T. Belman. I give up. I can’t seem to get it right. Yesterday, I advocated for vaccines because Bennett and Trump and many others I respect were also backing them.
Then today I noticed this article.
By Dr. Laurie Roth, NEWS WITH VIEWS July 20th, 2021
Dr. Sharri TenPenny and others have boldly been warning the masses of the dangers of taking the Covid 19 vaccines and the amount of people being hurt and killed by them already. However, millions have continued to be manipulated and tricked by Government, media and medical spokes people to take the vaccines or else. Recently fake President Joe Biden is sharing his plans to go door to door to convince us all to take the experimental vaccines.
Whole industries are being forced to take the vaccines, Pilots, military, health professionals and many others are having their freedom of choice taken away at the expense of their lives, Horrifyingly, we are now finding out just what this really will mean to hundreds of millions around the world.
Vaccine expert, Doctor/scientist Dr. Vanden Bossche outlines in detail why the vaccine so dangerous, Watch his interview and listen up. Dr. Bossche explains the danger with clear urgency.
The bottom line that I got from Dr. Bossche was that when you take the vaccine, very specific antibodies go into your immune system and neuter the nonspecific antibodies that are there to fight off all that attacks your body. It renders your immune system as totally nonfunctioning. It cannot defend you from anything else that attacks you, nor a potential hybrid and more deadly version of Covid 19, which he states is starting to pop up around the world in highly vaccinated countries. Now the deaths are rapidly growing and out of control.
What has been unleashed with the release and push of vaccines on people here and around the world is nothing but an unfolding Genocide.
Doctors and scientists had better get busy figuring out how they are going to save the hundreds of millions who have taken this vaccine and are literally waiting for the next virus or illness to attack them that they cannot fight.
It is beyond absurd and unbelievable that as leading Doctors and Scientists continue to come forward and expose the deadly dangers of the vaccines, that we have an unelected President, Joe Biden pushing to go door to door to push the vaccines even farther. It appears that Genocide may be one of the many goals of this administration. Wake up world. Do not take the vaccine ever and pray to God for help and protection if you have.
These are deadly times to live in but we will get through them with our Lord’s help. Phil: 4:13 “I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me.’ Spread the real word around.
FYI:
@Bear
I agree with your comments here. The burden of leadership is always an onerous one. Indeed the burden is greater still, should the leadership be among a democratic nation, as unlike the oligarch or tyrant, their authority is due to the consent of the governed and those they rule rather than by other more crude means. As such a democratic leader, actually, every democratic leader, should carry the consent of their public by responding specifically to the cries of their concern. The level to which these concerns are, well, concerning to the public, as well as the level to which these concerns are met with a scornful reproach by the leadership will only render the burden you referenced more extreme and less capably managed. In fact, the move to ignore a free public by their elected managers places the public lower than free and the managers higher than elected. This is a perilous road that can be easily manipulated towards an authoritarian use of mandates if not supported and accepted by the public. The employment of authoritarian measures, such as limiting free travel and prohibiting free commerce, are forces too extreme in a democratic realm to enact while ignoring these growing concerns that seem well sourced and repeatedly stated. A response beyond mandates is fairly expected by freemen, as opposed to an enslaved public, I think. And should the reproachful silence be replaced by a fair and equitable response to the many concerns raised of late, it might just make the burden placed on leadership, that you correctly referenced, a lighter load.
One thing Ariel Sharon said that made sense and had the knowledge of experience in it. “Things look different from the Prime Minister’s seat as opposed to those looking at it”. I would extend that to the role of leadership.
It is very easy to be a armchair quarterback to repeat an American Football expression. In other words it is easy to take cheap verbal shots at those in leadership when you actually do not have to make any decisions nor take any actions.
Well Bear, I could not disagree more vehemently, but we’ll let it go at that and agree to disagree.
@Felix, so sorry you are back this will be the last time I comment to you because it is not of value.
Learn your facts. Israel has for years NOT been able to pass a budget with Bibi at the helm. So I know you like to take people on for sport and self promotion to show us how smart you are. But give it a rest. Some of us remember you and how truly worthless your commentary is.
