Bennett government votes down Judea and Samaria sovereignty bill

T. Belman.  How does Bennett justify this?

Bill introduced by the Likud to apply Israeli sovereignty in Judea and Samaria defeated in Knesset, 50 to 64.

By Hezki Baruch, INN

??''? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????

The Knesset voted Wednesday afternoon to reject a bill which would apply Israeli sovereignty over parts of Judea and Samaria.

The bill was introduced by Likud MK Mikki Zohar, along with cosponsor MK Shlomo Karhi (Likud).

In the preliminary vote in the Knesset plenum, the bill was rejected, with 50 MKs voting in favor and 64 against.

The Bennett government voted against the bill, ensuring its failure in the plenum.

Zohar excoriated the government for voting down the bill, calling the coalition an “evil, left-wing” government, and lambasted it as “opportunistic”.

“This bill will once again show and reveal who is ideological in this Knesset, who believes in their path, and who is just an opportunist and who seeks positions for himself and his friends.”

“I understand and can accept it when [United Arab List chief] Mansour Abbas and UAL vote against the law, but when the right-wingers in this government vote against the law, they will prove to the public once more that they came to the Knesset for jobs, for positions, for opportunism, not because of ideology or any values.”

The government response was offered by Justice Minister Gideon Sa’ar (New Hope).

“I heard MK Mikki Zohar relating to the fact that in the last administration, Netanyahu wanted to apply sovereignty but Blue and White prevented him from doing so. And I was just thinking to myself, ‘How far from the truth can you get?’ In the coalition agreement between the Likud and Blue and White, which I voted on along with you in the previous Knesset, which Netanyahu highlighted, and justifiably, that it included a major concession [from Blue and White] that regardless of the details of their veto power, the one thing that would be off limits is the issue of sovereignty, and that [Netanyahu] can bring the application sovereignty to the Cabinet and government and Knesset approval after July 1st, 2020.”

“The agreement also included a clause which allowed the Prime Minister to bring the [sovereignty] bill to the Knesset as a private MK’s bill, so long as it was through a Likud MK. So you, MK Zohar, party whip for the Likud in the last Knesset, could have brought this bill up in the last Netanyahu government, during the Trump administration, during the amazing window of opportunity – you could have submitted the sovereignty bill and had a majority in the Knesset.”

July 29, 2021 | 6 Comments »

Leave a Reply

6 Comments / 6 Comments

  1. Dr. Gottlieb Explains Why US COVID Hot Spots May Have Reached Point Where Delta Surge Reversed
    Tyler Durden’s Photo
    by Tyler Durden
    Thursday, Jul 29, 2021 – 07:20 PM

    A few days ago, we shared some analysis from Goldman Sachs and other investment banks projecting that the surge across the US in newly diagnosed COVID cases attributed to the delta variant would soon fade, just as outbreaks in the UK, Continental Europe and India all have. They’ve been closely monitoring the situation because it’s now a key factor in their economic growth projections, and most expect delta will have a mild impact in heavily vaccinated Europe.

    Now, Bloomberg has apparently caught on.

    While hospitalizations and deaths are clearly higher in areas where vaccination rates are lower, rates are still well below their levels from just a few months ago. And although Dr. Anthony Fauci would have you believe that Delta might cause the end of the world as we know it, his isn’t the only view on the matter. Dr. Scott Gottlieb, a former director of the FDA, believes delta will peak within the next two to three weeks.

    And after breaking the data down to the regional level, Bloomberg has apparently spotted some trends that suggest as Delta’s global conquest has been characterized by “hyperspeed spikes in infections that eased dramatically after about two months.”

    The first US outbreaks that caught officials’ eye were in Missouri and Arkansas, and they both started in earnest around the end of May, per BBG.

    They noted that the rest of the country will be keeping a close eye on both states (along with a handful of others, including California).

    The rest of the US will be watching those states closely as infections spread. The cases are prompting authorities to reconsider masking and other public-health measures, but many state and local governments are doing so gingerly and only after outbreaks are well underway. In Florida’s Miami-Dade County, Mayor Daniella Levine Cava said Wednesday that she would require masks again at indoor county facilities such as libraries.

    Bloomberg also cited the following tweet from Dr. Gottlieb where he explained how Rt, a virus’s effective reproductive number, plays into forecasts of the virus’s spread. The logic behind it is pretty simple: If Rt falls below 1, then the virus’s spread should start to slow.

