Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Menu There is no diplomatic solutionIsrael should declare three nos;
no to nuclear Iran, no to two-state solution, no to bi-national state
no to nuclear Iran, no to two-state solution, no to bi-national state
From Dr. McCullough:
Take action into your own hands if having long C19 or #COVIDVACCINE syndrome. #CourageousDiscourse
@Felix
This is not true. Perhaps you did not read my posts when I wrote them, but the Covid-19 disease was the subject of the fist posts which I made here on Israpundit and I wrote an unknown number of posts related to the virus, the disease and the treatment,…and the ‘vaccine’. None of the other three topics are terribly relevant at the moment, but I have written extensively on all of these topics. Mind you, this is not a boast, simply correcting your statement of my selective interest, which is easily not an accurate one.
If you have an interest in something about Covid-19, we can discuss it. It is a dangerous, though not terribly lethal disease if treated with the care and responsibility which any viral infection requires, but which was specifically withheld in the case of Covid-19. Of course, there were specific centers of death in which the disease caused inexplicably high rates of death, but these deaths were due to negligence, corruption and medical malfeasance rather than the disease itself. It was treated as if it was something as dangerous as small pox, but even with the lack of care an treatment, the rate of death of Covid-19 was seen to be 0.03% rather than 30% deaths which came from small pox. You see, everything I write about Covid-19, such as this last line, is not terribly unknown, nor terribly controversial, nor terribly relevant currently. I have however written on this topic to a great length when its relevance was relevant. I wrote a LOT about it actually.
Peloni
All of your posts deal with the vaccines. This is a giveaway
You never deal with COVID-19
This has become the distinguishing feature of Israpundit.
Your entry above of condensed paragraphs show this.
As if you try to deflect discussion from COVID-19.
Example is this concluding paragraph
“The hardest part is to acknowledge that we have a problem, and so long as we do not do so, it will only become more difficult to accept that we could have done so much more by doing so very little.”
One study is just one study, but what has been forming over the past two years is a preponderance of evidence indicating the serious cardiovascular effects associated with these toxic shots. Screen and treat should be the modus operandi for anyone having taken these shots and this should always have been the case given the fact that these shots were marginally tested in drug studies which are rife with fraud – and even with the fraud in place, more people died after taking the shots than in the placebo group.
After the significant evidence found from the ongoing research and the enormous number of people dying from cardiovascular deaths, the need for a policy of screen and treat is more essential than ever. The lack of any action by the medical bureaucrats, who double as stakeholders of the shots, to identify risks, assess the risks, and implement risk limiting strategies (such as screen and treat) associated with the shots is a clear indictment of their malfeasance. Tragedies are being experience which could be avoided, lives are being destroyed which need to be preserved, and people are dying who could be saved with adequate treatment. Screen and treat.
The hardest part is to acknowledge that we have a problem, and so long as we do not do so, it will only become more difficult to accept that we could have done so much more by doing so very little.