To Peloni et Al
I do not think this coalition is an experiment. I take it the root is experience and the idea is going through this living experience in the aim of a success. But I have problems. They are:
Netanyahu like Sharon had become the focus of the world antisemitism. On principle to the very end not the slightest concession no matter the pressure or even enticement – like a budget to pass. I mean this. No concession. The Coalition hpas been a concession to world Antisemitism. And the answer then – a different program but the immediate to defend Netanyahu. Bennett, Shaked and Lapid did not do this. And so they are damned. But will Israel be damned too. Yes but only if THEY are not resisted. The tone of what you said, wait and see after all we don’t know something good might come from this, I think my reading is accurate. But we do know one hundred per cent…the ganging up on Netanyahu is a deadly thing for Jews to have done. I cannot think of anything more deadly other than Sharon betraying on Gaza. This action of forming this government will become an action with massive repercussions. Not may become but WILL become. For reasons which I go into on Twitter the world is now like a powder keg and repercussions on Jews may be most serious. For Jews and supporters pessimism is a sterling quality which will never let them down. And finally does Bear claim that Netanyahu who pioneered the successful capitalism revival opposed a budget. He inverts things 180 degrees. It was the hate campaign against Netanyahu that was stopping everything.
FYI:
Bennett had a choice let the country go for a fifth, sixth or seventh election or try a unique coalition where the security functions and defense functions are controlled by the right. Perfect no! The country needs budgets for health care, defense, schools etc. Should Bennett have the allowed the country to just keep going in circles not in my view.
So as a true leader Bennett stepped up and accepted Lapid’s proposal to have a rotation between them and work as partners for the betterment of Israel. Ideal no! Sometimes in life as an intelligent person or leader one just has to take the bull by the horns in-spite of the naysayers and critics.
We will find out in the end of this experiment was more good than bad. Was it worth trying absolutely. Being pragmatic is necessary as a politician!
“Bennett in my view is doing a decent job. Yes having RAAM in the coalition is awful!!!!“
Seriously? So after making solid promises NOT to align with the far left and with Ra’am, Bennett does exactly that. So now we have a coalition made up of far left anti-Zionists (that’s exactly what they are), and an Arab party connected with the Muslim Brotherhood who does not nor ever will recognize Israel as a Jewish State, which by the way is illegal in Israel for them to even BE in the Knesset.
And Bear you think Bennett is doing “a decent job”.
Wow. This is quite a group of Zionists here.
@Reader
It was in fact Lapid’s mandate under which this gambit was set, so there is that, but I find it to be an unimportant point under whose name we establish things. To any event, the inclusion of the many members remain unchanged by such semantics. However, my perspective remains unchanged that Bennett was the kingmaker here, but it is of little importance, I think. Hence, name the experiment as Lapid’s, if you prefer.
FYI: Israel’s Health Ministry response to Netanyahu’s interference with vaccination planning:
https://www.timesofisrael.com/health-ministry-head-says-no-thanks-after-netanyahu-contacts-pfizer-moderna/
@peloni
It wasn’t Bennet’s experiment, it was Lapid’s experiment.
Lapid was the one who put together the coalition of 8 parties in 9 days.
@Felix
The experiment that I was referenced to Bennett’s experiment of his coalition of spare parts, as I have described it, intending to call attention to the divisive nature existing between the many factions whose member will be required to pursue a Zionist agenda by many, some more than others, who are unlikely to support such an agenda without a significant motivation – this is specifically relevant, as I perceive things, given the current US administration.
Regarding Lapid, you are likely find me to seldom address any praise towards the man. Though I would offer it to him should he ever rise to warrant such praise, I see little chance of him betraying his inner quality that sets him well apart from a nature that I see as damaging to the State – an opinion that is ever reinforced in every interview and every topic he raises, it seems. Indeed, I see him and his advocacy for a return to the peace negotiations as being an enormous injury to Israel, for the hope it brings to our enemies of our eventual return to his desired bloody policy, on which he speaks quite warmly each time he draws breath. Your mention of Lapid’s redefining antisemitism to include the prejudice against all men and mice alike, is a deep betrayal of the unique burden placed upon our lineage by this eternal movement to destroy us in every age of our existence. This is a very distinct thing to what is shared among other hate based philosophies. To be a Jew is to be more than the Other. To create an accommodation of equivalence between these two very different hatreds is to abrogate any responsibility towards addressing the the underlying nature of antisemitism, and this, in itself, renders his comments to be judged as being not just ignorant, but quite damaging as well.