    Gottlieb cited data from covidestim, a project with contributors from Yale School of Public Health, Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Stanford Medicine, showing the Rt rate in the worst hit states is already trending toward 1. When the numbers did this in the UK, seen as being just a few weeks ahead of the US, cases quickly started falling off.

    Just some food for thought.

  2. Immigration and Absorption Minister threatening to vote against budget
    Minister of Immigration and Absorption Pnina Tamano-Shata livid over Treasury’s refusal to include clause supporting Ethiopian Aliyah in annual budget.

    Hezki Baruch , Jul 30 , 2021 2:04 AM

    A crisis is brewing between Minister of Immigration and Absorption Pnina Tamano-Shata (Blue and White) and the Ministry of Finance and threatening the stability of the government.

    The Ministry of Finance refuses to add a section to the state budget that will allow Ethiopian Jews to continue making Aliyah to Israel.

    The Treasury has agreed to fund an increase of only a thousand people in each of the next two years. The Ministry of Absorption demanded an increase of 4,000 people in the next two years.

    In response, Tamano-Shata is threatening to bring down the government. “I will never allow them to continue abusing Ethiopians and abandoning them at the bottom of the government’s list priorities. Those who have been waiting decades to make Aliyah from Ethiopia and their families in the country have suffered more than enough.”

    “I will oppose a budget that will not significantly advance their Aliyah, even at a price where I will no longer sit in the government, and I will return to the Knesset to vote against abandoning them,” the minister clarified.

    As the coalition has 61 Knesset members, Tamano-Shata’s opposition will prevent the approval of the budget and will lead to the toppling of the government and the dissolution of the Knesset.

  3. What is vital for Israel now is a budget and the reforms it carries. Such as the increase in the Defense Budget and Health Care Budget. Plus reducing costs for Israelis buried with extra costs at restaurants and at the super market because of past policies.

  4. Cynical move by Likud who never brought this up when they were in power and it had a chance to pass.

    Only reason they brought it up now so that the some right-wingers would have a knee jerk react how can they Bennett and company not vote for this. Pure politics.

    Bennett/Lapid Coalition had said on its formation that it would not be able to pass bills like this because of its diverse makeup.

    If members of the Likud or Religious Zionist care about a bill like this passing, they should join the government so that they can get rid of RAAM and Meretz. The true goal is not sovereignty but political power. So cynicism reigns!!

  5. There is no need for a sovereignty bill for Judea and Samaria. The 1994 Peace and Border Treaty with Jordan defines in minute detalil the limits to Israeli state sovereignty in the area. The whole debate is based on a misunderstanding of International law. The issue is not about sovereignty, but about local application of Israeli law. The adoption of the Oslo Accords was a sovereign act by Israel.

  6. So you, MK Zohar, party whip for the Likud in the last Knesset, could have brought this bill up in the last Netanyahu government, during the Trump administration, during the amazing window of opportunity – you could have submitted the sovereignty bill and had a majority in the Knesset.”

    Is this really the limit of their response? I have looked for a further comment from the govt but have only found this pathetic counter-charge as their stated defense of in action on this matter in which they cite only that Likud didn’t try to it, while maintaining a great silence to explain why Bennett and Saar succeeded in stopping it. No mention that the matter will be addressed after the budget, no mention of any intent to move forward with this at all, ever. If the claim is that Zohar and Likud are being disingenuous on this point or simply that Bibi failed to push this forward while in power for whatever reason, it can not be denied that this bill could now be law, if not for the defecting members of the Right who joined the Left and anti-Zionists to form this govt and withheld their support or any recommendation to do so in the future.

    I can not help but accept that they are more focused on their continued experiment than greater matters such as this, which would countenance the fact that they have no intention on bridge the the gap between their stated goals and their vote cast to deny this law. While in office, Bibi never had access to so great a chorus of Right wing MKs within the Knessett as are available to make this matter complete, regardless of Trump. The intolerable acceptance that Jews are forced to live under a military govt, limiting their freedoms within their own lands has too long been left unattended.

    I do not know what has held the hand of Bennett and Saar from extending the employment of civil law and justice over Jewish lands, be it the tenuous govt, the Americans or some other matter, but it has created a chasm between a key objective of theirs and their voting record. Seems relavent that they provide a better qualification of their intent by this recent vote than offering some slight towards the Opposition, who did indeed vote to provide sovereignty to J&S.