lame effort to shake the large body of evidence that supports IVM as beneficial. The withdrawn study is claimed to be a politically maneuvered attempt towards undermining IVM cocktail treatment. This may or not be true, but given the length of time it took to get that study printed with no reason in the midst of the vaccine only policy per CDC, it seems probably true, but it really doesn’t matter. One study is one study. There are over 60 studies on IVM and there should, by this time be many more. Since you ask for the whole truth, lets consider a meta analysis review on IVM. Have you ever heard of a meta analysis review? Few outside the scientific community are aware of such things. Here is an explanation of it: https://himmelfarb.gwu.edu/tutorials/studydesign101/metaanalyses.cfm
Briefly, meta-analyses are the highest level of review upon which knowledge is judged and their findings, if done properly, are impossible for WHO/CDC to counter, but they can of course just ignore them as they are doing today. Meta-analysis parses and evaluates the full breadth of evidence and applies statistical analysis to determine if a treatment plan is useful or contrarily indicated. The most recent meta-analysis on IVM was completed by Dr. Theresa A Lawrie MBBCh, PhD which parsed through the dozens studies. Dr. Lawrie is a consultant for the WHO and quite unimpeachable in the medical field. Here is a brief video and some other data from her
https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxView/DrTessLawrie-IVM-for-Covid-050721.html
Here is her meta-analysis:
https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Fulltext/2021/08000/Ivermectin_for_Prevention_and_Treatment_of.7.aspx
There are over 60 studies on IVM with Covid and some are rigged for poor results. Still, in all the studies used there is an average of 86% improvement with IVM with prophylaxis. All studies showed an average of 72% improvement with Early Treatment. All studies showed an average of 40% improvement with Late Treatment. These values changed marginally if you look at only peer-reviewed studies or RCTs which are about half of all the total studies. That is pretty incredible data.
Dr. Lawrie completed her meta-analysis with a conclusion of “high-certainty” that IVM effectively treats Covid. The study cited in the Guardian was then withdrawn and Lawrie revised her conclusion to “moderate-certainty”. I will let you draw your own conclusions for the likely validity of whether that study should have been withdrawn or not. It is really quite irrelevant to the whole story, really. I could cover this much more thoroughly, but I think this pretty well summarizes the “whole story” for you. If you are intimidated by the use of Early Treatment, I would never force it on you because such things are not done in a free society, but you should never withhold treatment from someone who is ill and wants to be treated. It is quite barbaric, I think.
In truth, I think HCQ is a better drug choice to IVM, just an opinion, but these are each unnecessary to pursue Early Treatment. A doctor in South Africa treated 6300 patients with a similar antiviral drug cocktail(no IVM or HCQ) and only 1 person was hospitalized and that person lived. Do you need more examples? There are many. Dr. Urso has 30 drugs he uses treat Covid – treatment of Covid is very easily achieved if pursued EARLY. Think of a fire engine arriving the day after your home burned down…easy right??
There are at least 45 Nations that are using no vaccines at all & doing very well with Ivermctin and/or Hydroxychloroquine or both!
India leads the way.
The Indians were using the vaccine Remdesvere & the virus fatalities were going thru the roof.
In desperation They started using Ivermectin instead & the positive results were almost immediate
A single coincidence is not proof.
However, when a coincidence occurs many times, it is no longer a just a coincidence.
What is criminally dangerous (and criminal) is withholding treatment from patients in order to increase the number of “cases” and deaths and to create panic and a demand for a “life-saving vaccine” (which is nothing of the sort).
In fact, withholding treatment is murder in many cases because many have false positive results for COVID with the invalid PCR test and their illness is not COVID.
Israeli study at Sheba Medical Center (Tel Aviv). Indicates excellent results for certain patients of Covid.
https://www.jpost.com/health-science/israeli-scientist-says-covid-19-could-be-treated-for-under-1day-675612
Those who present this drug as the answer are very dangerous. It leads people away from the vaccine. That is criminally dangerous.
Peloni coincidence is never proof
Also do tell the whole story as here
The preprint endorsing ivermectin as a coronavirus therapy has been widely cited, but independent researchers find glaring discrepancies in the data
https://amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.theguardian.com/science/2021/jul/16/huge-study-supporting-ivermectin-as-covid-treatment-withdrawn-over-ethical-concerns?amp_js_v=a6&_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16299899602117&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&_tf=From%20%251%24s&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fscience%2F2021%2Fjul%2F16%2Fhuge-study-supporting-ivermectin-as-covid-treatment-withdrawn-over-ethical-concerns
How can that information go out and yet its business as usual with children getting shots in school in Israel and Australia running lockdown camps to get people these shots. What does it take to stop this malfeasance and calamity?
When will heads start to roll?
Here is Karen Kingston’s first interview from July 28. Worth seeing.
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/07/deadly-shots-former-pfizer-employee-confirms-poison-in-covid-vaccine/
Countries who use IVM show marked decrease in cases/fatalities per Chairman of Tokyo’s Medical Assn. Countries that distribute IVM as a general anti-parasite, for malaria as an example, shows their populations have 134.4 cases per 100k people as opposed to 950.6 from countries not using IVM. It also shows the countries using IVM had only 2.2 deaths per 100k people compared to 29.3 in countries not using IVM. He relates that it may be due to other factors, but advocates that IVM should be given on an authorized basis with informed consent.
Here is the 2min video:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1429624844379824129