Bennett clarifies: I did not apologize to Netanyahu

As Hilary Clinton once said “What difference does it make now?”. Bennett didn’t attack Bibi, just his policy. And his attack was a mortal blow to such policy. That’s what matters. As for an apology, who cares? Ted Belman

By Barak Ravid, HAARETZ

Economy Minister Naftali Bennett clarified on Wednesday that he did not apologize to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for his criticism of the prime minister’s peace plans.

Earlier Wednesday, Netanyahu issued an ultimatum to Bennett, ordering him to apologize for his statements by Sunday at 10 A.M., or he will be fired. Bennett then said that he did not mean to hurt the prime minister, but that he stands by his statements. Later on Wednesday, senior officials in the Likud party said that Bennett had backed down and apologized quicker than they had expected.

The row began on Sunday when Bennett launched an unprecedented attack against Netanyahu’s suggestion that Israelis could live under Palestinian rule.

Bennett was responding to remarks made by Netanyahu at the World Economic Forum in Davos, where he said he has no intention of uprooting a single settlement and suggested settlers could remain outside Israel’s borders under a peace agreement with the Palestinians.

Shortly after Netanyahu’s ultimatum was reported, Bennett spoke at a conference at the Dead Sea and commented on the issue.

“There are elements trying to turn a substantive debate over the future of our security and our land into a personal attack that didn’t happen,” said Bennett at an education conference at the Dead Sea.

“I respect Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his leadership under difficult conditions, support him when needed and criticize when necessary and that is my duty.

“Placing Palestinian sovereignty over Israeli citizens is dangerous, and it was my duty to shoot down the idea from the agenda immediately, and indeed the idea was shot down.”

Bennett’s office released his statements to the press, and it was initially reported that he also said: “If the prime minister was hurt, I am certainly sorry about that.”
However shortly afterward, his office released a correction and said that they made a mistake while transcribing Bennett’s statements, and that he in fact did not apologize.

Bennett told his associates later on Wednesday that he did not mean to hurt the prime minister, but rather wanted to express a strong stance on an important issue. “Bennett said that he has no interest in hurting the prime minister, but he does not intend on saying anything more than that… the ball is in their court.”

Sources in the Likud party responded on Wednesday evening to Bennett’s statements. “Bennett’s letter of dismissal was already ready. We didn’t expect our threat to work so quickly. [Housing and Construction Minister] Uri Ariel persuaded Bennett to apologize,” said senior sources in the Likud.

Earlier Wednesday, sources said that Bennett, leader of the Habayit Hayehudi party, had told confidants that he has no intention of apologizing. Indirect contacts between the Prime Minister’s Office and Bennett’s office were held throughout the day on Wednesday, mediated by Housing and Construction Minister Uri Ariel.

Ariel, who is a member of Bennett’s Habayit Hayehudi party, received a phone call from Cabinet Secretary Avichai Mandelblit on Wednesday morning saying that Netanyahu expected Bennett to apologize publicly for the sharp personal attack he made. The housing minister passed along the message and tried to persuade Bennett to apologize and end the row as soon as possible.

Ariel even went on Israel Radio Wednesday morning to call for an end to the spat and said, “If it were me, I would find a way to apologize.” Meanwhile, Ariel and other sources said that Bennett made clear that he believed he had expressed a legitimate position regarding a fundamental issue – the future of the settlements.

Earlier Wednesday, Netanyahu’s bureau has informed Naftali Bennett that he must apologize “clearly and sharply, in public” for his personal attacks against Netanyahu over the last few days or the coalition would be in danger.

“It was clarified to Bennett that there a lack of apology comes at a price,” a senior source in the Prime Minister’s Bureau said. “Nobody will teach Netanyahu what love of Israel is, and what concern for the security of its citizens is. With all of Bennett’s claims, it’s not clear why he’s stuck to a seat in the government.”

Netanyahu’s bureau called Bennett “cheeky” and said “his type of irresponsibility will not be passed over quietly.”

The source added that Bennett’s behavior also endangered the interests of the residents of West Bank settlements.

“If he doesn’t apologize, he endangers the composition of the current government,” said Netanyahu’s bureau. “We have enough alternatives to Habayit Hayehudi. A government without Bennett can continue to worry about the security of the state just like every government before him.”

The controversy exploded Sunday with Bennett’s unprecedented attack against Netanyahu’s suggestion that Israelis could live under Palestinian rule.

Bennett was responding to remarks made by Netanyahu at the World Economic Forum in Davos, where he said he has no intention of uprooting a single settlement and suggested settlers could remain outside Israel’s borders under a peace agreement with the Palestinians.

Bennett said Netanyahu’s comments reflect “ethical befuddlement” and that “whoever even considers having Jews live in the Land of Israel under Palestinian sovereignty undermines our presence in Tel Aviv.”

January 29, 2014 | 6 Comments »

Leave a Reply

6 Comments / 6 Comments

  1. Will the following scenario in anyway be in Israel’s interest: 1) Keeping Judea & Samaria under a Palestinian rule as Israeli Arabs are under Israel’s rule; 2) Dividing the Temple Mount into a Jew and Muslim sectors and keeping it under an international body; 3) Giving Israel to keep the Jordan valley under its army?

    I heard part of the above statements from a person on a talk show this morning. He is of the opinion that an agreement could be signed on April 29, 2014 between Israel and Palestinian Authority after the US Secretary of State, John Kerry, presents US plans to both parties.

  2. This whole thing is pathetic and disgusting. What Israel needs is patriotic and principled leadership, not political theatre and rivalry.

  3. the phoenix Said:

    Is Feiglin making any moves?

    Nothing obvious above the waterline beyond stuff he writes and a few interviews nobody sees.

    He is a pariah with a large segment of Likud voters and will not bring in or garner votes in the wider public.

  4. BB was happy to have Bennett attack him and Bennett was happy to attack. It served both their interests for different reasons

    It raised the stature and right wing credentials of Bennett who has ambitions of leading all of the Israeli right in the future and it helped BB by showing he has a difficult coalition at home and a lack of his own party’s support many sided with Bennett.

    Bennett will quit the government on his own if he has no other political options and BB will fire him when it serves his purpose. Bennett is expendable but BB has to time the dissolution of his current coalition with political exigencies.

    The real power still lies with Likud MK’s, the Likud central committee and Lieberman. Lieberman whose party has sunk to low single digits in the polling has a problem. Without the Likud he is in danger of becoming irrelevant and if he wants to be PM in the future he can only succeed by becoming an extreme right winger and that means opposing BB with everything he can muster, otherwise he will not have a political base.

    Behind the current political theater of Bennett and BB is the beginnings of political jockeying for who will replace BB as leader of the Israeli right. Moshe Ya’alon is also beginning to make the correct noises that could endear him to hard core Likudniks.

    Let’s see who comes out on top in leading Likud rebels against BB. That will indicate if it’s a serious rebellion or just some internal political posturing for internal Likud consumption.

    Israeli politics is political theater for ugly people.