Indeed, it also allows our allies and enemies alike to undermine any effort towards the expanded adoption of the IHRA of antisemitism – having just typed this, I am currently questioning if Lapid means to abandon the adoption of this definition as a stated objective of the Israeli govt. He has the potential of creating many such setbacks, so I do hope Bennett makes some great gains with this alliance. Raam and Meretz will likely each offer the best testimony against their involvement in the gov’t, and I have stated strong opinions on each of them. But neither of them have the potential to so easily undermine the international gains that Israel has generated over this past decade on these two very significant topics as Lapid might achieve with just a random phrase or a single speech. So, my views on this topic is quite aligned, I think, with your own and Glick and Kramer.
@Ted Belman
Something suddenly happened to Bennett, too.
Did that Netanyahu’s trick of negotiating with Pfizer and Moderna for the 3rd jab work, and Bennet has fallen into the trap and is trying to outdo Netanyahu as “the savior of the country”?
Or has someone warned him that he better fall in line with the COVID thing?
Just the other day Bennett was saying that the vaccine is not everything, and yesterday he was calling on the public to follow the rules, and today he is siccing the public on the ”anti-vaxxers”?:
In the worst case scenario, we might end up with TWO Dr. Bengeles.
I think Israel has the highest percentage of those vaccinated against COVID.
To Peloni I don’t recognize what Lapid has done as you put it as an experiment. Caroline Glick is sound on many not all things and I disagreed with her most strongly on the Bush Iraqi war. She just this last week hets to the heart of it when she deals with Lapid redefining Antisemitism. After 3000 years! Will Jews laugh or cry? You would think this line of ideology has to lead to revising seriously the whole Jewish experience. Of course any like Lapid can defend Jews but in an overall future sense this revisionist change in ideology as Glick outlined means it will not be stopped. Such things always have a momentum. The human brain has this dangerous side. Jews and Israel need to assess leaders and I am impressed by recent analysis on Antisemitism by Steve Kramer.
It is not easy to keep up with this crowd so who is Inna who is pushing Judy Mikovits.
Do a little thing here. Search her name along with Richie Allen pupil of David Icke and that is her circle.
I have never met Allen nor will I ever. He runs a nightly radio podcast from Manchester and he is as evil towards Israel as can be.
So who I wonder is Inna? Who pushes a regular guest of Allen.
@Peloni I agree Meretz is also not a party that is in the slightest desirable to have as part of the governing coalition. I do not agree with Lapid on many issues but he is a pragmatic man and frankly if I had to choose between him and the Shas and UTJ on many issues I prefer Lapid as I live in the modern world and do not like those who half live in the 16th century trying to run my life.
@Bear
Meretz too!!! And the Leftists in general, should I speak frankly, not the least of which Lapid and his angst and ready support for the principles of trading land for more dead innocents – his rhetoric is quite a loaded gun. I am not sure of what has been achieve as yet to reference a decent job, beyond maintaining the gov’t while the immigration issue is still unsettled regardless of who Bennett blames for the failure, which seems no small defeat in my eyes. Also the immediacy of the budget seems to have been so important that it was further delayed, so we will be waiting a bit longer for that as well, should it succeed. The issue of the settlement was a significant victory, I think, yet the only victory so far, I believe. Still, the gov’t is very new and unconventional, so growing pains are not surprising, and we should all have expected some such issues to arise. Some good may come from this great experiment, and Ted’s veiled input holds some promise on this possibility. So we will see.
Bennett in my view is doing a decent job. Yes having RAAM in the coalition is awful!!!!
@Sabasarge
I know something that I can’t divulge to anyone. So I am supporting him for another couple of months.
I disagree Ted regarding Bennett. There was a time when I had high hope for both he and Shaked, but his blatant and consequential lies to his own voters, that he shamelessly admits to, shows him (and her) to be nothing more than just two more sleazy Israeli politicians, with only ego and power driving them. As a previous supporter of them both I find them disgusting.
Serious scientists and doctors have serious concerns about these shots.
Most are very pro vaccines.
Too many dear people have I fear blindly followed the masses while 100’s of 1000’s have experienced adverse harm events.
Vaccines are not a religion.
Science would consider data and not ignore it.
We are witnessing the religion of “Scientism.”
Where anyone who criticised the safety or efficacy of a shot as heresy (Anti-Vaxxer).
These shots are shit.
Actually things are looking closer to Shittim every day.
Where’s our Pinchas?
These people seem ready for an uprising.
I’m not sure how to navigate this plague of ignorance, seduction and control.
Perhaps those tuned into what is happening here simply must unplug and find a way to go off grid.
Yes – good you showing all sides.
