Peloni: Indeed, this deal, whatever it ultimately contains, will only serve to constrain Israel from acting in its own best interest as the Shiite dominated Lebanese faction serves its Iranian masters intent to dominate and destroy Israel, much as was the result the previous deals. The international community is not only incapable of responding to an Iranian threat to Israel in Lebanon, they have demonstrated quite clearly that they also have no interest in doing so. The best deal is no deal at all. Severing the head of Iranian aggression in Tehran is the only deal worth negotiating.
Israel does not need a “deal” in Lebanon. Not only is a “deal” unnecessary, but also it would be a net negative. There should be no intermediaries or constraints on Israeli operations in the territory to its north.
— Tony Badran (@AcrossTheBay) November 18, 2024
Right, but the thing is Israel doesn’t need an agreement to operate whenever and wherever it needs to. Inserting the US (let alone France) as an intermediary is a net negative—an affirmation of Washington’s status as arbiter and protecting power in the Hezbollah territory to its… https://t.co/7f3EFD4x3a
— Tony Badran (@AcrossTheBay) November 18, 2024
There should be no deal with Lebanon. Instead, the deal regarding the oil and gas field in the Mediterranean should be annulled immediately. If they really wanted friendly relations with Israel, they wouldn’t be firing rockets every day into Israel. Involving France is a no-go and USA maybe when Trump is in the saddle. We cannot expect anything good or useful from either of them or any of their allies (Turkey?).