To view the video interview of Dr Peter McCullough or to read the article in full go HERE.
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
- Over the past two years (2021 and 2022), more than 1,650 professional and amateur athletes have collapsed due to cardiac events and 1,148 of them proved fatal
- Damar Hamlin, a 24-year-old Buffalo Bills football player went into cardiac arrest on live television after being tackled during a January 2, 2023, game against the Cincinnati Bengals. Team trainers and emergency medical staff performed CPR for more than nine minutes, which saved his life
- Whether the COVID jab played a role in what happened to Hamlin is impossible to know for sure, but Dr. Peter McCullough suspects it may have played a role — provided he actually got the shot
- A condition called commotio cordis is known to occur in baseball when a player is hit hard on the breastbone, thereby causing cardiac arrest. There are approximately 20 to 30 such cases each year, but never in pro football. In McCullough’s view, commotio cordis can likely be ruled out. The more likely cause for Hamlin’s cardiac arrest, he believes, is hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), or abnormal thickening of the heart muscle, which is the primary cause for athletes suffering cardiac arrest
- During exercise, adrenaline is pumping, and when the heart is damaged this adrenaline rush is what triggers the cardiac arrest. This helps explain not only the death of athletes on the field, or people dying while jogging, but also why so many are dying in their sleep, because adrenaline is released between 3 a.m. and 6 a.m., as your body readies to wake up
So, Paul Offit, a long time, major supporter of the vaccine program has finally accepted that the vaccines clearly cause myocarditis. How unfortunate that this was not revealed in the weeks and months either before the vaccine rollout or in the weeks and months afterwards so that the vaccinations could be halted and investigated….but of course this ‘side effect’ was in fact revealed during the rollout, but the data was first hidden, then ignored, and next misrepresented as being mild and unimportant. Even today, the vaccines are not being pulled from use, no screening is being implemented to discover who might be stricken with myocarditis, and no attempt is being made to treat those who are afflicted by this life limiting, life threatening consequence of vaccination. The fact of the vaccine causing myocarditis isn’t even being offered to those who are being injected with this toxic shot as required as informed consent.
I highly recommend this video – particularly the last 10 minutes.
Dissecting Excess Death Data and How Insurance Industry’s Trillions Could Be Deployed to Help the Vaccine-Injured
Can insurance agencies solve the Covid excess death debacle?
Josh Sterling, a insurance research analyst discusses the excess death data. He shows that in regions throughout the US where more vaccines have been used, the excess deaths are relatively higher. He also explains how and why some aspects of the data are different when using different data bases around the world.
In addition to all of this, though, he breaks completely new ground (last 10 minutes) with a new proposal in which he is advocating to screen the population to try to manage the ongoing health crisis of excess deaths, regardless of what is actually causing the health crisis itself. His brilliant approach seeks to sidestep the debate over virus vs vaccine relating to the cause of the athlete deaths, the sudden deaths, cardiac deaths and the massive increase in deaths of the young, while focusing on the management of people who are ill and are unaware of it.
He notes that the insurance industry is not central to the problem but they unfortunately have to deal with the consequences of the problem on a person by person basis.
He states that it is his goal is to save a million lives by employing existing screening techniques which will identify the sub-clinical cases of bloodclots, myocarditis, autoimmune issues, etc.
By doing so, he hopes to be able to identify the 5-10% of Americans who are at risk of some catastrophic event while being unaware of the risk they are facing, simply by using existent routine screening tests.
This is all very simple, very sensible, very doable and potentially very helpful. More importantly, perhaps, is the fact that it is actually in the interest of the insurance industry to find a way to reduce the wave of excess deaths and thereby reduce the enormous number of payouts which are associated with the excess deaths.
Personally, I have never understood why such routine screening has not already been put in place given the now well established fact that millions of people are dying who should not be dying. Since the govt seems incapable of such a simple feat, it seems the insurance company may fill the void of interest in treating these sick people as if they are sick and needing of treatment.
.
To this, Jan with sage-like clarity adds a summary observation that the insurance industry is actually incentivized to succeed in leading people towards lifestyle choices which might blunt the excess deaths which are being experienced today and are likely to be expected to continue for the foreseeable future.