@Sabasarge
Its too early to judge Bennett. Since he formed his government, there has been an intense effort to denigrate him.
Tierney News:
Actually Ted, I’m still stuck at where you mentioned that you respect Bennett.
Now that’s a head scratcher.
The mere fact that this whole affair is global and is managed by politicians and phony government appointed experts is a HUGE cause for suspicion.
If it were a real plague, all the politicians in the world would hide in their bunkers with their gallons of disinfectant and tons of food and water supplies and let the real medical professionals “heroically save the world from the plague”.
Also, in such cases (a new pathogen causing high mortality) the 1st things to be done are:
1) isolating the sick (the ones who show symptoms);
2) finding some sort of a cure/treatment ASAP;
3) at the same time isolating the pathogen;
4) then eventually trying to develop a vaccine with the aid of the mandatory animal testing.
This COVID situation is just abnormal in more ways than one.
If the whole world were to writhe in hysterics every year because of a new annual flu virus, we would be back in the caves by now.
Ted, why should you reconsider posting this article? Because of a handful of nasty comments? It’s a very good piece of information. A rare one on your site. I was wondering why you were not placing such articles since the beginning of this “plandemic”? Now you did it, thank you!
Comments here: “No one should turn this into a political debate”… “Who is right who is wrong?”… “Another crusader against vaccines?” Well, all of these comments are surprising. How can it be nonpolitical? Those who push for total mandatory “vaccination” are Globalists/Democrats, against it are conservatives. Conservatives are common sense people. The so-called “vaccines” are experimental mRNA solutions and even cannot be called vaccines by definition because they do not have a weakened pathogen in them. These “vaccines” are not authorized. The legal description of EUA (emergency use authorization) includes requirements that are not met. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/emergency-use-authorization-medical-products-and-related-authorities#euas
1. Criteria for Issuance
Serious or Life-Threatening Disease or Condition
Evidence of Effectiveness
Risk-Benefit Analysis
No Alternatives
There is no evidence of effectiveness, no risk-benefit analysis, and it’s a blatant lie that there are no alternatives. Globalists are suppressing proven treatments, and official protocols are killing people. Go to the American Frontline Doctors website, listen to Dr. Judy Mikovits – virologist who is fighting with Fauci for many years, to former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Science Officer Dr. Michael Yeadon, to the inventor of mRNA vaccine Dr. Robert Malone… There are many courageous medical professionals and scientists speaking out about the danger of “vaccines”! The situation with the “plandemic” became clear (remember event 201) – it’s a global bio war. Listen to the Dr. Fuellmich interview with Dr. David Martin, who is talking about artificial viruses patents. Follow the money. Gates and Soros are buying a UK maker of Covid tests. “Plandemic” is a very profitable business. The goal is total control.
Please, you’ve done a valuable service by posting this article! Do not question yourself, we need ALL information to be an informed individual. I Thank You for posting.
Ted, your cognitive dissonance has kicked in. You just can’t comprehend that Netanyahu and other world leaders are pushing genocide by injection on billions of people. Remember Patty Hearst. Listen to Claus Schwab is saying. He means it. Compliance means death.
you have lost all your credibility with posting this criminaly insane opinion, by an obviously mentally ill rabies infected sewer rat
@Raphael
Very well stated!
@Ted, I appreciate your sharing this as well as the many other articles you have chosen on this topic. The Western World stands upon the brink of a contest with authoritarian powers, beginning within the US which may or not spread elsewhere depending upon the current contest there. In the wake of this contest, and probably as a consequence of it, there seems to be an ever spreading adoption of the idea of thoughtcrime, as relatively harmless questions should be met with derision or greater penalties. In any case, I believe, whether this article or yesterday’s article are, either one, proven to be accurate or not, the conversation of the topic benefits from the conversation amid the great uncertainty that surrounds much of the topic of the virus and vaccine, though we learn of more questions to ask each day, it would seem. People should accept, I believe, that their is a concern among serious members of the world including significant scientific minds who hold substantive proofs that are too readily ignored to be reasonable. Ignoring these concerns will only amplify the unease of a growing arm of the public about the willfulness of the responsible members of society to all too quietly ignore. I fail to understand why a simple conversation by rational men might not be used to come to a fair conclusion as to why these govts are refusing to respond to the evidence being provided. They don’t say the evidence is wrong, taken out of context, misunderstood. They just agree to buy more vaccines while these questions remain unattended.
