A Line Has Been Crossed

by Jerrold L. Sobel

Within the next 48 hours Russia will begin fueling up the reactor at Iran’s Bushehr nuclear facility and will complete a project first started in 1975, four years prior to the Islamic takeover of the country. Regardless of the spin, both here and abroad, this is an untenable situation, whether the West wishes to recognize it or not; this is Hitler reoccupying the Rhineland. If the United States allows these fanatic crazies an operational ability to produce weapons grade plutonium on their own, all bets are off. A deadly pandoras box will have opened and the inevitability of nuclear war throughout the Middle East within two to five years may be a conservative estimate.

In March of this year, Secretary of State Clinton visited Moscow to voice strong U.S. objection to this project. The Russians listened intently to her admonitions but for all intents and purposes, gave her a jar of homemade caviar, a bottle of vodka and sent her home. They did however issue a statement reassuring the world that Iran had signed a pledge to ship all spent uranium fuel from the reactor back to Russia eliminating any chance it could be used for weapons. For some reason, I just don’t feel reassured.

Trumping the likelihood of weapon potential is the political victory the Ayatollahs will have achieved if this project is left to stand. Thus my re-occupation of the Rhineland analogy. If one reactor, why not three? or seven? Keep in mind the Bushehr reactor has nothing to do with the advanced nuclear program underway that has prompted both the U.N. and the United States to impose, what so far have proven to be meaningless sanctions. Sanctions which are laughable since many countries such as Turkey, Venezuela, and Brazil amongst others have pledged to counter in the event of shortfalls. Likewise, the bearded ones running this theocracy could care less if Joe Mohammad is inconvenienced by having to wait an hour on a gas line or go without heating oil for his home. What they do care about is their professed goal, the annihilation of Israel and all the Jews in it. Unfortunately, the means to accomplish this has incrementally moved forward to where this rogue nation will actually produce its own fissionable material. In terms of weapons grade production created at this plant, the amount is minimal but the political implications are great. In no uncertain terms Iran has fired a shot across the bow of the U.N., the United Staters, and most directly at Israel.

This low yield reactor is a political gambit more than a military one. it’s an in your face taunt telling the world, “our nuclear program is here to stay, what are you going to to do about it?” No doubt, this is a dilemma for Israel. With Iranian clients Hezbollah and Hamas armed to the teeth, Syria and her client Lebanon supporting the terrorists, and questionable American support under the Obama Administration; within hours, the government of Israel must decide if it’s time to cut the snake off by the head now, or deal with it later

For people that look to history attempting to forecast the future, one can only imagine how many times during the occupation of France in the 1940’s, while languishing in Buchenwald concentration camp, the deposed Prime Minister of France, Edouard Daladier regretted not stopping Hitler on March, 7 1936. This was the date the fascist Nazi tyrant boldly remilitarized the Rhineland. At the time France, in alliance with Great Britain was a great military power. Conversely, weak from the restrictions placed upon her by the Treaty of Versailles, Germany was both weak in men and material. Then too, as now, a line was crossed, there was a fork in the road. To it’s own detriment France took the road of appeasement when the path to war was the appropriate choice. Now as then, in face of an insidious fanatical foe, the West defers its own interest to an ineffectual, biased world body; then, the League of nations, today the United Nations. As Churchill famously stated at the end of the the Great War, “Britain and France had to choose between war and dishonor. They chose dishonor. They got war.” Does history often repeat itself? As Sarah Palin might say, You betcha.

As the United States and the free world run around the U.N. and at conferences, wasting countless months ironing exact verbiage hoping to enlist Iranian supporters Russia and China to climb on board; undaunted, Iran pushes ahead. At this point, relatively weak and militarily no match for Israel or the United States, but with bravado and determination the Iranians continue their diplomatic feigning and feinting act; using the age old tactic perfected by the North Koreans of first adhering to international demands then withdrawing that adherence, all the while strengthening their capabilities and becoming diplomatically more brazen each day. Sound familiar?