An additional caveat to Sterling’s focus on screening would also be that in addition to the assistance provided to the people would result in a massive increase of real-time data being collected which could be used to return to the debate of virus vs vaccine being the causative agent behind these catastrophic events.
On a more cynical and practical level, of course, we must also consider what the insurance industry will propose to do with those people whose health has actually been found to have been damaged during the screening process…will they face higher premiums?…will they even be insurable?…will they still be employable?…
One thing more, I never said cure. As a noun, this word is not in my vocabulary. I find it to be medically unsound, terribly persuasive, but utterly unscientific. Pick up a copy of Katzung’s “Basic and Clinical Pharmacology” and search for the word cure. You won’t find it. Try looking in Murray & Nadel’s “Textbook of Respiratory Medicine”. There is no chapter on cures, not even a single mention on a single page using the word cure. There is no entry in Black’s Medical Dictionary for this word either, however, it’s verb form is used regularly throughout the book, which would be appropriate, as you can be cured by a treatment. But to suggest that a treatment is a cure presumes an input which is greater than the treatment itself, as it requires that the health status of the individual involved is capable of being cured, and such presumptions assume facts which are easily not accurate for all individuals.
Of course, the use of the word cure may be employed by some clinicians to try to improve patient compliance (which is a very real challenge in the medical field), and it can also be used to simply instill hope for people who need it, but I would prefer we did not use it. As you may have noticed that in my writings, I did not, do not, and will not use it.
Instead let us use the appropriate word, and that word is ‘treatment’. This is what medicine does, it treats the patient, it doesn’t cure them, not necessarily. This is what doctors do as well, they treat patients by prescribing the medicine or issuing treatment activities (eg exercises to help improve the recovery process following a healed broken foot). Medical treatment is what people go to the doctor to receive not cures. While some treatments are curative, they are not cures and should not be described as such. Some may likely differ with my opinion on this topic, as this is my own view, but hopefully I have explained the basis of my opposition to the use of this word.
@Felix
They would be treated before they were seriously ill so there would be no need for them to go to the hospital. They would be prescribed medicine so they would not become seriously ill. This is what the Zelenko protocol achieved as well as the Borody protocol, each using multi drug protocols incuding HCQ and IVM, respectively.
The avoidance of becoming seriously ill is why medicine is prescribed to people before they become too ill to save, before they need hospitalization. This is true of every disease, not just Covid. Have you never received treatment for a disease outside a hospital? Of course you have, unless you have lived a life of spectacular health and luck. When you become ill, you are treated. You aren’t told to go home and wait til you are too sick to cure along with thousands of others, who all wind up in the hospital and overwhelm the very few beds and resources (including the trained technicians, nurses and doctors). It is better for the patients to be treated before serious illness develops. It keeps people from encountering unnecessary life threatening situations and it keeps hospitals from becoming life threatening centers of triage, chaos and death. In short it is a win win scenario for all involved.
There were always potential treatments available, and there was no reason to not try to discover a treatment which was curative instead of sending people home with no help and no hope while they became sicker and more likely to die due to a lack of medical intervention. This is how Zelenko, Dr. Raoult and Dr. Flemming, among many others came to formulate treatments which actually did provide a curative treatment to their patients, some treatments working better than others of course.
Tens of thousands and likely more than this were kept out of the hospital by being treated with various medical treatment plans, the findings of which led to an actual treatment protocol, covering everyone based on age and health status, which was published by Dr. McCullough in August 2020.
Consequently, when you are very ill, you will go to hospital, but the patients who were treated and treated in time, ie early in the first days of their illness, rarely progressed to become seriouskly ill, and when they did, the illness was still less severe. The drugs used were safe, and the patients were given informed consent before receiving treatment, and nearly all were cured after receiving the treatment. For example, Zelenko treated over 7K patients and lost only 3 patients, one was treated late, one had late stage cancer, and I am unfamiliar with the situation of the third. Dr. Chetty in South Africa treated over 7K patients and lost not a single one. A doctor in India (forgot his name) treated 70K and lost about a dozen. This is why people go to the doctor, not to be told go home and come back when you can’t breath, when you’re blue in the face, and when the best chance of recovery was lost while you were waiting at home getting more ill.
