Scott Ritter is a Russian asset. Before he was a Saddam asset. Saddam was a Russian client. Today he’s both a Russian and Iranian asset. Iran is a Russian client. https://tinyurl.com/2co77wc8
To quote: “In the days of the Cold War, Soviet intelligence services were adept at exploiting drug use and sexual weaknesses in ranking foreign personnel to subvert and enlist them….With Saddam overthrown, Ritter’s access to Saddam’s child prisons “too horrible to describe” for a proud wager of peace, had no doubt run out and he had to resort to 14 year old girls on the internet…”
“…By 2002 though Scott Ritter was taking a guided tour of Iraq paid for by Saddam’s regime and delivering a speech to the Iraqi Parliament where he declared that Iraq had no WMD’s and was not a threat to anyone.”
“What happened specifically to Ritter after 1998? Between 1998 and 1990? Scott Ritter had continued his work this time in Russia, on disarmament. While still married to his first wife, Ritter began an affair with 19 year old Marina Khatiashvili, his Russian supplied translator and escort.…”
As I recall, North Vietnam defeated the US because, it was said, that its difficult to fight a war half way around the world.. The US also lost in Afghanistan after a 20 year war and trillions of dollars expended.
The US also started a war in Syria and coopted Russia to take over.
Did the US win in Iraq? You tell me.
So don’t be s sure that the US would win against Russia.
@Michael
Russia alone can boast of holding an asymmetrical military advantage over the west with their hypersonic tech. The ability of asymmetrical military advantages to dominate the world is not a new discovery. It is thru the use of asymmetrical military advantages which the world has seen great kingdoms fall and significant nations crumble. From long before Alexander’s conquest of the Persian Empire to modern times, it is thru such advantages as Russia currently holds which a small nation, such as Macedonia was, could bring vast empires to their knees, as occurred with the fall of the Persian Empire. The proof is in the proving if this new Russian asset will be capable of doing what it is believe capable of doing, but I believe that Russia has the means to do what it says, and I am told that the US military does as well. Hopefully, Russia will not be pressed to offer us such terrible proof of their new hypersonic toys, but it should be realized that if the US had such an asymmetric advantage over Russia, we would likely have already seen the Ukrainians sacking St. Petersberg.
I don’t know what Scott Ritter has been smoking. He believes that Russia and Belarus will defeat not just Ukraine, but the US & friends, NATO, Japan and S. Korea as well. Maybe Mark Zuckerberg can concoct a META program that makes this all seem real.
All things are possible, to them that believe.
EDITOR
Ted Belman
tbelman3- at- gmail.com
Co-Editor
Peloni
peloni1986@yahoo.com
Customized SEARCH
ISRAPUNDIT DAILY DIGEST
Subscribe for Free
SUPPORT ISRAPUNDIT
If you are paying by credit card, when filling out the form, make sure you show the country at the top of the form as the country in which you live.
😀
https://www.themideastbeast.com/bush-lend-putin-mission-accomplished-banner/
Scott Ritter is a Russian asset. Before he was a Saddam asset. Saddam was a Russian client. Today he’s both a Russian and Iranian asset. Iran is a Russian client. https://tinyurl.com/2co77wc8
To quote: “In the days of the Cold War, Soviet intelligence services were adept at exploiting drug use and sexual weaknesses in ranking foreign personnel to subvert and enlist them….With Saddam overthrown, Ritter’s access to Saddam’s child prisons “too horrible to describe” for a proud wager of peace, had no doubt run out and he had to resort to 14 year old girls on the internet…”
“…By 2002 though Scott Ritter was taking a guided tour of Iraq paid for by Saddam’s regime and delivering a speech to the Iraqi Parliament where he declared that Iraq had no WMD’s and was not a threat to anyone.”
“What happened specifically to Ritter after 1998? Between 1998 and 1990? Scott Ritter had continued his work this time in Russia, on disarmament. While still married to his first wife, Ritter began an affair with 19 year old Marina Khatiashvili, his Russian supplied translator and escort.…”
Also see: https://tinyurl.com/22hv4m8z
and: https://tinyurl.com/2xm8oh5q
and: https://tinyurl.com/25kl2e62
and last, Tucker Carlson and Doug MacGregor in March! https://tinyurl.com/2amdcfty
Ritter is also a convicted pedophile: https://tinyurl.com/222vz4dw
Now you all understand what Russian disinformation and active measures mean.
Further reading:
a. https://tinyurl.com/258g549n
b. https://tinyurl.com/2flcduvk
As I recall, North Vietnam defeated the US because, it was said, that its difficult to fight a war half way around the world.. The US also lost in Afghanistan after a 20 year war and trillions of dollars expended.
The US also started a war in Syria and coopted Russia to take over.
Did the US win in Iraq? You tell me.
So don’t be s sure that the US would win against Russia.
@Michael
Russia alone can boast of holding an asymmetrical military advantage over the west with their hypersonic tech. The ability of asymmetrical military advantages to dominate the world is not a new discovery. It is thru the use of asymmetrical military advantages which the world has seen great kingdoms fall and significant nations crumble. From long before Alexander’s conquest of the Persian Empire to modern times, it is thru such advantages as Russia currently holds which a small nation, such as Macedonia was, could bring vast empires to their knees, as occurred with the fall of the Persian Empire. The proof is in the proving if this new Russian asset will be capable of doing what it is believe capable of doing, but I believe that Russia has the means to do what it says, and I am told that the US military does as well. Hopefully, Russia will not be pressed to offer us such terrible proof of their new hypersonic toys, but it should be realized that if the US had such an asymmetric advantage over Russia, we would likely have already seen the Ukrainians sacking St. Petersberg.
I don’t know what Scott Ritter has been smoking. He believes that Russia and Belarus will defeat not just Ukraine, but the US & friends, NATO, Japan and S. Korea as well. Maybe Mark Zuckerberg can concoct a META program that makes this all seem real.
All things are possible, to them that believe.