So what’s next, now that most reasonable people agree the sanction policy is a bust? More sanctions? Place an embargo on water pipes? More than likely our post nationalist president will do what his political grandfather Neville Chamberlain did; nothing. His advisors will misadvise him with disingenuous drivel such as, “we can live with a nuclear Iran.” “We can contain them.” Unless this trend is soon reversed, a nuclear Iran will control the Straits of Hormuz through which the bulk of oil flows to a glutinous West. A lot sooner than later, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Syria will most likely enter into what will have become a full fledged arms race between the Shi’a and Sunni branches of Islam. And one should always keep in mind that next to a Jew, they hate each other the most. Which brings us to Israel.

In the midst of all this nuttiness, unless you are an Israeli, it’s almost easy to forget the Jewish State is the only one with a horse in this race. Geopolitically her present position is untenable. Sworn to her destruction, Iranian client Hamas incessantly keeps Israel on edge with rockets from Gaza. In the North, another Iranian client now recognized as legitimate members of the Lebanese government, Hezbollah, threatens Israel along the boarder with Lebanon. Add these factors to a bunch of maniacs, sworn to her total destruction, headed soon to possess nuclear weapons; but not yet having them. Netanyahu must think hard and fast, perhaps now is the time for war; sooner rather than later. Factored into his decision; for the first time in her existence a majority of Israelis no longer trust in the political or military support of an American Administration. An Administration which would likely offer less abutment during a second term of office when Jewish American votes would no longer be needed.

So here’s the rub. As the dark clouds of an inevitable war gather, does Israel embark upon this conflict prior to Iranian nuclear capability? Or should she wait for “crippling sanctions” to somehow force the Ayatollahs to abandon their nuclear weapons program? One thing for sure, Iran has crossed a line. The only question is how will the West, the United States, and most particularly, Israel respond to it?

August 20, 2010 | 10 Comments »

Leave a Reply

10 Comments / 10 Comments

  1. there is little I can agree with in this statement

    Geopolitically her present position is untenable. Sworn to her destruction, Iranian client Hamas incessantly keeps Israel on edge with rockets from Gaza. In the North, another Iranian client now recognized as legitimate members of the Lebanese government, Hezbollah, threatens Israel along the boarder with Lebanon. Add these factors to a bunch of maniacs, sworn to her total destruction, headed soon to possess nuclear weapons; but not yet having them. Netanyahu must think hard and fast, perhaps now is the time for war; sooner rather than later. Factored into his decision; for the first time in her existence a majority of Israelis no longer trust in the political or military support of an American Administration. An Administration which would likely offer less abutment during a second term of office when Jewish American votes would no longer be needed.

    Isn’t this reassuring?

    On April 22, 2008, Clinton threatened Iran with nuclear annihilation if they attacked Israel with nuclear weapons. On ABC News Good Morning America, she said “If Iran were to launch a nuclear attack on Israel what would our response be? I want the Iranians to know that if I’m the president, we will attack Iran. That’s what we will do. There is no safe haven.” She continued, “Whatever stage of development they might be in their nuclear weapons program in the next 10 years during which they may foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them.”[72] Iran complained to the UN about her comments

    Bush: We will support Israel if her security is threatened by Iran

    President George W. Bush on Thursday addressed the issue of Iran’s possible nuclear armament, declining to offer his full endorsement of Europe’s negotiations to get Iran to halt its suspected nuclear weapons program.

    He said the United States and Europe share the goal that Iran must not develop a nuclear weapon. Still, he left it up in the air whether he fully supports Europe’s approach.

    “I look forward to … discussing strategies, ways forward with the Europeans to make sure we continue to speak with one voice, and that is Iran should not have a nuclear weapon and how to work together to make sure they don’t,” Bush said.

    Asked if was concerned that Israel might attack Iran to prevent it from acquiring a nuclear weapon, Bush said Israel is concerned about Iran’s intentions.

    “But clearly, if I was the leader of Israel and I’d listened to some of the statements by the Iranian ayatollahs that regarded the security of my country, I’d be concerned about Iran having a nuclear weapon as well,” Bush said.

    He said Israel “is our ally and in that we’ve made a very strong commitment to support Israel, we will support Israel if her security is threatened.”

