America’s Color Revolution

By Paul Craig Roberts September 14, 2020

I have provided evidence that the military/security complex, using the media and the Democrats, intends to turn the November election into a color revolution here,  here and here.  The CIA is very experienced at color revolutions, having pulled them off in a number of countries where the existing government did not suit the CIA.  As we have known  since CIA Director John Brennan’s denunciations of President Trump, Trump doesn’t suit the CIA either. As far as the CIA is concerned, Trump is no different from Hugo Chavez, Nicolas Maduro, Charles de Gaulle, Manuel Zelaya, Evo Morales, Viktor Yanukovych, and a large number of others.

Russiagate was a coup that failed, followed by the failed Impeachgate coup.  Faced with Trump’s reelection and the realization that upon reelection Trump will be able to deal with the treason against him, the Deep State has decided to take him out with a color revolution.

The evidence of a color revolution in the works is abundantly supplied by CNN, MSNBC, New York Times, NPR, Washington Post and numerous Internet sites funded by the CIA and the foundations and corporations through which it operates, all of which are committed to Trump’s ejection from the Oval Office.  The American public does not realize the extent to which the institutions of a free society have been penetrated and turned against freedom. All of these media organizations are establishing the story in the mind of Americans that Trump will not leave office when he loses or steals the election and must be driven out.

Emails are arriving from readers in the UK and Europe reporting that the British and European media are at work preparing the acceptability of the CIA’s color revolution against President Trump.  It is taken for granted by both media and politicians in Europe and the UK that Trump cannot win reelection because he (1) is a Putin agent, (2) abuses the power of his office, (3) represents racist “Trump Deplorables,” (4) is a womanizer—“grab them by the pussy,” (5) is responsible for America leading the world in Covid-19 cases and deaths, (6) doesn’t support NATO (a sinecure for many Europeans), (7) is an outsider and not a member of The Establishment and “is not like us,” (8) “has orange hair” (orange is considered a low class color).  You can add your own to the list.

The scenarios for what the American, British, and European media assume to be a necessary color revolution  to drive Trump from office are:

  1. Trump loses the election, refuses to leave office and must be dislodged or democracy is lost.
  2. Trump wins the election by fraud and must be dislodged or democracy is lost.

The scenarios do not accommodate Trump actually winning the election by the vote of the people.  That outcome is outside the possibilities. According to the media, Trump can only lose or steal the election.

With Antifa and Black Lives Matter now experienced in violent protests, they will be unleashed anew on American cities when there is news of a Trump election victory. The media will explain the violence as necessary to free us from a tyrant and egg on the violence, as will the Democrat Party.  The CIA will be certain that the violence is well funded.

Trump, isolated in his own government, which has failed to bring charges against the Obama regime officials who tried to frame the President of the United States and drive him from office—Barr and Durham represent The Establishment, not the President or law—will be cut off from Twitter, Facebook and from the print and TV media.  All Americans and the world will hear is that Trump lost and must go or Trump won by vote fraud and must go. It will be impossible for Trump or anyone to refute the charges. The weak-minded, weak-willed Republicans will collapse. Republicans are not people capable of combat. Republicans believe that to disparage the military/security complex is unpatriotic. Thus, they are sitting ducks.

The CIA, the National Endowment for Democracy, Radio Liberty, etc., have used color revolution against others who stood in the way of the American National Security State. Only Maduro has survived them.  So far.

The Secret Service cooperated with the CIA and the Joint Chiefs in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. What is a reelected President Trump going to do when the Secret Service refuses to repel Antifa and Black Lives Matter when they breach White House Security?  There is no doubt whatsoever that the Secret Service is penetrated by the CIA.  How else could President Kennedy have been assassinated?

American Democracy is on the verge of being ended for all times, and the world media will herald the event as the succesful overthrowing of a tyrant.

The Best of Paul Craig Roberts

<
>
<
>

Paul Craig Roberts, a former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, has been reporting shocking cases of prosecutorial abuse for two decades. A new edition of his book, The Tyranny of Good Intentions, co-authored with Lawrence Stratton, a documented account of how americans lost the protection of law, has been released by Random House. Visit his website.<
>

PaulCraigRoberts.org<
>
<
>

<
>

<
>

<
>

<
>

September 14, 2020 | 5 Comments »

Leave a Reply

5 Comments / 5 Comments

  1. I don’t think there is a conspiracy to remove Trump from office for the simple reason that Trump is a perfect tool to accomplish the Reset (so called), and I am still convinced that the Democratic party WANTS Trump to win but wishes to pretend they are fighting against him.
    Why otherwise they would choose clearly disabled candidates to run for President TWICE IN A ROW?
    I am amazed that Roberts, of all people, doesn’t get it (or maybe he does but thinks it will be rejected if he states it openly).
    Also, Trump lost the last election to Clinton but was still chosen by the electors.
    The popular vote doesn’t mean much, apparently.
    Plus, after that scandal with “hanging chads”, everything was computerized so it is really easy to fix up.
    About “antisemites”.
    Jews, who are always in denial, like to think that there is a fairly small percentage of people who hate them (“antisemites”) and who are “bad people” or simply ignorant and the rest who are not antisemites .and are the opposite.
    In reality, it is “antisemitism” which is normal and it has virtually nothing to do with someone’s personal qualities.
    I’ve worked with people who were good human beings in all respects and they couldn’t stand the Jews.
    This doesn’t say anything either about them or about the Jews, it’s just that “It is a common law that Esau hates Jacob”.

