Barkat: Let the Palestinians rename Ramallah, ‘Jerusalem’

Jerusalem’s mayor rules out any notion of Palestinian rule in the capital, slams Olmert’s peace offer as a ‘terrible mistake,’ and says it’s ‘ridiculous’ that Jews can’t pray on the Temple Mount

By DAVID HOROVITZ, TOI

Setting out a resolutely uncompromising vision of continued Israeli sovereignty throughout Jerusalem, the capital’s Mayor Nir Barkat rejected any notion of Palestinian rule in any part of the city, and branded international pressure on Israel to freeze building over the pre-1967 lines in Jerusalem as “illegal.”

In arguably the most candid and forthright interview he has given since winning office in 2008, Barkat suggested that if the Palestinians wanted a capital in Jerusalem they could rename Ramallah “Jerusalem” or “northern Jerusalem.”

It was in Jerusalem’s DNA to be a united city, under sole Jewish rule, he said. “By definition, that DNA cannot be divided.” Palestinian demands for some degree of sovereignty in the city, largely endorsed by the international community as integral to an Israeli-Palestinian accommodation, were unacceptable and unworkable, he said. “That kind of thinking will get us nowhere. It will get us to a dead end, to a bad deal… The answer is no separation of the city… If the world pushes us there, it’s just a matter of time before things will fall apart. It will not bring closer a resolution or a better relationship with our neighbors. There is no doubt in my mind. It will get much, much worse.”

When it was put to him that his views ran against the current of international thinking, including that espoused by US President Barack Obama, Barkat said, “Unfortunately, they’re wrong. You want to hear the truth. You want to understand what will work, not what our allies are telling you. And if anything, I would recommend to our allies to ask us and to better understand the big writing on the wall. For every complex problem, there is one simple, wrong answer. What they’re seeking is the simple, wrong answer for this region, for Jerusalem, for the Middle East and for the relationship between us and our neighbors.”

Barkat, who is up for reelection in October, vowed to maintain development across the city for the benefit of all its citizens, in the east and west of Jerusalem, and said Arab East Jerusalemites were increasingly appreciative of his leadership. His master plan, designed to raise Jerusalem’s population from 800,000 people to a million people, “is an honest and fair plan. It enables natural growth, for the Jews and non-Jews alike.”

The mayor was interviewed by The Times of Israel ahead of Wednesday’s Jerusalem Day, when Israel commemorates the reunification of the city under its control in the 1967 war. (The full transcript of the interview will be posted later.) He was also speaking as US efforts to restart Israeli-Palestinian peace talks intensified in the wake of Obama’s visit to the region in late March and subsequent shuttle diplomacy overseen by US Secretary of State John Kerry.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (center) and Jerusalem mayor Nir Barkat (right) in the Gilo neighborhood of Jerusalem on October 23, 2012. (photo credit: Moshe Milner/GPO/Flash90)

An ex-IDF paratrooper and high-tech millionaire who takes a symbolic one shekel annual salary as mayor, Barkat, 53, heads his own independent party list. He staked out positions in the interview similar to, and in some instances more hardline than, those espoused by Likud Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Asked for his vision of an accommodation with the Palestinians, Barkat said “it would probably be in line with Prime Minister Netanyahu’s understanding of the two-state solution. But not dividing Jerusalem.” With no Palestinian sovereign role? “No, no, there’s no such thing,” he said. “No such thing in the world.”

He described former prime minister Ehud Olmert’s 2008 peace offer to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas as a “terrible mistake” and said “thank God” Olmert was no longer prime minister. “It would have been a bad deal. And I was deeply disappointed to hear [Olmert] even think this way, because I did not hear this from him in the past, when he was here [as Jerusalem mayor]. Maybe he was like others. He may have given up on the city.”

Former prime minister Ehud Olmert meets with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in Paris in 2008 (photo credit: Thaer Ganaim/Flash90)

Barkat further criticized Olmert and Uri Lupolianski, his two immediate predecessors as mayor, for sending Jerusalem “backwards for 15 years.” How so? “Because in those years Jerusalem suffered from terrible negative migration. It suffered from a lack of deep understanding of how the city should exploit its potential. There were quite negative internal sectoral tensions. Jerusalem became the poorest city in the country. It was very bearish for business, and people shied away.”

He said he had turned the city round, citing eased tensions between different sectors, a boosted economy, growing investment, improved education, flourishing cultural tourism and more. Jerusalemites of all backgrounds were increasingly happy in the city, and had growing faith in its municipal leadership, he said.

“We’ve won trust,” Barkat said. “It’s a lot about trust. It’s giving hope to the young people: ‘Come, it’s worthwhile being here. Be part of the building of the city of Jerusalem. Don’t shy away.’ A lot of people gave up on the city. And now you see that things are changing. People are starting to re-believe in the future of the city… The young population, they’re much happier in the city. A lot of them see their future in the city.”