In fact, when did you last go to the doctor, receive a diagnosis for a life threatening illness and were told to go home and come back when you are much more ill in two weeks before you could be offered any medical treatment? Never.
When a person becomes seriously ill then theyay need medical help to stay alive.
So where?
The only place today is in a local hospital
So what on earth can you be talking about
*Keeping them out of hospital”
As you write:
“What Malone and other have advocated is to use early treatment to treat people to prevent serious illness, keeping people out of the hospital”
Where would they be treated?
And they did not even understand the virus.
It therefore follows they had no cure available!!!
@Felix
The elders of every society are the teachers of their community. They transmit culture, philosophy and values across generational divides. The loss of the elders is a particularly devastating event to any community as it breaks the transmission of societal memory from the old to the young. This point stands aside from the simple humanitarian sense of empathy which should focus the efforts of the community towards saving every life possible.
With this in mind, it should be recalled that the elderly were the cohort most at risk of serious disease and death with Covid, and they required treatment more readily than even the young, and they received it less, as many of them were treated according to the protocols followed in the facility in which they were housed, ie elder care facilities during the first year of the Covid scam. When the Spike shots became available, many of the Medical Freedom movement advocated for the use of the vaccine with the elderly, eg the Great Barrington Declaration among others.
In fact, Dr. Malone was one of the most ardent advocates for the elderly to be vaccinated. Yes, he actually agreed with you thru the entire first year of the Covid scam, though I have to admit that this was not a point on which I agreed with him or you. He came to change his opinion based on the massive number of severe adverse events which were documented to be taking place in the elderly as seen in the VAERS reports. As Dr. Rose demonstrated, the very cohort which required the protection of the vaccines, the elderly, were the very cohort of people who were suffering the most adverse events, and given the fragility of the elderly due to the reduced immune activity and multiple comorbitities, they were the least able to compensate when encountering the adverse events. This is why I never agreed with Malone’s position, as it never really made coherent sense, til he changed his position in early 2022. Dr. Rose’s reports and that of another Doctor (forgot his name at the moment), even earlier than Rose, displayed the consequences of the vaccines.
Honestly, Malone gave an insight into his thinking during his first collaborative effort with about 15 other members of the Medical Freedom group where he was still not wholly in support of their efforts. During this two hour round table, he indicated that it was his desire to move towards something which might be accepted by the vaccine stakeholders rather than making some quixotic attempt to ban the vaccines from all cohorts, which he viewed was simply an unobtainable goal doomed from the outset.
The simple reality is that there was an argument to be made to use the vaccines on the elderly, if we were to accept that the efficacy was useful (this was before the level of fraud in the trials was as well known as it is today), that is, if the elderly would consent to accepting the risk of the vaccine injuries. Malone had hoped that this would be the bargain which might be struck with the vaccine stakeholders, ie Fauci, FDA, CDC, PHARMA, etc. or at least this was the inference I took from his comments in that round table discussion and many other interviews he made afterwards.
So the point of controversy between you and he on the point of the elderly, if there is one, would be that he believed that informed consent was not negotiable, and you, well, I will let you fill in the blank as to your own thoughts on this point. You can watch almost any interview Malone made in 2021 to gain an appreciation of his views on the elderly, as it was one which he made over and over again.
As to the issue of herd immunity, it won’t work so long as the viral mutations continue, and the viral mutations won’t stop til the disease is treated early and off-target vaccines are stopped. If you care for me to explain this, I can, but it is a long explanation and I don’t care to go into it unless you or someone else has an interest in understanding it.
What Malone and other have advocated is to use early treatment to treat people to prevent serious illness, keeping people out of the hospital, which removes the images of chaos which we all saw in NY, Italy and Spain, among other localities with less significant examples of this. Chaos inside the hospitals was the cause of so much death, and it was quite preventable if early treatment had been used, as the efforts of Dr. Zelenko, Dr. Bartlett, Dr. Tyson, Dr. Boros, Dr. Chettya, and countless others have shown. As Dr. Malone advocated back in 2020, by treating Covid early, it keeps the patient form getting pneumonia and all of the severe aspects of the disease, which keeps them at home, and prevents an overload at the hospitals. It should be recalled that people die of Covid only when the are hospitalized, so keeping people from getting to the point of needing to be hospitalized would actually keep them from dying. Hope this is clear.