  2. I am embarrassed that many people who agree with me about matters unrelated to Jews are antisemites. For example, many antisemites agree with me that there is a coordinated campaign, involving many powerful interest groups, to dump Trump. Many antisemites agree with me that the U.S. economy is in deep trouble, and may collapse in the near or at least the foreseeable future. Many antisemites agree with me that the severity of the CV-2 outbreak has been exaggerated, andt that the “hype” about it and the lockdowns may have been motivated by economic concerns, not health concerns. Many antisemites agree with me that the SARS CoV-2 virus may have been created in a laboratory or laboratories, either in China, or the United States, or both.

    The explanation for the embarrassing fact is that I share with antisemites one belief: that there are real conspiracies in this world, both past and present by wealthy and powerful people, and that not all “conspiracy theories” are crazy and irrational.

    The reason so many people who believe in the reality of conspiracies in general believe in the antisemitic conspiracy theories is thatthey are the oldest conspiracy theories in the world, and are deeply rooted in Western, Christian culture, which has been antisemitic for nearly two thousand years. Claims that there is a global Jewish conspiracy against Christians and all the Christian nations go back at least to the tweth century C.E. Antisemitic mythology has always exaggerated Jewish power. As a result, people who believe in general that conspiracies are real, not simply figments of the imagination are also inclined to believe
    that “the Jews” are behind all of them.

    As a student of history,I believe that conspiracies in general have indeed played a role in world history–for example, the Roman conspiracy to assassinate Julius Caesar, Napoleon’s conspiracy to seize control of the French government, and the Nazis conspiracy to launch World War II, murder all Jews and seize their wealth , and conquer the world. They all happened. But unlike the antisemitic conspiracy theorists, I know from my historical research that Jews played no role in these conspiracies. The only conspiracies , historically, in which Jews were involved were financial frauds, such as the Madoff and Stavisky affairs. But these conspiracies only involved small groups of individuals, both Jewish and Gentile, and had no motive beyond making money for these particular individuals. They were not intended to benefit any Jews except the handful of individuals who were involved in these conspiracies. Political conspiracies have very rarely if at all involved Jews.

    So agree with nearly all conspiracy theorists in believing that some wealthy and powerful people (not all, of course) are selfish, even ruthless, and as a result some of these individuals (not all or most) become involved in consppiracies that aim at benefiting themselves, but are harmful to humanity as a whole. But unlike most conspiracy theorists, I know my own people well enough to know that very few of them are capable, either morally or even intellectually, of conspiring against anyone at all, except perhaps themselves or each other.

  3. @ evildoctor: If these quotations from Wikipedia are accurate, then Mr. Roberts is indeed an anti-Semite. However, in recent years, some Wikiperdia articles about controversial individuals have been “fact-checked” for inaccuracies and bias by legitimate conservative journalists, and credible evidence that there are errors motivated by bias in some Wikipedia articles have been brought to light by these conservative journalists.

    Even if Mr. Roberts is an anti-Semite, it doesn’t prove that he is wrong about everything, when he/she discusses a subject that is not about Jews per se.
    For example, Martin Luther was a vicious antisemite. But some of his criticisms of the papacy in his day were accurate.

    Some authentic information has come to light that there is a determined, and to some degree a coordinated, effort by such diverse organizations as the Democratic Party leadership, seeral major media channels, BLM and Antifa to drive Trump from office by any means necessary, including the use of force and armed insurrection. Indeed if one follows the news closely every day, both anti-Trump and pro-Trump, it is difficult to come to any other conclusion.

    It is true that the CIA has overthrown many foreign governments in the past. I don’t know if anyone in the CIA has thrown their support behind the people who are trying to remove Trump from office by fair means or foul. It isn’t out of the question.

    It is documented that the senior military officers of the US. armed forces informed Trump that they would not obey orders from him to supress the riots and insurrections in U.S. cities and enforce the Insurrection Act of 1807.Trump’s own Secretary of Defense said so openly and in so many words at a press conference.

    It is also well documented that many full-time civil servants and holdovers from previous administrations, the so-called “deep state,” are extremely hostile to Trump, and that has made it very difficult for him to govern.

    Henry Kissinger once remarked that even paranoid people are right about ten percent of the time.

  4. In the 1st article referenced by Roberts (by Roberts) he writes:
    Trump has done many things for Israel, but Jews are Democrats and it will be the Jewish owned media that discredits Trump’s reelection.
    According to Wikipedia:
    In 2019, Roberts wrote in support of the views of Holocaust denier David Irving, asserting that “Irving, without any doubt the best historian of the European part of World War II, learned at his great expense that challenging myths does not go unpunished… I will avoid the story of how this came to be, but, yes, you guessed it, it was the Zionists”.[32] Roberts added that “No German plans, or orders from Hitler, or from Himmler or anyone else have ever been found for an organized holocaust by gas and cremation of Jews… The “death camps” were in fact work camps. Auschwitz, for example, today a Holocaust museum, was the site of Germany’s essential artificial rubber factory. Germany was desperate for a work force.”
    Articles from such people should not be included in Israpundit. Ted, are you aware of this guy’s background?

  5. As an ex-government employee, who by the way demonstrated that the dems computer files were downloaded on a chip (and the material then sent to Assange/ WikiLeaks) and not hacked, stated that the three branches of the government and the two parties are deeply corrupt!
    Another mind boggling fact is that for the Europeans, the dems are NOT the party of racism or slavery!!!