So, for my part, at least, I have found Israpundit to be a powerful chance where a conversation at least might be shared by the many great minds of the bloggers as well as the wise Webmaster. No one should turn this into a political debate where egos too commonly determine choices. Your own ability to accept the possibility that yesterday’s opinion does not need dictate today’s inspection of these concerns was a very welcome moment in the great sea of Censorship, and I salute you for your great example of such intellectual honesty to be able to accept that these are terribly important matters that we will all gain or suffer should the Right shoe be placed upon the Left foot. So, that being stated, I again just want to suggest your judgement in sharing these articles which do not hold to one view or the other as a dogma is likely more beneficial than strictly supporting a presumed knowledge of their accuracy, because we, none of us, have a full breadth of understanding upon this reality, which again is the failure of the govts to provide the answers for their actions. As always, I remain terribly impressed with your efforts here at Israpundit, and am sure you will provide a wise course for us all to interact upon.
Who’s right? Who’s wrong? Who’s the expert? Who’s not? What should we do? Who knows? No one needs to be an expert, however, to know that if you take the vaccination, there is no going back. If you are in doubt, I believe that the best course of action is to “defer” the shot. Plenty of people are vaccinated now, so let’s just wait and see. Give it a year or two. The water should clear by then, and we will know who was right. In the meantime, each of us must try to make the best decision that we can, amid conflicting information. That should be respected, regardless of one’s decision to vax, or not. That includes not punishing those who choose not to get the shot, by consigning them to virtual house arrest and other repressive measures. The essence of a republic is protecting the rights of the individual over the demands of the majority. Let’s remain true to our founding principles.
Ted, you shouldn’t reconsider publishing this article. The main thing is that we need free debate about this momentous issue, in which there are valid concerns on both sides, it is only be free debate that the truth can emerge and scientific progress can be made. When qualified people have different opinions about a medical or other scientific issue, both sides should be given a forum. I hope that Israpundit will become such a forum about scientific matters.
The best place to go to understand Dr. Van Den Bossche’s concerns is his own website, https://www.geertvandenbossche.org. I admit that I don’t fully understand his position, which is complicated. But he definitely has reservations about the safety and effectiveness of the new vaccines for treating Covid.
I agree with Peloni. The biggest problem is not that the vaccines have been proven to be more harmful than CV-2,(that they can harm some individuals has been more or less proven and admitted by regulatory agencies and the pharmaceutical companies themselves) or that they have been proven to be ineffective, but that many competent physicians and medical scientists have serious concerns that the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, but governments throughout the world are simply igoring their concerns or issuing blanket denials. Still worse, doctors who have questioned the safety and value of the vaccines are being actively persecuted by being fired from their jobs, censured by medical associations, etc., just because they have raised their concerns about the vaccines. That sort of behavior by official bodies threatens the very survival of medical science. If there is no free debate about medical matters among scientists, then correcting any possible dangers in medical treatments becomes impossible, and even the development of new treatments is called into question.
I have reconsidered this article and have come to the conclusion that I shouldn’t have posted.
Antivaxxer rhetoric. 100% nonsense. Please don’t post such articles.
People are placing a great deal of trust in their politically elected officials to provide the proper judgement upon this epidemic. And yet there are very real inexplicable documentary evidence of matters such as has been cited by Dr. Martin, Dr. McCullough, and many others. There claims are not imaginary but they are significant, just as they are not self-generated, but rather, based on actions and documented proofs. Hence, we have many questions. And the point that defies a sense of reason is not that we don’t have answers to these question, as that by itself would be incredible enough. It is that those same politically elected officials that we all admire and in whom we have placed our trust of govt have so far failed to ask these questions, which will serve to better inform their public to a level of trust in these products that are now being approved and mandated upon one and all. Indeed, these same politicians have yet to even acknowledge these questions as being relevant of questioning. This is where the attention should be placed – these politicos and not Pharma. Pharma will never respond til placed before a court, and good luck waiting for that court date. These questions are fairly based and less irrational than the State Censors would have people believe. If we do not hold these politicians to pursue these matters, they never will, as they have had a great deal of time to do more than posturing on not even the most serious of the issues posed.
Another crusader against vaccines??
Pls Ted..look at Dr. David Martin interviewed bt Reiner Fullmiech!!
Also Dr. Peter McCullough And Dr.Vladinir Zelenko abt treatment gor virus!!!
This is why Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is categorizing all aspects of this “epidemic” as Crimes Against Humanity.
Nuremberg anyone?