FYI, the roundtable video has been wiped from the internet. Can’t find it anywhere. Here was the original link for the video :
https://inoneplace.com/thewatch/item/a7VKK4WS0hA1874
On the video made by Dr. Dan Wilson in his critique of the very prominent Dr. Robert Malone – so many valuable points are made by Wilson.
What about natural immunity? Is that not the way to go in dealing with a Pandemic? Debunk the Funk deals with this in this advisory quoting John Hopkins Medicine and the CDC
And Wilson makes a great point that sticks in my mind. Yes you can get herd immunity but it will cause great loss of life.
It must be emphasized that this latter (great loss of life) is what antivaxxers were and are advocating.
But Wilson answers ( circa 19 minutes of video)
“It is irresponsible. It is not a policy that is worth going for.
Just get vaccinated!
It is much safer and it is highly effective”.
My own view: this was the most disgusting part of the antivaxxers as I experienced it.
Older people began to die in large numbers. Older people were very vulnerable to this disease. Older people were very scared. Older people badly needed a vaccine
That was and is still indeed the reality.
“The WHO global estimates on excess deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic raise many uncomfortable truths about how we as a global community value the lives of older people and those in low- and middle-income countries. Why do we allow our global leaders to continually fail to turn rhetoric on solidarity and equity, both between and within countries, into reality?
The recently-released data rebuts any idea that those in low- and middle-income countries have been less affected by COVID-19. Instead, it finally makes visible what those working with older people in these countries have seen with their own eyes: millions have been dying without even being counted.”
https://reliefweb.int/report/world/covid-millions-older-people-have-died-without-being-counted
And the antivaxxers were prepared, in their opposition to vaccination, to “sacrifice” these elderly people, who were dying terrible and isolated deaths as the pandemic raged.
It was a bankrupt policy at best, at worst it contained echoes of the Nazism of Hitlerism.
So therefore remember the wise words above of Dan Wilson on responsibility.
Peloni
I am not Rail…ing on
I offered the video made by Dr Wilson on Robert Malone
It is rejected without discussion and that means that science is rejected because these like Wilson use the scientific method.
I have drawn conclusions.
COVID vaccines: New study shows repeat boosters harm T-cell response
I read the reports on this study yesterday, and am quite shocked to see it being reported in real time on Arutz. Indeed the tide is turning…
@Felix
So not interested in a conversation I see. Not surprising, but still disappointing. Rail on as you like.
Dr Wilson on Dr Malone
https://youtu.be/xjszVOfG_wo
Peloni writes
“A whole hour of this vaccine shill’s distortions, misrepresentations and outright falsehoods, however, is far more than I care to offer a response.”
Ted Belman editor of Israpundit has published many articles by anti vaxxers like Malone, McCullough, Kennedy and many many more.
Each article would immediately have Peloni come in and back up the attacks on science.
These were never short comments. They were long affairs and fully behind these.
Peloni is a confirmed anti vaxxer.
So the record is quite recently I put forward to Peloni for discussion a debunking of Robert Malone massive interview on the Joe Rogan show of Malone by the micro biologist Dr. Dan Wilson.
This surely was of great importance.
I gave the link so I ask now why 1. Ted Belman didn’t devote an article specially to Wilson’s video and anyway and as well 2. Peloni ignored the video
SO THAT FULL OPEN DISCUSSION ON THE VIEWS OF DR.WILSON WOULD HAPPEN ON ISRAPUNDIT
Peloni still ignored the video.
This video is a tour de force against Malone and still it is hidden by Belman.
I think this is quite unacceptable.
Best thing is even now publish it.
