About Merah, Rinse, lather, repeat


By Mark Steyn

March 21, 2012 9:47 P.M. 
The killer of French schoolchildren and soldiers turns out to be a man called Mohammed Merah. The story can now proceed according to time-honored tradition:Stage One: The strange compulsion to assure us that the killer is a “right wing conservative extremist,” in the words of NRO commenter ExpatAsia, echoed by Chrisman and Galt’s Bain. Up north, this view was shared byCanada’s most prominent establishment Jew and the Liberal Party attack poodle Warren Kinsella (whom NR readers may recall from my free-speech cover story, which mentioned the groveling apology he was forced to make to “the Chinese community” after an unfortunately sinophobic cat joke). The insistence that the killer was emblematic of an epidemic of right-wing hate sweeping the planet is, regrettably, no longer operative. Instead, the killer isn’t representative of anything at all.

So on to Stage Two: Okay, he may be called Mohammed but he’s a “lone wolf.” Sure, he says he was trained by al-Qaeda, but what does he know? Don’t worry, folks, he’s just a lone wolf like Major Hasan and Faisal Shahzad and all the other card-carrying members of the Amalgamated Union of Lone Wolves. All jihad is local.

On to Stage Three: Okay, even if there are enough lone wolves around to form their own Radio City Rockette line, it’s still nothing to do with Islam. I’m sad to see the usually perceptive Ed West of the London Telegraphplanting his flag on this wobbling blancmange.

And then, of course, Stage Four: The backlash that never happens. Because apparently the really bad thing about actual dead Jews is that it might lead to dead non-Jews: “French Muslims Fear Backlash After Shooting.” Likewise, after Major Hasan’s mountain of dead infidels, “Shooting Raises Fears For Muslims In US Army.” Likewise, after the London Tube slaughter, “British Muslims Fear Repercussions After Tomorrow’s Train Bombing.” Oh, no, wait, that’s a parody, though it’s hard to tell.

Look, pace Ed West, isn’t it just a teensy-weensy little bit to do with Islam? Or at any rate the internal contradictions of one-way multiculturalism? No, it’s not a competition. Most times in today’s Europe, the guys beating, burning and killing Jews will be Muslims. Once in a while, it will be somebody else killing the schoolkids. But is it so hard to acknowledge that rapid, transformative, mass Muslim immigration might not be the most obvious aid to social tranquility? That it might possibly pose challenges that would otherwise not have existed — for uncovered women in Oslo, for gays in Amsterdam, for Jews everywhere? Is it so difficult to wonder if, for these and other groups living in a long-shot social experiment devised by their rulers, the price of putting an Islamic crescent in the diversity quilt might be too high? What’s left of Jewish life in Europe is being extinguished remorselessly, one vandalized cemetery, one subway attack at a time. How many Jewish children will be at that school in Toulouse a decade hence? A society that becomes more Muslim eventually becomes less everything else. What is happening on the Continent is tragic, in part because it was entirely unnecessary.     

 

 

 
March 23, 2012 | 8 Comments »

Leave a Reply

8 Comments / 8 Comments

  1. Mark Steyn usually hits the nail on the head, exposing it to the ridicule and derision deserved. Unlike the tactic of ridicule commonly used by the left to block transparency, Marks derision exposes hypocrisy and fraud. At the end of it all it appears that Europes Jews will ultimately need to leave as in Eastern Europe. As the Jews have been a very important part of positive European culture, civilization and development I will expect a sinking process in these areas. I find the European thought process not very creative or original. EG I find little of value in the culture and thinking of the so called advanced scandanavian countries. They are like programmed robots unable to think as individuals. I expect Europe to become more like Russia. The Jews will be sorry to leave but as they had so much to do with the positive aspects of European culture, wherever they go will be blessed and from where they leave will suffer loss. Check the facts where this has happened.

  3. @ robhood:
    Because Jews way down deep yearn for everyone to love them instead of the centuries old
    hatred that they’ve endured over and over again, in almost every country in the world.
    Only those citizens of Israel no longer give a damn what the UN or anyone else thinks.

  4. What doesn’t make sense to me is 2 things. First, why do Jews continue to live in Europe. WWII sent me a clear message that we are not welcome there. Second, why do so many Jews travel to Europe?

  5. I like the poetic justice so evident in the fact that Europe traded 6 million Jews for 20 Million Arabs. How are they doing with that trade today? Is this the curse of those who curse the Jews? It certainly seems so in the case of Europe.

  6. Whether its Toulouse, London, NY, Israel etc., it is the same war being waged on different fronts. Yet western officials keep acting as though none of these have to do with each other.

  7. What is happening on the Continent is tragic, in part because it was entirely unnecessary.

    Exactly. This horrific atrocity could have been avoided. As I said, western liberal policies are responsible for the murders of those children and no doubt will again. No matter how many innocents die, western politicians keep pretending islam is not at war with us.