Asked whether he was aware of further possible Jerusalem scandals like the Holyland real estate affair (in which Olmert and Lupolianski are both defendants, Barkat said,”I’m not aware of anything of that or any other magnitude.” He added, in another apparent critique of his immediate predecessors: “The whole dynamic around public officials and the professionals in the city is very, very different these days — which is something I’m very proud of. I usually don’t talk about it… Deep inside, people understand that the city’s managed differently. I’m very happy with the ethics. I come from the private sector, the business world, in the high-tech sector, and the army, where ethics are high. It’s not merely about [obeying] the law. It’s also about how you ethically manage the city in an honest and fair way.”

Addressing a hot-button religious issue in the city, Barkat indicated opposition to the campaign by the Women of the Wall for the right to hold services, complete with tallitot and Torah scrolls, at the Western Wall, noting that “they can go to the [adjacent] Davidson Center… I have been to ceremonies held by Evangelical Christians, and Reform Jews, or Conservatives, at the Davidson Center, with no restrictions. Much easier. Not in the Orthodox way of Judaism,” he said.

“My feeling is, you know, to respect the ultra-Orthodox because of the importance of the Western Wall to all people, and enable a solution [for other streams of Judaism] side-by-side to the ultra-Orthodox way. Legally, if the courts define that [the Women of the Wall] can do that, well, they can. But the challenge is: What’s the right thing to do?”

As for a second prayer-related controversy, Barkat said it was “ridiculous” that Jews were not allowed to pray on the Temple Mount, and that he was not “comfortable” with the status quo on this issue, but he accepted it. Asked whether Jews should be free to pray there, he said, “Well, theoretically, yeah. Why not? I mean, I don’t think the Muslims should feel that enabling Jews to pray in their holiest site should be a problem. But, again, it’s the status quo and changing the status quo is a huge challenge, especially in things like this. And I wouldn’t rush to make a change without working it out with the different players…

“I don’t think it’s prudent to deal with this at this point,” said Barkat. “That doesn’t mean I’m happy with it.”

May 7, 2013 | 7 Comments »

Leave a Reply

7 Comments / 7 Comments

  1. I am impressed – if I were a Jerusalemite Barkat would get my vote. I saw Jerusalem just after its liberation and still remember vividly the grey snake of destruction which ran right across its centre. Jerusalem must never again be divided.

  2. Jerusalem belongs to the Jews. All this talk about the 1967 lines is ridiculous. The Arabs lost that battle in 1967. Why anyone wants to give Arabs any land is beyond me. Most Holy Land Muslims are unable to support themselves–much of this is on purpose so they can keep milking the West for freebies. I don’t want any more American money given to them. We need this money at home for people who are actually trying to better themselves.

    The Palestones must be among the sorriest people in the world. They are not civilized in Western ways but prefer to use violence as their answer to whatever happens. Why are you demanding to live next to Israel when you know nothing about human rights and your parent religion Judaism? Mohammed said Muslims should read and incorporate the Old and New Testament into your beliefs. But what do you do? You take the part of the Quran, the first part, and abuse the world under the ideas of the criminal Abu Bakr, who made up his contribution to the Quran.

    The Quran says there is no compulsion in religion. But you kill those who want to escape Islam’s present day onslaught of terror. That’s because you are tyrants. I think you will be surprised to see the number of Americans who will come to Israel to fight you. You are not only messing with Israelis, you are messing with every Jew and Christian in the world. What part of Mecca are you willing to trade for more of the Jews’ land? Why not?

    America, please don’t give any more money to these people. The leaders skim the top, and the trickles go to the people. If these Muslims are supporting the families of prisoners in Israeli jails, definitely don’t give them any more money. There are consequences for killing people–Muslims must learn this. If you cannot live in peace with Jews and Christians, go.

  3. Interesting to read Nir Barkat’s views on Yerushalayim. He seems to have worked out his ideas in a very logical way, and he thoroughly supports an undivided Yerushalayim, which I deem excellent. Time will tell, though.
    I venture to say that if he continues to develop the city, and to stay steady with his political views, I could see him running for PM at some point. It’s worth keeping an eye on him!

  4. I fully support Barkat.
    Rome to the Christians, Mecca to the Muslims and Jerusalem to the Jews.
    Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to the Jews what is theirs.

  5. What we are seeing is the successful culmination of the Palestinian strategy. They have been waiting for a settlement to be imposed on Israel, without giving anything in return. They want a part of Jerusalem, and the rest of the world seems to think they should have it. Why should they get part of Jerusalem? Was it ever the capital of an Arab country? They want all the land that Israel retrieved in the 1967 war, and Obama and his EU buddies agree to that too.What we are are actually seeing, in the aftermath of the Boston bombing, is that terrorism is being rewarded. While people might want to make the case that Abbas is “moderate”, he rewards terrorism and terrorists with money that comes from the US and EU. Sorry, that makes him a terrorist also, regardless of his nice suits. The United States cannot take the position that terrorism must be fought, while it sends hundreds of millions of dollars to the PA to be used to pay salaries of convicted terrorists in Israeli jails, and to support the families of those terrorists.

  6. Nir Barkat looks set for an easy re-election win this fall. He’s been staunchly for keeping all of Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty. He has a bright future.