And see where the discussion leads…
Alas! Big Pharma has lost an advocate!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1615887208627539969
One of the “Vax babies” has just resigned (it’s the middle one)
https://citizenfreepress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/klaus-schwab-trudeau-jacinda.jpg
@Felix
Oh, the irony…Do you know what suppression of information really looks like? It looks similar to, no, it looks exactly as the actions which your vax fascist idols took when they silenced any dissenting views which contrasted with their own – when they censored from the public discussion via Youtube, Twitter or Facebook anyone who challenged, ridiculed or even questioned the supremacy of the vaccines which do not vaccinate. Where was your outrage over sch suppression when this took place? As I recall, you are an actual advocate for such suppression. In fact, your own views were not suppressed here, as you wrote comment after comment regaling of the importance of Dr. Wilson’s vax advocacy. No one silenced you, and no one censored you. The fact that no one responded to your repeated taunts is not suppressing anything but their lack of interest in what you raised.
You say you are not a scientist, well, that is no reason to not be able to discuss these matters with a clear thought to their merits. If you have something which you find important enough or relevant enough, presented by Wilson or others, cite it and I will be happy to respond as best I can. A whole hour of this vaccine shill’s distortions, misrepresentations and outright falsehoods, however, is far more than I care to offer a response. So pick a topic or a claim made by Wilson, if you care, or two or three, and if you like we can have a discussion as to the implications and honesty of the things which seem to hold your support for the vaccine so well.
Peloni
It was you Peloni who decided that you would not deal with the video made by Dr. Dan Wilson on Robert Malone. WHICH I PRESENTED ON THIS SITE. A most significant study. And very easy to understand. YOU decided to ignore it and Ted Belman the Editor of Israpundit decided to repress it.
I am not a scientist but I do have a strong awareness when antivaxxers suppress information.
Peloni and Ted have championed Malone many times.
Now deal in the open with a critique of Malone.
Simple.
@Felix
If the testing was rigourously tested, where are the animal safety trials? Where are the animal terotogenic safety trials? Where are the animal genotoxicity trials? These are but a few of the tests which were skipped in the ‘rigorous’ testing (and this doesn’t even address the fraud involved in the testing). But since I don’t know what I am talking about and you do, prove me wrong. Show me the safety trials.
In the meantime, you might read this
More people died in the key clinical trial for Pfizer’s Covid vaccine than the company publicly reported – by Alex Berenson – Unreported Truths
November 18, 2021 by Alex Berenson
More people died in the key clinical trial for Pfizer’s Covid vaccine than the company publicly reported
and this
Understanding Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) and Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) in Vaccine Trials – PAND
to provide some context to the vaccine propaganda Dr. Wilson is feeding you…
@ketzel2
And the rise in death among the working class age groups, independent of Covid, per the life insurance companies – all of them – who are responsible for reporting significant changes in the deaths. As to the use of independent information which Felix seems interested, this is among the most powerful.
Felix wrote
What is new is children dropping dead of heart attacks, professional athletes in their 20s having heart attacks. Yes, that is brand new. Before the covid vax, I would occasionally read of some high school athlete dying of a heart attack. These sad cases happened once or twice a year. Now it’s every day.
I read a comment somewhere, maybe on Steve Kirsch, random but extremely important. These vax drug companies like Pfizer have immunity from being sued by their victims. The commenter pointed out that the immunity from lawsuits is based on fraud, i.e. the drug companies knowingly lied about their safety. If a contract is based on fraud, it’s not valid, so a court could find that the drug companies could be sued after all. This is a very big deal and I hope some lawyer or victims group develops this.
Peloni
“If fraud fits the definition of rigorous, you might be right.”
The vaccines were tested rigorously and you do not know what you’re talking about.
The vaccines were found to be safe and effective
Then they were passed. They were thereby NO LONGER EXPERIMENTAL and that is one thing the anti vaxxers lie about.
Furthermore as with all vaccines the scrutiny of the vaccines has continued and confirmation of.safety grows.
They have saved lives massively.
@Felix
If fraud fits the definition of rigorous, you might be right.
Peloni
“Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95 % CI -0.4 to 20.6 and -3.6 to 33.8), respectively.”
Bla Bla.Bla
They were tested and passed. Rigorously!
Your evidence is not useful
You have to show the deaths from heart attack etc before vaccines used and after. Also before Pandemic and because of Pandemic
THIS YOU DO NOT DO!!!
To see anti vaxxers you would think heart attack is something new!!!