    America either Republican or Democrat wants Israel gone and rid of the Jews at the same time. Bush was no better as far as Israel is concerned than Obama. Congress at best pay meaningless lip service to pro Israel statements but always supports the president when h executes American policies aginst Israel and our national interests.

  2. Randy, I am sure you will agree and although I am not a Roger Clemens fan by no means however, congress is indicting him for lying to congress.
    How hypocritical these bastards are. They all lie. . .

    This is how they deal with unemployment, debt, the economy, Iran, etc,etc. They believe they control the agenda and the things they don’t have a clue how to handle can be avoided by removing them from the table and replacing them with issues concerning people lying about sports or politics.

    Politicians as a whole have become pompous liars and extortioners whose crimes far surpass those who they accuse of steroid use or corporate crimes—evil hypocrites who are thrusting the world into an economic collapse, global chaos, and eventually, military conflict.

  3. Cowardice and fear are a leveling national phenomenon. All of the Western Nations including America are cowards. The Tyrants perceive this Achilles Heel in the west and will proceed as long and as far as they are allowed. From here it looks like they will be allowed to go all the way.

  4. By Eli Stutz

    Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton, said there is only a week left for Israel to attack Iran if it wants to stop the Islamic Republic from creating a nuclear armament.

    On Friday, Russia announced that on August 21st, it will start loading nuclear fuel into the Bushehr reactor. Bushehr is Iran’s first atomic power station. Bolton said that once the reactor, also built by Russia, becomes operational next week, it will be too late to attack, because the attacking it would result in the spreading of radioactive material and hurt Iranian civilians.

    “If Israel wants to do something against the reactor in Bushehr, it must do so in the following eight days,” said Bolton. He said that in the absence of an Israeli attack, Iran would complete its goal of the establishment of a functioning nuclear reactor.

    Bolton was skeptical of the possibility that Israel would attack Iran in the coming days. “I do not think so, I fear that Israel has lost this opportunity,” he said.

    Already during his tenure in the Bush administration, Bolton stood out with his approach of advocating an attack on the regime in Tehran. He reiterated the danger for Israel and the world, and called on his government to deal with it firmly. Bolton has repeatedly stated that everything must be done to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, including a military attack.

  5. Randy, I am sure you will agree and although I am not a Roger Clemens fan by no means however, congress is indicting him for lying to congress.
    How hypocritical these bastards are. They all lie, the bastard lie all the time and obama, this SOB lies like a rug. The audacity of these characters.

    This is all backwards, congress should be held accountable and indicted for lying to the people who pay their salaries.

    Obama is a lying sack of sh-t and cannot be trusted. Israel should pay no attention to this anti-Semite incompetent fake president.

  6. AP – BUSHEHR, Iran – Iranian and Russian nuclear technicians made final preparations to start up Iran’s first reactor on Saturday after years of delays, an operation that will mark a milestone in what Tehran considers its right to produce nuclear energy.

    . . . Washington has persuaded Jerusalem that Tehran would take one year or longer to build nuclear weapon, . . . ‘A year is a very long period of time,’ Obama’s top advisor quoted as saying. . .

    Doctor: “I give you, maybe, a year.”

    Patient: “Great, No need to worry then; a year is a very long period of time.”

    Doctor: “Just remember, stay on your meds, and we’ll see you…uh maybe, back next year for your check-up.”

  7. I understood that the only reason not to attack once the fuel goes in is that there would be a horrible radioactive mess covering the whole area around the reactor that would stop people going there for years if the reactor is breached. And that’s a problem because?

  8. Israel won’t attack as long as BB and Barak are running the show. I never thought they would.

    Funny the electorate has moved strongly to the right and BB has moved strongly to the left. Only in Israel.

    US assures Israel on Iran’s bomb plans

    (Video) New York Times says Washington has persuaded Jerusalem that Tehran would take one year or longer to build nuclear weapon, dimming prospects of a preemptive strike on Islamic Republic’s nuclear facilities. ‘A year is a very long period of time,’ Obama’s top advisor quoted as saying