I am convinced, for historical reasons, that China and Russia and their partners will not succeed in a war against the West (for all practical purposes, the Globalists).
1. Geography works against China. No Asiatic power since the tribal Indo-Europeans. The Huns got the farthest, finally suffering defeat at Chalons. The Mongols conquered Russia, Iran and China, but then splintered.
2. The West shares a POWERFUL common culture, including shared language, religion, alphabets, calendar, history, arts and science. Russia is arguably a marginal part of that culture; and the Chinese and Islamic cultures have never surpassed it.
If China, Russia, Iran, etc. continue with their plan of “multipolarizing” the world, they will be destroyed by the Serpent that comes out of the Sea, just as Hitler and Tojo were.
I am not claiming absolute truth and I am presenting my own personal view.
1) China and Russia in our time cannot be not only strategic, but also tactical allies.
2) The globalists have successfully used China, Russia, Islamic terrorists and other tools they need for their purposes.
3 ) Moreover, Russia and China are by no means as uncompromising as it seems at first glance against the globalists.
Conservative publications periodically publish articles on this topic. About this, in particular, often writes the online edition ”
The New American”
https://thenewamerican.com/
Type in A) Putin and globalists , B ) China and globalists; and you will receive the corresponding materials.
@pelony1986
< I
wouldn’t say that they are unrelated, as they do work with the Globalists as it suits their purpose and their national goals, but they are unrelated in respect to them being globalists themselves. “Distinct, but associated, at times” might be a good description, I think. >
@Tranzon
One should not think that China and Russia are completely unrelated to the globalists.
I wouldn’t say that they are unrelated, as they do work with the Globalists as it suits their purpose and their national goals, but they are unrelated in respect to them being globalists themselves. “Distinct, but associated, at times” might be a good description, I think.
One should not think that China and Russia are completely unrelated to the globalists.
Clayton Morris himself, as well as this video, look like one big advert for investment in gold. That hardly qualifies as a news source.
Russia and China are challenging the dominance of Britain and the US, in a fashion that closely mirrors Germany and Japan’s challenge in the 1930s and 40s. Like the latter, the Eurasian powers are, like Avis Rent-a-Car, “Number two, so they try harder”.
There can be no doubt that Schwab, Biden and the rest in the West are plotting a one-way trip to disaster. They are trying to destroy the bedrock of faith, tradition and history beneath them, and “build back better” with essentially nothing. On the other hand, China, Russia and the countries cobbled together with them do not have a unified history to either tear down or build on, nor do they have a history of effectively working together. Let’s see how they do. My bet is, “not so well”.
EDITOR
Ted Belman
tbelman3- at- gmail.com
Co-Editor
Peloni
peloni1986@yahoo.com
Customized SEARCH
ISRAPUNDIT DAILY DIGEST
Subscribe for Free
SUPPORT ISRAPUNDIT
If you are paying by credit card, when filling out the form, make sure you show the country at the top of the form as the country in which you live.
Tranzon,
I am convinced, for historical reasons, that China and Russia and their partners will not succeed in a war against the West (for all practical purposes, the Globalists).
1. Geography works against China. No Asiatic power since the tribal Indo-Europeans. The Huns got the farthest, finally suffering defeat at Chalons. The Mongols conquered Russia, Iran and China, but then splintered.
2. The West shares a POWERFUL common culture, including shared language, religion, alphabets, calendar, history, arts and science. Russia is arguably a marginal part of that culture; and the Chinese and Islamic cultures have never surpassed it.
If China, Russia, Iran, etc. continue with their plan of “multipolarizing” the world, they will be destroyed by the Serpent that comes out of the Sea, just as Hitler and Tojo were.
I am not claiming absolute truth and I am presenting my own personal view.
1) China and Russia in our time cannot be not only strategic, but also tactical allies.
2) The globalists have successfully used China, Russia, Islamic terrorists and other tools they need for their purposes.
3 ) Moreover, Russia and China are by no means as uncompromising as it seems at first glance against the globalists.
Conservative publications periodically publish articles on this topic. About this, in particular, often writes the online edition ”
The New American”
https://thenewamerican.com/
Type in A) Putin and globalists , B ) China and globalists; and you will receive the corresponding materials.
@pelony1986
< I
@Tranzon
I wouldn’t say that they are unrelated, as they do work with the Globalists as it suits their purpose and their national goals, but they are unrelated in respect to them being globalists themselves. “Distinct, but associated, at times” might be a good description, I think.
One should not think that China and Russia are completely unrelated to the globalists.
Clayton Morris himself, as well as this video, look like one big advert for investment in gold. That hardly qualifies as a news source.
Russia and China are challenging the dominance of Britain and the US, in a fashion that closely mirrors Germany and Japan’s challenge in the 1930s and 40s. Like the latter, the Eurasian powers are, like Avis Rent-a-Car, “Number two, so they try harder”.
There can be no doubt that Schwab, Biden and the rest in the West are plotting a one-way trip to disaster. They are trying to destroy the bedrock of faith, tradition and history beneath them, and “build back better” with essentially nothing. On the other hand, China, Russia and the countries cobbled together with them do not have a unified history to either tear down or build on, nor do they have a history of effectively working together. Let’s see how they do. My bet is, “not so well”.