VAERS: There Were 3,296 COVID Vaccine Deaths in US Since July 24

3 Comments / 3 Comments

1. interesting, it says above: “There are now 14,701 reported deaths from the COVID vaccine in the United States, according to the latest numbers.” I just checked and the number decreased to 14,506. They must have come back to life.

2. VAERS is an important chronicler, by some margin, to record serious side effeccts of the vax, but it by no means chronicles all of them.

   The importance of the failure of the vaccines is responsible for the vaccinated now acting as potential superspreaders as they carry between 251X and 1000X more virus concentrations in their mouth/nose and are not symptomatic til much later when compared to the previous disease presentations. This increase concentration can act to both increase the rate of spread and the % of successful infection following exposure as the concentration is related to both.

   This is devastating for two reasons. First, and obviously, the disease will be much more difficult to contain(I think this is self-explanatory). Second, and more importantly, the move to heard immunity is now impossible via vaccine, which was the very purpose of the vax. The current efficacy is calculated by Isreal to be ~39% and by Mayo Clinic to be ~42%. These estimates are in very close agreement. So if 100 people are vaccinated, ~60 will not be protective but are susceptible to the side effects of the vax including the superspreader effect.

   A corollary to this is the number of protected individuals will never be 70% or 80% or 100% – whichever arbitrary value you care to guess the herd immunity will be achieved. Herd immunity is based upon the combined % of the unsusceptible parts of the population. The unsusceptible population was to include the Covid recovered, the vaccinated and, arguably, the children, who were never faced with serious illness from Covid and don’t spread the disease – but let us ignore the children at present. If the Covid recovered pubic was comprised of ~20% and the vaccinated public was ~70%, the susceptible portion of the public could be accepted to be very very low and the likelihood of an infected person passing an infection to this remaining susceptible 10% would be quite remote.

   The vaccines failures, however, have resulted in a great complication of this calculation. Worse than this, however, is the fact that of this estimated ~70% of the public who are vaccinated, there is no possible way to determine who among these vaccinated individuals are susceptible to Covid – and therefore a potential superspreader – and who is truly protected. Nor can we estimate whom among the ~40% who are protected, how long this protection might last – another month or another day or forever.

   So as these shareholders call for continued universal vaccination, this vaccination group is increasing its size and the presumed portion of superspreaders in the public. This situation is very bad, but the pursuit of repeated vaccination presents a potential of an even more devastating outcome than proposed here. Within the Israeli data, there is evidence that shows a possibility that tolerance of the virus may result with repeated injections of the vax. Of course, as with every detail that is eked out of these non-independent studies which are repeatedly based upon minuscule sample sizes(only double or low triple digit samples) and so the possibility that I refer to is not statistically certified. Still, the possible implication of tolerance of Covid with excessive boosters was shown to exist and must be accepted as a real concern with these hope-based vaccine boosters until it can be demonstrated as not accurate with data, which the basis of Israel’s booster program was quite devoid.

   Of course, once more, we would know more, if the CDC shareholders and their surrogates in Israel would be more transparent with the collected data that they hoard, but then again, this is 2021 and they are more prone to use their massive coercive authority to change the definition of transparency than to change their non-transparent nature.

3. So, 3.4K additional deaths in 2.5 months. Can someone do the math and find a relationship here? Of course the CDC will analyze this for about 10min and establish that not 1 of the 3.4K additional deaths are related to the vaccines, just as the did in April and June relating to the ~11K dead upto that time. That is correct, out of 11K+ deaths not one vaccine related death, even as some died feet away from their vaccine centers as CPR was being performed upon them in the testing centers. No relation to the vax they just took. So, obvious question: Is it no relation or no reliable inquiry?

   Let’s consider the inquiry method in non-Covid vaccine deaths. The inquiries always include a review of death certificates, evaluation of laboratory blood panels, diagnostic tests and radiographs, detailed reviews on each patient’s medical history and the resulting conclusion must include an agreement between two independent parties doing the review, and the entire process is started over with a third independent party if the first two independent parties are not in agreement. Of course Covid is the special disease where no independent review is performed on anything. Hene, the CDC simplified this routine process and eliminated the need of any independent review, and instead some unnamed CDC representatives reviewed thousands of cases and in less time than it would take to review a fraction of these, concluded that none of the deaths were related to the experimental vaccines, to which the CDC is a shareholder of the patent.

   No independent reviews, no transparency, no discussion, no questions… Just safe and effective, shut up and take the shot, endure the risk, and suffer the harm if you are so unfortunate to be a winner in this death lottery.