@Felix
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36055877/
https://t.co/MFRfoJcSLp
Gary Dempsey Twitter
The Covid shots are labeled for an association with Myocarditis. This is not a trivial warning, and we should not consider it as such. Myocarditis is a deadly, life altering disease. It isn’t a mild concern, even when the immediate clinical signs are mild or negligible. It is known as the silent killer, as many of its victims first demonstrate signs when they collapse dead from cardiac arrest. Left untreated, the disease can lead to Dilated Cardiomyopathy, heart block and other secondary diseases which are life altering and life limiting. Risk of sudden death is not something which should be easily ignored no matter the level of risk, even as many are ignoring it.
Despite all of this, however, we do not know why these athletes are dying suddenly, only that their deaths are needlessly being ignored by the very institutions which are responsible for determining the cause of such things. Given the captured aspect of these instutitions which are highly motivated by financial incentives by their Pharma masters, both in the payments which Pharma makes to these institutions directly and the well paying positions which Pharma provides for them after they leave govt service, it begs the question, why are they not able to explain the massive increase in athletes dying suddenly on the field. This has been going on for two years now, eerily coincident with the vaccine rollout, and a year after the China Flu was first launched against the world.
Related story: Steve Kirsch reports that the FAA has changed its requirements for pilots’ EKGs, to allow pilots to keep flying even with damaged hearts, because the damage is so widespread, keeping the old guidelines would disqualify too many pilots. There is lots of data in this article.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-faa-has-very-quietly-tacitly
Peloni writes
“So nearly 1200 athletes have died following collapse on the field, relating to an increase in well over 1000-fold occurrence of such events. Of course, we know that the vaccines are involved in causing massive increases in myocarditis”
Can these assertions be fact checked by ANYONE on this site?
So nearly 1200 athletes have died following collapse on the field, relating to an increase in well over 1000-fold occurrence of such events. Of course, we know that the vaccines are involved in causing massive increases in myocarditis, but this is not necessarily proof of their involvement in these deaths. What would prove or disprove the vaccine involvement would be to have had these young men undergo testing to determine the presence or absence of myocardial scarring which might occur with either vaccine induced or viral induced myocarditis. Either way, evidence could be obtained from those athletes which succumb to this sudden-death-on-the-field syndrome which could be proven to be associated with either the Covid vaccine or the SARS-Cov2 virus. The proof of the histochemical testing is undeniable as it provides the only method of distinguishing which, if either, of these two causes might be involved in these deaths.
Of course, if the virus were truly suspected to be involved in these deaths, it would be quite advantageous to the vaccine-pushing US administration to demonstrate that the cause was in fact the virus. If, however, the vaccine were to be suspected as the cause of these deaths, for the same reason just stated, the US administration would be expected to gaslight the existence of this sudden-death-on-the-field syndrome. Well, I think the reality of the gross malfeasance in ignoring these deaths has spoken for itself as to which of these two scenarios is most likely. No doubt, though, this exacerbating syndrome is unlikely to disappear anytime soon. Perhaps thru private funding we will find the answers to these deaths at some point, but how many must die before we simply decide to look for the answer. Myocarditis is a deadly condition, but it can be treated to mitigate its consequences, particularly if diagnosed early and treated aggressively. Even if cardiomyopathy develops following myocarditis, this disease also can be treated. Why are we not taking these reasonable and necessary steps to determine the cause of this plague and why are we not trying to treat the people who are to be the next casualties in this deadly game of medical malfeasance?… that is, of course, if the answer does not lie in the rationale I suggested above.
No, of course not!!!
“Correlation is not causation” as you know because I’m such a smarty pants Jewish lawyer or barrister and I really know my stuff.
Especially if I’m from Mizrachi or Modern Orthodox.
Even Chabad – I hate Chabad but even they will tell you to JUST ASK YOUR DOCTOR!
They are certainly free and willing to tell you the truth.
We really know our stuff and if we are wrong we will shout at you until you shrivel up and crawl home so …uh, no, it’s certainly not the SAFE AND EFFECTIVE vaccines.
They might be dropping from their Wheaties or their protein powder or those dangerous vitamins they take.
“…Thump”
Wow, I guess obnoxious Mizrachi Barristers (& lawyers, doctors, dentists and sound engineers) also had Wheaties this morning.