By Matt Margolis, PJ MEDIA APR 21, 2022
AP Photo/Ben Gray, File
According to a new complaint to the Georgia State Election Board, more than 300,000 ballots are alleged to have been “unreliably recorded on unverified early voting poll closing tapes in Fulton County, Ga., in the 2020 election,” reports Just the News.
David Cross of Election Truth in Georgia filed the complaint on March 28.
The complaint alleges that “Fulton County’s Advance Voting poll closing tapes are a fraudulent, un-certified, unsigned, and un-checked false representation of over 311,000 ballots that no court could legally accept.”
Joe Biden’s state-certified margin of victory in the state was only 11,779 votes.
This comes on the heels of a recent report from Just the News indicating that at least 36 memory cards had to be prematurely removed from Dominion Voting System tabulation machines, “raising new concerns about chain of custody and belatedly discovered memory cards.”
The new complaint accuses Fulton County of violating state law “regarding the closing of ballot scanner polls and tampering with ballot scanners,” as seals had broken and flashcards were removed at the end of early voting on Oct. 30, 2020.
“Each flashcard is supposed to be used for only one specific tabulator and is not supposed to be removed until 7 p.m. on election night,” explains Just the News. “Under state law, at least three copies of each poll tape with the total number of ballots stored on the flashcard must be printed, and three witnesses must sign each copy for verification or explain in writing why they will not.”
There were 148 flashcards for Fulton County’s early voting in 2020. But, in response to an open records request, “the county produced 138 poll tapes, 136 of which were not signed, meaning the identities of the persons who checked the ballot numbers are unknown.” The poll tapes showed that flashcards “were closed on 12 different ballot scanners,” violating state law.
According to independent investigative journalist Kevin Moncla, Fulton County “removed the flashcards from 109 tabulators and closed them out on different machines, and it leaves them wide open — unsecure and open to manipulation.”
“If those flashcards were put into another machine, then we would never know it,” he added. “They could have scanned — added additional votes, and we would have no idea.”
Moncla insists that Fulton County “had enough tabulators to supply both early voting and Election Day. And there was no reason to swap the tabulators out — to take the cards out. They had plenty to do both.”
The Georgia State Election Board has yet to respond to the complaint.
Matt Margolis is the author of Airborne: How The Liberal Media Weaponized The Coronavirus Against Donald Trump, and the bestselling book The Worst President in History: The Legacy of Barack Obama, and The Scandalous Presidency of Barack Obama. nd media inquiries can be sent to mattm@pjmedia.com.
A great deal of evidence has surfaced to strongly suggest election fraud in a number of U.S. States is how Biden won the Presidential election. So far, however many court challenges have failed, not because of a judicial determination of the evidence, but because before a court reviews and considers the evidence, the Plaintiff must satisfy the court that they have standing to bring such action. Standing means that they have in some material way been personally harmed by the alleged fraudulent acts of others. It seems all cases were dismissed so far because none of the Plaintiffs could prove they had standing.
I don’t think there is any question there was a fraudulently manipulated vote count to declare Biden the winner. The big question is whether there is enough solid unassailable evidence to prove that the fraud was so considerable that it was fraud that resulted in Biden being declared winner.
It has been well over a year since the last presidential election. So far no litigant has been able to get over the standing pre-condition to having their cases heard and the evidence considered.
What is puzzling is that all litigation lawyers and not just the big name ones who represented clients alleging fraud, know full well about their client having to prove standing before the court in order to have their cases determined on the evidence.
So why did these lawyers not figure out how to get their clients cases over the standing hurdle in order to get their cases determined based on the evidence presented?
W