AIPAC pummels Obama

By Dana Milbank, WaPo

A slide projected onto the wall at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee gathering Monday contained a warning to delegates: “AIPAC is Bipartisan,” it said, next to an image of a Democratic donkey and Republican elephant in boxing gear. “Check your gloves at the door.”

They checked their gloves, all right — but less to practice bipartisanship than to pummel the Obama administration with bare knuckles. In the brawl between President Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over Iran nuclear negotiations, AIPAC has joined congressional Republicans in siding wholeheartedly with the Israeli hard-liner.

The rift with Obama is nothing new; four years ago, AIPAC delegates were urged not to boo Obama when he spoke to the group (most obeyed). But this situation is worse, because Netanyahu, by accepting House Speaker John Boehner’s invitation to address Congress Tuesday — snubbing Obama, who wasn’t consulted — is exploiting a partisan rift in American politics and driving a wedge through the American Jewish community. And congressional Republicans, by giving Netanyahu their pulpit 14 days before Israel’s elections, are brazenly taking sides in that country’s politics. This all is likely to backfire by firming Democratic resistance to more Iran sanctions — and, in the long run, by politicizing U.S.-Israeli relations.

The AIPAC delegates left no doubt where they stood as they listened to speeches at the Washington convention center Monday morning by Netanyahu and by an Obama administration representative, U.N. Ambassador Samantha Power. The transcript will show that they applauded Netanyahu 59 times in his 22-minute speech, compared with 34 times during Power’s 30-minute address. But that doesn’t reflect the rapturous nature of the reception for Netanyahu (who got an 80-second standing ovation, with thousands of phones raised to take photos, on either end of his speech) and the polite but tepid response to Power (who received a perfunctory 18 seconds).

“As a few of you may have heard, the prime minister of Israel is in town,” Power said with a smile. There was laughter — and then a wave of defiant applause swelled across the room. Power aimed for the high ground, saying that the “U.S.-Israel partnership transcends politics,” but only about half the crowd lumbered, slowly, to their feet at this obligatory applause line, while others sat with arms folded.

Israel’s Netanyahu has ‘respect’ for Obama(1:33)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insisted Monday that despite recent differences with the Obama administration over Iran, the alliance between his country and the United States is “stronger than ever.” (AP)

Thirty minutes later, Netanyahu gave his version of the joke: “I also bring to you news that you may not have heard: You see, I’ll be speaking in Congress tomorrow.” The delegates cheered. The prime minister asserted that “my speech is not intended to show any disrespect to President Obama or the esteemed office that he holds” — but curiously, only about 1 in 10 stood to applaud.

“My speech is also not intended to inject Israel into the American partisan debate,” Netanyahu continued, noting that the alliance “has been championed by both parties and so it must remain.” Roughly the same percentage stood to applaud this sentiment.

AIPAC delegates had to be warned to be nice to Power. A slide flashed on the wall featured Casper the Friendly Ghost and the message: “Don’t boo! Be Friendly.” Just before Power took the stage, the announcer admonished attendees to “be sure to treat all of our speakers and fellow delegates as guests in our home.”

Power read a too-long speech that included a couple of Hebrew words and made all the usual references to the Holocaust, her trip to Israel and Jewish culture. But no more than one-fifth of participants stood when she vowed that “the United States of America will not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon — period.” And, in truth, her boasts about her achievements for Israel (helping “secure for Israel permanent membership in what’s called the Western European and Others Group”) were modest.

She was no match for Netanyahu, a head of government and a gifted orator whose politics are more in tune with AIPAC’s. They politely applauded when he acknowledged the presence of Dan Shapiro, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, but they gave a huge ovation to Ron Dermer, the Israeli ambassador to the U.S. who has been active in Republican politics.

They gave a boisterous standing ovation to his invocation of a “moral obligation” to give his views on the Iran negotiations, declaring an end to “the days when the Jewish people are passive in the face of threats to annihilate us.” Added Netanyahu: “Today we have a voice. And tomorrow .?.?. I plan to use that voice.”

The Israeli leader put his spat with Obama in the context of previous disagreements back to 1948, arguing that “disagreements in the family are always uncomfortable, but we must always remember that we are family.”

That’s true. But when family members start meddling in each other’s domestic affairs, they risk estrangement.

March 3, 2015 | 5 Comments »

Leave a Reply

5 Comments / 5 Comments

  1. Bert Said:

    Glad to see that AIPAC has FINALLY developed some backbone

    I have been the comments on the Jewish Daily Forward about AIPAC and BB speech. Don/t start that vertebrae yet.

  2. Glad to see that AIPAC has FINALLY developed some backbone. More and more Americans are looking to Israel for leadership on the Iranian threat. The more Israel stands up for itself the more that supporters of Israel, of ALL backgrounds, will be energized to speak out. Now black pastors are criticizing the Congressional Black Caucus for threatening to walk out on Bibi. Nuclear Iran is the defining issue for these days.

  3. “The irony in both these comments [the “meddling” coda] and BHO’s alleged goal [the “bipartisanship” façade] is palpable; BHO is meddling in Israeli politics and the result of this visit will be to steel unity against BHO.”

    The hypocrisy is Obama is meddling in Israeli politics in an unprecedented manner by openly supporting the Labor Party and making its desire evident to see Netanyahu defeated. But he has the chutzpah to accuse Netanyahu of turning support for Israel in the US into a political football. That kind of ugly libel gives dignified political debate a bad name.

  4. Dana Milbank is the same guy who lashed out at Scott Walker for not defending Obama.

    Should we defend Obama not for his patriotism but for his contemplated sell-out of Israel?

    I think that’s beyond the pale. I don’t care if Milbank doesn’t approve.

  5. The irony in both these comments [the “meddling” coda] and BHO’s alleged goal [the “bipartisanship” façade] is palpable; BHO is meddling in Israeli politics and the result of this visit will be to steel unity against BHO.